<scp>T3</scp> + 3: 3 + 3 Design With Delayed Outcomes

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2024-06-25

Citations: 0

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.2414

Abstract

ABSTRACT Delayed outcome is common in phase I oncology clinical trials. It causes logistic difficulty, wastes resources, and prolongs the trial duration. This article investigates this issue and proposes the time‐to‐event 3 + 3 (T3 + 3) design, which utilizes the actual follow‐up time for at‐risk patients with pending toxicity outcomes. The T3 + 3 design allows continuous accrual without unnecessary trial suspension and is costless and implementable with pretabulated dose decision rules. Besides, the T3 + 3 design uses the isotonic regression to estimate the toxicity rates across dose levels and therefore can accommodate for any targeted toxicity rate for maximum tolerated dose (MTD). It dramatically facilitates the trial preparation and conduct without intensive computation and statistical consultation. The extension to other algorithm‐based phase I dose‐finding designs (e.g., i3 + 3 design) is also studied. Comprehensive computer simulation studies are conducted to investigate the performance of the T3 + 3 design under various dose‐toxicity scenarios. The results confirm that the T3 + 3 design substantially shortens the trial duration compared with the conventional 3 + 3 design and yields much higher accuracy in MTD identification than the rolling six design. In summary, the T3 + 3 design addresses the delayed outcome issue while keeping the desirable features of the 3 + 3 design, such as simplicity, transparency, and costless implementation. It has great potential to accelerate early‐phase drug development.

Locations

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat Modified Toxicity Probability Interval Design: A Safer and More Reliable Method Than the 3 + 3 Design for Practical Phase I Trials 2013 Yuan Ji
Sue-Jane Wang
+ Probability-of-decision interval 3+3 (POD-i3+3) design for phase I dose finding trials with late-onset toxicity 2021 Zichun Xu
Xiaolei Lin
+ PDF Chat Overview of model-assisted design for phase I dose-finding trials in oncology 2022 Koichi Hashizume
Kentaro Takeda
Hiroyuki Sato
Akihiro Hirakawa
Takashi Sozu
+ PDF Chat A hybrid design for dose‐finding oncology clinical trials 2022 Jason J. Z. Liao
Feng Zhou
Heng Zhou
Lilli Petruzzelli
Kevin Hou
Ekaterine Asatiani
+ PDF Chat A novel toxicity scoring system treating toxicity response as a quasi-continuous variable in Phase I clinical trials 2010 Zhengjia Chen
Mark Krailo
Stanley P. Azen
Mourad Tighiouart
+ An adaptive seamless Phase 2-3 design with multiple endpoints 2021 Man Jin
Pingye Zhang
+ <scp>TITE‐gBOIN</scp>: Time‐to‐event Bayesian optimal interval design to accelerate dose‐finding accounting for toxicity grades 2021 Kentaro Takeda
Qing Xia
Shufang Liu
Alan Rong
+ The Generalized 3+3 (G3+3) Design for Phase I Dose-Finding Trials 2024 Yuan Ji
Yunxuan Zhang
Andrew Liu Ji
+ Seamless Phase 2-3 Design: A Useful Strategy to Reduce the Sample Size for Dose Optimization 2022 Jiang Liyun
Ying Yuan
+ PDF Chat The 3 + 3 design in dose-finding studies with small sample sizes: Pitfalls and possible remedies 2024 Codruța Chiuzan
Hakim‐Moulay Dehbi
+ Phase I Designs for Late-Onset Toxicity 2023 Haitao Pan
Ying Yuan
+ Seamless phase I/II design for novel anticancer agents with competing disease progression 2021 Lucie Biard
Shing M. Lee
Bin Cheng
+ PDF Chat Handling Incomplete or Late-Onset Toxicities in Early-Phase Dose-Finding Clinical Trials: Current Practice and Future Prospects 2024 Zhulin Yin
Adrian Mander
Johann S. de Bono
Haiyan Zheng
Christina Yap
+ Optimal seamless phase 2/3 oncology trial designs based on Probability of Success (PoS) 2018 Zhaoyang Teng
Liang Liang
Guohui Liu
Yi Liu
+ Review of Statistical Treatment for Oncology Dose-Escalation Trial with Prolonged Evaluation Window or Fast Enrollment 2022 Xin Wei
Rong Liu
+ PDF Chat Time-to-event model-assisted designs for dose-finding trials with delayed toxicity 2019 Ruitao Lin
Ying Yuan
+ PDF Chat Phase I–II clinical trial design: a state-of-the-art paradigm for dose finding 2017 Fangrong Yan
Peter F. Thall
K.H. Lu
Mark R. Gilbert
Ying Yuan
+ Seamless phase 2/3 oncology trial design with flexible sample size determination 2020 Zhaoyang Teng
Yuan Tian
Yi Liu
Guohui Liu
+ PDF Chat The i3+3 design for phase I clinical trials. 2019 Yuan Ji
Meizi Liu
+ PDF Chat Introduction of accelerated BOIN design and facilitation of its application 2024 Masahiro Kojima
Wu Wende
Henry Zhao

Works That Cite This (0)

Action Title Year Authors