Fairness perceptions of algorithmic decision-making: A systematic review of the empirical literature

Christopher Starke, Janine Baleis, Birte Keller, Frank Marcinkowski

Type: Review

Publication Date: 2022-07-01

Citations: 109

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221115189

View Publication

Locations

Big Data & Society - View
arXiv (Cornell University) - View - PDF
DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) - View
Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) - View - PDF

Similar Works

Action	Title	Year	Authors
+	Fairness Perceptions of Algorithmic Decision-Making: A Systematic Review of the Empirical Literature	2021	Christopher Starke Janine Baleis Birte Keller Frank Marcinkowski
+	Factors Influencing Perceived Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making: Algorithm Outcomes, Development Procedures, and Individual Differences	2020	Ruotong Wang F. Maxwell Harper Haiyi Zhu
+	Dimensions of Diversity in Human Perceptions of Algorithmic Fairness	2020	Nina Grgić-Hlača Gabriel Lima Adrian Weller Elissa M. Redmiles
+	Dimensions of Diversity in Human Perceptions of Algorithmic Fairness	2022	Nina Grgić-Hlača Gabriel Lima Adrian Weller Elissa M. Redmiles
+ PDF Chat	Algorithmic Fairness: A Tolerance Perspective	2024	Renqiang Luo Tao Tang Feng Xia Jiaying Liu Chengpei Xu Leo Yu Zhang Wei Xiang Chengqi Zhang
+	A Sociotechnical View of Algorithmic Fairness	2021	Mateusz Dolata Stefan Feuerriegel Gerhard Schwabe
+	A Sociotechnical View of Algorithmic Fairness	2021	Mateusz Dolata Stefan Feuerriegel Gerhard Schwabe
+ PDF Chat	A sociotechnical view of algorithmic fairness	2021	Mateusz Dolata Stefan Feuerriegel Gerhard Schwabe
+	Understanding Relations Between Perception of Fairness and Trust in Algorithmic Decision Making	2021	Jianlong Zhou Sunny Verma Mudit Mittal Fang Chen
+	Algorithmic Fairness	2020	Dana Pessach Erez Shmueli
+	Algorithmic Fairness	2020	Dana Pessach Erez Shmueli
+ PDF Chat	A Human-Centric Perspective on Fairness and Transparency in Algorithmic Decision-Making	2022	Jakob Schoeffer
+ PDF Chat	The FairCeptron: A Framework for Measuring Human Perceptions of Algorithmic Fairness	2021	Georg Ahnert Ivan Smirnov Florian Lemmerich Claudia Wagner Markus Strohmaier
+ PDF Chat	Perceptions of Fairness and Trustworthiness Based on Explanations in Human vs. Automated Decision-Making	2022	Jakob Schoeffer Yvette Machowski Niklas Kühl
+	Perceptions of Fairness and Trustworthiness Based on Explanations in Human vs. Automated Decision-Making	2021	Jakob Schoeffer Yvette Machowski Niklas Kuehl
+ PDF Chat	Understanding Relations Between Perception of Fairness and Trust in Algorithmic Decision Making	2021	Jianlong Zhou Sunny Verma Mudit Mittal Fang Chen
+ PDF Chat	Subjective fairness in algorithmic decision-support	2024	Sarra Tajouri Alexis Tsoukiàs
+	Human Perceptions of Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making: A Case Study of Criminal Risk Prediction	2018	Nina Grgić-Hlača Elissa M. Redmiles Krishna P. Gummadi Adrian Weller
+	On the Fairness of Machine-Assisted Human Decisions	2021	Talia B. Gillis Bryce McLaughlin Jann Spiess
+ PDF Chat	On the Fairness of Machine-Assisted Human Decisions	2022	Bryce McLaughlin Jann Spiess Talia B. Gillis

Works That Cite This (11)

Action	Title	Year	Authors
+	A Critical Survey on Fairness Benefits of XAI	2023	Luca Deck Jakob Schoeffer Maria De‐Arteaga Niklas Kühl
+ PDF Chat	On the Impact of Explanations on Understanding of Algorithmic Decision-Making	2023	Timothée Schmude Laura Koesten Torsten Möller Sebastian Tschiatschek
+ PDF Chat	Inherent Limitations of AI Fairness	2024	Maarten Buyl Tijl De Bie
+ PDF Chat	Human-centered NLP Fact-checking: Co-Designing with Fact-checkers using Matchmaking for AI	2024	Houjiang Liu Anubrata Das Alexander Boltz Didi Zhou Daisy Pinaroc Matthew Lease Min Kyung Lee
+ PDF Chat	A Critical Survey on Fairness Benefits of Explainable AI	2024	Luca Deck Jakob Schoeffer Maria De‐Arteaga Niklas Kühl
+ PDF Chat	Taking Algorithmic (Vs. Human) Advice Reveals Different Goals to Others	2023	Emir Efendić Philippe van de Calseyde Štěpán Bahník Marek Vranka
+	A signal detection perspective on error and unfairness detection as a critical aspect of human oversight of AI-based systems	2023	Markus Langer Kevin Baum Nadine Schlicker
+	Taking algorithmic (vs. human) advice reveals different goals to others	2023	Emir Efendić Philippe van de Calseyde Štěpán Bahník Marek Vranka
+ PDF Chat	Legally Binding but Unfair? Towards Assessing Fairness of Privacy Policies	2024	Vincent Freiberger Erik Buchmann
+ PDF Chat	Perceptions of Discriminatory Decisions of Artificial Intelligence: Unpacking the Role of Individual Characteristics	2024	Soojong Kim

Works Cited by This (20)

Action	Title	Year	Authors
+	Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement	2009	David Moher
+ PDF Chat	Fairness through awareness	2012	Cynthia Dwork Moritz Hardt Toniann Pitassi Omer Reingold Richard S. Zemel
+	Human Perceptions of Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making: A Case Study of Criminal Risk Prediction	2018	Nina Grgić-Hlača Elissa M. Redmiles Krishna P. Gummadi Adrian Weller
+ PDF Chat	50 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learning	2019	Ben Hutchinson Margaret Mitchell
+	Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning	2016	Moritz Hardt Eric Price Nathan Srebro
+ PDF Chat	The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines	2019	Anna Jobin Marcello Ienca Effy Vayena
+	Fair Prediction with Disparate Impact: A Study of Bias in Recidivism Prediction Instruments	2017	Alexandra Chouldechova
+	Algorithmic targeting of social policies	2020	Alejandro Noriega-Campero Bernardo Garcia-Bulle Luis Fernando Cantú Michiel A. Bakker Luis Tejerina Alex Pentland
+ PDF Chat	The Threats of Artificial Intelligence Scale (TAI). Development, Measurement and Test Over Three Application Domains.	2020	Kimon Kieslich Marco Lünich Frank Marcinkowski
+ PDF Chat	Society-in-the-loop: programming the algorithmic social contract	2017	Iyad Rahwan