Shear calibration biases in weak-lensing surveys

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2003-07-22

Citations: 245

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06683.x

Abstract

We investigate biases induced by the conversion between the observed image shape to shear distortion in current weak lensing analysis methods. Such overall calibration biases cannot be detected by the standard tests such as E/B decomposition or calibration with stars. We find that the non-Gaussianity of point spread function has a significant effect and can lead to up to 15 per cent error on the linear amplitude of fluctuations sigma_8 depending on the method of analysis. This could explain some of the discrepancies seen in recent amplitude determinations from weak lensing. Using an elliptical Laguerre expansion method we develop a re-Gaussianization method which reduces the error to calibration error of order 1 per cent even for poorly resolved galaxies. We also discuss a new type of shear selection bias which results in up to roughly 8 percent underestimation of the signal. It is expected to scale with redshift, inducing errors in the growth factor extraction if not properly corrected for. Understanding and correcting for such effects is crucial if weak lensing is to become a high precision probe of cosmology.

Locations

  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society - View
  • arXiv (Cornell University) - PDF
  • DataCite API - View

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat Calibration biases in measurements of weak lensing 2012 Matthias Bartelmann
Massimo Viola
P. Melchior
B Schäfer
+ PDF Chat Measurement and calibration of noise bias in weak lensing galaxy shape estimation 2012 T. Kacprzak
J. Zuntz
Barnaby Rowe
S. L. Bridle
Alexandre Réfrégier
A. Amara
L. M. Voigt
Michael Hirsch
+ PDF Chat The Shear Testing Programme 2: Factors affecting high-precision weak-lensing analyses 2007 R. Massey
Catherine Heymans
Joel Bergé
G. M. Bernstein
Sarah Bridle
Douglas Clowe
H. Dahle
Richard S. Ellis
T. Erben
M. Hetterscheidt
+ PDF Chat Shear Recovery Accuracy in Weak-Lensing Analysis with the Elliptical Gauss-Laguerre Method 2007 Reiko Nakajima
G. M. Bernstein
+ PDF Chat Combining size and shape in weak lensing 2013 Alan Heavens
Justin Alsing
Andrew H. Jaffe
+ PDF Chat Systematic bias in cosmic shear: extending the Fisher matrix 2008 A. Amara
Alexandre Réfrégier
+ PDF Chat Shapes and Shears, Stars and Smears: Optimal Measurements for Weak Lensing 2002 G. M. Bernstein
Mike Jarvis
+ PDF Chat Noise bias in weak lensing shape measurements 2012 Alexandre Réfrégier
Tomasz Kacprzak
A. Amara
Sarah Bridle
Barnaby Rowe
+ PDF Chat On scale-dependent cosmic shear systematic effects 2015 T. Kitching
A. N. Taylor
M. Cropper
Henk Hoekstra
Rosie Hood
R. Massey
S. Niemi
+ PDF Chat Shape measurement biases from underfitting and ellipticity gradients 2010 G. M. Bernstein
+ PDF Chat Systematic Biases in Weak Lensing Cosmology with the Dark Energy Survey 2017 S. Samuroff
+ Metacalibration: Direct Self-Calibration of Biases in Shear Measurement 2017 Eric Huff
Rachel Mandelbaum
+ PDF Chat Limitations of model-fitting methods for lensing shear estimation 2010 L. M. Voigt
S. L. Bridle
+ PDF Chat Means of confusion: how pixel noise affects shear estimates for weak gravitational lensing 2012 P. Melchior
Massimo Viola
+ PDF Chat Weak lensing power spectra for precision cosmology: Multiple-deflection, reduced shear and lensing bias corrections 2009 E. Krause
Christopher M. Hirata
+ PDF Chat PSF anisotropy and systematic errors in weak lensing surveys 2006 Bhuvnesh Jain
Mike Jarvis
G. M. Bernstein
+ The effect of imperfect models of point spread function anisotropy on cosmic shear measurements 2004 Henk Hoekstra
+ PDF Chat Cosmic shear measurement with maximum likelihood and maximum a posteriori inference 2017 A. Hall
Andy Taylor
+ PDF Chat Weak lensing power spectra for precision cosmology: Multiple-deflection, reduced shear and lensing bias corrections 2010 E. Krause
Christopher M. Hirata
+ A New Shear Estimator for Weak‐Lensing Observations 2000 Nick Kaiser

Works That Cite This (232)

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat Seeing in the dark – II. Cosmic shear in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey 2014 Eric M. Huff
T. F. Eifler
Christopher M. Hirata
Rachel Mandelbaum
David J. Schlegel
Uroš Seljak
+ PDF Chat Cosmological constraints from galaxy–lensing cross-correlations using BOSS galaxies with SDSS and CMB lensing 2019 Sukhdeep Singh
Rachel Mandelbaum
Uroš Seljak
Sergio Rodríguez-Torres
Anže Slosar
+ PDF Chat Weak lensing and CMB: Parameter forecasts including a running spectral index 2004 Mustapha Ishak
Christopher M. Hirata
Patrick McDonald
Uroš Seljak
+ Probing gravity with a joint analysis of galaxy and CMB lensing and SDSS spectroscopy 2018 Sukhdeep Singh
Shadab Alam
Rachel Mandelbaum
Uroš Seljak
Sergio Rodríguez-Torres
Shirley Ho
+ PDF Chat Weak lensing calibration of mass bias in the REFLEX+BCS X-ray galaxy cluster catalogue 2016 Melanie Simet
Nicholas Battaglia
Rachel Mandelbaum
Uroš Seljak
+ PDF Chat Seeing in the dark – I. Multi-epoch alchemy 2014 Eric M. Huff
Christopher M. Hirata
Rachel Mandelbaum
David J. Schlegel
Uroš Seljak
Robert H. Lupton
+ PDF Chat FPFS Shear Estimator: Systematic Tests on the Hyper Suprime-Cam Survey First-year Data 2020 Xiangchong Li
Masamune Oguri
N. Katayama
Wentao Luo
Wenting Wang
Jiaxin Han
Hironao Miyatake
Keigo Nakamura
Surhud More
+ PDF Chat Fundamental Plane of BOSS galaxies: correlations with galaxy properties, density field, and impact on RSD measurements 2020 Sukhdeep Singh
Byeonghee Yu
Uroš Seljak
+ PDF Chat Self-calibration method for II and GI types of intrinsic alignments of galaxies 2018 Ji Yao
Mustapha Ishak
M. A. Troxel
+ Shear Measurement Bias Due to Spatially Varying Spectral Energy Distributions in Galaxies 2019 Sowmya Kamath
J. Meyers
P. R. Burchat