Quantitative non-contact dynamic Casimir force measurements

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2009-01-22

Citations: 138

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/85/31001

Abstract

We show that the Casimir force (CF) gradient can be measured with no contact involved. Results of the CF measurement with systematic uncertainty of 3% are presented for the distance range of 100–600 nm. The statistical uncertainty is shown to be due to the thermal fluctuations of the force probe. The corresponding signal-to-noise ratio equals unity at the distance of 600 nm. Direct contact between surfaces used in most previous studies to determine absolute distance separation is here precluded. Use of direct contact to identify the origin of distances is a severe limitation for studies of the CF on structured surfaces as it deteriorates irreversibly the studied surface and the probe. This force machine uses a dynamical method with an inserted gold sphere probe glued to a lever. The lever is mechanically excited at resonant frequency in front of a chosen sample. The absolute distance determination is achieved to be possible, without any direct probe/sample contact, using an electrostatic method associated to a real time correction of the mechanical drift. The positioning shift uncertainty is as low as 2 nm. Use of this instrument to probe a very thin film of gold (10 nm) reveals important spatial variations in the measurement.

Locations

  • EPL (Europhysics Letters) - View - PDF
  • arXiv (Cornell University) - View - PDF
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) - View - PDF
  • DataCite API - View

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ Quantitative non contact dynamic Casimir force measurements 2007 Guillaume Jourdan
Astrid Lambrecht
F. Comin
J. Chevrier
+ PDF Chat Theory confronts experiment in the Casimir force measurements: Quantification of errors and precision 2004 F. Chen
G. L. Klimchitskaya
U. Mohideen
V. M. Mostepanenko
+ PDF Chat Precision measurements of the gradient of the Casimir force between ultraclean metallic surfaces at larger separations 2019 Mingyue Liu
Jun Xu
G. L. Klimchitskaya
V. M. Mostepanenko
U. Mohideen
+ PDF Chat Experimental procedures for precision measurements of the Casimir force with an atomic force microscope 2008 Hsiang‐Chih Chiu
Chia‐Cheng Chang
Rodrigo Castillo-Garza
F Chen
U. Mohideen
+ PDF Chat Casimir force measurements in Au-Au and Au-Si cavities at low temperature 2012 Justine Laurent
H. Sellier
A. Mosset
S. Huant
J. Chevrier
+ PDF Chat Sensitivity and accuracy of Casimir force measurements in air 2019 Joseph L. Garrett
David A. T. Somers
Kyle Sendgikoski
Jeremy N. Munday
+ PDF Chat Examining the Casimir puzzle with an upgraded AFM-based technique and advanced surface cleaning 2019 Mingyue Liu
Jun Xu
G. L. Klimchitskaya
V. M. Mostepanenko
U. Mohideen
+ PDF Chat Precision measurement of the Casimir force using gold surfaces 2000 B. W. Harris
F. Chen
U. Mohideen
+ Measurement of the Casimir force with a ferrule-top sensor 2011 P Zuurbier
S. de Man
Grzegorz Gruca
K. Heeck
Davide Iannuzzi
+ PDF Chat Experimental and theoretical investigation of the angular dependence of the Casimir force between sinusoidally corrugated surfaces 2014 Alexandr Banishev
J. Wagner
Thorsten Emig
Roya Zandi
U. Mohideen
+ PDF Chat Measurement of dispersive forces between evaporated metal surfaces in the range below 100nm 2008 P. J. van Zwol
G. Palasantzas
M. van de Schootbrugge
J. Th. M. De Hosson
+ PDF Chat Measurement of the Casimir Force between 0.2 and 8 μm: Experimental Procedures and Comparison with Theory 2021 Giuseppe Bimonte
Benjamin Spreng
Paulo A. Maia Neto
Gert‐Ludwig Ingold
G. L. Klimchitskaya
V. M. Mostepanenko
R. S. Decca
+ PDF Chat Progress in Experimental Measurements of the Surface–Surface Casimir Force: Electrostatic Calibrations and Limitations to Accuracy 2011 S. K. Lamoreaux
+ PDF Chat Halving the Casimir force with conductive oxides: Experimental details 2010 S. de Man
K. Heeck
Davide Iannuzzi
+ PDF Chat Beyond-proximity-force-approximation Casimir force between two spheres at finite temperature 2018 Giuseppe Bimonte
+ PDF Chat CASIMIR AND VAN DER WAALS FORCES: ADVANCES AND PROBLEMS 2015 G. L. Klimchitskaya
V. M. Mostepanenko
+ Potential contributions of noncontact atomic force microscopy for the future Casimir force measurements 2010 W. J. Kim
Udo D. Schwarz
+ Potential contributions of noncontact atomic force microscopy for the future Casimir force measurements 2010 W.J. Kim
Udo D. Schwarz
+ PDF Chat Measurement of the Casimir Force between Parallel Metallic Surfaces 2002 G. Bressi
G. Carugno
Roberto Onofrio
G. Ruoso
+ PDF Chat Potential contributions of noncontact atomic force microscopy for the future Casimir force measurements 2010 W. J. Kim
Udo D. Schwarz

Works That Cite This (51)

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat Statistical approach to Casimir-Polder potentials in heterogeneous media 2015 Nicolas Cherroret
R. Guérout
Astrid Lambrecht
Serge Reynaud
+ PDF Chat Probing the Casimir force with optical tweezers 2015 Diney S. Ether
Luís Barbosa Pires
Stefan Umrath
Daniel Martinez
Yareni A. Ayala
Bruno Pontes
Glauber Ribeiro de Sousa Araújo
Susana Frasés
Gert‐Ludwig Ingold
F. S. S. Rosa
+ PDF Chat Large Variation in the Boundary-Condition Slippage for a Rarefied Gas Flowing between Two Surfaces 2011 Justine Laurent
Aurélien Drezet
H. Sellier
J. Chevrier
S. Huant
+ PDF Chat Classical and fluctuation‐induced electromagnetic interactions in micron‐scale systems: designer bonding, antibonding, and Casimir forces 2014 Alejandro W. Rodríguez
Pui‐Chuen Hui
David P. Woolf
Steven G. Johnson
Marko Lončar
Federico Capasso
+ PDF Chat Casimir effect from a scattering approach 2015 Gert‐Ludwig Ingold
Astrid Lambrecht
+ PDF Chat Casimir force measurements in Au-Au and Au-Si cavities at low temperature 2012 Justine Laurent
H. Sellier
A. Mosset
S. Huant
J. Chevrier
+ PDF Chat Casimir Effect in the Scattering Approach: Correlations Between Material Properties, Temperature and Geometry 2011 Astrid Lambrecht
Antoine Canaguier‐Durand
R. Guérout
Serge Reynaud
+ PDF Chat Sensitivity and accuracy of Casimir force measurements in air 2019 Joseph L. Garrett
David A. T. Somers
Kyle Sendgikoski
Jeremy N. Munday
+ PDF Chat Casimir interaction between two magnetic metals in comparison with nonmagnetic test bodies 2013 Alexandr Banishev
G. L. Klimchitskaya
V. M. Mostepanenko
U. Mohideen
+ PDF Chat Disentangling geometric and dissipative origins of negative Casimir entropies 2015 Stefan Umrath
M. Hartmann
Gert‐Ludwig Ingold
Paulo A. Maia Neto

Works Cited by This (28)

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat Role of surface plasmons in the Casimir effect 2007 F. Intravaia
Carsten Henkel
Astrid Lambrecht
+ PDF Chat Measurement of the Casimir Force between Parallel Metallic Surfaces 2002 G. Bressi
G. Carugno
Roberto Onofrio
G. Ruoso
+ PDF Chat Stiction, adhesion energy, and the Casimir effect in micromechanical systems 2001 Eyal Buks
M. L. Roukes
+ PDF Chat Vacuum fluctuation forces between ultra-thin films 2008 A. Benassi
C. Calandra
+ PDF Chat Casimir Forces between Arbitrary Compact Objects 2007 Thorsten Emig
Noah Graham
R. L. Jaffe
Mehran Kardar
+ PDF Chat Precision Measurement of the Casimir Force from 0.1 to<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mn>0.9</mml:mn><mml:mi /><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math> 1998 U. Mohideen
Anushree Roy
+ PDF Chat Nonlinear Micromechanical Casimir Oscillator 2001 H. B. Chan
Vladimir Aksyuk
R. N. Kleiman
D. J. Bishop
Federico Capasso
+ PDF Chat Coupled surface polaritons and the Casimir force 2004 Carsten Henkel
Karl Joulain
J. Mulet
Jean‐Jacques Greffet
+ PDF Chat Tests of new physics from precise measurements of the Casimir pressure between two gold-coated plates 2007 R. S. Decca
Daniel López
Ephraim Fischbach
G. L. Klimchitskaya
D. E. Krause
V. M. Mostepanenko
+ Lateral Casimir force beyond the proximity force approximation: A nontrivial interplay between geometry and quantum vacuum 2007 Robson B. Rodrigues
Paulo A. Maia Neto
Astrid Lambrecht
Serge Reynaud