Minimising bias in an un-masked, pragmatic rct comparing two treatment pathways for glaucoma by the use of decision support software - the light trial experience

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2013-11-01

Citations: 0

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-s1-p131

Abstract

Pragmatic trials of treatment pathways can require patient awareness of treatment allocation in order to better represent clinical reality, for example when concordance with a treatment has an important effect on outcome. Conversely, masking of treating clinicians to allocation group can be impossible when full clinical assessment requires knowledge of the current treatments, resources do not permit separate teams for treatment and assessment or when such duplication of clinician contact might affect an outcome such as patient experience. The LiGHT trial is a 718 subject multi-centre 6-year NIHR-funded study of two treatment pathways for glaucoma with outcome measures of health related quality of life and cost effectiveness. We aimed to minimise variation in aspects of clinical behaviour that might introduce bias by affecting either of these outcomes.

Locations

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat Masking in Pragmatic Trials: Who, What, and When to Blind 2019 Jennifer Christian
Emily Brouwer
Cynthia J. Girman
Dimitri Bennett
Kourtney J. Davis
Nancy A Dreyer
+ PDF Chat Masking in Pragmatic Trials: Who, What, and When to Blind 2020 Jennifer Christian
Emily Brouwer
Cynthia J. Girman
Dimitri Bennett
Kourtney J. Davis
Nancy A Dreyer
+ Validation of the GetReal Trial Tool – Facilitating discussion and understanding more pragmatic design choices and their implications 2022 Daniel Boateng
T. Kumke
Robin W.M. Vernooij
Iris Goetz
Anna‐Katharina Meinecke
Charlotte Steenhuis
Diederick E. Grobbee
Mira G. P. Zuidgeest
+ PDF Chat Guidelines for Data and Safety Monitoring in Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trials Using Case Studies 2023 David Zahrieh
Ivana T. Croghan
Jonathan Inselman
Sumithra J. Mandrekar
+ Optimizing the design of pragmatic trials: key issues remain 2012 J. Jaime
K. Jack Ishak
+ PDF Chat Choosing and evaluating randomisation methods in clinical trials: a qualitative study 2024 Cydney Bruce
Mais Iflaifel
Alan Montgomery
Reuben Ogollah
Kirsty Sprange
Christopher Partlett
+ Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 1. Introduction 2017 Mira G. P. Zuidgeest
Iris Goetz
Rolf H. H. Groenwold
Elaine Irving
Ghislaine J. M. W. van Thiel
Diederick E. Grobbee
+ PDF Chat Pragmatic randomized clinical trials: best practices and statistical guidance 2018 Victoria Gamerman
Tianxi Cai
Amelie Elsäßer
+ Pragmatic Trials and Approaches to Transforming Care 2020 Peter G. Stock
Rita A. Mukhtar
Hila Ghersin
Allison Stover Fiscalini
Laura J. Esserman
+ PDF Chat Pragmatic trials revisited: applicability is about individualization 2018 José Antonio Sacristán
Tatiana Dilla
+ Critical and Comprehensive Ethical Analysis on Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trials 2020 Soaad Hossain
+ Critical and Comprehensive Ethical Analysis on Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trials 2020 Soaad Hossain
+ PDF Chat Pragmatic Trial 2020
+ PRECIS-2 : making trials matter : providing an empirical basis for the selection of pragmatic design choices in clinical trials 2015 Kirstine Loudon
+ An analysis of published trials found that current use of pragmatic trial labels is uninformative 2022 Monica Taljaard
Stuart G. Nicholls
Alison H. Howie
Hayden P. Nix
Kelly Carroll
Paxton M. Moon
Natalie Nightingale
Bruno Giraudeau
Spencer Phillips Hey
Sandra Eldridge
+ PDF Chat Extension of the SPIRIT 2013 Statement for Factorial Randomized Trials—A Step Toward Transparency and the Curse of Interaction 2023 Luca Mastrantoni
Gennaro Daniele
Emilio Bria
+ Pragmatic Clinical Trials 2020 Peter C. Minneci
Katherine J. Deans
+ Bias Control – A Closer Look at Blinding and Randomization 2008
+ PDF Chat The GetReal Trial Tool: design, assess and discuss clinical drug trials in light of Real World Evidence generation 2021 Mira G. P. Zuidgeest
Iris Goetz
Anna‐Katharina Meinecke
Daniel Boateng
Elaine Irving
Ghislaine J. M. W. van Thiel
Paco M J Welsing
Katrien Oude-Rengerink
Diederick E. Grobbee
+ Guidelines for estimating causal effects in pragmatic randomized trials 2019 Eleanor J. Murray
Sonja A. Swanson
Miguel A. Hernán

Works That Cite This (0)

Action Title Year Authors

Works Cited by This (0)

Action Title Year Authors