Probing for quantum speedup in spin-glass problems with planted solutions

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2015-10-23

Citations: 155

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.92.042325

Abstract

The availability of quantum annealing devices with hundreds of qubits has made the experimental demonstration of a quantum speedup for optimization problems a coveted, albeit elusive goal. Going beyond earlier studies of random Ising problems, here we introduce a method to construct a set of frustrated Ising-model optimization problems with tunable hardness. We study the performance of a D-Wave Two device (DW2) with up to 503 qubits on these problems and compare it to a suite of classical algorithms, including a highly optimized algorithm designed to compete directly with the DW2. The problems are generated around predetermined ground-state configurations, called planted solutions, which makes them particularly suitable for benchmarking purposes. The problem set exhibits properties familiar from constraint satisfaction (SAT) problems, such as a peak in the typical hardness of the problems, determined by a tunable clause density parameter. We bound the hardness regime where the DW2 device either does not or might exhibit a quantum speedup for our problem set. While we do not find evidence for a speedup for the hardest and most frustrated problems in our problem set, we cannot rule out that a speedup might exist for some of the easier, less frustrated problems. Our empirical findings pertain to the specific D-Wave processor and problem set we studied and leave open the possibility that future processors might exhibit a quantum speedup on the same problem set.

Locations

  • Physical Review A - View - PDF
  • arXiv (Cornell University) - View - PDF
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) - View
  • DataCite API - View

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat Increasing the Hardness of Posiform Planting Using Random QUBOs for Programmable Quantum Annealer Benchmarking 2024 Elijah Pelofske
Georg Hahn
Hristo Djidjev
+ PDF Chat Max 2-SAT with up to 108 qubits 2014 Siddhartha Santra
Gregory Quiroz
Greg Ver Steeg
Daniel A. Lidar
+ 3-regular three-XORSAT planted solutions benchmark of classical and quantum heuristic optimizers 2022 Matthew Kowalsky
Tameem Albash
Itay Hen
Daniel A. Lidar
+ Mind the Gap: Achieving a Super-Grover Quantum Speedup by Jumping to the End 2023 Alexander M. Dalzell
Nicola Pancotti
Earl T. Campbell
Fernando G. S. L. Brandão
+ Scaling Advantage in Approximate Optimization with Quantum Annealing 2024 Humberto Munoz Bauza
Daniel A. Lidar
+ Mind the gap: Achieving a super-Grover quantum speedup by jumping to the end 2022 Alexander M. Dalzell
Nicola Pancotti
Earl T. Campbell
Fernando G. S. L. Brandão
+ PDF Chat Scalable Quantum-Inspired Optimization through Dynamic Qubit Compression 2024 Cuong Tran
Quang Vĩnh Trần
Hyukmin Son
Thang N. Dinh
+ Performance of a quantum annealer on range-limited constraint satisfaction problems 2015 Andrew D. King
+ Performance of a quantum annealer on range-limited constraint satisfaction problems 2015 Andrew D. King
T. Lanting
Richard Harris
+ Optimizing the Optimizer: Decomposition Techniques for Quantum Annealing 2020 Gideon Bass
M. Todd Henderson
Joshua Heath
Joseph Dulny
+ Optimizing the Optimizer: Decomposition Techniques for Quantum Annealing 2020 Gideon Bass
M. Todd Henderson
Joshua A. Heath
Joseph Dulny
+ Quantum Annealing amid Local Ruggedness and Global Frustration 2017 James King
Sheir Yarkoni
Jack Raymond
Isil Ozfidan
Andrew D. King
Mayssam Mohammadi Nevisi
Jeremy Hilton
Catherine C. McGeoch
+ Quantum Annealing amid Local Ruggedness and Global Frustration 2017 James King
Sheir Yarkoni
Jack Raymond
Isil Ozfidan
Andrew D. King
Mayssam Mohammadi Nevisi
Jeremy Hilton
Catherine C. McGeoch
+ PDF Chat Experimental quantum annealing: case study involving the graph isomorphism problem 2015 Kenneth M. Zick
Omar Shehab
Matthew French
+ PDF Chat Computational hardness of spin-glass problems with tile-planted solutions 2020 Dilina Perera
Firas Hamze
Jack Raymond
Martin Weigel
Helmut G. Katzgraber
+ PDF Chat Iterative quantum optimization of spin glass problems with rapidly oscillating transverse fields 2024 Brandon A. Barton
Jacob Sagal
Sean Feeney
George Grattan
Pratik Patnaik
Vadim Oganesyan
Lincoln D. Carr
Eliot Kapit
+ PDF Chat Practical engineering of hard spin-glass instances 2016 Jeffrey Marshall
V. Martı́n-Mayor
Itay Hen
+ Evidence for a Limited Quantum Speedup on a Quantum Annealer 2017 Tameem Albash
Daniel A. Lidar
+ Comparing Three Generations of D-Wave Quantum Annealers for Minor Embedded Combinatorial Optimization Problems 2023 Elijah Pelofske
+ PDF Chat Readiness of Quantum Optimization Machines for Industrial Applications 2019 Alejandro Perdomo‐Ortiz
Alexander Feldman
Asier Ozaeta
Sergei V. Isakov
Zheng Zhu
Bryan O’Gorman
Helmut G. Katzgraber
Alexander Diedrich
Hartmut Neven
Johan de Kleer