Francesco Pignatti

Follow

Generating author description...

All published works
Action Title Year Authors
+ Externally Controlled Studies Using Real-World Data in Patients With Hematological Cancers 2024 Sjoerd J. F. Hermans
N Maas
Yvette van Norden
Avinash G. Dinmohamed
Elizabeth Berkx
Peter C. Huijgens
Donna R. Rivera
R. Angelo de Claro
Francesco Pignatti
Jurjen Versluis
+ PDF Chat Examining the Effect of Missing Data and Unmeasured Confounding on External Comparator Studies: Case Studies and Simulations 2024 Gerd Rippin
HĂ©ctor Sanz
Wilhelmina E. Hoogendoorn
NicolĂĄs Ballarini
Joan Largent
Eleni Demas
Douwe Postmus
Theodor Framke
Lukas M. Aguirre DĂĄvila
Chantal Quinten
+ PDF Chat Bayesian interim analysis for prospective randomized studies: reanalysis of the acute myeloid leukemia HOVON 132 clinical trial 2024 N Maas
Jurjen Versluis
Kazem Nasserinejad
Joost van Rosmalen
Thomas Pabst
Johan Maertens
Dimitri Breems
Markus G. Manz
Jacqueline Cloos
Gert J. Ossenkoppele
+ Attitudes of healthcare professionals and drug regulators about progression-free survival as endpoint in the advanced cancer setting 2023 Douwe Postmus
Saskia LitiĂšre
Jan Bogaerts
Jurjen Versluis
Jan J. Cornelissen
Francesco Pignatti
+ PCR20 Preferences for Cancer Treatments: A Discrete-Choice Experiment with Adult Patients with Cancer in Europe 2023 Willings Botha
Stephanie Philpott
Douwe Postmus
Francesco Pignatti
A.M. Rodriguez-Leboeuf
+ Queries Raised During Oncology Business Pipeline Meetings at the European Medicines Agency: A 5‐Year Retrospective Analysis 2023 C. Mircea S. Tesileanu
Francesco Pignatti
Enrico Tognana
A. J. B. Humphreys
+ PDF Chat Quantitative Benefit-Risk Assessment in Medical Product Decision Making: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force 2023 Tommi Tervonen
Jorien Veldwijk
Katherine Payne
Xinyi Ng
Bennett Levitan
Leila G. Lackey
Kevin Marsh
Praveen Thokala
Francesco Pignatti
Anne Donnelly
+ The HOVON 100 Study in Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Re-Analysed By Multi-State Modeling: Benefits and Risks of Clofarabine 2022 Sjoerd J. F. Hermans
Yvette van Norden
Jurjen Versluis
Anita W. Rijneveld
Okke de Weerdt
Bart J. Biemond
Arjan A. van de Loosdrecht
Lotte E. van der Wagen
Mar Bellido
Michel van Gelder
+ Bayesian Inference for Optimization of Interim Analysis in Clinical Trials By Incorporation of Historical Data: Reanalysis of the HOVON AML 132 Clinical Trial 2022 Niek Van Der Maas
Kazem Nasserinejad
Thomas Pabst
Johan Maertens
Dimitri Breems
Markus G. Manz
Jacqueline Cloos
Gert J. Ossenkoppele
Yngvar FlĂžisand
Patrycja Gradowska
+ PDF Chat A simulated maximum likelihood procedure for analyzing imprecise trade‐off thresholds between the benefits and harms of medicines 2022 Douwe Postmus
Francesco Pignatti
Hans L. Hillege
Tommi Tervonen
+ Evaluation of Treatment Effect in Underrepresented Population in Cancer Trials: Discussion with International Regulators 2022 Rajeshwari Sridhara
Olga Marchenko
Qing Jiang
Elizabeth Barksdale
Jie Chen
Nancy A Dreyer
Lola A. Fashoyin-Aje
Elizabeth Garrett‐Mayer
Nicole Gormley
Thomas Gwise
+ A Review of Causal Inference for External Comparator Arm Studies 2022 Gerd Rippin
NicolĂĄs Ballarini
HĂ©ctor Sanz
Joan Largent
Chantal Quinten
Francesco Pignatti
+ PDF Chat The value of anticancer drugs — a regulatory view 2021 Francesco Pignatti
Ulla Wilking
Douwe Postmus
Nils Wilking
Julio Delgado
Jonas Bergh
+ Randomized Controlled Trials Versus Real World Evidence: Neither Magic Nor Myth 2020 Hans‐Georg Eichler
Francesco Pignatti
Brigitte Schwarzer‐Daum
Ana Hidalgo‐Simon
Irmgard Eichler
Peter Arlett
A. J. B. Humphreys
Spiros Vamvakas
Nikolai C. Brun
Guido Rasi
+ PDF Chat Individual Trade-Offs Between Possible Benefits and Risks of Cancer Treatments: Results from a Stated Preference Study with Patients with Multiple Myeloma 2017 Douwe Postmus
Sarah Richard
Nathalie Bere
Gert van Valkenhoef
Jayne Galinsky
Eric Low
Isabelle Moulon
Maria Mavris
Tomas Salmonsson
Beatriz Flores
+ PDF Chat Eliciting Individual Patient Preferences on The Benefits and Risks of Cancer Treatments: Results From A Survey Conducted in Myeloma Patients 2016 Douwe Postmus
Sarah Richard
Nathalie Bere
JL Hillege
Eric Low
Francesco Pignatti
+ PDF Chat “Threshold‐crossing”: A Useful Way to Establish the Counterfactual in Clinical Trials? 2016 H‐G Eichler
Brigitte Bloechl‐Daum
Philipp K. Bauer
Frank Bretz
Jeffrey S. Brown
L Hampson
Peter K. Honig
Michael Krams
Hubert G.M. Leufkens
Robyn Lim
+ Incorporating patient preferences into drug development and regulatory decision making: Results from a quantitative pilot study with cancer patients, carers, and regulators 2015 Douwe Postmus
Maria Mavris
HL Hillege
Tomas Salmonson
Bettina Ryll
Ananda Plate
Isabelle Moulon
H‐G Eichler
Nathalie Bere
Francesco Pignatti
+ Assessment of benefits and risks in development of targeted therapies for cancer — The view of regulatory authorities 2014 Francesco Pignatti
Bertil Jönsson
Gideon M. Blumenthal
Robert Justice
+ The European Medicines Agency: An Overview of Its Mission, Responsibilities, and Recent Initiatives in Cancer Drug Regulation 2011 Francesco Pignatti
Iordanis Gravanis
Ralf Herold
Spiros Vamvakas
Bertil Jönsson
M.L. Marty
+ Is it time to abandon complete blinded independent central radiological evaluation of progression in registration trials? 2011 Francesco Pignatti
Rob Hemmings
Bertil Jönsson
+ The review of drug applications submitted to the European Medicines Evaluation Agency: frequently raised objections, and outcome 2002 Francesco Pignatti
B. Aronsson
Nick Gate
Spiros Vamvakas
George N. Wade
Isabelle Moulon
Patrick Le Courtois
+ Clinical trials for registration in the European Union: the EMEA 5-year experience in oncology 2002 Francesco Pignatti
B. Aronsson
Spiros Vamvakas
George N. Wade
Irene Papadouli
Marisa Papaluca
Isabelle Moulon
Patrick Le Courtois
+ Design of equivalence studies: Facts and fantasies 1998 Richard Sylvester
Laurence Collette
Francesco Pignatti
Patrick Therasse
Common Coauthors
Commonly Cited References
Action Title Year Authors # of times referenced
+ Incorporating patient preferences into drug development and regulatory decision making: Results from a quantitative pilot study with cancer patients, carers, and regulators 2015 Douwe Postmus
Maria Mavris
HL Hillege
Tomas Salmonson
Bettina Ryll
Ananda Plate
Isabelle Moulon
H‐G Eichler
Nathalie Bere
Francesco Pignatti
4
+ PDF Chat A stochastic multicriteria model for evidence‐based decision making in drug benefit‐risk analysis 2011 Tommi Tervonen
Gert van Valkenhoef
Erik Buskens
Hans L. Hillege
Douwe Postmus
4
+ PDF Chat The value of anticancer drugs — a regulatory view 2021 Francesco Pignatti
Ulla Wilking
Douwe Postmus
Nils Wilking
Julio Delgado
Jonas Bergh
3
+ An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies 2011 Peter C. Austin
3
+ PDF Chat Characteristics of non-randomised studies using comparisons with external controls submitted for regulatory approval in the USA and Europe: a systematic review 2019 Sarah Goring
Aliki Taylor
Kerstin MĂŒller
Tina Jun Jian Li
Ellen Korol
Adrian R. Levy
Nick Freemantle
3
+ Beyond Randomized Clinical Trials: Use of External Controls 2019 Heinz Schmidli
Dieter A. HĂ€ring
Marius Thomas
Adrian Cassidy
Sebastian Weber
Frank Bretz
3
+ PDF Chat Using Electronic Health Records to Derive Control Arms for Early Phase Single‐Arm Lung Cancer Trials: Proof‐of‐Concept in Randomized Controlled Trials 2019 Gillis Carrigan
Samuel Whipple
William B. Capra
Michael D. Taylor
Jeffrey S. Brown
Michael W. Lu
Brandon Arnieri
Ryan Copping
Kenneth J. Rothman
3
+ The Magic of Randomization versus the Myth of Real-World Evidence 2020 Rory Collins
Louise Bowman
Martin Landray
Richard Peto
2
+ PDF Chat The Use of External Controls in FDA Regulatory Decision Making 2021 Mahta Jahanshahi
Keith Gregg
Gillian Davis
Adora Ndu
Veronica Miller
Jerry Vockley
CĂ©cile Ollivier
Tanja Franolic
Sharon Sakai
2
+ When Context Is Hard to Come By: External Comparators and How to Use Them 2020 Christina Mack
Jennifer Christian
Emma Brinkley
Edward J. Warren
Marni Hall
Nancy A Dreyer
2
+ PDF Chat Implementing Historical Controls in Oncology Trials 2021 Olivier Collignon
Anna Schritz
Riccardo Spezia
Stephen Senn
2
+ PDF Chat External control arms in oncology: current use and future directions 2022 Pallavi S. Mishra‐Kalyani
L. Amiri Kordestani
Donna R. Rivera
Harpreet Singh
Amna Ibrahim
R. Angelo DeClaro
Yuan Li Shen
Shenghui Tang
R. Sridhara
Paul G. Kluetz
2
+ Research outcomes and recommendations for the assessment of progression in cancer clinical trials from a PhRMA working group 2011 A Stone
William D. Bushnell
Jon Denne
Daniel J. Sargent
Ohad Amit
C. CHEN
R. Bailey-Iacona
Jeffrey D. Helterbrand
Grant Williams
2
+ PDF Chat A roadmap to using historical controls in clinical trials – by Drug Information Association Adaptive Design Scientific Working Group (DIA-ADSWG) 2020 Mercedeh Ghadessi
Rui Tang
Joey Tianyi Zhou
Rong Liu
Chenkun Wang
Kiichiro Toyoizumi
Chaoqun Mei
Lixia Zhang
C. Q. Deng
Robert A. Beckman
2
+ PDF Chat <p>Synthetic and External Controls in Clinical Trials – A Primer for Researchers</p> 2020 Kristian Thorlund
Louis Dron
Jay Park
Edward J. Mills
2
+ PDF Chat An Exploratory Analysis of Real-World End Points for Assessing Outcomes Among Immunotherapy-Treated Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer 2019 Mark Stewart
Andrew D. Norden
Nancy A Dreyer
Henry J. Henk
Amy P. Abernethy
Elizabeth A. Chrischilles
Lawrence H. Kushi
Aaron S. Mansfield
Sean Khozin
Elad Sharon
2
+ PDF Chat A Framework for Methodological Choice and Evidence Assessment for Studies Using External Comparators from Real-World Data 2020 Christen Gray
Fiona Grimson
Deborah Layton
Stuart J. Pocock
Joseph Kim
2
+ Closed‐form variance estimator for weighted propensity score estimators with survival outcome 2018 David Hajage
Guillaume Chauvet
Lisa Belin
Alexandre Lafourcade
Florence Tubach
Yann De Rycke
2
+ PDF Chat The proportion of missing data should not be used to guide decisions on multiple imputation 2019 Paul Madley‐Dowd
Rachael A. Hughes
Kate Tilling
Jon Heron
2
+ PDF Chat Are Novel, Nonrandomized Analytic Methods Fit for Decision Making? The Need for Prospective, Controlled, and Transparent Validation 2019 Hans‐Georg Eichler
Franz Koenig
Peter Arlett
Harald Enzmann
A. J. B. Humphreys
Frank PĂ©tavy
Brigitte Schwarzer‐Daum
Bruno Sepodes
Spiros Vamvakas
Guido Rasi
2
+ When Context Is Hard to Come By: External Comparators and How to Use Them 2019 Christina Mack
Jennifer Christian
Emma Brinkley
Edward J. Warren
Marni Hall
Nancy A Dreyer
2
+ PDF Chat Real‐world evidence to support regulatory decision‐making for medicines: Considerations for external control arms 2020 Mehmet Burcu
Nancy A Dreyer
Jessica M. Franklin
Michael D. Blum
Cathy W. Critchlow
Eleanor M. Perfetto
Wei Zhou
2
+ PDF Chat Including historical data in the analysis of clinical trials: Is it worth the effort? 2017 Joost van Rosmalen
David Dejardin
Yvette van Norden
Bob Löwenberg
Emmanuel Lesaffre
2
+ PDF Chat The use of external controls: To what extent can it currently be recommended? 2021 Hans Ulrich Burger
Christoph Gerlinger
Chris Harbron
Armin Koch
Martin Posch
Justine Rochon
Anja Schiel
2
+ Evaluating the Use of Nonrandomized Real‐World Data Analyses for Regulatory Decision Making 2019 Jessica M. Franklin
Robert J. Glynn
David Martin
Sebastian Schneeweiß
2
+ Exploring the Potential of External Control Arms created from Patient Level Data: A case study in non-small cell lung cancer 2022 Xiang Yin
Pallavi S. Mishra-Kalyan
Rajeshwari Sridhara
Mark Stewart
Elizabeth A. Stuart
Ruthanna Davi
2
+ PDF Chat Matching Methods for Causal Inference: A Review and a Look Forward 2010 Elizabeth A. Stuart
2
+ Application of the BRAT Framework to Case Studies: Observations and Insights 2010 B Levitan
Elizabeth Andrews
Alicia Gilsenan
John G. Ferguson
R A Noel
Paul Coplan
Filip Mussen
2
+ PDF Chat Quantitative Benefit–Risk Assessment: State of the Practice Within Industry 2020 Meredith Y. Smith
Janine A. van Til
Rachael L. DiSantostefano
Brett Hauber
Kevin Marsh
2
+ Single-arm Trials with Historical Controls 2020 Samy Suissa
2
+ The role of nonrandomized trials in the evaluation of oncology drugs 2015 Richard Simon
GM Blumenthal
Rothenberg Ml
Josh Sommer
SA Roberts
D. K. Armstrong
LM LaVange
Richard Pazdur
2
+ The European Medicines Agency: An Overview of Its Mission, Responsibilities, and Recent Initiatives in Cancer Drug Regulation 2011 Francesco Pignatti
Iordanis Gravanis
Ralf Herold
Spiros Vamvakas
Bertil Jönsson
M.L. Marty
2
+ PDF Chat The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects 1983 Paul R. Rosenbaum
Donald B. Rubin
2
+ Blinded independent central review of progression in cancer clinical trials: Results from a meta-analysis 2011 Ohad Amit
Frank Mannino
A Stone
William D. Bushnell
Jonathan Denne
Jeffrey D. Helterbrand
Hans-Ulrich Burger
2
+ PDF Chat “Threshold‐crossing”: A Useful Way to Establish the Counterfactual in Clinical Trials? 2016 H‐G Eichler
Brigitte Bloechl‐Daum
Philipp K. Bauer
Frank Bretz
Jeffrey S. Brown
L Hampson
Peter K. Honig
Michael Krams
Hubert G.M. Leufkens
Robyn Lim
2
+ The combination of randomized and historical controls in clinical trials 1976 Stuart J. Pocock
2
+ PDF Chat Real-world Data for Clinical Evidence Generation in Oncology 2017 Sean Khozin
Gideon M. Blumenthal
Richard Pazdur
2
+ PDF Chat The use of real-world data in cancer drug development 2018 Eva Skovlund
Hubert G. M. Leufkens
John F. Smyth
2
+ PDF Chat Sample size considerations for historical control studies with survival outcomes 2015 Hong Zhu
Song Zhang
Chul Ahn
2
+ PDF Chat Effect Estimates in Randomized Trials and Observational Studies: Comparing Apples With Apples 2019 Sara Lodi
Andrew Phillips
Jens Lundgren
Roger Logan
Shweta Sharma
Stephen R. Cole
Abdel Babiker
Matthew Law
Haitao Chu
Dana Byrne
2
+ PDF Chat Methods for external control groups for single arm trials or <scp>long‐term</scp> uncontrolled extensions to randomized clinical trials 2020 John D. Seeger
Kourtney J. Davis
Michelle R. Iannacone
Wei Zhou
Nancy A Dreyer
Almut G. Winterstein
Nancy C. Santanello
Barry J. Gertz
Jesse A. Berlin
2
+ Nonrandomized Real‐World Evidence to Support Regulatory Decision Making: Process for a Randomized Trial Replication Project 2019 Jessica M. Franklin
Ajinkya Pawar
David Martin
Robert J. Glynn
Mark Levenson
Robert Temple
Sebastian Schneeweiß
2
+ PDF Chat Blinded Independent Central Review of Progression-Free Survival in Phase III Clinical Trials: Important Design Element or Unnecessary Expense? 2008 Lori E. Dodd
Edward L. Korn
Boris Freidlin
C. Carl Jaffe
Larry Rubinstein
Janet Dancey
Margaret Mooney
2
+ PDF Chat A comparison of two methods of estimating propensity scores after multiple imputation 2012 Robin Mitra
Jerome P. Reiter
1
+ PDF Chat Bias Modelling in Evidence Synthesis 2008 Rebecca M. Turner
David J. Spiegelhalter
Gordon C. S. Smith
Simon G. Thompson
1
+ A Bayesian approach to evaluating net clinical benefit allowed for parameter uncertainty 2005 Alex J. Sutton
Nicola J. Cooper
Keith R. Abrams
Paul C. Lambert
David R. Jones
1
+ PDF Chat A tutorial on propensity score estimation for multiple treatments using generalized boosted models 2013 Daniel F. McCaffrey
Beth Ann Griffin
Daniel Almirall
Mary Ellen Slaughter
Rajeev Ramchand
Lane F. Burgette
1
+ I-SPY 2: An Adaptive Breast Cancer Trial Design in the Setting of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy 2009 AD Barker
C C Sigman
Kelloff Gj
NM Hylton
DA Berry
L. Esserman
1
+ A Checklist for Retrospective Database Studies—Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Retrospective Databases 2003 Brenda R. Motheral
John M. Brooks
Mary Ann Clark
William H. Crown
Peter Davey
Dave Hutchins
Bradley C. Martin
Paul Stang
1
+ PDF Chat Commensurate Priors for Incorporating Historical Information in Clinical Trials Using General and Generalized Linear Models 2012 Brian P. Hobbs
Daniel J. Sargent
Bradley P. Carlin
1