Ask a Question

Prefer a chat interface with context about you and your work?

Neutral <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math> Decays as Discovery Channels for Charm <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math> Violation

Neutral <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math> Decays as Discovery Channels for Charm <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math> Violation

We point out that the CP asymmetries in the decays D^{0}→K_{S}K^{*0} and D^{0}→K_{S}K[over ¯]^{*0} are potential discovery channels for charm CP violation in the standard model. We stress that no flavor tagging is necessary, the untagged CP asymmetry a_{CP}^{dir}(D[over (-)]→K_{S}K^{*0}) is essentially equal to the tagged one, so that the …