Ask a Question

Prefer a chat interface with context about you and your work?

Implications of the Dimuon<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math>Asymmetry in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math>Decays

Implications of the Dimuon<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math>Asymmetry in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math>Decays

The D0 Collaboration reported a 3.2σ deviation from the standard model (SM) prediction in the like-sign dimuon asymmetry. Assuming that new physics contributes only to B(d,s) mixing, we show that the data can be analyzed without using the theoretical calculation of ΔΓ(s), allowing for robust interpretations. We find that this …