Ask a Question

Prefer a chat interface with context about you and your work?

Correlations among new<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math>violating effects in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:math>observables

Correlations among new<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math>violating effects in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:math>observables

We point out that the observed $CP$ violation in ${B}_{d}\ensuremath{-}{\overline{B}}_{d}$ mixing, taking into account the measured ratio $\ensuremath{\Delta}{M}_{d}/\ensuremath{\Delta}{M}_{s}$, the recently decreased lattice value of the nonperturbative parameter ${\stackrel{^}{B}}_{K}$ and an additional effective suppression factor ${\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{ϵ}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.92$ in ${ϵ}_{K}$ neglected so far in most analyses, may be insufficient to describe the measured …