On Yiu’s Equilateral Triangles Associated with a Kiepert Hyperbola

Abstract

In 2014, Paul Yiu constructed two equilateral triangles inscribed in a Kiepert hyperbola associated with a reference triangle. It was asserted that each of the equilateral triangles is triply perspective with the reference triangle, and in each case, the corresponding three perspectors are collinear. In this note, we provide proof of his assertions. Furthermore, as an analogue of Lemoine’s problem, we formulated and answered the question of how to recover the reference triangle given a Kiepert hyperbola, one of the two Fermat points and one vertex of the reference triangle.

Locations

Ask a Question About This Paper

Summary

This paper establishes rigorous proofs for a set of remarkable geometric properties previously conjectured by Paul Yiu in 2014 concerning equilateral triangles associated with the Kiepert hyperbola. The work validates and extends a significant construction in modern triangle geometry, demonstrating a profound interplay between classical Euclidean concepts and advanced projective techniques.

At its core, the paper focuses on the Kiepert hyperbola, a unique conic defined for any given reference triangle ABC. This hyperbola is known to pass through several notable triangle centers, including the vertices A, B, C, the first and second Fermat points (F₁ and F₂), and the centroid. Yiu’s original assertion was that two specific equilateral triangles can be inscribed within this Kiepert hyperbola. These triangles, PQR and P’Q’R’, are generated by intersecting circles centered at the Fermat points (F₂ and F₁) with the Kiepert hyperbola itself. The paper proves two main properties of these triangles:
1. Equilaterality: PQR and P’Q’R’ are indeed equilateral.
2. Triple Perspectivity and Collinearity: Each of these equilateral triangles (PQR and, with a specific orientation, P’R’Q’) is triply perspective to the original reference triangle ABC. This means that for each pair of triangles, there are three distinct choices of corresponding vertices (e.g., (A,P,B,Q,C,R), (A,Q,B,R,C,P), and (A,R,B,P,C,Q)) such that the lines joining corresponding vertices (e.g., AP, BQ, CR) are concurrent. Remarkably, the paper proves that the three points of concurrency (perspectors) arising from each triple perspectivity are collinear.

The significance of this work lies in providing the mathematical bedrock for Yiu’s elegant discoveries, moving them from assertion to proven fact. It enriches the field of triangle geometry by adding new, non-trivial constructions and relationships involving fundamental triangle centers and conics. The paper also highlights the aesthetic appeal of geometric theorems where multiple, seemingly independent properties (equilaterality, triple perspectivity, collinearity) converge.

Key innovations in this paper include:
* Rigorous Proofs: The central innovation is providing definitive, detailed proofs for Yiu’s assertions, which had previously lacked formal justification.
* Analogue of Lemoine’s Problem: The paper formulates and solves an inverse problem akin to Lemoine’s classic construction problem. Given a Kiepert hyperbola, one of the two Fermat points, and one vertex of the reference triangle, the paper demonstrates how to reconstruct the other two vertices of the original triangle. This adds a valuable constructive aspect to Yiu’s results.
* Methodological Synthesis: The paper effectively employs a blend of geometric techniques:
* Synthetic Geometry: Used for initial proofs, drawing on established theorems like Feuerbach’s Theorem.
* Analytic (Coordinate) Geometry: Extensively used in the core proofs (Theorem 2) involving rational parameterization of circles and a Kiepert hyperbola, often relying on computer algebra systems (SAGE) for complex algebraic manipulations. This showcases the power of computational methods in modern geometry research.
* Projective Geometry: Utilized to provide a more general framework for results on triply perspective triangles inscribed in a conic, establishing broader implications beyond the specific context of the Kiepert hyperbola.

The main prior ingredients upon which this research builds are:
* Yiu’s Original Construction (2014): The assertions and the geometric setup that forms the basis of the paper.
* Classical Triangle Geometry: Fundamental concepts such as:
* Fermat Points (Isogonic Centers): Their definitions and properties are crucial for defining the associated circles and the Kiepert hyperbola.
* Kiepert Hyperbola: Knowledge of its definition (passing through vertices, Fermat points, centroid), its nature as a rectangular hyperbola, and its property that the orthocenter of an inscribed triangle lies on it are essential. Its center being the midpoint of the Fermat points is also key.
* Nine Point Circle (Feuerbach Circle): Utilized in the proof of equilaterality, specifically its relationship with rectangular hyperbolas and their centers (Feuerbach’s Theorem).
* Projective Geometry Concepts:
* Pascal’s Theorem: Repeatedly applied to establish collinearity relationships, particularly in the context of perspective triangles and Hessian lines.
* Perspective Triangles: The theory of triangles being perspective from a point (or axis), including the concept of doubly and triply perspective triangles.
* Projective Collineations: Employed to simplify general proofs by mapping complex conics to simpler forms (like circles) and then transforming back.
* Analytic Geometry: The ability to represent geometric objects (points, lines, conics) with coordinates and perform algebraic computations, which is fundamental to the detailed proofs in Section 3.

In 2014, Paul Yiu constructed two equilateral triangles inscribed in a Kiepert hyperbola associated with a reference triangle. It was asserted that each of the equilateral triangles is triply perspective … In 2014, Paul Yiu constructed two equilateral triangles inscribed in a Kiepert hyperbola associated with a reference triangle. It was asserted that each of the equilateral triangles is triply perspective to the reference triangle, and in each case, the corresponding three perspectors are collinear. In this note, we give a proof of his assertions. Furthermore as an analogue of Lemoine's problem, we formulated and answered the question about how to recover the reference triangle given a Kiepert hyperbola, one of the two Fermat points and one vertex of the reference triangle.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content. An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content. An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content. An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
The geometries of points, lines, line segments, triangles and circles have been studied at depth by many learned mathematicians, scholars and researchers for a long period of time. Among these … The geometries of points, lines, line segments, triangles and circles have been studied at depth by many learned mathematicians, scholars and researchers for a long period of time. Among these geometries the geometrical properties of nine-point circle is indeed interesting, fascinating and glamorous also. The curiosity present in human mind have motivated the aforesaid community to explore the properties of more than one nine-point circle emerging from four arbitrarily chosen points. In this paper the authors have attempted to simulate a few of them in a user friendly environment and bringing in light a case which is yet not either studied or not found in the prevailing literature, as regards Schro ̈dder’s findings. Key words: Nine-point circle, ortho-centric points, collinear points, MATLAB
The center of an inscribed conic which have a given perspector is the complement of its isotomic conjugate. We provide a synthetic proof, based on fine proprieties of Lemoine point. The center of an inscribed conic which have a given perspector is the complement of its isotomic conjugate. We provide a synthetic proof, based on fine proprieties of Lemoine point.
We study pairs of conics $(\mathcal{D},\mathcal{P})$, called \textit{$n$-Poncelet pairs}, such that an $n$-gon, called an \textit{$n$-Poncelet polygon}, can be inscribed into $\mathcal{D}$ and circumscribed about $\mathcal{P}$. Here $\mathcal{D}$ is a … We study pairs of conics $(\mathcal{D},\mathcal{P})$, called \textit{$n$-Poncelet pairs}, such that an $n$-gon, called an \textit{$n$-Poncelet polygon}, can be inscribed into $\mathcal{D}$ and circumscribed about $\mathcal{P}$. Here $\mathcal{D}$ is a circle and $\mathcal{P}$ is a parabola from a confocal pencil $\mathcal{F}$ with the focus $F$. We prove that the circle contains $F$ if and only if every parabola $\mathcal{P}\in\mathcal{F}$ forms a $3$-Poncelet pair with the circle. We prove that the center of $\mathcal{D}$ coincides with $F$ if and only if every parabola $\mathcal{P}\in \mathcal{F}$ forms a $4$-Poncelet pair with the circle. We refer to such property, observed for $n=3$ and $n=4$, as \textit{$n$-isoperiodicity}. We prove that $\mathcal{F}$ is not $n$-isoperiodic with any circle $\mathcal{D}$ for $n$ different from $3$ and $4$. Using isoperiodicity, we construct explicit algebraic solutions to Painlev\'e VI equations.
No scientific theory lasts forever, but specific research and discoveries continuously build upon each other. The three classic ancient Greek mathematical challenges likely referring to are “Doubling The Circle”, “Trisecting … No scientific theory lasts forever, but specific research and discoveries continuously build upon each other. The three classic ancient Greek mathematical challenges likely referring to are “Doubling The Circle”, “Trisecting An Angle” & “Squaring The Circle”, all famously proven Impossible under strict compass-and-straightedge constraints, by Pierre Wantzel (1837) using field theory and algebraic methods, then also by Ferdinand von Lindemann (1882) after proving π is transcendental. These original Greek challenges remain impossible under classical rules since their proofs rely on deep algebraic/transcendental properties settled in the 19th century. Recent claims may involve reinterpretations or unrelated advances but do overturn these conclusions above. Among these, the "Squaring The Circle" problem and related problems involving π have captivated both professional and amateur mathematicians for millennia. The title of this paper refers to the concept of "constructing a circle that has the exact area of a given equilateral triangle " or “Circling The Triangle”. This research idea arose after the “Squaring The Circle” problem was studied, solved and published in “SJPMS” in 2024 [8]. This paper presents an exact solution to constructing a circle that is concentric with and has the same area as any given regular triangle. The solution does not rely on the number π and adheres strictly to the constraints of Euclidean geometry, using only a straightedge and compass. The technique of “GEOMETRY ANALYSIS” is employed to solve this “Circling The Triangle” problem precisely and exactly with only a straightedge and compass, without altering any premise of the problem. This independent research demonstrates the solution to the challenge using only these tools. All mathematical tools and propositions in this solution are derived from Euclidean geometry. The methodology involves geometric methods to arrange the given regular triangle and its equal-area circle into a concentric po
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content. An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
By applying analytic geometry within a special Cartesian reference, based on the Kiepert hyperbola, we prove a great number of relations (collinear- ities, similarities, inversions etc.) regarding central points, central … By applying analytic geometry within a special Cartesian reference, based on the Kiepert hyperbola, we prove a great number of relations (collinear- ities, similarities, inversions etc.) regarding central points, central lines and cen- tral conics of a triangle. Most - not all - of these statements are well-known, but somehow dispersed throughout the literature. Some relations turn out to be easy consequences of the action of a conjugation - an involutory M¨ obius transforma- tion - whose fixed points are the foci of the Steiner inellipse.
In this paper, we prove the existence of the Poncelet-Morley point for a given elliptic configuration. The paper ends with an application of such a point in angle trisection problem. In this paper, we prove the existence of the Poncelet-Morley point for a given elliptic configuration. The paper ends with an application of such a point in angle trisection problem.
One of the most important results discovered by French mathematician Desargues on pure combinative relationship in geometry is the theorem which relates two triangles. It is shown that there is … One of the most important results discovered by French mathematician Desargues on pure combinative relationship in geometry is the theorem which relates two triangles. It is shown that there is a perspective center between two triangles if and only if there is a perspective axis. Based on it, we have brought forward the definition of orthogonal perspective of two triangles and obtained a result that if two triangles become orthogonal perspective and perspective, then the perspective center between them and the two orthogonal perspective centers will be in line. Moreover, the perspective axis between them will be orthogonal with the line. Our result generalizes the Euler′s theorem.
Given a reference triangle and its Kiepert hyperbola K, we study sev- eral construction problems related to the triangles which have K as their own Kiepert hyperbolas. Such triangles necessarily … Given a reference triangle and its Kiepert hyperbola K, we study sev- eral construction problems related to the triangles which have K as their own Kiepert hyperbolas. Such triangles necessarily have their vertices on K, and are called special Kiepert inscribed triangles. Among other results, we show that the family of special Kiepert inscribed triangles all with the same centroid G form part of a poristic family between K and an inscribed conic with center which is the inferior of the Kiepert center. 1. Special Kiepert inscribed triangles Given a triangle ABC and its Kiepert hyperbola K, consisting of the Kiepert perspectors
This paper presents an elegant classical geometric solution to the ancient Greek's problem of angle trisection. Its primary objective is to provide a provable construction for resolving the trisection of … This paper presents an elegant classical geometric solution to the ancient Greek's problem of angle trisection. Its primary objective is to provide a provable construction for resolving the trisection of an arbitrary angle, based on the restrictions governing the problem. The angle trisection problem is believed to be unsolvable for compass-straightedge construction. As stated by Pierre Laurent Wantzel (1837), the solution of the angle trisection problem corresponds to an implicit solution of the cubic equation x cubed minus 3x minus 1 equals 0, which is algebraically irreducible, and so is the geometric solution of the angle trisection problem. The goal of the presented solution is to show the possibility to solve the trisection of an arbitrary angle using the traditional Greek's tools of geometry (a classical compass and straightedge) by changing the problem from the algebraic impossibility classification to a solvable plane geometrical problem. Fundamentally, this novel work is based on the fact that algebraic irrationality is not a geometrical impossibility. The exposed methods of proof have been reduced to the Euclidean postulates of classical geometry.
The objective of this paper is to provide a provable solution of the ancient Greek problem of trisecting an arbitrary angle employing only compass and straightedge (ruler).(Pierre Laurent Wantzel, 1837) … The objective of this paper is to provide a provable solution of the ancient Greek problem of trisecting an arbitrary angle employing only compass and straightedge (ruler).(Pierre Laurent Wantzel, 1837) obscurely presented a proof based on ideas from Galois field showing that, the solution of angle trisection corresponds to solution of the cubic equation; 3 -3 -1 = 0, which is geometrically irreducible [1].The focus of this work is to show the possibility to solve the trisection of an angle by correcting some flawed methods meant for general construction of angles, and exemplify why the stated trisection impossible proof is not geometrically valid.The revealed proof is based on a concept from the Archimedes proposition of straightedge construction [2,3].
(1994). The Conics of Ludwig Kiepert: A Comprehensive Lesson in the Geometry of the Triangle. Mathematics Magazine: Vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 188-205. (1994). The Conics of Ludwig Kiepert: A Comprehensive Lesson in the Geometry of the Triangle. Mathematics Magazine: Vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 188-205.
The first part of the present paper reproduces an article contributed by me to the July issue of Mathesis, 1900, entitled “Sur les triangles trihomologiques”; the second part contains fresh … The first part of the present paper reproduces an article contributed by me to the July issue of Mathesis, 1900, entitled “Sur les triangles trihomologiques”; the second part contains fresh developments.
This note was suggested by Dr. Maxwell’s query in the May “Gazette” for a simple proof of the fact that the rectangular hyperbola whose centre is the point of contact … This note was suggested by Dr. Maxwell’s query in the May “Gazette” for a simple proof of the fact that the rectangular hyperbola whose centre is the point of contact of the nine-point circle and the inscribed circle of a triangle and which passes through the vertices, also passes through the incentre. This fact appears as a special case, together with a number of other interesting results, which include a new proof of Feuerbach’s Theorem.