Sign up or log in for free. It helps support the project and unlocks personalized paper recommendations and new AI tools. .
We consider the fundamental problem of allocating $T$ indivisible items that arrive over time to $n$ agents with additive preferences, with the goal of minimizing envy. This problem is tightly connected to online multicolor discrepancy: vectors $v_1, \dots, v_T \in \mathbb{R}^d$ with $\| v_i \|_2 \leq 1$ arrive over time and must be, immediately and irrevocably, assigned to one of $n$ colors to minimize $\max_{i,j \in [n]} \| \sum_{v \in S_i} v - \sum_{v \in S_j} v \|_{\infty}$ at each step, where $S_\ell$ is the set of vectors that are assigned color $\ell$. The special case of $n = 2$ is called online vector balancing. Any bound for multicolor discrepancy implies the same bound for envy minimization. Against an adaptive adversary, both problems have the same optimal bound, $\Theta(\sqrt{T})$, but whether this holds for weaker adversaries is unknown. Against an oblivious adversary, Alweiss et al. give a $O(\log T)$ bound, with high probability, for multicolor discrepancy. Kulkarni et al. improve this to $O(\sqrt{\log T})$ for vector balancing and give a matching lower bound. Whether a $O(\sqrt{\log T})$ bound holds for multicolor discrepancy remains open. These results imply the best-known upper bounds for envy minimization (for an oblivious adversary) for $n$ and two agents, respectively; whether better bounds exist is open. In this paper, we resolve all aforementioned open problems. We prove that online envy minimization and multicolor discrepancy are equivalent against an oblivious adversary: we give a $O(\sqrt{\log T})$ upper bound for multicolor discrepancy, and a $\Omega(\sqrt{\log T})$ lower bound for envy minimization. For a weaker, i.i.d. adversary, we prove a separation: For online vector balancing, we give a $\Omega\left(\sqrt{\frac{\log T}{\log \log T}}\right)$ lower bound, while for envy minimization, we give an algorithm that guarantees a constant upper bound.
This paper addresses the fundamental problem of online allocation of indivisible items to multiple agents with the objective of minimizing envy.
It establishes an equivalence between online envy minimization and online multicolor discrepancy against an oblivious adversary. It provides an \(O(\sqrt{\log T})\) upper bound for multicolor discrepancy, which implies the same upper bound for online envy minimization, resolving open questions in both fields. It then provides a matching \(\Omega(\sqrt{\log T})\) lower bound for envy minimization showing the problems are equivalent.
The paper also studies weaker adversaries and proves the problems are no longer equivalent in these settings. Specifically, it gives a separation for i.i.d. adversaries.
Key innovations:
- Establishing an equivalence between online envy minimization and online multicolor discrepancy against an oblivious adversary.
- Providing an optimal \(O(\sqrt{\log T})\) bound for online multicolor discrepancy.
- Providing a separation for online envy minimization and online multicolor discrepancy against weaker adversaries (i.i.d.).
Prior ingredients:
- Prior algorithms and bounds for online vector balancing and multicolor discrepancy, including the breakthrough result of \(O(\sqrt{\log T})\) by Kulkarni et al. [2024] for vector balancing.
- Notions of envy-freeness and its relation to fair allocation.
- Connections between online algorithms and discrepancy minimization.
Action | Title | Date | Authors |
---|
Action | Title | Date | Authors |
---|