Interpolation techniques for reconstructing Galactic Faraday rotation

Type: Preprint

Publication Date: 2024-10-19

Citations: 0

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2410.15265

Abstract

The line-of-sight structure of the Galactic magnetic field (GMF) can be studied using Faraday rotation measure (RM) grids. We analyze how the choice of interpolation kernel can affect the accuracy and reliability of reconstructed RM maps. We test the following kernels: inverse distance weighting (IDW), natural neighbour interpolation (NNI), inverse multiquadric interpolation (IM), thin-plate spline interpolation (TPS), and a Bayesian rotation measure sky (BRMS); all techniques were tested on two simulated Galactic foreground RMs (one assuming the GMF has patchy structures and the other assuming it has filamentary structures) using magnetohydrodynamic simulations. Both foregrounds were sampled to form RM grids with densities of $\sim$40 sources deg$^{-2}$ and area $\sim$144 deg$^2$. The techniques were tested on data sets with different noise levels and Gaussian random extragalactic RM contributions. The data set that most closely emulates expected data from current surveys, such as the POlarization Sky Survey of the Universe's Magnetism (POSSUM), had extragalactic contributions and a noise standard deviation of $\sim 1.5$ rad m$^{-2}$. For this data set, the accuracy of the techniques for the patchy structures from best to worst was: BRMS, NNI, TPS, IDW and IM; while in the filamentary simulate foreground it was: BRMS, NNI, TPS, and IDW. IDW is the most computationally expensive technique, while TPS and IM are the least expensive. BRMS and NNI have the same, intermediate computational cost. This analysis lays the groundwork for Galactic RM studies with large radio polarization sky surveys, such as POSSUM.

Locations

  • arXiv (Cornell University) - View - PDF

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat Estimating extragalactic Faraday rotation 2014 Niels Oppermann
H. Junklewitz
Maksim Greiner
T. A. Enßlin
Takuya Akahori
E. Carretti
B. M. Gaensler
A. Goobar
Lisa Harvey-Smith
M. Johnston‐Hollitt
+ PDF Chat Prototype Faraday rotation measure catalogs from the Polarisation Sky Survey of the Universe's Magnetism (POSSUM) pilot observations 2024 Shannon Vanderwoude
Jennifer West
B. M. Gaensler
L. Rudnick
Cameron L. Van Eck
A. J. M. Thomson
H. Andernach
C. S. Anderson
E. Carretti
G. Heald
+ PDF Chat STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES FOR DETECTING THE INTERGALACTIC MAGNETIC FIELD FROM LARGE SAMPLES OF EXTRAGALACTIC FARADAY ROTATION DATA 2014 Takuya Akahori
B. M. Gaensler
Dongsu Ryu
+ PDF Chat An improved map of the Galactic Faraday sky 2012 Niels Oppermann
H. Junklewitz
Georg Robbers
M. R. Bell
T. A. Enßlin
A. Bonafede
RĂłbert Braun
J. C. Brown
Tom Clarke
Ilana Feain
+ PDF Chat Prototype Faraday Rotation Measure Catalogs from the Polarisation Sky Survey of the Universe’s Magnetism (POSSUM) Pilot Observations 2024 Shannon Vanderwoude
Jennifer West
B. M. Gaensler
L. Rudnick
Cameron L. Van Eck
A. J. M. Thomson
H. Andernach
C. S. Anderson
E. Carretti
G. Heald
+ A method for reconstructing the Galactic magnetic field using dispersion of fast radio bursts and Faraday rotation of radio galaxies 2022 Ayush Pandhi
Sebastian Hutschenreuter
Jennifer West
B. M. Gaensler
Ashley Stock
+ PDF Chat The Galactic Faraday rotation sky 2020 2021 Sebastian Hutschenreuter
C. S. Anderson
Sarah Betti
Geoffrey C. Bower
J. C. Brown
M. BrĂźggen
E. Carretti
T. E. Clarke
Andrew Clegg
Allison H. Costa
+ The Galactic Faraday rotation sky 2020 2021 Sebastian Hutschenreuter
C. S. Anderson
Sarah Betti
Geoffrey C. Bower
J. C. Brown
M. BrĂźggen
E. Carretti
T. E. Clarke
Andrew Clegg
Allison H. Costa
+ PDF Chat Characterizing the Uncertainty in Cluster Magnetic Fields Derived from Rotation Measures 2020 Adam R. Johnson
L. Rudnick
T. W. Jones
P. J. Mendygral
K. Dolag
+ PDF Chat Exploring the intergalactic magnetic field by means of Faraday tomography 2014 Takuya Akahori
Kohei Kumazaki
Keitaro Takahashi
Dongsu Ryu
+ PDF Chat Removing non-physical structure in fitted Faraday rotated signals: Non-parametric QU-fitting 2021 Luke Pratley
M. Johnston‐Hollitt
B. M. Gaensler
+ Removing non-physical structure in fitted Faraday rotated signals: non-parametric QU-fitting 2020 Luke Pratley
M. Johnston‐Hollitt
B. M. Gaensler
+ PDF Chat SIMULATED FARADAY ROTATION MEASURES TOWARD HIGH GALACTIC LATITUDES 2013 Takuya Akahori
Dongsu Ryu
Jongsoo Kim
B. M. Gaensler
+ PDF Chat The Galactic Faraday depth sky revisited 2019 Sebastian Hutschenreuter
T. A. Enßlin
+ Optimizing Faraday Background Grids 2019 L. Rudnick
+ Optimizing Faraday Background Grids 2019 L. Rudnick
+ PDF Chat Wide-band Rotation Measure Synthesis 2020 Luke Pratley
M. Johnston‐Hollitt
+ PDF Chat A method for reconstructing the Galactic magnetic field using dispersion of fast radio bursts and Faraday rotation of radio galaxies 2022 Ayush Pandhi
Sebastian Hutschenreuter
Jennifer West
B. M. Gaensler
Ashley Stock
+ PDF Chat Disentangling the Faraday rotation sky 2024 Sebastian Hutschenreuter
M. Haverkorn
Philipp Frank
Nergis C. Raycheva
T. A. Enßlin
+ PDF Chat Faraday tomography of LoTSS-DR2 data 2022 A. Erceg
Vibor Jelić
M. Haverkorn
A. Bracco
T. W. Shimwell
C. Tasse
J. M. Dickey
L. Ceraj
A. Drabent
M. J. Hardcastle

Works That Cite This (0)

Action Title Year Authors

Works Cited by This (0)

Action Title Year Authors