Lost in the plot: missing visual elements in Kaplan-Meier plots of phase III oncology trials

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2024-06-01

Citations: 1

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae067

Abstract

Missing visual elements (MVE) in Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves can misrepresent data, preclude curve reconstruction, and hamper transparency. This study evaluated KM plots of phase III oncology trials. MVE were defined as an incomplete y-axis range or missing number at risk table in a KM curve. Surrogate endpoint KM curves were additionally evaluated for complete interpretability, defined by (1) reporting the number of censored patients and (2) correspondence of the disease assessment interval with the number at risk interval. Among 641 trials enrolling 518 235 patients, 116 trials (18%) had MVE in KM curves. Industry sponsorship, larger trials, and more recently published trials were correlated with lower odds of MVE. Only 3% of trials (15 of 574) published surrogate endpoint KM plots with complete interpretability. Improvements in the quality of KM curves of phase III oncology trials, particularly for surrogate endpoints, are needed for greater interpretability, reproducibility, and transparency in oncology research.

Locations

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ Visual Illusions Created by Survival Curves and the Need to Avoid Potential Misinterpretation 2002 Ernest W. Lau
G. André Ng
+ 1688O Informative censoring of surrogate end-point data in FDA-approved cancer drugs 2023 Tomer Meirson
Jonathan Ofer
Gal Markel
Yarden Pras
S. Gilboa
+ PDF Chat Challenges, Complexities, and Considerations in the Design and Interpretation of Late-Phase Oncology Trials 2023 Timothy A. Lin
Alexander D. Sherry
Ethan B. Ludmir
+ PDF Chat PRM46 - MEASURING AND ANALYSING THE MATURITY OF OVERALL SURVIVAL DATA FOR TREATMENTS FOR RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA 2018 Giles Monnickendam
L Zhang
Caitlin Quinn
+ Estimating hazard ratios from published Kaplan‐Meier survival curves: A methods validation study 2019 Ronak Saluja
Sierra Cheng
Keemo Althea delos Santos
Kelvin Chan
+ Missing Data and Censoring in the Analysis of Progression-Free Survival in Oncology Clinical Trials 2013 Jonathan Denne
A Stone
R. Bailey-Iacona
T.-T. Chen
+ Supplementary Figure S1 from Proportional Hazards Violations in Phase III Cancer Clinical Trials: A Potential Source of Trial Misinterpretation 2024 Timothy A. Lin
Zachary R. McCaw
Alex Koong
Christine Lin
Joseph Abi Jaoude
Roshal R. Patel
Ramez Kouzy
Molly B. El Alam
Alexander D. Sherry
Sonal S. Noticewala
+ Survival plots of time-to-event outcomes in clinical trials: good practice and pitfalls 2002 Stuart J. Pocock
Tim Clayton
Douglas G. Altman
+ Supplementary Figure S2 from Proportional Hazards Violations in Phase III Cancer Clinical Trials: A Potential Source of Trial Misinterpretation 2024 Timothy A. Lin
Zachary R. McCaw
Alex Koong
Christine Lin
Joseph Abi Jaoude
Roshal R. Patel
Ramez Kouzy
Molly B. El Alam
Alexander D. Sherry
Sonal S. Noticewala
+ PDF Chat Harvesting information from Kaplan-Meier plots: part 1—detecting censoring 2024 Antonio Tito Fojo
Brian Labadie
+ PDF Chat A toolbox of different approaches to analyze and present PRO-CTCAE data in oncology studies 2023 Antoine Regnault
Angély Loubert
Boris Gorsh
Randy Davis
Anna Cardellino
Kristin Creel
S. Quéré
Sandhya Sapra
Linda Nelsen
Laurie Eliason
+ PCR22 Standardizing Pro-CTCAE Analyses and Output: Must Have, Helpful to Have, and Easy to Understand 2022 K Skaltsa
J Shaw
E Hawryluk
SE Bean
M Reaney
+ PDF Chat Assessment of Accuracy of Waterfall Plot Representations of Response Rates in Cancer Treatment Published in Medical Journals 2019 Myung Sun Kim
Vinay Prasad
+ PDF Chat KMDATA: a curated database of reconstructed individual patient-level data from 153 oncology clinical trials 2021 Geoffrey Fell
Robert Redd
Alyssa M. Vanderbeek
Rifaquat Rahman
Bill Louv
Jon McDunn
Andrea Arfé
Brian M. Alexander
Steffen Ventz
Lorenzo Trippa
+ Data from Deviation from the Proportional Hazards Assumption in Randomized Phase 3 Clinical Trials in Oncology: Prevalence, Associated Factors, and Implications 2023 Rifaquat Rahman
Geoffrey Fell
Steffen Ventz
Andrea ArfĂš
Alyssa M. Vanderbeek
Lorenzo Trippa
Brian M. Alexander
+ Data from Deviation from the Proportional Hazards Assumption in Randomized Phase 3 Clinical Trials in Oncology: Prevalence, Associated Factors, and Implications 2023 Rifaquat Rahman
Geoffrey Fell
Steffen Ventz
Andrea ArfĂš
Alyssa M. Vanderbeek
Lorenzo Trippa
Brian M. Alexander
+ Data from Proportional Hazards Violations in Phase III Cancer Clinical Trials: A Potential Source of Trial Misinterpretation 2024 Timothy A. Lin
Zachary R. McCaw
Alex Koong
Christine Lin
Joseph Abi Jaoude
Roshal R. Patel
Ramez Kouzy
Molly B. El Alam
Alexander D. Sherry
Sonal S. Noticewala
+ Statistical Considerations of Designs for Single-Arm Proof-of-Concept Oncology Trial with Time-to-Event Endpoint 2023 Heng Zhou
Linda Sun
Meihua Wang
+ Proportional Hazards Violations in Phase 3 Cancer Clinical Trials: A Potential Source of Trial Misinterpretation 2024 Timothy A. Lin
Zachary R. McCaw
Alex Koong
Christine Lin
Joseph Abi Jaoude
Roshal R. Patel
Ramez Kouzy
Molly B. El Alam
Alexander D. Sherry
Sonal S. Noticewala
+ Supplementary Data S2 from Proportional Hazards Violations in Phase III Cancer Clinical Trials: A Potential Source of Trial Misinterpretation 2024 Timothy A. Lin
Zachary R. McCaw
Alex Koong
Christine Lin
Joseph Abi Jaoude
Roshal R. Patel
Ramez Kouzy
Molly B. El Alam
Alexander D. Sherry
Sonal S. Noticewala