Comparing Recent Pulsar Timing Array Results on the Nanohertz Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2024-04-29

Citations: 31

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad36be

Abstract

Abstract The Australian, Chinese, European, Indian, and North American pulsar timing array (PTA) collaborations recently reported, at varying levels, evidence for the presence of a nanohertz gravitational-wave background (GWB). Given that each PTA made different choices in modeling their data, we perform a comparison of the GWB and individual pulsar noise parameters across the results reported from the PTAs that constitute the International Pulsar Timing Array (IPTA). We show that despite making different modeling choices, there is no significant difference in the GWB parameters that are measured by the different PTAs, agreeing within 1 σ . The pulsar noise parameters are also consistent between different PTAs for the majority of the pulsars included in these analyses. We bridge the differences in modeling choices by adopting a standardized noise model for all pulsars and PTAs, finding that under this model there is a reduction in the tension in the pulsar noise parameters. As part of this reanalysis, we “extended” each PTA’s data set by adding extra pulsars that were not timed by that PTA. Under these extensions, we find better constraints on the GWB amplitude and a higher signal-to-noise ratio for the Hellings–Downs correlations. These extensions serve as a prelude to the benefits offered by a full combination of data across all pulsars in the IPTA, i.e., the IPTA’s Data Release 3, which will involve not just adding in additional pulsars but also including data from all three PTAs where any given pulsar is timed by more than a single PTA.

Locations

  • The Astrophysical Journal - View - PDF

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ Comparing recent PTA results on the nanohertz stochastic gravitational wave background 2023 The International Pulsar Timing Array Collaboration
Gabriella Agazie
John Antoniadis
Akash Anumarlapudi
Anne M. Archibald
P. Arumugam
S. Arumugam
Z. Arzoumanian
Jacob Askew
S. Babak
+ The International Pulsar Timing Array checklist for the detection of nanohertz gravitational waves 2023 B. Allen
Sanjeev Dhurandhar
Yashwant Gupta
M. A. McLaughlin
Priyamvada Natarajan
R. M. Shannon
E. Thrane
A. Vecchio
+ PDF Chat The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array II. Customised pulsar noise models for spatially correlated gravitational waves 2023 John Antoniadis
P. Arumugam
S. Arumugam
S. Babak
Manjari Bagchi
A.-S. Bak Nielsen
C. Bassa
Adarsh Bathula
A. Berthereau
Matteo Bonetti
+ PDF Chat The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Detector Characterization and Noise Budget 2023 Gabriella Agazie
Akash Anumarlapudi
Anne M. Archibald
Zaven Arzoumanian
P. T. Baker
B. Bécsy
Laura Blecha
Adam Brazier
Paul R. Brook
Sarah Burke-Spolaor
+ The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array 2023 John Antoniadis
P. Arumugam
S. Arumugam
S. Babak
Manjari Bagchi
A.-S. Bak Nielsen
C. Bassa
Adarsh Bathula
A. Berthereau
Matteo Bonetti
+ Astrophysics Milestones for Pulsar Timing Array Gravitational-wave Detection 2021 Nihan S. Pol
Stephen R. Taylor
Luke Zoltan Kelley
Sarah J. Vigeland
Joseph Simon
Siyuan Chen
Zaven Arzoumanian
P. T. Baker
B. Bécsy
Adam Brazier
+ PDF Chat Gravitational-wave Statistics for Pulsar Timing Arrays: Examining Bias from Using a Finite Number of Pulsars 2022 Aaron D. Johnson
Sarah J. Vigeland
Xavier Siemens
Stephen R. Taylor
+ PDF Chat The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III. Search for gravitational wave signals 2023 John Antoniadis
P. Arumugam
S. Arumugam
S. Babak
Manjari Bagchi
A.-S. Bak Nielsen
C. Bassa
Adarsh Bathula
A. Berthereau
Matteo Bonetti
+ PDF Chat The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array 2023 John Antoniadis
P. Arumugam
S. Arumugam
S. Babak
Manjari Bagchi
A.-S. Bak Nielsen
C. Bassa
Adarsh Bathula
A. Berthereau
Matteo Bonetti
+ PDF Chat Optimizing Pulsar Timing Array Observational Cadences for Sensitivity to Low-frequency Gravitational-wave Sources 2018 Michael T. Lam
+ The Need For Speed: Rapid Refitting Techniques for Bayesian Spectral Characterization of the Gravitational Wave Background Using PTAs 2023 William G. Lamb
Stephen R. Taylor
Rutger van Haasteren
+ PDF Chat The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Observations and Timing of 68 Millisecond Pulsars 2023 Gabriella Agazie
Md Faisal Alam
Akash Anumarlapudi
Anne M. Archibald
Zaven Arzoumanian
P. T. Baker
Laura Blecha
Victoria Bonidie
Adam Brazier
Paul R. Brook
+ PDF Chat Hunting the stochastic gravitational wave background in pulsar timing array cross correlations through theoretical uncertainty 2023 Reginald Christian Bernardo
Kin‐Wang Ng
+ Hunting the stochastic gravitational wave background in pulsar timing array cross correlations through theoretical uncertainty 2023 Reginald Christian Bernardo
Kin‐Wang Ng
+ PDF Chat The spatial correlations between pulsars for interfering sources in Pulsar Timing Array and evidence for gravitational-wave background in NANOGrav 15-year data set 2024 Yu-Mei Wu
Yan-Chen Bi
Qing-Guo Huang
+ PDF Chat Rapid refitting techniques for Bayesian spectral characterization of the gravitational wave background using pulsar timing arrays 2023 William G. Lamb
Stephen R. Taylor
Rutger van Haasteren
+ Exploring the Capabilities of Gibbs Sampling in Pulsar Timing Arrays 2023 Nima Laal
William G. Lamb
Joseph D. Romano
X. Siemens
Stephen R. Taylor
Rutger van Haasteren
+ PDF Chat The NANOGrav 15 year Data Set: Removing pulsars one by one from the pulsar timing array 2024 Gabriella Agazie
Akash Anumarlapudi
Anne M. Archibald
Zaven Arzoumanian
J. G. Baier
P. T. Baker
B. Bécsy
Laura Blecha
Adam Brazier
Paul R. Brook
+ PDF Chat Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I 2023 Heng Xu
Siyuan Chen
Yanjun Guo
Jinchen Jiang
Bojun Wang
Jiangwei Xu
Zihan Xue
R. N. Caballero
J. P. Yuan
Yonghua Xu
+ PDF Chat The NANOGrav 12.5 yr Data Set: Wideband Timing of 47 Millisecond Pulsars 2020 Md Faisal Alam
Zaven Arzoumanian
P. T. Baker
Harsha Blumer
Keith E. Bohler
Adam Brazier
Paul R. Brook
Sarah Burke-Spolaor
Keeisi Caballero
Richard Camuccio

Works That Cite This (18)

Action Title Year Authors
+ PINT: Maximum-likelihood Estimation of Pulsar Timing Noise Parameters 2024 Abhimanyu Susobhanan
D. L. Kaplan
Anne M. Archibald
Jing Luo
Paul S. Ray
Timothy T. Pennucci
S. M. Ransom
Gabriella Agazie
William Fiore
Bjorn Larsen
+ Gravitational wave background from primordial black holes in globular clusters 2024 Eleonora Vanzan
Sarah Libanore
Lorenzo Valbusa Dall'Armi
Nicola Bellomo
Alvise Raccanelli
+ Tomography of flavoured leptogenesis with primordial blue gravitational waves 2024 Marco Chianese
Satyabrata Datta
Rome Samanta
Ninetta Saviano
+ PDF Chat A unified accretion disc model for supermassive black holes in galaxy formation simulations: method and implementation 2024 Sophie Koudmani
Rachel S. Somerville
Debora Sijacki
Martin A. Bourne
Yan-Fei Jiang
Kasar Profit
+ The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Looking for Signs of Discreteness in the Gravitational-wave Background 2024 Gabriella Agazie
Akash Anumarlapudi
Anne M. Archibald
Zaven Arzoumanian
J. G. Baier
P. T. Baker
B. Bécsy
Laura Blecha
Adam Brazier
Paul R. Brook
+ PDF Chat Mass-redshift dependency of supermassive black hole binaries for the gravitational wave background 2024 Musfar Muhamed Kozhikkal
Siyuan Chen
G. Theureau
Mélanie Habouzit
Alberto Sesana
+ PDF Chat Primordial black holes from supercooled phase transitions 2024 Yann Gouttenoire
Tomer Volansky
+ PDF Chat Exploring the NANOGrav signal and planet-mass primordial black holes through Higgs inflation 2024 Zhu Yi
Zhi-Qiang You
You Wu
Zu-Cheng Chen
Lang Liü
+ Measuring the circular polarization of gravitational waves with pulsar timing arrays 2024 N. M. Jiménez Cruz
Ameek Malhotra
Gianmassimo Tasinato
Ivonne Zavala
+ PDF Chat Revisiting the ultraviolet tail of the primordial gravitational wave 2024 Shi Pi
Misao Sasaki
Ao Wang
Jianing Wang

Works Cited by This (42)

Action Title Year Authors
+ On measuring the gravitational-wave background using Pulsar Timing Arrays 2009 Rutger van Haasteren
Y. Levin
Patrick McDonald
Tingting Lu
+ PDF Chat Constraining the solution to the last parsec problem with pulsar timing 2015 L. M. Sampson
N. Cornish
Sean T. McWilliams
+ PDF Chat SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLE BINARY EVOLUTION IN AXISYMMETRIC GALAXIES: THE FINAL PARSEC PROBLEM IS NOT A PROBLEM 2013 Fazeel Mahmood Khan
Kelly Holley‐Bockelmann
Peter Berczik
A. Just
+ PDF Chat Optimal strategies for gravitational wave stochastic background searches in pulsar timing data 2009 M. Anholm
Stefan W. Ballmer
J. D. E. Creighton
Larry R. Price
Xavier Siemens
+ PDF Chat Time-domain implementation of the optimal cross-correlation statistic for stochastic gravitational-wave background searches in pulsar timing data 2015 S. J. Chamberlin
J. D. E. Creighton
Xavier Siemens
Paul Demorest
Justin A. Ellis
Larry R. Price
Joseph D. Romano
+ PDF Chat Insights into the astrophysics of supermassive black hole binaries from pulsar timing observations 2013 Alberto Sesana
+ PDF Chat Hyper-efficient model-independent Bayesian method for the analysis of pulsar timing data 2013 L. Lentati
Paul Alexander
M. P. Hobson
Stephen R. Taylor
J. Gair
S. T. Balan
Rutger van Haasteren
+ Long‐Term Evolution of Massive Black Hole Binaries 2003 Miloš Milosavljević
David Merritt
+ PDF Chat The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array Project 2013 R. N. Manchester
G. Hobbs
M. Bailes
W. A. Coles
W. van Straten
M. J. Keith
R. M. Shannon
N. D. R. Bhat
Andrew Brown
Sarah Burke-Spolaor
+ PDF Chat Expected properties of the first gravitational wave signal detected with pulsar timing arrays 2015 P. A. Rosado
Alberto Sesana
J. Gair