<i>Euclid</i>: Validation of the MontePython forecasting tools

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2023-11-21

Citations: 5

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346772

Abstract

Context . The Euclid mission of the European Space Agency will perform a survey of weak lensing cosmic shear and galaxy clustering in order to constrain cosmological models and fundamental physics. Aims . We expand and adjust the mock Euclid likelihoods of the MontePython software in order to match the exact recipes used in previous Euclid Fisher matrix forecasts for several probes: weak lensing cosmic shear, photometric galaxy clustering, the cross-correlation between the latter observables, and spectroscopic galaxy clustering. We also establish which precision settings are required when running the Einstein–Boltzmann solvers CLASS and CAMB in the context of Euclid . Methods . For the minimal cosmological model, extended to include dynamical dark energy, we perform Fisher matrix forecasts based directly on a numerical evaluation of second derivatives of the likelihood with respect to model parameters. We compare our results with those of previously validated Fisher codes using an independent method based on first derivatives of the Euclid observables. Results . We show that such MontePython forecasts agree very well with previous Fisher forecasts published by the Euclid Collab oration, and also, with new forecasts produced by the CosmicFish code, now interfaced directly with the two Einstein–Boltzmann solvers CAMB and CLASS . Moreover, to establish the validity of the Gaussian approximation, we show that the Fisher matrix marginal error contours coincide with the credible regions obtained when running Monte Carlo Markov chains with MontePython while using the exact same mock likelihoods. Conclusions . The new Euclid forecast pipelines presented here are ready for use with additional cosmological parameters, in order to explore extended cosmological models.

Locations

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics - View - PDF
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) - View - PDF
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) - View - PDF
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) - View - PDF
  • Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo) - View - PDF

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ Euclid: Validation of the MontePython forecasting tools 2023 Santiago Casas
Julien Lesgourgues
Nils Schöneberg
V. M. Sabarish
L. Rathmann
M. Doerenkamp
M. Archidiacono
E. Bellini
Sébastien Clesse
N. Frusciante
+ PDF Chat Euclid preparation: VII. Forecast validation for Euclid cosmological probes 2020 Alain Blanchard
S. Camera
C. Carbone
V. F. Cardone
Santiago Casas
Sébastien Clesse
S. Ilić
M. Kilbinger
T. Kitching
M. Kunz
+ PDF Chat <i>Euclid</i> preparation 2020 Alain Blanchard
S. Camera
C. Carbone
V. F. Cardone
Santiago Casas
Sébastien Clesse
S. Ilić
M. Kilbinger
T. Kitching
M. Kunz
+ PDF Chat <i>Euclid</i>: Forecasts from the void-lensing cross-correlation 2022 Marco Bonici
C. Carbone
S. Davini
P Vielzeuf
L. Paganin
V. F. Cardone
Nico Hamaus
Alice Pisani
A. J. Hawken
András Kovács
+ PDF Chat Euclid Preparation XXIX: Forecasts for 10 different higher-order weak lensing statistics 2023 V. Ajani
M. Baldi
A. Barthelemy
Aoife Boyle
Peter Rolf Burger
V. F. Cardone
Sihao Cheng
S. Codis
C. Giocoli
Joachim Harnois-Déraps
+ Euclid preparation. LIV. Sensitivity to neutrino parameters 2024 M. Archidiacono
J. Lesgourgues
S. Casas
S. Pamuk
Nils Schöneberg
Z. Sakr
G. Parimbelli
A. Schneider
F. Peters
Francesco Pace
+ Euclid preparation. LII. Forecast impact of super-sample covariance on 3x2pt analysis with Euclid 2024 Davide Sciotti
S. Gouyou Beauchamps
V. F. Cardone
S. Camera
I. Tutusaus
F. Lacasa
Alexandre Barreira
Marco Bonici
Adélie Gorce
M Aubert
+ PDF Chat <i>Euclid</i> preparation 2021 S. Ilić
N. Aghanim
C. Baccigalupi
J. R. Bermejo-Climent
Giulio Fabbian
L. Legrand
D. Paoletti
M. Ballardini
M. Archidiacono
M. Douspis
+ $Euclid$ preparation: XV. Forecasting cosmological constraints for the $Euclid$ and CMB joint analysis 2021 S. Ilić
N. Aghanim
C. Baccigalupi
J. R. Bermejo-Climent
Giulio Fabbian
L. Legrand
D. Paoletti
M. Ballardini
Maria Archidiacono
M. Douspis
+ Euclid preparation. LVI. Sensitivity to non-standard particle dark matter models 2024 J Lesgourgues
J. Schwagereit
Jozef Bucko
Gabriele Parimbelli
Sambit K. Giri
F. Hervas-Peters
Aurel Schneider
M. Archidiacono
Francesco Pace
Z. Sakr
+ <i>Euclid</i> preparation 2023 K. Tanidis
V. F. Cardone
M. Martinelli
I. Tutusaus
S. Camera
N. Aghanim
A. Amara
S. Andreon
N. Auricchio
Marco Baldi
+ CosmicFish Implementation Notes V1.0 2016 Marco Raveri
M. Martinelli
Gong‐Bo Zhao
Yuting Wang
+ PDF Chat <i>Euclid</i>preparation 2021 A. Pocino
I. Tutusaus
F. J. Castander
P. Fosalba
M. Crocce
A. Porredon
S. Camera
V. F. Cardone
Santiago Casas
T. Kitching
+ PDF Chat <i>Euclid</i>: Forecast constraints on consistency tests of the ΛCDM model 2022 Savvas Nesseris
D. Sapone
M. Martinelli
David Camarena
Valerio Marra
Z. Sakr
J. García-Bellido
C. J. A. P. Martins
Chris Clarkson
A. Da Silva
+ <i>Euclid</i> preparation 2023 Virginia Ajani
Marco Baldi
Alexandre Barthelemy
Aoife Boyle
Pierre Burger
V. F. Cardone
Sihao Cheng
S. Codis
C. Giocoli
Joachim Harnois-Déraps
+ Euclid preparation. Improving cosmological constraints using a new multi-tracer method with the spectroscopic and photometric samples 2024 Fabien Dournac
Alain Blanchard
S. Ilić
Brahim Lamine
I. Tutusaus
A. Amara
S. Andreon
N. Auricchio
H. Aussel
Marco Baldi
+ PDF Chat Euclid preparation. Sensitivity to neutrino parameters 2024 Euclid Collaboration
M. Archidiacono
J. Lesgourgues
Santiago Casas
S. Pamuk
Nils Schöneberg
Z. Sakr
G. Parimbelli
A. Schneider
F. Peters
+ PDF Chat Euclid preparation. Improving cosmological constraints using a new multi-tracer method with the spectroscopic and photometric samples 2024 Fabien Dournac
Alain Blanchard
S. Ilić
Brahim Lamine
I. Tutusaus
A. Amara
S. Andreon
N. Auricchio
H. Aussel
Marco Baldi
+ Euclid preparation. TBD. Forecast impact of super-sample covariance on 3x2pt analysis with Euclid 2023 Euclid Collaboration
Davide Sciotti
S. Gouyou Beauchamps
V. F. Cardone
S. Camera
I. Tutusaus
F. Lacasa
Alexandre Barreira
Adélie Gorce
M Aubert
+ PDF Chat <i>Euclid</i> preparation 2022 Francesca Lepori
I. Tutusaus
C. Viglione
Camille Bonvin
S. Camera
F. J. Castander
Ruth Durrer
P. Fosalba
Goran Jelic-Cizmek
M. Kunz

Works Cited by This (19)

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat Conservative constraints on early cosmology with MONTE PYTHON 2013 Benjamin Audren
J. Lesgourgues
K. Benabed
S. Prunet
+ PDF Chat Efficient Computation of Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies in Closed Friedmann‐Robertson‐Walker Models 2000 Antony Lewis
A. Challinor
A. Lasenby
+ PDF Chat Optimising Boltzmann codes for the PLANCK era 2009 Jan Hamann
A. Balbi
J. Lesgourgues
Claudia Quercellini
+ PDF Chat Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe 2003 Eric V. Linder
+ PDF Chat Neutrino masses and cosmological parameters from a Euclid-like survey: Markov Chain Monte Carlo forecasts including theoretical errors 2013 Benjamin Audren
Julien Lesgourgues
Simeon Bird
Martin G. Haehnelt
Matteo Viel
+ The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS). Part II: Approximation schemes 2011 Diego Blas
J Lesgourgues
Thomas Tram
+ PDF Chat SKA weak lensing – III. Added value of multiwavelength synergies for the mitigation of systematics 2016 S. Camera
I. Harrison
Anna Bonaldi
Michael D. Brown
+ PDF Chat MontePython 3: Boosted MCMC sampler and other features 2019 Thejs Brinckmann
Julien Lesgourgues
+ PDF Chat <i>Euclid</i> preparation 2020 Alain Blanchard
S. Camera
C. Carbone
V. F. Cardone
Santiago Casas
Sébastien Clesse
S. Ilić
M. Kilbinger
T. Kitching
M. Kunz
+ PDF Chat Testing KiDS cross-correlation redshifts with simulations 2020 Jan Luca van den Busch
H. Hildebrandt
Angus H. Wright
Christopher Morrison
Chris Blake
Benjamin Joachimi
T. Erben
Catherine Heymans
Konrad Kuijken
Edward N. Taylor