Calling for a National Model Benchmarking Facility

Type: Preprint

Publication Date: 2023-04-14

Citations: 1

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31223/x5195q

Abstract

The modern world uses predictive computer models for many important purposes, including weather predictions, epidemic management, flood forecasting and warnings, and economic policymaking. We need to know how much we can trust the projections of these models, not only to achieve more accurate projections for systems, but also to undertake scientific learning about systems by incrementally testing hypotheses using models. But we routinely fail to adequately benchmark the performance of our complicated models of systems due to the cost and complexity of the task and owing to social and institutional barriers. Decades of lessons learned from Model Intercomparison Projects (MIPs) and similar community modeling efforts have yielded understanding of both the challenge and the opportunity facing 21st century model benchmarking efforts. To implement this understanding at scale, we call for the establishment of a major national research facility for scientific computer model benchmarking. Such a facility would institutionalize and properly resource the technically challenging and laborious work of computer model benchmarking, thereby establishing a firm foundation for 21st century science and prediction. This facility would advance basic science, overcome many of the social barriers to benchmarking, and would improve projections and decisions.

Locations

  • EarthArXiv (California Digital Library) - View - PDF

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat DataStorm-EM: Exploration of Alternative Timelines within Continuous-Coupled Simulation Ensembles 2024 Fahim Tasneema Azad
J. Antón
Shubhodeep Mitra
Fateh Singh
Hans Walter Behrens
Mao‐Lin Li
Bilgehan Arslan
K. Selçuk Candan
Maria Luisa Sapino
+ Technical Group Report: Model Fitness-for-Purpose Assessment Report 2020 Itamar Megiddo
+ PDF Chat Democratizing Uncertainty Quantification 2024 Linus Seelinger
Anne Reinarz
Mikkel B. Lykkegaard
Amal Alghamdi
David Aristoff
Wolfgang Bangerth
Jean Bénézech
Matteo Diez
Kurt Frey
John Jakeman
+ PDF Chat Recommendations for Comprehensive and Independent Evaluation of Machine Learning-Based Earth System Models 2024 Paul Ullrich
Elizabeth A. Barnes
William D. Collins
Katherine Dagon
Shiheng Duan
Joe D. Elms
Jiwoo Lee
L. Ruby Leung
Dan Lu
María J. Molina
+ PDF Chat Addressing Model Data Archiving Needs for the Department of Energy’s Environmental Systems Science Community 2020 Maegen Simmonds
W. J. Riley
Shreyas Cholia
Charuleka Varadharajan
+ PDF Chat Modeling and simulation of large-scale systems: A systematic comparison of modeling paradigms 2019 Gerald Schweiger
Henrik Nilsson
Josef Schoeggl
Wolfgang Birk
Alfred Posch
+ When do we need multiple infectious disease models? Agreement between projection rank and magnitude in a multi-model setting 2024 La Keisha Wade-Malone
Emily Howerton
William J. M. Probert
Michael C. Runge
Cécile Viboud
Katriona Shea
+ PDF Chat Toward a Cohesive AI and Simulation Software Ecosystem for Scientific Innovation 2024 Michael A. Heroux
Sameer Shende
Lois Curfman McInnes
Todd Gamblin
James Willenbring
+ Next-Generation Earth System Models: Towards Reliable Hybrid Models for Weather and Climate Applications 2023 Tom Beucler
Erwan Koch
Sven Kotlarski
David Leutwyler
Adrien Michel
Jonathan Koh
+ Model Validation, Science, and Application 2000 P. J. H. Builtjes
Andrèa I. Flossmann
+ PDF Chat The Future of Forecasting Competitions: Design Attributes and Principles 2021 Spyros Makridakis
Chris Fry
Fotios Petropoulos
Evangelos Spiliotis
+ Modeling and Simulation: the vital role of biocurated models 2014 Anastasia Chasapi
Anne Niknejad
Julien Dorier
Isaac Crespo
Aurélien Naldi
Alan Bridge
Mark Ibberson
Ioannis Xénarios
+ Simulation Intelligence: Towards a New Generation of Scientific Methods 2021 Alexander Lavin
David C. Krakauer
Héctor Zenil
Justin Gottschlich
Tim Mattson
Johann Brehmer
Anima Anandkumar
Sanjay Choudry
Kamil Rocki
Atılım Güneş Baydin
+ Opportunities and Challenges in Developing COVID-19 Simulation Models: Lessons from Six Funded Projects 2021 Philippe J. Giabbanelli
Jennifer Badham
Brian Castellani
Hamdi Kavak
Vijay Mago
Ashkan Negahban
Samarth Swarup
+ PDF Chat Performance Analysis of Sequential Experimental Design for Calibration in Parallel Computing Environments 2024 Özge Sürer
Stefan M. Wild
+ Climate Impact Modelling Framework 2022 B. Edwards
Paolo Fraccaro
N. Stoyanov
Nelson Bore
Julian Kuehnert
Kommy Weldemariam
Anne Jones
+ How is model-related uncertainty quantified and reported in different disciplines? 2022 Emily G. Simmonds
Kwaku Peprah Adjei
Christoffer Wold Andersen
Janne Cathrin Hetle Aspheim
Claudia Battistin
Nicola Bulso
Hannah Christensen
Benjamin Cretois
Ryan John Cubero
Ivan A. Davidovich
+ The Zoltar forecast archive: a tool to facilitate standardization and storage of interdisciplinary prediction research 2020 Reich Ng
Matthew Cornell
Ray El
Katie House
Le K
+ PDF Chat LFRic: Meeting the challenges of scalability and performance portability in Weather and Climate models 2019 Samantha V. Adams
Rupert Ford
M. Hambley
J. M. Hobson
Iva Kavčič
Christopher Maynard
Thomas Melvin
Eike H. Müller
Steven Mullerworth
Andrew Porter
+ VECMAtk: a scalable verification, validation and uncertainty quantification toolkit for scientific simulations 2021 Derek Groen
Hamid Arabnejad
Vytautas Jancauskas
Wouter Edeling
Fredrik Jansson
Robin A. Richardson
Jalal Lakhlili
Lourens Veen
Bartosz Bosak
Piotr Kopta

Works That Cite This (0)

Action Title Year Authors