Definable groups in models of Presburger Arithmetic and G^{00}

Type: Preprint
Publication Date: 2016-01-01
Citations: 1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1612.09042

Abstract

This paper is devoted to understand groups definable in Presburger arithmetic. We prove the following theorems: Theorem 1. Every group definable in a model of Presburger Arithmetic is abelian-by-finite. Theorem 2. Every bounded group definable in a model (Z,+,<) of Presburger Arithmetic is definably isomorphic to (Z, +)^{n} mod out by a lattice.

Locations

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • DataCite API

Ask a Question About This Paper

Summary

Login to see paper summary

This paper is devoted to understand groups definable in Presburger arithmetic. We prove the following theorems: Theorem 1. Every group definable in a model of Presburger Arithmetic is abelian-by-finite. Theorem … This paper is devoted to understand groups definable in Presburger arithmetic. We prove the following theorems: Theorem 1. Every group definable in a model of Presburger Arithmetic is abelian-by-finite. Theorem 2. Every bounded group definable in a model (Z,+,<) of Presburger Arithmetic is definably isomorphic to (Z, +)^{n} mod out by a lattice.
Here we give a complete list of the groups definable in Presburger arithmetic up to a finite index subgroup. Here we give a complete list of the groups definable in Presburger arithmetic up to a finite index subgroup.
We prove that any linear order definable in the standard model (Z, <, +) of Presburger arithmetic is (Z, <, +)-definably embeddable into the lexicographic ordering on Z^n, for some … We prove that any linear order definable in the standard model (Z, <, +) of Presburger arithmetic is (Z, <, +)-definably embeddable into the lexicographic ordering on Z^n, for some n.
We determine all groups definable in Presburger arithmetic, up to a finite index subgroup. We determine all groups definable in Presburger arithmetic, up to a finite index subgroup.
We entirely classify definable sets up to definable bijections in Z-groups, where the language is the one of ordered abelian groups. From this, we deduce, among others, a classification of … We entirely classify definable sets up to definable bijections in Z-groups, where the language is the one of ordered abelian groups. From this, we deduce, among others, a classification of definable families of bounded definable sets.
We show that if a first-order structure $\mathcal{M}$, with universe $\mathbb{Z}$, is an expansion of $(\mathbb{Z},+,0)$ and a reduct of $(\mathbb{Z},+,<,0)$, then $\mathcal{M}$ must be interdefinable with $(\mathbb{Z},+,0)$ or $(\mathbb{Z},+,<,0)$. We show that if a first-order structure $\mathcal{M}$, with universe $\mathbb{Z}$, is an expansion of $(\mathbb{Z},+,0)$ and a reduct of $(\mathbb{Z},+,<,0)$, then $\mathcal{M}$ must be interdefinable with $(\mathbb{Z},+,0)$ or $(\mathbb{Z},+,<,0)$.
We show that if a first-order structure $\mathcal{M}$, with universe $\mathbb{Z}$, is an expansion of $(\mathbb{Z},+,0)$ and a reduct of $(\mathbb{Z},+,<,0)$, then $\mathcal{M}$ must be interdefinable with $(\mathbb{Z},+,0)$ or $(\mathbb{Z},+,<,0)$. We show that if a first-order structure $\mathcal{M}$, with universe $\mathbb{Z}$, is an expansion of $(\mathbb{Z},+,0)$ and a reduct of $(\mathbb{Z},+,<,0)$, then $\mathcal{M}$ must be interdefinable with $(\mathbb{Z},+,0)$ or $(\mathbb{Z},+,<,0)$.
Abstract We show that if a first-order structure ${\cal M}$ , with universe ℤ, is an expansion of (ℤ,+,0) and a reduct of (ℤ,+,&lt;,0), then ${\cal M}$ must be interdefinable … Abstract We show that if a first-order structure ${\cal M}$ , with universe ℤ, is an expansion of (ℤ,+,0) and a reduct of (ℤ,+,&lt;,0), then ${\cal M}$ must be interdefinable with (ℤ ,+,0) or (ℤ ,+,&lt;,0).
Abstract We prove a cell decomposition theorem for Presburger sets and introduce a dimension theory for Z-groups with the Presburger structure. Using the cell decomposition theorem we obtain a full … Abstract We prove a cell decomposition theorem for Presburger sets and introduce a dimension theory for Z-groups with the Presburger structure. Using the cell decomposition theorem we obtain a full classification of Presburger sets up to definable bijection. We also exhibit a tight connection between the definable sets in an arbitrary p-minimal field and Presburger sets in its value group. We give a negative result about expansions of Presburger structures and prove uniform elimination of imaginaries for Presburger structures within the Presburger language.
We prove a cell decomposition theorem for Presburger sets and introduce a dimension theory for Z-groups with the Presburger structure. Using the cell decomposition theorem we obtain a full classification … We prove a cell decomposition theorem for Presburger sets and introduce a dimension theory for Z-groups with the Presburger structure. Using the cell decomposition theorem we obtain a full classification of Presburger sets up to definable bijection. We also exhibit a tight connection between the definable sets in an arbitrary p-minimal field and Presburger sets in its value group. We give a negative result about expansions of Presburger structures and prove uniform elimination of imaginaries for Presburger structures within the Presburger language.
Let $G$ be a model of Presburger arithmetic. Let $\mathcal{L}$ be an expansion of the language of Presburger $\mathcal{L}_{Pres}$. In this paper we prove that the $\mathcal{L}$-theory of $G$ is … Let $G$ be a model of Presburger arithmetic. Let $\mathcal{L}$ be an expansion of the language of Presburger $\mathcal{L}_{Pres}$. In this paper we prove that the $\mathcal{L}$-theory of $G$ is $\mathcal{L}_{Pres}$-minimal iff it has the exchange property and any bounded definable set has a maximum.
We define a class of pre-ordered abelian groups that we call finite-by-Presburger groups, and prove that their theory is model-complete. We show that certain quotients of the multiplicative group of … We define a class of pre-ordered abelian groups that we call finite-by-Presburger groups, and prove that their theory is model-complete. We show that certain quotients of the multiplicative group of a local field of characteristic zero are finite-by-Presburger and interpret the higher residue rings of the local field. We apply these results to give a new proof of the model completeness in the ring language of a local field of characteristic zero (a result that follows also from work of Prestel-Roquette).
Let $G$ be a multiplicative subgroup of $\mathbb{Q}_p$. In this paper, we describe the theory of the pair $(\mathbb{Q}_p, G)$ under the condition that $G$ satisfies Mann property and is … Let $G$ be a multiplicative subgroup of $\mathbb{Q}_p$. In this paper, we describe the theory of the pair $(\mathbb{Q}_p, G)$ under the condition that $G$ satisfies Mann property and is small as subset of a first-order structure. First, we give an axiomatisation of the first-order theory of this structure. This includes an axiomatisation of the theory of the group $G$ as valued group (with the valuation induced on $G$ by the $p$-adic valuation). If the subgroups $G^{[n]}$ of $G$ have finite index for all $n$, we describe the definable sets in this theory and prove that it is NIP. Finally, we extend some of our results to the subanalytic setting.
Abstract Let G be a model of Presburger arithmetic. Let be an expansion of the language of Presburger . In this paper, we prove that the ‐theory of G is … Abstract Let G be a model of Presburger arithmetic. Let be an expansion of the language of Presburger . In this paper, we prove that the ‐theory of G is ‐minimal iff it has the exchange property and is definably complete (i.e., any bounded definable set has a maximum). If the ‐theory of G has the exchange property but is not definably complete, there is a proper definable convex subgroup H . Assuming that the induced theories on H and are definable complete and o ‐minimal respectively, we prove that any definable set of G is ‐definable.
Suppose $N$ is elementarily equivalent to an archimedean ordered abelian group $(G,+,<)$ with small quotients (for all $1 \leq n < \omega$, $[G: nG]$ is finite). Then every stable reduct … Suppose $N$ is elementarily equivalent to an archimedean ordered abelian group $(G,+,<)$ with small quotients (for all $1 \leq n < \omega$, $[G: nG]$ is finite). Then every stable reduct of $N$ which expands $(G,+)$ (equivalently every reduct that does not add new unary definable sets) is interdefinable with $(G,+)$. This extends previous results on stable reducts of $(\mathbb{Z}, +, <)$ to (stable) reducts of elementary extensions of $\mathbb{Z}$. In particular this holds for $G = \mathbb{Z}$ and $G = \mathbb{Q}$. As a result we answer a question of Conant from 2018.
We prove that any left-ordered inp-minimal group is abelian, and we provide an example of a non-abelian left-ordered group of dp-rank 2. We prove that any left-ordered inp-minimal group is abelian, and we provide an example of a non-abelian left-ordered group of dp-rank 2.