SU\G(𝔸)/K·U
Sign Up for free Log In

Online Weighted Matching with a Sample

Authors

Haim Kaplan, David Naori, Danny Raz
Type: Book-Chapter
Publication Date: 2022-01-01
Citations: 9
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611977073.52

Abstract

Previous chapter Next chapter Full AccessProceedings Proceedings of the 2022 Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA)Online Weighted Matching with a SampleHaim Kaplan, David Naori, and Danny RazHaim Kaplan, David Naori, and Danny Razpp.1247 - 1272Chapter DOI:https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611977073.52PDFBibTexSections ToolsAdd to favoritesExport CitationTrack CitationsEmail SectionsAboutAbstract We study the greedy-based online algorithm for edge-weighted matching with (one-sided) vertex arrivals in bipartite graphs, and edge arrivals in general graphs. This algorithm was first studied more than a decade ago by Korula and Pál for the bipartite case in the random-order model. While the weighted bipartite matching problem is solved in the random-order model, this is not the case in recent and exciting online models in which the online player is provided with a sample, and the arrival order is adversarial. The greedy-based algorithm is arguably the most natural and practical algorithm to be applied in these models. Despite its simplicity and appeal, and despite being studied in multiple works, the greedy-based algorithm was not fully understood in any of the studied online models, and its actual performance remained an open question for more than a decade. We provide a thorough analysis of the greedy-based algorithm in several online models. For vertex arrivals in bipartite graphs, we characterize the exact competitive-ratio of this algorithm in the random-order model, for any arrival order of the vertices subsequent to the sampling phase (adversarial and random orders in particular). We use it to derive tight analysis in the recent adversarial-order model with a sample (AOS model) for any sample size, providing the first result in this model beyond the simple secretary problem. Then, we generalize and strengthen the black box method of converting results in the random-order model to single-sample prophet inequalities, and use it to derive the state-of-the-art single-sample prophet inequality for the problem. Finally, we use our new techniques to analyze the greedy-based algorithm for edge arrivals in general graphs and derive results in all the mentioned online models. In this case as well, we improve upon the state-of-the-art single-sample prophet inequality. Previous chapter Next chapter RelatedDetails Published:2022eISBN:978-1-61197-707-3 https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611977073Book Series Name:ProceedingsBook Code:PRDA22Book Pages:xvii + 3771

Locations

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
    View PDF
  • Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks
    View

Ask a Question About This Paper

Summary

Login to see paper summary

Similar Works

Online Weighted Matching with a Sample

2021-04-12
Haim Kaplan , David Naori , Danny Raz
We study the greedy-based online algorithm for edge-weighted matching with (one-sided) vertex arrivals in bipartite graphs, and edge arrivals in general graphs. This algorithm was first studied more than a … We study the greedy-based online algorithm for edge-weighted matching with (one-sided) vertex arrivals in bipartite graphs, and edge arrivals in general graphs. This algorithm was first studied more than a decade ago by Korula and Pal for the bipartite case in the random-order model. While the weighted bipartite matching problem is solved in the random-order model, this is not the case in recent and exciting online models in which the online player is provided with a sample, and the arrival order is adversarial. The greedy-based algorithm is arguably the most natural and practical algorithm to be applied in these models. Despite its simplicity and appeal, and despite being studied in multiple works, the greedy-based algorithm was not fully understood in any of the studied online models, and its actual performance remained an open question for more than a decade. We provide a thorough analysis of the greedy-based algorithm in several online models. For vertex arrivals in bipartite graphs, we characterize the exact competitive-ratio of this algorithm in the random-order model, for any arrival order of the vertices subsequent to the sampling phase (adversarial and random orders in particular). We use it to derive tight analysis in the recent adversarial-order model with a sample (AOS model) for any sample size, providing the first result in this model beyond the simple secretary problem. Then, we generalize and strengthen the black box method of converting results in the random-order model to single-sample prophet inequalities, and use it to derive the state-of-the-art single-sample prophet inequality for the problem. Finally, we use our new techniques to analyze the greedy-based algorithm for edge arrivals in general graphs and derive results in all the mentioned online models. In this case as well, we improve upon the state-of-the-art single-sample prophet inequality.

Online Weighted Matching with a Sample

2021-01-01
Haim Kaplan , David Naori , Danny Raz
We study the greedy-based online algorithm for edge-weighted matching with (one-sided) vertex arrivals in bipartite graphs, and edge arrivals in general graphs. This algorithm was first studied more than a … We study the greedy-based online algorithm for edge-weighted matching with (one-sided) vertex arrivals in bipartite graphs, and edge arrivals in general graphs. This algorithm was first studied more than a decade ago by Korula and P\'al for the bipartite case in the random-order model. While the weighted bipartite matching problem is solved in the random-order model, this is not the case in recent and exciting online models in which the online player is provided with a sample, and the arrival order is adversarial. The greedy-based algorithm is arguably the most natural and practical algorithm to be applied in these models. Despite its simplicity and appeal, and despite being studied in multiple works, the greedy-based algorithm was not fully understood in any of the studied online models, and its actual performance remained an open question for more than a decade. We provide a thorough analysis of the greedy-based algorithm in several online models. For vertex arrivals in bipartite graphs, we characterize the exact competitive-ratio of this algorithm in the random-order model, for any arrival order of the vertices subsequent to the sampling phase (adversarial and random orders in particular). We use it to derive tight analysis in the recent adversarial-order model with a sample (AOS model) for any sample size, providing the first result in this model beyond the simple secretary problem. Then, we generalize and strengthen the black box method of converting results in the random-order model to single-sample prophet inequalities, and use it to derive the state-of-the-art single-sample prophet inequality for the problem. Finally, we use our new techniques to analyze the greedy-based algorithm for edge arrivals in general graphs and derive results in all the mentioned online models. In this case as well, we improve upon the state-of-the-art single-sample prophet inequality.
Chat View PDF

Competitive Analysis with a Sample and the Secretary Problem

2019-12-23
Haim Kaplan , David Naori , Danny Raz
Previous chapter Next chapter Full AccessProceedings Proceedings of the 2020 ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA)Competitive Analysis with a Sample and the Secretary ProblemHaim Kaplan, David Naori, and Danny RazHaim … Previous chapter Next chapter Full AccessProceedings Proceedings of the 2020 ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA)Competitive Analysis with a Sample and the Secretary ProblemHaim Kaplan, David Naori, and Danny RazHaim Kaplan, David Naori, and Danny Razpp.2082 - 2095Chapter DOI:https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611975994.128PDFBibTexSections ToolsAdd to favoritesExport CitationTrack CitationsEmail SectionsAboutAbstract We extend the standard online worst-case model to accommodate past experience which is available to the online player in many practical scenarios. We do this by revealing a random sample of the adversarial input to the online player ahead of time. The online player competes with the expected optimal value on the part of the input that arrives online. Our model bridges between existing online stochastic models (e.g., items are drawn i.i.d. from a distribution) and the online worst-case model. We also extend in a similar manner (by revealing a sample) the online random-order model. We study the classical secretary problem in our new models. In the worst-case model we present a simple online algorithm with optimal competitive-ratio for any sample size. In the random-order model, we also give a simple online algorithm with an almost tight competitive-ratio for small sample sizes. Interestingly, we prove that for a large enough sample, no algorithm can be simultaneously optimal both in the worst-cast and random-order models. Previous chapter Next chapter RelatedDetails Published:2020eISBN:978-1-61197-599-4 https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611975994Book Series Name:ProceedingsBook Code:PRDA20Book Pages:xxii + 3011
Chat View PDF

Single-Sample Prophet Inequalities via Greedy-Ordered Selection

2022-01-01
Constantine Caramanis , Paul Dütting , Matthew Faw +6 more
Previous chapter Next chapter Full AccessProceedings Proceedings of the 2022 Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA)Single-Sample Prophet Inequalities via Greedy-Ordered SelectionConstantine Caramanis, Paul Dütting, Matthew Faw, Federico Fusco, Philip … Previous chapter Next chapter Full AccessProceedings Proceedings of the 2022 Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA)Single-Sample Prophet Inequalities via Greedy-Ordered SelectionConstantine Caramanis, Paul Dütting, Matthew Faw, Federico Fusco, Philip Lazos, Stefano Leonardi, Orestis Papadigenopoulos, Emmanouil Pountourakis, and Rebecca ReiffenhäuserConstantine Caramanis, Paul Dütting, Matthew Faw, Federico Fusco, Philip Lazos, Stefano Leonardi, Orestis Papadigenopoulos, Emmanouil Pountourakis, and Rebecca Reiffenhäuserpp.1298 - 1325Chapter DOI:https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611977073.54PDFBibTexSections ToolsAdd to favoritesExport CitationTrack CitationsEmail SectionsAboutAbstract We study single-sample prophet inequalities (SSPIs), i.e., prophet inequalities where only a single sample from each prior distribution is available. Besides a direct, and optimal, SSPI for the basic single choice problem [Rubinstein et al., 2020], most existing SSPI results were obtained via an elegant, but inherently lossy reduction to order-oblivious secretary (OOS) policies [Azar et al., 2014]. Motivated by this discrepancy, we develop an intuitive and versatile greedy-based technique that yields SSPIs directly rather than through the reduction to OOSs. Our results can be seen as generalizing and unifying a number of existing results in the area of prophet and secretary problems. Our algorithms significantly improve on the competitive guarantees for a number of interesting scenarios (including general matching with edge arrivals, bipartite matching with vertex arrivals, and certain matroids), and capture new settings (such as budget additive combinatorial auctions). Complementing our algorithmic results, we also consider mechanism design variants. Finally, we analyze the power and limitations of different SSPI approaches by providing a partial converse to the reduction from SSPI to OOS given by Azar et al. Previous chapter Next chapter RelatedDetails Published:2022eISBN:978-1-61197-707-3 https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611977073Book Series Name:ProceedingsBook Code:PRDA22Book Pages:xvii + 3771
Chat View PDF

Online Weighted Bipartite Matching with a Sample.

2021-04-12
Haim Kaplan , David Naori , Danny Raz
We study the classical online bipartite matching problem: One side of the graph is known and vertices of the other side arrive online. It is well known that when the … We study the classical online bipartite matching problem: One side of the graph is known and vertices of the other side arrive online. It is well known that when the graph is edge-weighted, and vertices arrive in an adversarial order, no online algorithm has a nontrivial competitive-ratio. To bypass this hurdle we modify the rules such that the adversary still picks the graph but has to reveal a random part (say half) of it to the player. The remaining part is given to the player in an adversarial order. This models practical scenarios in which the online algorithm has some history to learn from. This way of modeling a history was formalized recently by the authors (SODA 20) and was called the AOS model (for Adversarial Online with a Sample). It allows developing online algorithms for the secretary problem that compete even when the secretaries arrive in an adversarial order. Here we use the same model to attack the much more challenging matching problem. We analyze a natural algorithmic framework that decides how to match an arriving vertex $v$ by applying an offline matching algorithm to $v$ and the sample. We get roughly $1/4$ of the maximum weight by applying the offline greedy matching algorithm to the sample and $v$. Our analysis ties the performance of this algorithm to the performance of the offline greedy matching on the online part and we also prove that it is tight. Surprisingly, when replacing greedy with an optimal algorithm for maximum matching, no constant competitive-ratio can be guaranteed when the size of the sample is comparable to the size of the online part. However, when the sample is quadratic in the size of the online part, we do get a competitive-ratio of $1/e$.
Chat View PDF

Prophet Inequalities for Matching with a Single Sample

2021-01-01
Paul Dütting , Federico Fusco , Philip Lazos +2 more
We consider the prophet inequality problem for (not necessarily bipartite) matching problems with independent edge values, under both edge arrivals and vertex arrivals. We show constant-factor prophet inequalities for the … We consider the prophet inequality problem for (not necessarily bipartite) matching problems with independent edge values, under both edge arrivals and vertex arrivals. We show constant-factor prophet inequalities for the case where the online algorithm has only limited access to the value distributions through samples. First, we give a $16$-approximate prophet inequality for matching in general graphs under edge arrivals that uses only a single sample from each value distribution as prior information. Then, for bipartite matching and (one-sided) vertex arrivals, we show an improved bound of $8$ that also uses just a single sample from each distribution. Finally, we show how to turn our $16$-approximate single-sample prophet inequality into a truthful single-sample mechanism for online bipartite matching with vertex arrivals.
Chat View PDF

Prophet Inequalities for Matching with a Single Sample.

2021-04-05
Paul Dütting , Federico Fusco , Philip Lazos +2 more
We consider the prophet inequality problem for (not necessarily bipartite) matching problems with independent edge values, under both edge arrivals and vertex arrivals. We show constant-factor prophet inequalities for the … We consider the prophet inequality problem for (not necessarily bipartite) matching problems with independent edge values, under both edge arrivals and vertex arrivals. We show constant-factor prophet inequalities for the case where the online algorithm has only limited access to the value distributions through samples. First, we give a $16$-approximate prophet inequality for matching in general graphs under edge arrivals that uses only a single sample from each value distribution as prior information. Then, for bipartite matching and (one-sided) vertex arrivals, we show an improved bound of $8$ that also uses just a single sample from each distribution. Finally, we show how to turn our $16$-approximate single-sample prophet inequality into a truthful single-sample mechanism for online bipartite matching with vertex arrivals.
Chat View PDF

Class Fairness in Online Matching

2022-01-01
Seyed Hossein Hosseini , Zhiyi Huang , Ayumi Igarashi +1 more
In the classical version of online bipartite matching, there is a given set of offline vertices (aka agents) and another set of vertices (aka items) that arrive online. When each … In the classical version of online bipartite matching, there is a given set of offline vertices (aka agents) and another set of vertices (aka items) that arrive online. When each item arrives, its incident edges -- the agents who like the item -- are revealed and the algorithm must irrevocably match the item to such agents. We initiate the study of class fairness in this setting, where agents are partitioned into a set of classes and the matching is required to be fair with respect to the classes. We adopt popular fairness notions from the fair division literature such as envy-freeness (up to one item), proportionality, and maximin share fairness to our setting. Our class versions of these notions demand that all classes, regardless of their sizes, receive a fair treatment. We study deterministic and randomized algorithms for matching indivisible items (leading to integral matchings) and for matching divisible items (leading to fractional matchings). We design and analyze three novel algorithms. For matching indivisible items, we propose an adaptive-priority-based algorithm, MATCH-AND-SHIFT, prove that it achieves 1/2-approximation of both class envy-freeness up to one item and class maximin share fairness, and show that each guarantee is tight. For matching divisible items, we design a water-filling-based algorithm, EQUAL-FILLING, that achieves (1-1/e)-approximation of class envy-freeness and class proportionality; we prove (1-1/e) to be tight for class proportionality and establish a 3/4 upper bound on class envy-freeness. Finally, we build upon EQUAL-FILLING to design a randomized algorithm for matching indivisible items, EQAUL-FILLING-OCS, which achieves 0.593-approximation of class proportionality. The algorithm and its analysis crucially leverage the recently introduced technique of online correlated selection (OCS) [Fahrbach et al., 2020].
Chat View PDF

Improved Guarantees for Offline Stochastic Matching via new Ordered Contention Resolution Schemes

2021-01-01
Brian Brubach , Nathaniel Grammel , Will Ma +1 more
Matching is one of the most fundamental and broadly applicable problems across many domains. In these diverse real-world applications, there is often a degree of uncertainty in the input which … Matching is one of the most fundamental and broadly applicable problems across many domains. In these diverse real-world applications, there is often a degree of uncertainty in the input which has led to the study of stochastic matching models. Here, each edge in the graph has a known, independent probability of existing derived from some prediction. Algorithms must probe edges to determine existence and match them irrevocably if they exist. Further, each vertex may have a patience constraint denoting how many of its neighboring edges can be probed. We present new ordered contention resolution schemes yielding improved approximation guarantees for some of the foundational problems studied in this area. For stochastic matching with patience constraints in general graphs, we provide a 0.382-approximate algorithm, significantly improving over the previous best 0.31-approximation of Baveja et al. (2018). When the vertices do not have patience constraints, we describe a 0.432-approximate random order probing algorithm with several corollaries such as an improved guarantee for the Prophet Secretary problem under Edge Arrivals. Finally, for the special case of bipartite graphs with unit patience constraints on one of the partitions, we show a 0.632-approximate algorithm that improves on the recent $1/3$-guarantee of Hikima et al. (2021).
Chat View PDF

The Power of Multiple Choices in Online Stochastic Matching

2022-01-01
Zhiyi Huang , Xinkai Shu , Shuyi Yan
We study the power of multiple choices in online stochastic matching. Despite a long line of research, existing algorithms still only consider two choices of offline neighbors for each online … We study the power of multiple choices in online stochastic matching. Despite a long line of research, existing algorithms still only consider two choices of offline neighbors for each online vertex because of the technical challenge in analyzing multiple choices. This paper introduces two approaches for designing and analyzing algorithms that use multiple choices. For unweighted and vertex-weighted matching, we adopt the online correlated selection (OCS) technique into the stochastic setting, and improve the competitive ratios to $0.716$, from $0.711$ and $0.7$ respectively. For edge-weighted matching with free disposal, we propose the Top Half Sampling algorithm. We directly characterize the progress of the whole matching instead of individual vertices, through a differential inequality. This improves the competitive ratio to $0.706$, breaking the $1-\frac{1}{e}$ barrier in this setting for the first time in the literature. Finally, for the harder edge-weighted problem without free disposal, we prove that no algorithms can be $0.703$ competitive, separating this setting from the aforementioned three.
Chat View PDF

The power of multiple choices in online stochastic matching

2022-06-09
Zhiyi Huang , Xinkai Shu , Shuyi Yan
We study the power of multiple choices in online stochastic matching. Despite a long line of research, existing algorithms still only consider two choices of offline neighbors for each online … We study the power of multiple choices in online stochastic matching. Despite a long line of research, existing algorithms still only consider two choices of offline neighbors for each online vertex because of the technical challenge in analyzing multiple choices. This paper introduces two approaches for designing and analyzing algorithms that use multiple choices. For unweighted and vertex-weighted matching, we adopt the online correlated selection (OCS) technique into the stochastic setting, and improve the competitive ratios to 0.716, from 0.711 and 0.7 respectively. For edge-weighted matching with free disposal, we propose the Top Half Sampling algorithm. We directly characterize the progress of the whole matching instead of individual vertices, through a differential inequality. This improves the competitive ratio to 0.706, breaking the 1−1/e barrier in this setting for the first time in the literature. Finally, for the harder edge-weighted problem without free disposal, we prove that no algorithms can be 0.703 competitive, separating this setting from the aforementioned three.
Chat View PDF

Online Stochastic Max-Weight Bipartite Matching: Beyond Prophet Inequalities

2024-08-01
Christos H. Papadimitriou , Tristan Pollner , Amin Saberi +1 more
The rich literature on online Bayesian selection problems has long focused on so-called prophet inequalities, which compare the gain of an online algorithm to that of a “prophet” who knows … The rich literature on online Bayesian selection problems has long focused on so-called prophet inequalities, which compare the gain of an online algorithm to that of a “prophet” who knows the future. An equally natural, though significantly less well-studied, benchmark is the optimum online algorithm, which may be omnipotent (i.e., computationally unbounded), but not omniscient. What is the computational complexity of the optimum online? How well can a polynomial-time algorithm approximate it? Motivated by applications in ride hailing, we study the above questions for the online stochastic maximum-weight matching problem under vertex arrivals. For this problem, a number of [Formula: see text]-competitive algorithms are known. This is the best possible ratio for this problem, as it generalizes the original single-item prophet inequality problem. We present a polynomial-time algorithm, which approximates the optimal online algorithm within a factor of 0.51—strictly more than the best-possible constant against a prophet. In contrast, we show that it is PSPACE-hard to approximate this problem within some universal constant [Formula: see text]. Funding: Financial support from the National Science Foundation [Grants CCF1763970, CCF1812919, and CCF191070], the Office of Naval Research [Grant N000141912550], and Cisco Research is gratefully acknowledged.
Chat View PDF

Online Stochastic Max-Weight Matching: prophet inequality for vertex and edge arrival models

2020-01-01
Tomer Ezra , Michal Feldman , Nick Gravin +1 more
We provide prophet inequality algorithms for online weighted matching in general (non-bipartite) graphs, under two well-studied arrival models, namely edge arrival and vertex arrival. The weight of each edge is … We provide prophet inequality algorithms for online weighted matching in general (non-bipartite) graphs, under two well-studied arrival models, namely edge arrival and vertex arrival. The weight of each edge is drawn independently from an a-priori known probability distribution. Under edge arrival, the weight of each edge is revealed upon arrival, and the algorithm decides whether to include it in the matching or not. Under vertex arrival, the weights of all edges from the newly arriving vertex to all previously arrived vertices are revealed, and the algorithm decides which of these edges, if any, to include in the matching. To study these settings, we introduce a novel unified framework of batched prophet inequalities that captures online settings where elements arrive in batches; in particular it captures matching under the two aforementioned arrival models. Our algorithms rely on the construction of suitable online contention resolution scheme (OCRS). We first extend the framework of OCRS to batched-OCRS, we then establish a reduction from batched prophet inequality to batched OCRS, and finally we construct batched OCRSs with selectable ratios of 0.337 and 0.5 for edge and vertex arrival models, respectively. Both results improve the state of the art for the corresponding settings. For the vertex arrival, our result is tight. Interestingly, a pricing-based prophet inequality with comparable competitive ratios is unknown.
Chat View PDF

Online Stochastic Max-Weight Matching: prophet inequality for vertex and edge arrival models

2020-02-23
Tomer Ezra , Michal Feldman , Nick Gravin +1 more
We provide prophet inequality algorithms for online weighted matching in general (non-bipartite) graphs, under two well-studied arrival models, namely edge arrival and vertex arrival. The weight of each edge is … We provide prophet inequality algorithms for online weighted matching in general (non-bipartite) graphs, under two well-studied arrival models, namely edge arrival and vertex arrival. The weight of each edge is drawn independently from an a-priori known probability distribution. Under edge arrival, the weight of each edge is revealed upon arrival, and the algorithm decides whether to include it in the matching or not. Under vertex arrival, the weights of all edges from the newly arriving vertex to all previously arrived vertices are revealed, and the algorithm decides which of these edges, if any, to include in the matching. To study these settings, we introduce a novel unified framework of batched prophet inequalities that captures online settings where elements arrive in batches; in particular it captures matching under the two aforementioned arrival models. Our algorithms rely on the construction of suitable online contention resolution scheme (OCRS). We first extend the framework of OCRS to batched-OCRS, we then establish a reduction from batched prophet inequality to batched OCRS, and finally we construct batched OCRSs with selectable ratios of 0.337 and 0.5 for edge and vertex arrival models, respectively. Both results improve the state of the art for the corresponding settings. For the vertex arrival, our result is tight. Interestingly, a pricing-based prophet inequality with comparable competitive ratios is unknown.
Chat View PDF

Online Bipartite Matching in the Probe-Commit Model

2023-01-01
Allan Borodin , Calum MacRury
We consider the classical online bipartite matching problem in the probe-commit model. In this problem, when an online vertex arrives, its edges must be probed to determine if they exist, … We consider the classical online bipartite matching problem in the probe-commit model. In this problem, when an online vertex arrives, its edges must be probed to determine if they exist, based on known edge probabilities. A probing algorithm must respect commitment, meaning that if a probed edge exists, it must be used in the matching. Additionally, each online vertex has a patience constraint which limits the number of probes that can be made to an online vertex's adjacent edges. We introduce a new configuration linear program (LP) which we prove is a relaxation of an optimal offline probing algorithm. Using this LP, we establish the following competitive ratios which depend on the model used to generate the instance graph, and the arrival order of its online vertices: - In the worst-case instance model, an optimal $1/e$ ratio when the vertices arrive in uniformly at random (u.a.r.) order. - In the known independently distributed (i.d.) instance model, an optimal $1/2$ ratio when the vertices arrive in adversarial order, and a $1-1/e$ ratio when the vertices arrive in u.a.r. order. The latter two results improve upon the previous best competitive ratio of $0.46$ due to Brubach et al. (Algorithmica 2020), which only held in the more restricted known i.i.d. (independent and identically distributed) instance model. Our $1-1/e$-competitive algorithm matches the best known result for the prophet secretary matching problem due to Ehsani et al. (SODA 2018). Our algorithm is efficient and implies a $1-1/e$ approximation ratio for the special case when the graph is known. This is the offline stochastic matching problem, and we improve upon the $0.42$ approximation ratio for one-sided patience due to Pollner et al. (EC 2022), while also generalizing the $1-1/e$ approximation ratio for unbounded patience due to Gamlath et al. (SODA 2019).
Chat View PDF

Random-order Contention Resolution via Continuous Induction: Tightness for Bipartite Matching under Vertex Arrivals

2023-01-01
Calum MacRury , Will Ma
We introduce a new approach for designing Random-order Contention Resolution Schemes (RCRS) via exact solution in continuous time. Given a function $c(y):[0,1] \rightarrow [0,1]$, we show how to select each … We introduce a new approach for designing Random-order Contention Resolution Schemes (RCRS) via exact solution in continuous time. Given a function $c(y):[0,1] \rightarrow [0,1]$, we show how to select each element which arrives at time $y \in [0,1]$ with probability exactly $c(y)$. We provide a rigorous algorithmic framework for achieving this, which discretizes the time interval and also needs to sample its past execution to ensure these exact selection probabilities. We showcase our framework in the context of online contention resolution schemes for matching with random-order vertex arrivals. For bipartite graphs with two-sided arrivals, we design a $(1+e^{-2})/2 \approx 0.567$-selectable RCRS, which we also show to be tight. Next, we show that the presence of short odd-length cycles is the only barrier to attaining a (tight) $(1+e^{-2})/2$-selectable RCRS on general graphs. By generalizing our bipartite RCRS, we design an RCRS for graphs with odd-length girth $g$ which is $(1+e^{-2})/2$-selectable as $g \rightarrow \infty$. This convergence happens very rapidly: for triangle-free graphs (i.e., $g \ge 5$), we attain a $121/240 + 7/16 e^2 \approx 0.563$-selectable RCRS. Finally, for general graphs we improve on the $8/15 \approx 0.533$-selectable RCRS of Fu et al. (ICALP, 2021) and design an RCRS which is at least $0.535$-selectable. Due to the reduction of Ezra et al. (EC, 2020), our bounds yield a $0.535$-competitive (respectively, $(1+e^{-2})/2$-competitive) algorithm for prophet secretary matching on general (respectively, bipartite) graphs under vertex arrivals.
Chat View PDF

Weighted Matching in the Random-Order Streaming and Robust Communication Models

2024-08-27
Diba Hashemi , Weronika Wrzos-Kaminska
We study the maximum weight matching problem in the random-order semi-streaming model and in the robust communication model. Unlike many other sublinear models, in these two frameworks, there is a … We study the maximum weight matching problem in the random-order semi-streaming model and in the robust communication model. Unlike many other sublinear models, in these two frameworks, there is a large gap between the guarantees of the best known algorithms for the unweighted and weighted versions of the problem. In the random-order semi-streaming setting, the edges of an $n$-vertex graph arrive in a stream in a random order. The goal is to compute an approximate maximum weight matching with a single pass over the stream using $O(n\text{ polylog } n)$ space. Our main result is a $(2/3-\epsilon)$-approximation algorithm for maximum weight matching in random-order streams, using space $O(n \log n \log R)$, where $R$ is the ratio between the heaviest and the lightest edge in the graph. Our result nearly matches the best known unweighted $(2/3+\epsilon_0)$-approximation (where $\epsilon_0 \sim 10^{-14}$ is a small constant) achieved by Assadi and Behnezhad [ICALP 2021], and significantly improves upon previous weighted results. Our techniques also extend to the related robust communication model, in which the edges of a graph are partitioned randomly between Alice and Bob. Alice sends a single message of size $O(n\text{ polylog }n)$ to Bob, who must compute an approximate maximum weight matching. We achieve a $(5/6-\epsilon)$-approximation using $O(n \log n \log R)$ words of communication, matching the results of Azarmehr and Behnezhad [ICALP 2023] for unweighted graphs.
Chat View PDF

Online Stochastic Max-Weight Matching: Prophet Inequality for Vertex and Edge Arrival Models

2020-07-09
Tomer Ezra , Michal Feldman , Nick Gravin +1 more
We provide prophet inequality algorithms for online weighted matching in general (non-bipartite) graphs, under two well-studied arrival models, namely edge arrival and vertex arrival. The weight of each edge is … We provide prophet inequality algorithms for online weighted matching in general (non-bipartite) graphs, under two well-studied arrival models, namely edge arrival and vertex arrival. The weight of each edge is drawn independently from an a-priori known probability distribution. Under edge arrival, the weight of each edge is revealed upon arrival, and the algorithm decides whether to include it in the matching or not. Under vertex arrival, the weights of all edges from the newly arriving vertex to all previously arrived vertices are revealed, and the algorithm decides which of these edges, if any, to include in the matching. To study these settings, we introduce a novel unified framework of batched prophet inequalities that captures online settings where elements arrive in batches; in particular it captures matching under the two aforementioned arrival models. Our algorithms rely on the construction of suitable online contention resolution schemes (OCRS). We first extend the framework of OCRS to batched-OCRS, we then establish a reduction from batched prophet inequality to batched OCRS, and finally we construct batched OCRSs with selectable ratios of 0.337 and 0.5 for edge and vertex arrival models, respectively. Both results improve the state of the art for the corresponding settings. For vertex arrival, our result is tight. Interestingly, pricing-based prophet inequalities with comparable competitive ratios are unknown.
Chat View PDF

Online Stochastic Matching with Edge Arrivals

2019-01-01
Nick Gravin , Zhihao Gavin Tang , Kangning Wang
Online bipartite matching with edge arrivals remained a major open question for a long time until a recent negative result by [Gamlath et al. FOCS 2019], who showed that no … Online bipartite matching with edge arrivals remained a major open question for a long time until a recent negative result by [Gamlath et al. FOCS 2019], who showed that no online policy is better than the straightforward greedy algorithm, i.e., no online algorithm has a worst-case competitive ratio better than $0.5$. In this work, we consider the bipartite matching problem with edge arrivals in a natural stochastic framework, i.e., Bayesian setting where each edge of the graph is independently realized according to a known probability distribution. We focus on a natural class of prune & greedy online policies motivated by practical considerations from a multitude of online matching platforms. Any prune & greedy algorithm consists of two stages: first, it decreases the probabilities of some edges in the stochastic instance and then runs greedy algorithm on the pruned graph. We propose prune & greedy algorithms that are $0.552$-competitive on the instances that can be pruned to a $2$-regular stochastic bipartite graph, and $0.503$-competitive on arbitrary bipartite graphs. The algorithms and our analysis significantly deviate from the prior work. We first obtain analytically manageable lower bound on the size of the matching, which leads to a non linear optimization problem. We further reduce this problem to a continuous optimization with a constant number of parameters that can be solved using standard software tools.
Chat View PDF

On (Random-order) Online Contention Resolution Schemes for the Matching Polytope of (Bipartite) Graphs

2023-01-01
Calum MacRury , Will Ma , Nathaniel Grammel
We present new results for online contention resolution schemes for the matching polytope of graphs, in the random-order (RCRS) and adversarial (OCRS) arrival models. Our results include improved selectability guarantees … We present new results for online contention resolution schemes for the matching polytope of graphs, in the random-order (RCRS) and adversarial (OCRS) arrival models. Our results include improved selectability guarantees (i.e., lower bounds), as well as new impossibility results (i.e., upper bounds). By well-known reductions to the prophet (secretary) matching problem, a c-selectable OCRS (RCRS) implies a c-competitive algorithm for adversarial (random order) edge arrivals. Similar reductions are also known for the query-commit matching problem. For the adversarial arrival model, we present a new analysis of the OCRS of Ezra et al. (EC, 2020). We show that this scheme is 0.344-selectable for general graphs and 0.349-selectable for bipartite graphs, improving on the previous 0.337 selectability result for this algorithm. We also show that the selectability of this scheme cannot be greater than 0.361 for general graphs and 0.382 for bipartite graphs. We further show that no OCRS can achieve a selectability greater than 0.4 for general graphs, and 0.433 for bipartite graphs.For random-order arrivals, we present two attenuation-based schemes which use new attenuation functions. Our first RCRS is 0.474-selectable for general graphs, and our second is 0.476-selectable for bipartite graphs. These results improve upon the recent 0.45 (and 0.456) selectability results for general graphs (respectively, bipartite graphs) due to Pollner et al. (EC, 2022). On general graphs, our 0.474-selectable RCRS provides the best known positive result even for offline contention resolution, and also for the correlation gap. We conclude by proving a fundamental upper bound of 0.5 on the selectability of RCRS, using bipartite graphs.* The full version of the paper can be accessed at https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.07520
Chat View PDF

Cited by (6)

Prophet Inequalities Require Only a Constant Number of Samples

2024-06-10
Andrés Cristi , Bruno Ziliotto
In a prophet inequality problem, n independent random variables are presented to a gambler one by one. The gambler decides when to stop the sequence and obtains the most recent … In a prophet inequality problem, n independent random variables are presented to a gambler one by one. The gambler decides when to stop the sequence and obtains the most recent value as reward. We evaluate a stopping rule by the worst-case ratio between its expected reward and the expectation of the maximum variable. In the classic setting, the order is fixed, and the optimal ratio is known to be 1/2. Three variants of this problem have been extensively studied: the prophet-secretary model, where variables arrive in uniformly random order; the free-order model, where the gambler chooses the arrival order; and the i.i.d. model, where the distributions are all the same, rendering the arrival order irrelevant. Most of the literature assumes that distributions are known to the gambler. Recent work has considered the question of what is achievable when the gambler has access only to a few samples per distribution. Surprisingly, in the fixed-order case, a single sample from each distribution is enough to approximate the optimal ratio, but this is not the case in any of the three variants. We provide a unified proof that for all three variants of the problem, a constant number of samples (independent of n) for each distribution is good enough to approximate the optimal ratios. Prior to our work, this was known to be the case only in the i.i.d. variant. Previous works relied on explicitly constructing sample-based algorithms that match the best possible ratio. Remarkably, the optimal ratios for the prophet-secretary and the free-order variants with full information are still unknown. Consequently, our result requires a significantly different approach than for the classic problem and the i.i.d. variant, where the optimal ratios and the algorithms that achieve them are known. We complement our result showing that our algorithms can be implemented in polynomial time. A key ingredient in our proof is an existential result based on a minimax argument, which states that there must exist an algorithm that attains the optimal ratio and does not rely on the knowledge of the upper tail of the distributions. A second key ingredient is a refined sample-based version of a decomposition of the instance into "small" and "large" variables, first introduced by Liu et al. [EC'21]. The universality of our approach opens avenues for generalization to other sample-based models. Furthermore, we uncover structural properties that might help pinpoint the optimal ratios in the full-information cases.
Chat View PDF

Almost Tight Bounds for Online Facility Location in the Random-Order Model

2023-01-01
Haim Kaplan , David Naori , Danny Raz
We study the online facility location problem with uniform facility costs in the random-order model. Meyerson's algorithm [FOCS'01] is arguably the most natural and simple online algorithm for the problem … We study the online facility location problem with uniform facility costs in the random-order model. Meyerson's algorithm [FOCS'01] is arguably the most natural and simple online algorithm for the problem with several advantages and appealing properties. Its analysis in the random-order model is one of the cornerstones of random-order analysis beyond the secretary problem. Meyerson's algorithm was shown to be (asymptotically) optimal in the standard worst-case adversarial-order model and 8-competitive in the random order model. While this bound in the random-order model is the long-standing state-of-the-art, it is not known to be tight, and the true competitive-ratio of Meyerson's algorithm remained an open question for more than two decades.We resolve this question and prove tight bounds on the competitive-ratio of Meyerson's algorithm in the random-order model, showing that it is exactly 4-competitive. Following our tight analysis, we introduce a generic parameterized version of Meyerson's algorithm that retains all the advantages of the original version. We show that the best algorithm in this family is exactly 3-competitive. On the other hand, we show that no online algorithm for this problem can achieve a competitive-ratio better than 2. Finally, we prove that the algorithms in this family are robust to partial adversarial arrival orders.
Chat View PDF

Online Resource Allocation with Samples

2022-01-01
Negin Golrezaei , Patrick Jaillet , Zijie Zhou
We study an online resource allocation problem under uncertainty about demand and about the reward of each type of demand (agents) for the resource. Even though dealing with demand uncertainty … We study an online resource allocation problem under uncertainty about demand and about the reward of each type of demand (agents) for the resource. Even though dealing with demand uncertainty in resource allocation problems has been the topic of many papers in the literature, the challenge of not knowing rewards has been barely explored. The lack of knowledge about agents' rewards is inspired by the problem of allocating units of a new resource (e.g., newly developed vaccines or drugs) with unknown effectiveness/value. For such settings, we assume that we can \emph{test} the market before the allocation period starts. During the test period, we sample each agent in the market with probability $p$. We study how to optimally exploit the \emph{sample information} in our online resource allocation problem under adversarial arrival processes. We present an asymptotically optimal algorithm that achieves $1-\Theta(1/(p\sqrt{m}))$ competitive ratio, where $m$ is the number of available units of the resource. By characterizing an upper bound on the competitive ratio of any randomized and deterministic algorithm, we show that our competitive ratio of $1-\Theta(1/(p\sqrt{m}))$ is tight for any $p =\omega(1/\sqrt{m})$. That asymptotic optimality is possible with sample information highlights the significant advantage of running a test period for new resources. We demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed algorithm using a dataset that contains the number of COVID-19 related hospitalized patients across different age groups.
Chat View PDF

Prophet Inequalities Require Only a Constant Number of Samples

2023-01-01
Andrés Cristi , Bruno Ziliotto
In a prophet inequality problem, $n$ independent random variables are presented to a gambler one by one. The gambler decides when to stop the sequence and obtains the most recent … In a prophet inequality problem, $n$ independent random variables are presented to a gambler one by one. The gambler decides when to stop the sequence and obtains the most recent value as reward. We evaluate a stopping rule by the worst-case ratio between its expected reward and the expectation of the maximum variable. In the classic setting, the order is fixed, and the optimal ratio is known to be 1/2. Three variants of this problem have been extensively studied: the prophet-secretary model, where variables arrive in uniformly random order; the free-order model, where the gambler chooses the arrival order; and the i.i.d. model, where the distributions are all the same, rendering the arrival order irrelevant. Most of the literature assumes that distributions are known to the gambler. Recent work has considered the question of what is achievable when the gambler has access only to a few samples per distribution. Surprisingly, in the fixed-order case, a single sample from each distribution is enough to approximate the optimal ratio, but this is not the case in any of the three variants. We provide a unified proof that for all three variants of the problem, a constant number of samples (independent of n) for each distribution is good enough to approximate the optimal ratios. Prior to our work, this was known to be the case only in the i.i.d. variant. We complement our result showing that our algorithms can be implemented in polynomial time. A key ingredient in our proof is an existential result based on a minimax argument, which states that there must exist an algorithm that attains the optimal ratio and does not rely on the knowledge of the upper tail of the distributions. A second key ingredient is a refined sample-based version of a decomposition of the instance into "small" and "large" variables, first introduced by Liu et al. [EC'21].
Chat View PDF

Bayesian and Randomized Clock Auctions

2022-07-12
Michal Feldman , Vasilis Gkatzelis , Nick Gravin +1 more
In a single-parameter mechanism design problem, a provider is looking to sell some service to a group of potential buyers. Each buyer i has a private value vi for receiving … In a single-parameter mechanism design problem, a provider is looking to sell some service to a group of potential buyers. Each buyer i has a private value vi for receiving this service, and some feasibility constraint restricts which subsets of buyers can be served simultaneously. Recent work in economics introduced (deferred-acceptance) clock auctions as a superior class of auctions for this problem, due to their transparency, simplicity, and very strong incentive guarantees. Subsequent work in computer science focused on evaluating these auctions with respect to their social welfare approximation guarantees, leading to strong impossibility results: in the absence of prior information regarding the buyers' values, no deterministic clock auction can achieve a bounded approximation, even for simple feasibility constraints with only two maximal feasible sets.
Chat View PDF

Online Bin Packing with Predictions

2023-12-20
Spyros Angelopoulos , Shahin Kamali , Kimia Shadkami
Bin packing is a classic optimization problem with a wide range of applications, from load balancing to supply chain management. In this work, we study the online variant of the … Bin packing is a classic optimization problem with a wide range of applications, from load balancing to supply chain management. In this work, we study the online variant of the problem, in which a sequence of items of various sizes must be placed into a minimum number of bins of uniform capacity. The online algorithm is enhanced with a potentially erroneous prediction concerning the frequency of item sizes in the sequence. We design and analyze online algorithms with efficient tradeoffs between the consistency, which is the competitive ratio assuming no prediction error, and the robustness, which is the competitive ratio under adversarial error. Moreover, we demonstrate that the performance of our algorithm degrades near-optimally as a function of the prediction error. This is the first theoretical and experimental study of online bin packing under competitive analysis in the realistic setting of learnable predictions. Previous work addressed only extreme cases with respect to the prediction error and relied on overly powerful and error-free oracles.
Chat View PDF

References (0)