Quantifying the Poor Purity and Completeness of Morphological Samples Selected by Galaxy Colour

Type: Preprint

Publication Date: 2021-12-08

Citations: 0

View Chat PDF

Abstract

The galaxy population is strongly bimodal in both colour and morphology, and the two measures correlate strongly, with most blue galaxies being late-types (spirals) and most early-types, typically ellipticals, being red. This observation has led to the use of colour as a convenient selection criteria to make samples which are then labelled by morphology. Such use of colour as a proxy for morphology results in necessarily impure and incomplete samples. In this paper, we make use of the morphological labels produced by Galaxy Zoo to measure how incomplete and impure such samples are, considering optical (ugriz), NUV and NIR (JHK) bands. The best single colour optical selection is found using a threshold of g-r = 0.742, but this still results in a sample where only 56% of red galaxies are smooth and 56% of smooth galaxies are red. Use of the NUV gives some improvement over purely optical bands, particularly for late-types, but still results in low purity/completeness for early-types. No significant improvement is found by adding NIR bands. With any two bands, including NUV, a sample of early-types with greater than two-thirds purity cannot be constructed. Advances in quantitative galaxy morphologies have made colour-morphology proxy selections largely unnecessary going forward; where such assumptions are still required, we recommend studies carefully consider the implications of sample incompleteness/impurity.

Locations

  • arXiv (Cornell University) - View - PDF

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat Quantifying the Poor Purity and Completeness of Morphological Samples Selected by Galaxy Colour 2021 Rebecca Smethurst
Karen L. Masters
Brooke Simmons
Izzy L. Garland
Tobias GĂ©ron
Boris HĂ€ußler
Sandor Kruk
Chris Lintott
David O’Ryan
Mike Walmsley
+ PDF Chat Quantifying the poor purity and completeness of morphological samples selected by galaxy colour 2021 Rebecca Smethurst
Karen L. Masters
Brooke Simmons
Izzy L. Garland
Tobias GĂ©ron
Boris HĂ€ußler
Sandor Kruk
Chris Lintott
David O’Ryan
Mike Walmsley
+ Galaxy Zoo: the independence of morphology and colour 2008 S. P. Bamford
R. C. Nichol
I. K. Baldry
Kate Land
Chris Lintott
Kevin Schawinski
AnĆŸe Slosar
Alexander S. Szalay
D. Thomas
Mehri Torki
+ Measuring galaxy morphology at $z>1$. I - calibration of automated proxies 2014 Marc Huertas-Company
Anton M. Koekemoer
A. Raichoor
Nimish P. Hathi
S. Mei
R. W. O’Connell
R. Licitra
Rogier A. Windhorst
Seth H. Cohen
Sugata Kaviraj
+ How the spectral energy distribution and galaxy morphology constrain each other, with application to morphological selection using galaxy colours 2022 Emir Uzeirbegovic
Garreth Martin
Sugata Kaviraj
+ PDF Chat Galaxy colour, morphology and environment in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey 2007 Nicholas M. Ball
J. Loveday
Robert J. Brunner
+ PDF Chat Characterizing the optical properties of galaxy clusters with GMPhoRCC 2017 R. J. Hood
R. G. Mann
+ PDF Chat Galaxy Zoo 2: detailed morphological classifications for 304 122 galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey 2013 Kyle Willett
Chris Lintott
S. P. Bamford
Karen L. Masters
Brooke Simmons
Kevin Casteels
Edward M. Edmondson
L. Fortson
Sugata Kaviraj
William C. Keel
+ PDF Chat ProFuse: physical multiband structural decomposition of galaxies and the mass–size–age plane 2022 A. S. G. Robotham
Sabine Bellstedt
Simon P. Driver
+ PDF Chat Bulge plus disc and SĂ©rsic decomposition catalogues for 16 908 galaxies in the SDSS Stripe 82 co-adds: a detailed study of the<i>ugriz</i>structural measurements 2019 Connor Bottrell
Luc Simard
J. Trevor Mendel
Sara L. Ellison
+ PDF Chat Galaxy morphological classification in deep-wide surveys via unsupervised machine learning 2019 Garreth Martin
Sugata Kaviraj
Anne M. Hocking
S. Read
J. E. Geach
+ PDF Chat Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): Galaxy colour gradients versus colour, structure, and luminosity 2016 Rebecca Kennedy
S. P. Bamford
Boris HĂ€ußler
Sarah Brough
Benne W. Holwerda
Andrew Hopkins
Marina Vika
Benedetta Vulcani
+ PDF Chat An extended catalogue of galaxy morphology using deep learning in southern photometric local universe survey data release 3 2023 C. R. Bom
A. Cortesi
Ulysses Ribeiro
Luciana Olivia Dias
Kshitija Kelkar
A. V. Smith Castelli
L. Santana-Silva
V. H. Lopes-Silva
Thiago S. Gonçalves
L. Raul Abramo
+ PDF Chat Morpho-z: improving photometric redshifts with galaxy morphology 2017 John Y. H. Soo
Bruno Moraes
Benjamin Joachimi
William G. Hartley
O. Lahav
A. Charbonnier
Martı́n Makler
M. E. S. Pereira
Johan Comparat
T. Erben
+ PDF Chat Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey<sup>★</sup> 2008 Chris Lintott
Kevin Schawinski
AnĆŸe Slosar
Kate Land
S. P. Bamford
D. Thomas
M. Jordan Raddick
R. C. Nichol
Alexander S. Szalay
Dan Andreescu
+ PDF Chat A New Nonparametric Approach to Galaxy Morphological Classification 2004 Jennifer M. Lotz
Joel R. Primack
Piero Madau
+ PDF Chat Galaxy Zoo 1: data release of morphological classifications for nearly 900 000 galaxies★ 2010 Chris Lintott
Kevin Schawinski
S. P. Bamford
AnĆŸe Slosar
Kate Land
D. Thomas
Edd Edmondson
Karen L. Masters
R. C. Nichol
M. Jordan Raddick
+ The impact from survey depth and resolution on the morphological classification of galaxies 2015 M. Pović
I. MĂĄrquez
J. Masegosa
J. Perea
A. del Olmo
Chris Simpson
J. A. L. Aguerri
B. Ascaso
Y. Jiménez-Teja
C. LĂłpez-SanjuĂĄn
+ PDF Chat Galaxy Zoo: quantitative visual morphological classifications for 48 000 galaxies from CANDELS 2016 Brooke Simmons
Chris Lintott
Kyle Willett
Karen L. Masters
Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe
Boris HĂ€ußler
Sugata Kaviraj
Coleman Krawczyk
Sandor Kruk
Daniel H. McIntosh
+ Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): Bulge-disk decomposition of KiDS and VIKING data in the nearby universe 2023 Sarah Casura

Cited by (0)

Action Title Year Authors

Citing (0)

Action Title Year Authors