Standard meta-analysis methods are not robust

S. Stanley Young, Warren B. Kindzierski

Type: Preprint

Publication Date: 2021-10-26

Citations: 0

Locations

arXiv (Cornell University) - View

Similar Works

Action	Title	Year	Authors
+	Standard meta-analysis methods are not robust	2021	S. Stanley Young Warren B. Kindzierski
+	Meta‐research: The art of getting it wrong	2010	John P. A. Ioannidis
+ PDF Chat	Meta‐analysis: Key features, potentials and misunderstandings	2018	Olaf M. Dekkers
+ PDF Chat	Strengths and Weaknesses of Meta-Analyses	2022	Katherine S. Corker
+	Meta-Analysis	2012	William Rhodes
+	Combined background information for meta-analysis evaluation	2018	S. Stanley Young Warren B. Kindzierski
+	Combined background information for meta-analysis evaluation	2018	S. Stanley Young Warren B. Kindzierski
+	Background information for meta-analysis evaluation, Info 00-Info 06	2018	S. Stanley Young Warren B. Kindzierski
+	Meta-Analysis of Genuine and Fake p-Values	2024	M. Fátima Brilhante M. Ivette Gomes Sandra Mendonça Dínis Pestana Rui Santos
+	Meta-analysis	2024	Markus Neuhäuser Graeme D. Ruxton
+	Metaanalyses Are Observational Studies: How Lack of Randomization Impacts Analysis	2005	Eloise Kaizar
+ PDF Chat	A Simple and Robust Way of Concluding Meta-Analysis Results Using Reported P values, Standardized Effect Sizes, or Other Statistics	2012	P.-H. Chyou
+	Meta-Methodology	2011	J. Rick Turner
+ PDF Chat	Commentary: Not all meta-analyses can be trusted	2020	Stephanie Tom Emily Perdoncin Kendra J. Grubb
+	Statistical Analysis—Meta-Analysis/Reproducibility	2023	Mackenzie Edmondson Chongliang Luo Yong Chen
+	Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta‐analysis	2008	John P. A. Ioannidis
+	Meta-analyses frequently pooled different study types together: a meta-epidemiological study	2019	René Sosata Bun Jordan Scheer S. Guillo Florence Tubach Agnès Dechartres
+	Meta‐Analysis	2005	Larry V. Hedges
+	The Problem With Mechanistic Risk of Bias Assessments in Evidence Synthesis of Observational Studies and a Practical Alternative: Assessing the Impact of Specific Sources of Potential Bias	2019	David A. Savitz Gregory A. Wellenius Thomas A Trikalinos
+	A Re-Evaluation of Fixed Effect(s) Meta-Analysis	2017	Kenneth Rice Julian P. T. Higgins Thomas Lumley

Works That Cite This (0)

Action	Title	Year	Authors

Works Cited by This (4)

Action	Title	Year	Authors
+ PDF Chat	Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials	2005	Sanaa Al-Marzouki Stephen Evans Tom Marshall Ian Roberts
+	Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta‐analysis	2008	John P. A. Ioannidis
+ PDF Chat	Evaluation of a meta-analysis of air quality and heart attacks, a case study	2019	S. Stanley Young Warren B. Kindzierski
+ PDF Chat	Evaluation of a Meta-Analysis of Ambient Air Quality as a Risk Factor for Asthma Exacerbation	2021	Warren B. Kindzierski Stanley Young Terry G. Meyer John Dunn