Dependent finitely homogneneous rosy structures

Type: Preprint
Publication Date: 2021-01-01
Citations: 0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2107.02727

Abstract

We study finitely homogeneous dependent rosy structures, adapting results of Cherlin, Harrington, and Lachlan proved for $ω$-stable $ω$-categorical structures. In particular, we prove that such structures have finite þ-rank and are coordinatized by a þ-rank 1 set. We show that they admit a distal, finitely axiomatizable, expansion. These results show that there are, up to inter-definability, at most countably many dependent rosy structures M which are homogeneous in a finite relational language.

Locations

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • DataCite API

Ask a Question About This Paper

Summary

Login to see paper summary

Similar Works

Let $L$ be a finite relational language and $\operatorname {Hom}(L,\omega )$ denote the class of countable $L$-structures which are stable and homogeneous. The main result of the paper is that … Let $L$ be a finite relational language and $\operatorname {Hom}(L,\omega )$ denote the class of countable $L$-structures which are stable and homogeneous. The main result of the paper is that there exists a natural number $c(L)$ such that for any transitive $\mathcal {M} \in \operatorname {Hom}(L;\omega )$, if $E$ is a maximal $0$-definable equivalence relation on $\mathcal {M}$, then either $|\mathcal {M}/E| < c(L)$, or $\mathcal {M}/E$ is coordinatizable. In an earlier paper the second author analyzed certain subclasses $\operatorname {Hom}(L, r)\ (r < \omega )$ of $\operatorname {Hom}(L,\omega )$ for all sufficiently small $r$. Thus the earlier analysis now applies to $\operatorname {Hom}(L,\omega )$.
A homogenizable structure $\mathcal{M}$ is a structure where we may add a finite amount of new relational symbols to represent some $\emptyset-$definable relations in order to make the structure homogeneous. … A homogenizable structure $\mathcal{M}$ is a structure where we may add a finite amount of new relational symbols to represent some $\emptyset-$definable relations in order to make the structure homogeneous. In this article we will divide the homogenizable structures into different classes which categorize many known examples and show what makes each class important. We will show that model completeness is vital for the relation between a structure and the amalgamation bases of its age and give a necessary and sufficient condition for an $\omega-$categorical model-complete structure to be homogenizable.
We study definable sets $D$ of SU-rank 1 in $\mathcal M^{\rm eq}$, where $\mathcal M$ is a countable homogeneous and simple structure in a language with finite relational vocabulary. Each … We study definable sets $D$ of SU-rank 1 in $\mathcal M^{\rm eq}$, where $\mathcal M$ is a countable homogeneous and simple structure in a language with finite relational vocabulary. Each such $D$ can be seen as a `canonically embedded structure', which i
The first chapter is devoted to an important class of categories, the locally presentable categories, which is broad enough to encompass a great deal of mathematical life: varieties of algebras, … The first chapter is devoted to an important class of categories, the locally presentable categories, which is broad enough to encompass a great deal of mathematical life: varieties of algebras, implicational classes of relational structures, interesting cases of posets (domains, lattices), etc., and yet restricted enough to guarantee a number of completeness and smallness properties. Besides, locally presentable categories are closed under a number of categorical constructions (limits, comma-categories), see also Chapter 2. The basic concept, a finitely presentable object, can be regarded as a generalization of the concept of a finite (or compact) element in a Scott domain, i.e., an element a such that for each directed set {di | i ∈ I} with a ≤ ∨ i∈Idi it follows that a ≤ di for some i ∈ I. Now, an object A is finitely presentable if for each directed diagram {Di | i ∈ I} every morphism A → colimi∈IDi factorizes (essentially uniquely) through Di for some i ∈ I.
We give a category-theoretic construction of simple and NSOP$_1$-like independence relations in locally finitely presentable categories, and in the more general locally finitely multipresentable categories. We do so by identifying … We give a category-theoretic construction of simple and NSOP$_1$-like independence relations in locally finitely presentable categories, and in the more general locally finitely multipresentable categories. We do so by identifying properties of a class of monomorphisms $\mathcal{M}$ such that the pullback squares consisting of morphisms in $\mathcal{M}$ form the desired independence relation. This generalizes the category-theoretic construction of stable independence relations using effective unions or cellular squares by M. Lieberman, S. Vasey and the second author to the unstable setting.
We develop the model theory of generalized metric spaces, in which distances between points are taken from arbitrary ordered additive structures. Our focus is on the class of structures obtained … We develop the model theory of generalized metric spaces, in which distances between points are taken from arbitrary ordered additive structures. Our focus is on the class of structures obtained by fixing a countable, positively ordered monoid R, and considering the universal, ultrahomogeneous Urysohn space U(R), which takes distances in R. As notable examples, this class includes the Fraisse limits of rational metric spaces, graphs, and refining equivalence relations, as well as more general structures previously studied by Delhomme, Laflamme, Pouzet, and Sauer. We characterize quantifier elimination in the theory of U(R) (in a relational language) using continuity properties in R, which hold in most natural examples arising in previous literature. In the case where quantifier elimination holds, we consider classification theoretic “neostability” properties of U(R), focusing especially on when such properties are characterized by first-order statements about the monoid R. As a first example of this phenomenon, we prove that U(R) is stable if and only if it is an ultrametric space. Using a characterization of forking for complete types, we are also able to characterize simplicity in terms of “low complexity” in the monoid R. We then generalize the characterizations of stability and simplicity, in order to define the integer-valued “archimedean complexity” of an ordered monoid. We show that the position of U(R) in Shelah's hierarchy of strong order properties is precisely determined by this invariant, which gives the first class of natural examples in which the entirety of this hierarchy can be meaningfully interpreted. We also generalize previous work of Casanovas and Wagner to obtain necessary conditions for elimination of hyperimaginaries and weak elimination of imaginaries in U(R). The last two chapters shift in focus to the combinatorics of these Urysohn spaces. We generalize work of Solecki to prove that, when R is archimedean, the class of finite R-metric spaces has the Hrushovski property. We then extend this result to a larger class, which includes ultrametric spaces. Finally, we consider the asymptotic behavior of finite distance monoids, and uncover some surprising connections to other areas of algebraic and additive combinatorics.
This thesis touches on many different aspects of homogeneous relational structures. We start with an introductory chapter in which we present all the background from model theory and homogeneity necessary … This thesis touches on many different aspects of homogeneous relational structures. We start with an introductory chapter in which we present all the background from model theory and homogeneity necessary to understand the results in the main chapters. The second chapter is a list of examples. We present examples of binary and ternary homogeneous relational stuctures, and prove the simplicity or non-simplicity of their theory. Many of these examples are well-known structures (the ordered rational numbers, random graphs and hypergraphs, the homogeneous Kn-free graphs), while others were constructed during the first stages of research. In the same chapter, we present some combinatorial results, including a proof of the TP2 in the Fraisse limit of semifree amalgamation classes in the language of n-graphs, such that all the minimal forbidden configurations of the class of size at least 3 are all triangles. The third chapter contains the main results of this thesis. We prove that supersimple finitely homogeneous binary relational structures cannot have infinite monomial SU-rank, show that primitive binary supersimple homogeneous structures of rank 1 are “random” in the sense that all their minimal forbidden configurations are of size at most 2, and partially classify the supersimple 3-graphs under the assumption of stable forking in the theories of finitely homogeneous structures with supersimple theory. The fourth chapter is a proof of the directed-graph version of a well-known result by Erdős, Kleitman and Rothschild. Erdős et al. prove that almost all finite labelled trianglefree simple graphs are bipartite, and we prove that almost all finite labelled directed graphs in which any three distinct vertices span at least one directed arc consist of two disjoint tournaments, possibly with some directed arcs from one to the other.
We study definable sets $D$ of SU-rank 1 in $M^{eq}$, where $M$ is a countable homogeneous and simple structure in a language with finite relational vocabulary. Each such $D$ can … We study definable sets $D$ of SU-rank 1 in $M^{eq}$, where $M$ is a countable homogeneous and simple structure in a language with finite relational vocabulary. Each such $D$ can be seen as a `canonically embedded structure', which inherits all relations on $D$ which are definable in $M^{eq}$, and has no other definable relations. Our results imply that if no relation symbol of the language of $M$ has arity higher than 2, then there is a close relationship between triviality of dependence and $D$ being a reduct of a binary random structure. Somewhat more preciely: (a) if for every $n \geq 2$, every $n$-type $p(x_1, ..., x_n)$ which is realized in $D$ is determined by its sub-2-types $q(x_i, x_j) \subseteq p$, then the algebraic closure restricted to $D$ is trivial; (b) if $M$ has trivial dependence, then $D$ is a reduct of a binary random structure.
We study definable sets $D$ of SU-rank 1 in $M^{eq}$, where $M$ is a countable homogeneous and simple structure in a language with finite relational vocabulary. Each such $D$ can … We study definable sets $D$ of SU-rank 1 in $M^{eq}$, where $M$ is a countable homogeneous and simple structure in a language with finite relational vocabulary. Each such $D$ can be seen as a `canonically embedded structure', which inherits all relations on $D$ which are definable in $M^{eq}$, and has no other definable relations. Our results imply that if no relation symbol of the language of $M$ has arity higher than 2, then there is a close relationship between triviality of dependence and $D$ being a reduct of a binary random structure. Somewhat more preciely: (a) if for every $n \geq 2$, every $n$-type $p(x_1, ..., x_n)$ which is realized in $D$ is determined by its sub-2-types $q(x_i, x_j) \subseteq p$, then the algebraic closure restricted to $D$ is trivial; (b) if $M$ has trivial dependence, then $D$ is a reduct of a binary random structure.
We give a self-contained introduction to accessible categories and how they shed light on both model- and set-theoretic questions. We survey for example recent developments on the study of presentability … We give a self-contained introduction to accessible categories and how they shed light on both model- and set-theoretic questions. We survey for example recent developments on the study of presentability ranks, a notion of cardinality localized to a given category, as well as stable independence, a generalization of pushouts and model-theoretic forking that may interest mathematicians at large. We give many examples, including recently discovered connections with homotopy theory and homological algebra. We also discuss concrete versions of accessible categories (such as abstract elementary classes), and how they allow nontrivial `element by element' constructions. We conclude with a new proof of the equivalence between saturated and homogeneous which does not use the coherence axiom of abstract elementary classes.
We give a self-contained introduction to accessible categories and how they shed light on both model- and set-theoretic questions. We survey for example recent developments on the study of presentability … We give a self-contained introduction to accessible categories and how they shed light on both model- and set-theoretic questions. We survey for example recent developments on the study of presentability ranks, a notion of cardinality localized to a given category, as well as stable independence, a generalization of pushouts and model-theoretic forking that may interest mathematicians at large. We give many examples, including recently discovered connections with homotopy theory and homological algebra. We also discuss concrete versions of accessible categories (such as abstract elementary classes), and how they allow nontrivial `element by element' constructions. We conclude with a new proof of the equivalence between saturated and homogeneous which does not use the coherence axiom of abstract elementary classes.
Let $\mathbf{K}$ be the class of countable structures $M$ with the strong small index property and locally finite algebraicity, and $\mathbf{K}_*$ the class of $M \in \mathbf{K}$ such that $acl_M(\{ … Let $\mathbf{K}$ be the class of countable structures $M$ with the strong small index property and locally finite algebraicity, and $\mathbf{K}_*$ the class of $M \in \mathbf{K}$ such that $acl_M(\{ a \}) = \{ a \}$ for every $a \in M$. For homogeneous $M \in \mathbf{K}$, we introduce what we call the expanded group of automorphisms of $M$, and show that it is second-order definable in $Aut(M)$. We use this to prove that for $M, N \in \mathbf{K}_*$, $Aut(M)$ and $Aut(N)$ are isomorphic as abstract groups if and only if $(Aut(M), M)$ and $(Aut(N), N)$ are isomorphic as permutation groups. In particular, we deduce that for $\aleph_0$-categorical structures the combination of strong small index property and no algebraicity implies reconstruction up to bi-definability, in analogy with Rubin's well-known $\forall \exists$-interpretation technique of [7]. Finally, we show that every finite group can be realized as the outer automorphism group of $Aut(M)$ for some countable $\aleph_0$-categorical homogeneous structure $M$ with the strong small index property and no algebraicity.
Let $\mathbf{K}$ be the class of countable structures $M$ with the strong small index property and locally finite algebraicity, and $\mathbf{K}_*$ the class of $M \in \mathbf{K}$ such that $acl_M(\{ … Let $\mathbf{K}$ be the class of countable structures $M$ with the strong small index property and locally finite algebraicity, and $\mathbf{K}_*$ the class of $M \in \mathbf{K}$ such that $acl_M(\{ a \}) = \{ a \}$ for every $a \in M$. For homogeneous $M \in \mathbf{K}$, we introduce what we call the expanded group of automorphisms of $M$, and show that it is second-order definable in $Aut(M)$. We use this to prove that for $M, N \in \mathbf{K}_*$, $Aut(M)$ and $Aut(N)$ are isomorphic as abstract groups if and only if $(Aut(M), M)$ and $(Aut(N), N)$ are isomorphic as permutation groups. In particular, we deduce that for $\aleph_0$-categorical structures the combination of strong small index property and no algebraicity implies reconstruction up to bi-definability, in analogy with Rubin's well-known $\forall \exists$-interpretation technique of [7]. Finally, we show that every finite group can be realized as the outer automorphism group of $Aut(M)$ for some countable $\aleph_0$-categorical homogeneous structure $M$ with the strong small index property and no algebraicity.

Cited by (0)

References (6)

A first order theory is totally categorical if it has exactly one model in each infinite power. We prove here that every such theory admits a finite language, and is … A first order theory is totally categorical if it has exactly one model in each infinite power. We prove here that every such theory admits a finite language, and is finitely axiomatizable in that language, modulo axioms stating that the structure is infinite. This was conjectured by Vaught. We also show that every <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="normal alef 0"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℵ<!-- ℵ --></mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">{\aleph _0}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-stable, <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="normal alef 0"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℵ<!-- ℵ --></mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">{\aleph _0}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-categorical structure is a reduct of one that has finitely many models in small uncountable powers. In the case of structures of disintegrated type we nearly find an explicit structure theorem, and show that the remaining obstacle resides in certain nilpotent automorphism groups.
Abstract It is shown lhat no infinite group is interpretable in any structure which is homogeneous in a finite relational language. Related questions are discussed for other ω -categorical structures. Abstract It is shown lhat no infinite group is interpretable in any structure which is homogeneous in a finite relational language. Related questions are discussed for other ω -categorical structures.
Abstract We develop a new notion of independence (ϸ-independence, read “thorn”-independence) that arises from a family of ranks suggested by Scanlon (ϸ-ranks). We prove that in a large class of … Abstract We develop a new notion of independence (ϸ-independence, read “thorn”-independence) that arises from a family of ranks suggested by Scanlon (ϸ-ranks). We prove that in a large class of theories (including simple theories and o-minimal theories) this notion has many of the properties needed for an adequate geometric structure. We prove that ϸ-independence agrees with the usual independence notions in stable, supersimple and o-minimal theories. Furthermore, we give some evidence that the equivalence between forking and ϸ-forking in simple theories might be closely related to one of the main open conjectures in simplicity theory, the stable forking conjecture. In particular, we prove that in any simple theory where the stable forking conjecture holds, ϸ-independence and forking independence agree.