CONQ: CONtinuous Quantile Treatment Effects for Large-Scale Online Controlled Experiments

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2021-03-06

Citations: 2

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3437963.3441779

Download PDF

Abstract

In many industry settings, online controlled experimentation (A/B test) has been broadly adopted as the gold standard to measure product or feature impacts. Most research has primarily focused on user engagement type metrics, specifically measuring treatment effects at mean (average treatment effects, ATE), and only a few have been focusing on performance metrics (e.g. latency), where treatment effects are measured at quantiles. Measuring quantile treatment effects (QTE) is challenging due to the myriad difficulties such as dependency introduced by clustered samples, scalability issues, density bandwidth choices, etc. In addition, previous literature has mainly focused on QTE at some pre-defined locations, such as P50 or P90, which doesn't always convey the full picture. In this paper, we propose a novel scalable non-parametric solution, which can provide a continuous range of QTE with point-wise confidence intervals while circumventing the density estimation altogether. Numerical results show high consistency with traditional methods utilizing asymptotic normality. An end-to-end pipeline has been implemented at Snap Inc., providing daily insights on key performance metrics at a distributional level.

Locations

  • arXiv (Cornell University) - View - PDF

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ CONQ: CONtinuous Quantile Treatment Effects for Large-Scale Online Controlled Experiments 2020 Weinan Wang
Xi Zhang
+ Variance Reduction Using In-Experiment Data: Efficient and Targeted Online Measurement for Sparse and Delayed Outcomes 2023 Alex Deng
Michelle Du
Anna Matlin
Qing Zhang
+ Bias Variance Tradeoff in Analysis of Online Controlled Experiments. 2020 Ali Mahmoudzadeh
Sophia Liu
Sol Sadeghi
Paul Luo Li
Somit Gupta
+ Bias Variance Tradeoff in Analysis of Online Controlled Experiments 2020 Ali Mahmoudzadeh
Sophia Liu
Sol Sadeghi
Paul Luo Li
Somit Gupta
+ Diluted Treatment Effect Estimation for Trigger Analysis in Online Controlled Experiments 2015 Alex Deng
Victor Hu
+ PDF Chat False Discovery Rate Controlled Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Detection for Online Controlled Experiments 2018 Yuxiang Xie
Nanyu Chen
Xiaolin Shi
+ Large-Scale Online Experimentation with Quantile Metrics 2019 Min Liu
Xiaohui Sun
Maneesh Varshney
Ya Xu
+ PDF Chat It's About Time: What A/B Test Metrics Estimate 2024 Sebastian Ankargren
Mattias FrÄnberg
MĂ„rten Schultzberg
+ All about sample-size calculations for A/B testing: Novel extensions and practical guide 2023 Jing Zhou
Jiannan Lu
Anas Shallah
+ All about Sample-Size Calculations for A/B Testing: Novel Extensions & Practical Guide 2023 Jing Zhou
Jiannan Lu
Anas Shallah
+ Measuring Average Treatment Effect from Heavy-tailed Data 2019 Jason Jason
Wang
Pauline Berry Burke
+ Assign Experiment Variants at Scale in Online Controlled Experiments 2022 Qike Li
Samir Jamkhande
Pavel Kochetkov
Pai Liu
+ A Systematic Paradigm for Detecting, Surfacing, and Characterizing Heterogeneous Treatment Effects (HTE) 2022 John J. Cai
Weinan Wang
+ Variance-Weighted Estimators to Improve Sensitivity in Online Experiments 2020 Kevin Liou
Sean J. Taylor
+ Flexible Online Repeated Measures Experiment 2015 Guo Yu
Alex Deng
+ Practical Policy Optimization with Personalized Experimentation 2023 Mia R. Garrard
Hanson Wang
Ben Letham
Shaun Singh
Abbas Kazerouni
Sarah Tan
Zehui Wang
Yin Huang
Yichun Hu
Chad Zhou
+ Trustworthy Online Controlled Experiments 2020 Ron Kohavi
Diane Tang
Ya Xu
+ PDF Chat Shrinkage Estimators in Online Experiments 2019 Drew Dimmery
Eytan Bakshy
Jasjeet S. Sekhon
+ PDF Chat Online randomized controlled experiments at scale: lessons and extensions to medicine 2020 Ron Kohavi
Diane Tang
Ya Xu
Lars G. Hemkens
John P. A. Ioannidis
+ Empirical Bayes Estimation of Treatment Effects with Many A/B Tests: An Overview 2019 Eduardo M. Azevedo
Alex Deng
José Luis Montiel Olea
E. Glen Weyl