Undecidability of the Spectral Gap in One Dimension

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2020-08-17

Citations: 37

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevx.10.031038

Abstract

The spectral gap problem - determining whether the energy spectrum of a system has an energy gap above ground state, or if there is a continuous range of low-energy excitations - pervades quantum many-body physics. Recently, this important problem was shown to be undecidable for quantum spin systems in two (or more) spatial dimensions: there exists no algorithm that determines in general whether a system is gapped or gapless, a result which has many unexpected consequences for the physics of such systems. However, there are many indications that one dimensional spin systems are simpler than their higher-dimensional counterparts: for example, they cannot have thermal phase transitions or topological order, and there exist highly-effective numerical algorithms such as DMRG - and even provably polynomial-time ones - for gapped 1D systems, exploiting the fact that such systems obey an entropy area-law. Furthermore, the spectral gap undecidability construction crucially relied on aperiodic tilings, which are not possible in 1D. So does the spectral gap problem become decidable in 1D? In this paper we prove this is not the case, by constructing a family of 1D spin chains with translationally-invariant nearest neighbour interactions for which no algorithm can determine the presence of a spectral gap. This not only proves that the spectral gap of 1D systems is just as intractable as in higher dimensions, but also predicts the existence of qualitatively new types of complex physics in 1D spin chains. In particular, it implies there are 1D systems with constant spectral gap and non-degenerate classical ground state for all systems sizes up to an uncomputably large size, whereupon they switch to a gapless behaviour with dense spectrum.

Locations

  • Physical Review X - View - PDF
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) - View - PDF
  • arXiv (Cornell University) - View - PDF
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) - View
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) - View - PDF
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) - View - PDF
  • DataCite API - View

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat Undecidability of the Spectral Gap 2022 Toby S. Cubitt
David PĂ©rez-Garcı́a
Michael M. Wolf
+ PDF Chat Undecidability of the spectral gap in rotationally symmetric Hamiltonians 2024 Laura Castilla-Castellano
Ángelo Lucia
+ PDF Chat Uncomputability of phase diagrams 2021 Johannes Bausch
Toby S. Cubitt
James D. Watson
+ PDF Chat Rigorous RG Algorithms and Area Laws for Low Energy Eigenstates in 1D 2017 Itai Arad
Zeph Landau
Umesh Vazirani
Thomas Vidick
+ PDF Chat Existence of a Spectral Gap in the Affleck-Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki Model on the Hexagonal Lattice 2020 Marius Lemm
Anders W. Sandvik
Ling Wang
+ PDF Chat A Hierarchy of Spectral Gap Certificates for Frustration-Free Spin Systems 2024 Kshiti Sneh Rai
Ilya Kull
Patrick Emonts
Jordi Tura
Norbert Schuch
F. Baccari
+ Renormalization method for proving frustration-free local spin chains are gapped 2021 Ari Mizel
Van Molino
+ Renormalization method for proving frustration-free local spin chains are gapped 2021 Ari Mizel
Van Molino
+ Quantum Spin Systems 2023 Amanda Young
+ The Complexity of Approximating Critical Points of Quantum Phase Transitions 2021 James D. Watson
Johannes Bausch
+ The Complexity of Approximating Critical Points of Quantum Phase Transitions 2021 James D. Watson
Johannes Bausch
+ PDF Chat Local gap threshold for frustration-free spin systems 2016 David Gosset
Evgeny Mozgunov
+ PDF Chat Entanglement versus gap for one-dimensional spin systems 2010 Daniel Gottesman
M. B. Hastings
+ PDF Chat Energy as an entanglement witness for quantum many-body systems 2004 Mark R. Dowling
Andrew C. Doherty
Stephen D. Bartlett
+ PDF Chat Spectral properties for a family of two-dimensional quantum antiferromagnets 2016 Andrew S. Darmawan
Stephen D. Bartlett
+ PDF Chat Entanglement entropy and spectra of the one-dimensional Kugel-Khomskii model 2012 Rex Lundgren
Victor Chua
Gregory A. Fiete
+ PDF Chat Gaplessness is not generic for translation-invariant spin chains 2019 Marius Lemm
+ PDF Chat Sufficient Condition for Entanglement Area Laws in Thermodynamically Gapped Spin Systems 2014 Jaeyoon Cho
+ PDF Chat Translationally Invariant Universal Quantum Hamiltonians in 1D 2021 Tamara Kohler
Stephen Piddock
Johannes Bausch
Toby S. Cubitt
+ Classification on the Computational Complexity of Spin Models 2019 Shi‐Xin Zhang