Type: Preprint
Publication Date: 2016-08-31
Citations: 12
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19086/da.887
Let $A$ be a finite subset of an arbitrary additive group $G$, and let $\phi(A)$ denote the cardinality of the largest subset $B$ in $A$ that is sum-avoiding in $A$ (that is to say, $b_1+b_2 \not \in A$ for all distinct $b_1,b_2 \in B$). The question of controlling the size of $A$ in terms of $\phi(A)$ in the case when $G$ was torsion-free was posed by Erd\H{o}s and Moser. When $G$ has torsion, $A$ can be arbitrarily large for fixed $\phi(A)$ due to the presence of subgroups. Nevertheless, we provide a qualitative answer to an analogue of the Erd\H{o}s-Moser problem in this setting, by establishing a structure theorem, which roughly speaking asserts that $A$ is either efficiently covered by $\phi(A)$ finite subgroups of $G$, or by fewer than $\phi(A)$ finite subgroups of $G$ together with a residual set of bounded cardinality. In order to avoid a large number of nested inductive arguments, our proof uses the language of nonstandard analysis. We also answer negatively a question of Erd\H{o}s regarding large subsets $A$ of finite additive groups $G$ with $\phi(A)$ bounded, but give a positive result when $|G|$ is not divisible by small primes.