ECLIPSING BINARY STARS AS BENCHMARKS FOR TRIGONOMETRIC PARALLAXES IN THE GAIA ERA

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2016-11-22

Citations: 187

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/180

Abstract

ABSTRACT We present fits to the broadband photometric spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of 158 eclipsing binaries (EBs) in the Tycho-2 catalog. These EBs were selected because they have highly precise stellar radii, effective temperatures, and in many cases metallicities previously determined in the literature, and thus have bolometric luminosities that are typically good to ≲10%. In most cases the available broadband photometry spans a wavelength range 0.4–10 μ m, and in many cases spans 0.15–22 μ m. The resulting SED fits, which have only extinction as a free parameter, provide a virtually model-independent measure of the bolometric flux at Earth. The SED fits are satisfactory for 156 of the EBs, for which we achieve typical precisions in the bolometric flux of ≈3%. Combined with the accurately known bolometric luminosity, the result for each EB is a predicted parallax that is typically precise to ≲5%. These predicted parallaxes—with typical uncertainties of 200 μ as—are 4–5 times more precise than those determined by Hipparcos for 99 of the EBs in our sample, with which we find excellent agreement. There is no evidence among this sample for significant systematics in the Hipparcos parallaxes of the sort that notoriously afflicted the Pleiades measurement. The EBs are distributed over the entire sky, span more than 10 mag in brightness, reach distances of more than 5 kpc, and in many cases our predicted parallaxes should also be more precise than those expected from the Gaia first data release. The EBs studied here can thus serve as empirical, independent benchmarks for these upcoming fundamental parallax measurements.

Locations

  • The Astronomical Journal - View
  • arXiv (Cornell University) - View - PDF
  • DataCite API - View

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat The Surface Brightness-color Relations Based on Eclipsing Binary Stars: Toward Precision Better than 1% in Angular Diameter Predictions 2017 D. Graczyk
P. Konorski
G. Pietrzyński
W. Gieren
J. Storm
N. Nardetto
A. Gallenne
Pierre Maxted
P. Kervella
Z. Kołaczkowski
+ Gaia Data Release 3. The first Gaia catalogue of eclipsing binary candidates 2022 N. Mowlavi
B. Holl
I. Lecœur-Taïbi
F. Barblan
A. Kochoska
A. Prša
T. Mazeh
L. Rimoldini
P. Gavras
M. Audard
+ PDF Chat APOGEE/Kepler Overlap Yields Orbital Solutions for a Variety of Eclipsing Binaries 2019 Joni Marie Clark Cunningham
Meredith L. Rawls
Diana Windemuth
Aleezah Ali
Jason Jackiewicz
Eric Agol
Keivan G. Stassun
+ PDF Chat Fundamental effective temperature measurements for eclipsing binary stars – I. Development of the method and application to AI Phoenicis 2020 N J Miller
P. F. L. Maxted
B. Smalley
+ Combining Hipparcos and Gaia data for the study of binaries: the BINARYS tool 2022 A. Leclerc
C. Babusiaux
F. Arenou
F. van Leeuwen
M. Bonnefoy
X. Delfosse
T. Forveille
J.-B. Le Bouquin
L. Rodet
+ The Value-Added Catalog of ASAS-SN Eclipsing Binaries III: Masses and Radii of Gaia Spectroscopic Binaries 2022 D. M. Rowan
T. Jayasinghe
K. Z. Stanek
C. S. Kochanek
Todd A. Thompson
B. J. Shappee
W. Giles
+ Astrometric Identification of Nearby Binary Stars I: Predicted Astrometric Signals 2021 Zephyr Penoyre
Vasily Belokurov
N. W. Evans
+ An algorithm to calculate the relative orbit, ephemeris, and individual masses of unresolved astrometric binaries. Example of application on the newest Gaia DR3 binaries: the ESMORGA catalog 2023 Xabier Pérez-Couto
J. Á. Docobo
P. P. Campo
+ PDF Chat The Araucaria project: High-precision orbital parallax and masses of eclipsing binaries from infrared interferometry 2019 A. Gallenne
G. Pietrzyński
D. Graczyk
B. Pilecki
J. Storm
N. Nardetto
Mónica Taormina
W. Gieren
A. Tkachenko
P. Kervella
+ A Probabilistic Approach to Fitting Period–luminosity Relations and Validating Gaia Parallaxes 2017 Branimir Sesar
M. Fouesneau
Adrian M. Price-Whelan
Coryn A. L. Bailer‐Jones
A. Gould
Hans‐Walter Rix
+ The 10 parsec sample in the Gaia era: first update 2023 C. Reyle
K. Jardine
P. Fouque
J. A. Caballero
R. L. Smart
A. Sozzetti
+ PDF Chat The 10 parsec sample in the Gaia era: first update 2023 C. Reylé
K Jardine
P. Fouqué
J. A. Caballero
R. L. Smart
A. Sozzetti
+ PDF Chat Tycho-Gaia Astrometric Solution Parallaxes and Proper Motions for Five Galactic Globular Clusters 2017 Laura L. Watkins
Roeland P. van der Marel
+ Tycho-Gaia Astrometric Solution Parallaxes and Proper Motions for Five Galactic Globular Clusters 2016 Laura L. Watkins
Roeland P. van der Marel
+ PDF Chat <i>Gaia</i> Data Release 1 2017 G. Clementini
L. Eyer
V. Ripepi
M. Marconi
T. Muraveva
A. Garofalo
L. M. Sarro
M. Palmer
X. Luri
R. Molinaro
+ Distinguishing exoplanet companions from field stars in direct imaging using Gaia astrometry 2023 Philipp Herz
M. Samland
Coryn A. L. Bailer‐Jones
+ PDF Chat Hubble Space Telescope Trigonometric Parallax of Polaris B, Companion of the Nearest Cepheid* 2018 Howard E. Bond
Edmund Nelan
Nancy Remage Evans
Gail Schaefer
Dianne Harmer
+ Astrometry as a Tool for Discovering and Weighing Faint Companions to Nearby Stars 2024 Timothy D. Brandt
+ PDF Chat Gaia Data Release 1. Summary of the astrometric, photometric, and survey properties 2016 A. G. A. Brown
A. Vallenari
T. Prusti
J. H. J. de Bruijne
F. Mignard
R. Drimmel
+ PDF Chat Evaluating GAIA performances on eclipsing binaries 2001 U. Munari
T. Tomov
T. Zwitter
E. F. Milone
Josef Kallrath
P. M. Marrese
Federico Boschi
A. Prša
L. Tomasella
D. Del Moro

Works That Cite This (169)

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat <scp>ariadne</scp>: measuring accurate and precise stellar parameters through SED fitting 2022 José I Vines
J. S. Jenkins
+ PDF Chat High atmospheric metal enrichment for a Saturn-mass planet 2023 Jacob L. Bean
Qiao Xue
Prune C. August
J. I. Lunine
Michael Zhang
Daniel Thorngren
Shang‐Min Tsai
Keivan G. Stassun
Everett Schlawin
Eva-Maria Ahrer
+ PDF Chat Probing core overshooting using subgiant asteroseismology: The case of KIC10273246 2021 A. Noll
S. Deheuvels
J. Ballot
+ PDF Chat Rubin Observatory LSST Stars Milky Way and Local Volume Star Clusters Roadmap 2023 Christopher Usher
Kristen C. Dage
L. Girardi
P. Barmby
C. Bonatto
Ana L. Chies-Santos
W. I. Clarkson
M. Gómez
Eduardo A. Hartmann
A. M. N. Ferguson
+ PDF Chat The HD 137496 system: A dense, hot super-Mercury and a cold Jupiter 2021 T. Azevedo Silva
O. D. S. Demangeon
S. C. C. Barros
D. J. Armstrong
J. F. Otegi
D. Bossini
E. Delgado Mena
S. G. Sousa
V. Adibekyan
Louise D. Nielsen
+ PDF Chat The Araucaria project: High-precision orbital parallax and masses of eclipsing binaries from infrared interferometry 2019 A. Gallenne
G. Pietrzyński
D. Graczyk
B. Pilecki
J. Storm
N. Nardetto
Mónica Taormina
W. Gieren
A. Tkachenko
P. Kervella
+ PDF Chat An Eclipsing Binary Comprising Two Active Red Stragglers of Identical Mass and Synchronized Rotation: A Post-mass-transfer System or Just Born That Way? 2023 Keivan G. Stassun
Guillermo Torres
Marina Kounkel
Benjamin M. Tofflemire
Emily Leiner
Dax L. Feliz
Don Dixon
Robert D. Mathieu
Natalie M. Gosnell
Michael Gully-Santiago
+ PDF Chat Geometry of the Draco C1 Symbiotic Binary 2020 Hannah M. Lewis
Borja Anguiano
Keivan G. Stassun
Steven R. Majewski
Phil Arras
Craig L. Sarazin
Zhi‐Yun Li
Nathan De Lee
T. Nicholas
Carlos Allende Prieto
+ PDF Chat TESS unveils the phase curve of WASP-33b 2020 C. von Essen
M. Mallonn
C. C. Borre
V. Antoci
Keivan G. Stassun
S. Khalafinejad
G. Tautvaišienė
+ PDF Chat Standard stellar luminosities: what are typical and limiting accuracies in the era after <i>Gaia</i>? 2021 Z. Eker
F. Soydugan
S. Bilir
V. Bakış

Works Cited by This (83)

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat Orbital and physical parameters of eclipsing binaries from the All-Sky Automated Survey catalogue - II. Two spotted M < 1 M⊙ systems at different evolutionary stages 2011 K. G. Hełminiak
M. Konacki
+ PDF Chat Confirmation of Errors in<i>Hipparcos</i>Parallaxes from<i>Hubble Space Telescope</i>Fine Guidance Sensor Astrometry of the Pleiades 2005 David R. Soderblom
E. Nelan
G. F. Benedict
B. McArthur
I. Ramírez
W. J. Spiesman
B. F. Jones
+ PDF Chat Estimating Distances from Parallaxes 2015 Coryn A. L. Bailer‐Jones
+ PDF Chat The Araucaria Project: accurate stellar parameters and distance to evolved eclipsing binary ASAS J180057-2333.8 in Sagittarius Arm 2015 K. Suchomska
D. Graczyk
R. Smolec
G. Pietrzyński
W. Gieren
K. Stȩpień
P. Konorski
B. Pilecki
S. Villanova
I. B. Thompson
+ PDF Chat The Tycho-Gaia astrometric solution. How to get 2.5 million parallaxes with less than one year of Gaia data 2014 Daniel Michalik
L. Lindegren
D. Hobbs
+ PDF Chat A VLBI resolution of the Pleiades distance controversy 2014 Carl Melis
M. J. Reid
A. J. Mioduszewski
J. R. Stauffer
Geoffrey C. Bower
+ PDF Chat The Problem of<i>Hipparcos</i>Distances to Open Clusters. I. Constraints from Multicolor Main‐Sequence Fitting 1998 Marc H. Pinsonneault
J. R. Stauffer
David R. Soderblom
Jeremy R. King
Robert B. Hanson
+ PDF Chat ABSOLUTE PROPERTIES OF THE TRIPLE STAR CF TAURI 2012 Claud H. Sandberg Lacy
Guillermo Torres
A. Claret
+ PDF Chat The distance to the Pleiades from orbital solution of the double-lined eclipsing binary HD 23642 2004 U. Munari
S. Dallaporta
A. Siviero
C. Soubiran
M. Fiorucci
P. Girard
+ PDF Chat ABSOLUTE PROPERTIES OF THE TRIPLE STAR HP AURIGAE 2013 Claud H. Sandberg Lacy
Guillermo Torres
M. Wolf
Charles L. Burks