Variance Estimation With Complex Data and Finite Population Correction—A Paradigm for Comparing Jackknife and <scp>Formula‐Based</scp> Methods for Variance Estimation

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2020-05-21

Citations: 5

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12294

Abstract

The finite population correction (FPC) factor is often used to adjust variance estimators for survey data sampled from a finite population without replacement. As a replicated resampling approach, the jackknife approach is usually implemented without the FPC factor incorporated in its variance estimates. A paradigm is proposed to compare the jackknifed variance estimates with those yielded by the delta method because the delta method has the effect of the FPC factor implicitly integrated. The goal is to examine whether the grouped jackknife approach properly estimates the variance of complex samples without incorporating the FPC effect, in particular for data sampled from a finite population with a high sampling rate. The investigation focuses on the data drawn by two‐stage sampling with probability proportional to size of schools and with simple random sampling of students. Moreover, the Hájek approximation of the joint probabilities is used in the delta method for a Horvitz–Thompson (H–T) estimator. Samples of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) state science assessments are used in the analysis.

Locations

  • ETS Research Report Series - View - PDF

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ JACKKNIFE ESTIMATION OF SAMPLING VARIANCE OF RATIO ESTIMATORS IN COMPLEX SAMPLES: BIAS AND THE COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION 2006 Andreas Oranje
+ Chapter 5: Population Inferences and Variance Estimation for NAEP Data 1992 Eugene G. Johnson
Keith Rust
+ Population Inferences and Variance Estimation for NAEP Data 1992 Eugene G. Johnson
Keith Rust
+ On variance estimation under complex sampling designs 2013 Emilio L. Escobar
+ A General Jackknife within Each Stratum Variance Estimator 2016 Arwa Mousa
S.M. Sayed
Shereen Hamdy Abdel Latif
+ PDF Chat CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR PROPORTION ESTIMATES IN COMPLEX SAMPLES 2006 Andreas Oranje
+ Variance Estimation with Complex Data and Finite Population Correction--A Paradigm for Comparing Jackknife and Formula-Based Methods for Variance Estimation. Research Report. ETS RR-20-11. 2020 Jiahe Qian
+ PDF Chat PracTools: Computations for Design of Finite Population Samples 2015 Richard Valliant
A. Dever Jill
Frauke Kreuter
+ Resampling methods revisited: advancing the understanding and applications in educational research 2008 Haiyan Bai
Wei Pan
+ Variance Estimation by Jackknife Method Under Two-Phase Complex Survey Design 2007 Debesh Roy
Md. Safiquzzaman
+ Computing Variances from Data with Complex Sampling Designs: A Comparison of Stata and SPSS 2001 Alicia C. Dowd
Michael B. Duggan
+ Computing Variances from Data with Complex Sampling Designs: A Comparison of Stata and SPSS 2001 Alicia C. Dowd
Michael B. Duggan
+ COMPARISON OF PROCEDURES TO ACCOUNT FOR CERTAINTY PRIMARY SAMPLING UNITS 2004 Frank Potter
Donsig Jang
Esther M. Friedman
Núria Díaz-Tena
Bidisha Ghosh
+ Systematic sampling from finite populations. 2013 Llewellyn Naidoo
+ Incorporating a First-Stage Finite Population Correction (FPC) in Variance Estimation for a Two-Stage Design in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 2011 Jennifer Kali
John P. Burke
Lloyd Hicks
Lou Rizzo
Keith Rust
+ Variance Estimation for Probability and Nonprobability Establishment Surveys: An Overview 2023 Jill A. Dever
Dan Liao
+ Sample Design and Sample Size for Single-Stage Surveys 2018 Richard Valliant
Jill A. Dever
Frauke Kreuter
+ Inferences based on Probability Sampling or Nonprobability Sampling: Are They Nothing but a Question of Models? 2019 Andreas Quatember
+ Computing Estimates and Their Sampling Errors from Complex Samples 2012 Jean Dumais
J. Heward Gough
+ Jackknife Variance Estimation from Complex Survey Designs 2016 Raghunath Arnab
Antonio Arcos