Statistical Models in Forensic Voice Comparison

Type: Book-Chapter

Publication Date: 2020-10-30

Citations: 13

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780367527709-20

Abstract

The purpose of forensic voice comparison is to assist a court of law in deciding whether the voices on two (or more) recordings were produced by the same speaker or by different speakers. The known-speaker recording is often an existing recording in which the identity of the speaker is not disputed, but sometimes a recording is made specifically for the purpose of conducting a forensic-voice-comparison analysis. Historically and in present practice, several approaches have been used to extract information from voice recordings and different frameworks have been used to draw inferences from that information. A simple automatic voice-activity detector may be based solely on root-mean-square amplitude, and thus simply find louder parts of the recording.

Locations

  • arXiv (Cornell University) - View - PDF
  • Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University) - View - PDF
  • Chapman and Hall/CRC eBooks - View

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ Statistical Models in Forensic Voice Comparison 2019 Geoffrey Stewart Morrison
Ewald Enzinger
Daniel Ramos
Joaquín González-Rodríguez
Alicia Lozano-Díez
+ Bayesian Strategies for Likelihood Ratio Computation in Forensic Voice Comparison with Automatic Systems 2019 Daniel Ramos
Juan Maroñas
Alicia Lozano-Díez
+ An Overview of Techniques for Biomarker Discovery in Voice Signal 2021 Rita Singh
Ankit Shah
Hira Dhamyal
+ PDF Chat Tutorial on logistic-regression calibration and fusion:converting a score to a likelihood ratio 2012 Geoffrey Stewart Morrison
+ PDF Chat Effects of language mismatch in automatic forensic voice comparison using deep learning embeddings 2023 Dávid Sztahó
Attila Fejes
+ PDF Chat Data-driven detection and analysis of the patterns of creaky voice 2014 Thomas Drugman
John Kane
Christer Gobl
+ Empirical validation of likelihood ratio methods – A case study in forensic speaker recognition 2016 Filipe Guapo
Paulo Lobato Correia
Didier Meuwly
David van der Vloed
+ PDF Chat Statistics in Phonetics 2024 Shahin Tavakoli
Beatrice Matteo
Davide Pigoli
Eleanor Chodroff
John Coleman
Michele Gubian
Margaret E. L. Renwick
Morgan Sonderegger
+ Generalised additive mixed models for dynamic analysis in linguistics: a practical introduction 2017 Márton Sóskuthy
+ Multifractal approach in pattern recognition of an announcer’s voice 2014 V. I. Solovyov
Y. Byelozorova
+ PDF Chat Reproducible Machine Learning-based Voice Pathology Detection: Introducing the Pitch Difference Feature 2024 Jan Vrba
Jakub Steinbach
Tomáš Jirsa
Laura Verde
Roberta De Fazio
Noriyasu Homma
Yuwen Zeng
Kei Ichiji
Lukáš Hájek
Zdeňka Sedláková
+ Distinguishing Neural Speech Synthesis Models Through Fingerprints in Speech Waveforms 2023 Chu Yuan Zhang
Jiangyan Yi
Jianhua Tao
Chenglong Wang
Xinrui Yan
+ Differences between Bayes Factors and Likelihood Ratios for Quantifying the Forensic Value of Evidence 2022 Danica M. Ommen
Christopher P. Saunders
+ Effects of language mismatch in automatic forensic voice comparison using deep learning embeddings 2022 Dávid Sztahó
Attila Fejes
+ Forensics: Assessing model goodness: A machine learning view 2018 Joseph R. Barr
Joseph E. Cavanaugh
+ Statistical Applications in Forensic Toxicology 2008 Rod G. Gullberg
+ PDF Chat Evaluating generalised additive mixed modelling strategies for dynamic speech analysis 2020 Márton Sóskuthy
+ PDF Chat Voice Disorder Analysis: a Transformer-based Approach 2024 Alkis Koudounas
Gabriele Ciravegna
Marco Fantini
Giovanni Succo
Erika Crosetti
Tania Cerquitelli
Elena Baralis
+ PDF Chat Voice Disorder Analysis: a Transformer-based Approach 2024 Alkis Koudounas
Gabriele Ciravegna
Marco Fantini
Erika Crosetti
Giovanni Succo
Tania Cerquitelli
Elena Baralis
+ Impact of Naturalistic Field Acoustic Environments on Forensic Text-independent Speaker Verification System 2022 Zhenyu Wang
John H. L. Hansen