Proximal Activation of Smooth Functions in Splitting Algorithms for Convex Image Recovery

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2019-01-01

Citations: 22

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/18m1224763

Abstract

Structured convex optimization problems typically involve a mix of smooth and nonsmooth functions. The common practice is to activate the smooth functions via their gradient and the nonsmooth ones via their proximity operator. We show that although intuitively natural, this approach is not necessarily the most efficient numerically and that, in particular, activating all the functions proximally may be advantageous. To make this viewpoint viable computationally, we derive a number of new examples of proximity operators of smooth convex functions arising in applications. A novel variational model to relax inconsistent convex feasibility problems is also investigated within the proposed framework. Several numerical applications to image recovery are presented to compare the behavior of fully proximal versus mixed proximal/gradient implementations of several splitting algorithms.

Locations

  • SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences - View
  • arXiv (Cornell University) - View - PDF

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ Proximal Activation of Smooth Functions in Splitting Algorithms for Convex Image Recovery 2018 Patrick L. Combettes
Lilian E. Glaudin
+ Proximal Activation of Smooth Functions in Splitting Algorithms for Convex Image Recovery 2018 Patrick L. Combettes
Lilian E. Glaudin
+ Proximal Activation of Smooth Functions in Splitting Algorithms for Convex Minimization 2018 Patrick L. Combettes
Lilian E. Glaudin
+ Fully Proximal Splitting Algorithms In Image Recovery 2019 Patrick L. Combettes
Lilian E. Glaudin
+ PDF Chat Block-Activated Algorithms For Multicomponent Fully Nonsmooth Minimization 2022 Minh N. BĂči
Patrick L. Combettes
Zev C. Woodstock
+ Block-Activated Algorithms for Multicomponent Fully Nonsmooth Minimization 2021 Minh N. BĂči
Patrick L. Combettes
Zev C. Woodstock
+ PDF Chat Proximal or gradient steps for cocoercive operators 2021 Luis M. Briceño-Arias
Nelly Pustelnik
+ Composite Minimization: Proximity Algorithms and Their Applications 2015 Feishe Chen
+ Activity Identification and Local Linear Convergence of Douglas--Rachford/ADMM under Partial Smoothness 2014 Jingwei Liang
Jalal Fadili
Gabriel Peyré
D. LĂŒke
+ PDF Chat Activity Identification and Local Linear Convergence of Douglas–Rachford/ADMM under Partial Smoothness 2015 Jingwei Liang
Jalal Fadili
Gabriel Peyré
Russell Luke
+ PDF Chat A proximal splitting algorithm for generalized DC programming with applications in signal recovery 2024 Tan Nhat Pham
Minh N. Dao
Nima Amjady
Rakibuzzaman Shah
+ Extensions to the Proximal Distance Method of Constrained Optimization 2020 Alfonso Landeros
Oscar HernĂĄn Madrid Padilla
Hua Zhou
Kenneth Lange
+ PDF Chat Proximal Splitting Methods in Signal Processing 2011 Patrick L. Combettes
Jean‐Christophe Pesquet
+ A Generic Proximal Algorithm for Convex Optimization—Application to Total Variation Minimization 2014 Laurent Condat
+ Proximal Splitting Methods in Nonsmooth Convex Optimization 2014 Christopher Hendrich
+ Signal Recovery by Proximal Forward-Backward Splitting 2005 Patrick L. Combettes
Valérie R. Wajs
+ PDF Chat Proximal Splitting Algorithms for Convex Optimization: A Tour of Recent Advances, with New Twists 2023 Laurent Condat
Daichi Kitahara
Andrés Contreras
Akira Hirabayashi
+ Proximal Splitting Algorithms for Convex Optimization: A Tour of Recent Advances, with New Twists 2019 Laurent Condat
Daichi Kitahara
Andrés Contreras
Akira Hirabayashi
+ Proximal Denoiser for Convergent Plug-and-Play Optimization with Nonconvex Regularization 2022 Samuel Hurault
Arthur Leclaire
Nicolas Papadakis
+ PDF Chat Distributed algorithms for scalable proximity operator computation and application to video denoising 2022 Feriel Abboud
Marin Stamm
Émilie Chouzenoux
Jean‐Christophe Pesquet
Hugues Talbot