Statistical Inference for Average Treatment Effects Estimated by Synthetic Control Methods

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2019-10-31

Citations: 96

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2019.1686986

Abstract

Abstract The synthetic control (SC) method, a powerful tool for estimating average treatment effects (ATE), is increasingly popular in fields such as statistics, economics, political science, and marketing. The SC is particularly suitable for estimating ATE with a single (or a few) treated unit(s), a fixed number of control units, and large pre and post-treatment periods (which we refer as “long panels”). To date, there has been no formal inference theory for SC ATE estimator with long panels under general conditions. Existing work mostly use placebo tests for inference or some permutation methods when the post-treatment period is small. In this article, we derive the asymptotic distribution of the SC and modified synthetic control (MSC) ATE estimators using projection theory. We show that a properly designed subsampling method can be used to obtain confidence intervals and conduct inference whereas the standard bootstrap cannot. Simulations and an empirical application that examines the effect of opening a physical showroom by an e-tailer demonstrate the usefulness of the MSC method in applications. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Locations

  • INDIGO (University of Illinois at Chicago) - View - PDF
  • Journal of the American Statistical Association - View

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ Inference for Synthetic Controls via Refined Placebo Tests 2024 Lihua Lei
Timothy Sudijono
+ PDF Chat synth2: Synthetic control method with placebo tests, robustness test, and visualization 2023 Guanpeng Yan
Qiang Chen
+ Practical and robust $t$-test based inference for synthetic control and related methods 2018 Victor Chernozhukov
Kaspar Wüthrich
Yinchu Zhu
+ Asymptotic Properties of the Synthetic Control Method 2022 Xiaomeng Zhang
Wendun Wang
Xinyu Zhang
+ PDF Chat Asymptotic Properties of the Synthetic Control Method 2022 Xiaomeng Zhang
Wendun Wang
Xinyu Zhang
+ Practical and robust $t$-test based inference for synthetic control and related methods 2019 Victor Chernozhukov
Kaspar Wüthrich
Yinchu Zhu
+ Estimation and Inference for Synthetic Control Methods with Spillover Effects 2019 Jianfei Cao
Connor Dowd
+ Estimation and Inference for Synthetic Control Methods with Spillover Effects 2019 Jianfei Cao
Connor Dowd
+ Estimating Treatment Effects Using Observational Data and Experimental Data with Non-Overlapping Support 2024 Kevin Han
Han Wu
Linjia Wu
Yu Shi
Canyao Liu
+ A $t$-test based synthetic controls 2018 Victor Chernozhukov
Kaspar Wüthrich
Yinchu Zhu
+ A $t$-test for synthetic controls 2018 Victor Chernozhukov
Kaspar Wüthrich
Yinchu Zhu
+ Estimating Treatment Effects Using Observational Data and Experimental Data with Non-overlapping Support 2022 Kevin Wu Han
+ Proximal Causal Inference for Synthetic Control with Surrogates 2023 Jizhou Liu
Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen
Carlos Varjão
+ Inference for Synthetic Control Methods with Multiple Treated Units 2019 Ziyan Zhang
+ PDF Chat A Design-Based Perspective on Synthetic Control Methods 2023 Lea Bottmer
Guido W. Imbens
Jann Spiess
Merrill Warnick
+ PDF Chat Synthetic Controls with spillover effects: A comparative study 2024 Andrii Melnychuk
+ scpi: Uncertainty Quantification for Synthetic Control Methods 2022 Matias D. Cattaneo
Yingjie Feng
Filippo Palomba
Rocío Titiunik
+ Prediction Intervals for Synthetic Control Methods 2021 Matias D. Cattaneo
Yingjie Feng
Rocío Titiunik
+ allsynth: Synthetic control bias-corrections utilities for Stata 2021 Justin Wiltshire
+ PDF Chat The Synth_Runner Package: Utilities to Automate Synthetic Control Estimation Using Synth 2017 Sebastián Galiani
Brian Quistorff