Evidence‐based statistical analysis and methods in biomedical research (SAMBR) checklists according to design features

Type: Review

Publication Date: 2019-08-22

Citations: 36

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1211

Abstract

Abstract Background Statistical analysis according to design features and objectives is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of the study findings and conclusions in biomedical research. Heterogeneity in reporting study design elements and conducting statistical analyses is often observed for the same study design and study objective in medical literatures. Sometimes, researchers face a lot of predicaments using appropriate statistical approaches highlighted by methodologists for a specific study design either due to lack of accessibility or understanding of statistical methods or unavailability of checklists related to design and analysis in a concise format. The purpose of this review is to provide the checklist of statistical analysis and methods in biomedical research (SAMBR) to applied researchers. Recent findings We initially identified the important steps of reporting design features that may influence the choice of statistical analysis in biomedical research and essential steps of data analysis of common studies. We subsequently searched for statistical approaches employed for each study design/study objective available in publications and other resources. Compilation of these steps produced SAMBR guidance document, which includes three parts. Applied researchers can use part (A) and part (B) of SAMBR to describe or evaluate research design features and quality of statistical analysis, respectively, in reviewing studies or designing protocols. Part (C) of SAMBR can be used to perform essential and preferred evidence‐based data analysis specific to study design and objective. Conclusions We believe that the statistical methods checklists may improve reporting of research design, standardize methodological practices, and promote consistent application of statistical approaches, thus improving the quality of research studies. The checklists do not enforce the use of suggested statistical methods but rather highlight and encourage to conduct the best statistical practices. There is a need to develop an interactive web‐based application of the checklists for users for its wide applications.

Locations

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ The Content of Statistical Requirements for Authors in Biomedical Research Journals 2016 Tianyi Liu
Siyu Cai
Xiaolu Nie
Yaqi Lyu
Xiaoxia Peng
Guoshuang Feng
+ How to Write Statistical Analysis Section in Medical Research 2022 Alok Dwivedi
+ Comprehensive guidelines for appropriate statistical analysis methods in research 2024 Jong Hae Kim
Dong Hyuck Kim
Sang Gyu Kwak
+ PDF Chat Common Statistical Methods and Reporting of Results in Medical Research 2022 Guoshuang Feng
Guoyou Qin
Tao Zhang
Zheng Chen
Yang Zhao
+ PDF Chat Trends in the Usage of Statistical Software and Their Associated Study Designs in Health Sciences Research: A Bibliometric Analysis 2021 Emad Masuadi
Mohamud Mohamud
Muhannad Almutairi
Abdulaziz Alsunaidi
Abdulmohsen K Alswayed
Omar F Aldhafeeri
+ How to Conduct Inferential Statistics Online (Part 2) 2022 Shaikat Mondal
Himel Mondal
Roopam Panda
+ Introduction to Statistical Method 2022 Luca Gianotti
+ Principles of Biostatistics 2016 Kush Kapur
+ PDF Chat Data analysis and documentation of statistics in biomedical research papers in Albania 2018 Eliana Ibrahimi
+ Basic statistical reporting for articles published in Biomedical Journals: The “Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature” or the SAMPL Guidelines 2014 T. Lang
Douglas G. Altman
+ A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY ON STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES AND R CODE IN RESEARCH ANALYSIS 2024 Deepika Prabhu
A P Suma
+ PDF Chat Reporting guidance considerations from a statistical perspective: overview of tools to enhance the rigour of reporting of randomised trials and systematic reviews 2017 Brian Hutton
Dianna Wolfe
David Moher
Larissa Shamseer
+ Statistical Methods for Health Sciences. 1997 Judith M. Conn
M. M. Shoukri
V. L. Edge
+ Best practice guidelines for modern statistical methods in applied clinical research: Introduction to the Special Section 2017 Timothy A. Brown
Andy P. Field
+ PDF Chat Research Design and Statistical Methods in Indian Medical Journals: A Retrospective Survey 2015 Shabbeer Hassan
Rajashree Yellur
Pooventhan Subramani
Poornima Adiga
Manoj Gokhale
Manasa S. Iyer
Shreemathi S Mayya
+ How to choose and interpret a statistical test? An update for budding researchers 2021 Ahmad Najmi
Balakrishnan Sadasivam
Avik Ray
+ What is Biostatistics? 2022
+ PDF Chat Statistical Analysis in Clinical and Experimental Medical Research: Simplified Guidance for Authors and Reviewers 2023 Georgios D. Panos
Frank M. Boeckler
+ An overview of commonly used statistical methods in clinical research 2018 Yuri V. Sebastião
Shawn D. St. Peter
+ PDF Chat Understanding Common Statistical Methods, Part I: Descriptive Methods, Probability, and Continuous Data 2011 Carl Skinner
Manish M. Patel
Jerry D. Thomas
Michael A. Miller

Works Cited by This (58)

Action Title Year Authors
+ G-estimation of Causal Effects, Allowing for Time-varying Confounding 2002 Jonathan A C Sterne
Kate Tilling
+ PDF Chat Methods to estimate the between‐study variance and its uncertainty in meta‐analysis 2015 Areti Angeliki Veroniki
Dan Jackson
Wolfgang Viechtbauer
Ralf Bender
Jack Bowden
Guido Knapp
Oliver Kuß
Julian P. T. Higgins
Dean Langan
Georgia Salanti
+ A group sequential Holm procedure with multiple primary endpoints 2012 Yining Ye
Li Ai
Lingyun Liu
Bin Yao
+ PDF Chat Designing and Analyzing Clinical Trials with Composite Outcomes: Consideration of Possible Treatment Differences between the Individual Outcomes 2012 Janice Pogue
P.J. Devereaux
Lehana Thabane
Salim Yusuf
+ Regression models: calculating the confidence interval of effects in the presence of interactions 1998 Adolfo Figueiras
Jose Maria Domenech-Massons
Carmén Cadarso-Suárez
+ Absolute risk reductions, relative risks, relative risk reductions, and numbers needed to treat can be obtained from a logistic regression model 2009 Peter C. Austin
+ Three-sided hypothesis testing: Simultaneous testing of superiority, equivalence and inferiority 2010 Jelle J. Goeman
Aldo Solari
Theo Stijnen
+ Methods and recommendations for evaluating and reporting a new diagnostic test 2012 Aaron S. Hess
Michelle Shardell
J. Kristie Johnson
Kerri A. Thom
Paula D. Strassle
Giora Netzer
Anthony D. Harris
+ PDF Chat Estimating adjusted risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) measures in the Cox regression model 2010 Rüdiger P. Laubender
Ralf Bender
+ PDF Chat The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method 2014 Joanna IntHout
John P. A. Ioannidis
George F. Borm