The photon identification loophole in EPRB experiments: computer models with single-wing selection

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2017-01-01

Citations: 27

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/phys-2017-0085

Abstract

Abstract Recent Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiments [M. Giustina et al . Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250401 (2015); L. K. Shalm et al . Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250402 (2015)] that claim to be loophole free are scrutinized. The combination of a digital computer and discrete-event simulation is used to construct a minimal but faithful model of the most perfected realization of these laboratory experiments. In contrast to prior simulations, all photon selections are strictly made, as they are in the actual experiments, at the local station and no other “post-selection” is involved. The simulation results demonstrate that a manifestly non-quantum model that identifies photons in the same local manner as in these experiments can produce correlations that are in excellent agreement with those of the quantum theoretical description of the corresponding thought experiment, in conflict with Bell’s theorem which states that this is impossible. The failure of Bell’s theorem is possible because of our recognition of the photon identification loophole. Such identification measurement-procedures are necessarily included in all actual experiments but are not included in the theory of Bell and his followers.

Locations

  • Open Physics - View - PDF
  • arXiv (Cornell University) - View - PDF
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) - View - PDF
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) - View - PDF
  • JuSER (Forschungszentrum Jülich) - View - PDF
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) - View

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ The photon identification loophole in EPRB experiments: computer models with single-wing selection 2017 Hans De Raedt
Kristel Michielsen
K. Hess
+ Comment on "The photon identification loophole in EPRB experiments: computer models with single-wing selection" 2018 Mateus Araújo
Philippe Grangier
Jan-Åke Larsson
+ PDF Chat Event-by-Event Simulation of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Experiments 2008 Shuang Zhao
Hans De Raedt
Kristel Michielsen
+ Event-by-event simulation of quantum phenomena: Application to Einstein-Podolosky-Rosen-Bohm experiments 2007 Hans De Raedt
K. De Raedt
Kristel Michielsen
K. Keimpema
Seiji Miyashita
+ PDF Chat Event-by-Event Simulation of Quantum Phenomena: Application to Einstein-Podolosky-Rosen-Bohm Experiments 2007 Hans De Raedt
K. De Raedt
Kristel Michielsen
K. Keimpema
Seiji Miyashita
+ PDF Chat Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm laboratory experiments: Data analysis and simulation 2012 Hans De Raedt
Kristel Michielsen
Fengping Jin
+ PDF Chat Event-Based Simulation of Quantum Physics Experiments 2014 Kristel Michielsen
Hans De Raedt
+ The digital computer as a metaphor for the perfect laboratory experiment: Loophole-free Bell experiments 2016 Hans De Raedt
Kristel Michielsen
K. Hess
+ PDF Chat Realistic loophole-free Bell test with atom–photon entanglement 2013 Colin Teo
Mateus Araújo
Marco Túlio Quintino
Jiří Minář
Daniel Cavalcanti
Valerio Scarani
Marcelo Terra Cunha
Marcelo F. Santos
+ Event based simulation of an EPR-B experiment by local hidden variables: epr-simple and epr-clocked 2015 Richard D. Gill
+ PDF Chat Event-Based Computer Simulation Model of Aspect-Type Experiments Strictly Satisfying Einstein's Locality Conditions 2007 Hans De Raedt
K. De Raedt
Kristel Michielsen
K. Keimpema
Seiji Miyashita
+ Simple experiment to test a hypothetical transient deviation from Quantum Mechanics 2015 Alejandro Hnilo
Mónica Agüero
+ Simple experiment to test a hypothetical transient deviation from Quantum Mechanics 2015 Alejandro Hnilo
Mónica Agüero
+ Can atom be considered as a photon trajectory detector 2010 Vladan Panković
+ Proposal for Sequential Stern-Gerlach Experiment with Programmable Quantum Processors 2022 Mengjun Hu
H. Miao
Yongsheng Zhang
+ Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen–Bohm experiments: A discrete data driven approach 2023 Hans De Raedt
M. I. Katsnelson
Manpreet Singh Jattana
Vrinda Mehta
Madita Willsch
Dennis Willsch
Kristel Michielsen
Fengping Jin
+ PDF Chat The Hong-Ou-Mandel experiment: from photon indistinguishability to continuous variables quantum computing 2022 Nicolas Fabre
Maria I. Amanti
F. Baboux
A. Keller
S. Ducci
P. Milman
+ Detector inefficiencies in the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment 1987 Anupam Garg
N. David Mermin
+ Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox in a hybrid bipartite system 2017 Michał Dąbrowski
Michał Parniak
Wojciech Wasilewski
+ PDF Chat Null-Result Detection and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Correlations 2013 Luiz Carlos Ryff