On the universality of potential well dynamics

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2017-01-01

Citations: 10

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4310/dpde.2017.v14.n3.a1

Abstract

Given a smooth potential function $V : \mathbf{R}^m \to \mathbf{R}$, one can consider the ODE $\partial_t^2 u = -(\nabla V)(u)$ describing the trajectory of a particle $t \mapsto u(t)$ in the potential well $V$. We consider the question of whether the dynamics of this family of ODE are \emph{universal} in the sense that they contain (as embedded copies) any first-order ODE $\partial_t u = X(u)$ arising from a smooth vector field $X$ on a manifold $M$. Assuming that $X$ is nonsingular and $M$ is compact, we show (using the Nash embedding theorem) that this is possible precisely when the flow $(M,X)$ supports a geometric structure which we call a \emph{strongly adapted $1$-form}; many smooth flows do have such a $1$-form, but we give an example (due to Bryant) of a flow which does not, and hence cannot be modeled by the dynamics of a potential well. As one consequence of this embeddability criterion, we construct an example of a (coercive) potential well system which is \emph{Turing complete} in the sense that the halting of any Turing machine with a given input is equivalent to a certain bounded trajectory in this system entering a certain open set. In particular, this system contains trajectories for which it is undecidable whether that trajectory enters such a set. Remarkably, the above results also hold if one works instead with the nonlinear wave equation $\partial_t^2 u - \Delta u = -(\nabla V)(u)$ on a torus instead of a particle in a potential well, or if one replaces the target domain $\mathbf{R}^m$ by a more general Riemannian manifold.

Locations

  • Dynamics of Partial Differential Equations - View
  • arXiv (Cornell University) - View - PDF
  • Dynamics of Partial Differential Equations - View
  • arXiv (Cornell University) - View - PDF
  • Dynamics of Partial Differential Equations - View
  • arXiv (Cornell University) - View - PDF

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ From the Perspective of Nonsolvable Dynamics on $$(\mathbb C,0)$$: Basics and Applications 2024 Isao Nakai
+ 1.2 Embedding of a discrete dynamical system into a flow 2012
+ One-Dimensional Dynamics 2005 Welington de Melo
Sebastian van Strien
+ Non-Smooth Dynamical Systems: An Overview 2001 Markus Kunze
Tassilo Küpper
+ Quasi-dynamical systems 1969 Vladimir Drobot
+ Blowup in Korteweg-de Vries-type systems 2012 E. V. Yushkov
+ Geometric analysis of nondeterminacy in dynamical systems 2007 Rafael Wisniewski
Martin Raußen
+ Continuous and Discrete Dynamics Near Manifolds of Equilibria (Bernd Aulbach) 1986 Alan Hastings
+ Homomorphisms of Differentiable Dynamical Systems (エルゴード理論とその周辺) 1974 Toshio Niwa
+ Dynamical Systems for U-Maps 1993 A. N. Sharkovsky
Yu. L. Maistrenko
E. Yu. Romanenko
+ Finite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems: Specialized Results 2007 A.N. Michel
Ling Hou
Derong Liu
+ An overview of Non Smooth Dynamical Systems. Moreau's Sweeping Process, Higher order systems and links with optimization 2005 Vincent Acary
+ PDF Chat An optimized Bell test in a dynamical system 2010 Bruno Bellomo
Rosario Lo Franco
G. Compagno
+ “Stickiness” in mappings and dynamical systems 1998 R. Dvořák
G. Contopoulos
Ch. Efthymiopoulos
N. Voglis
+ Hypersonic Stability and Transition 1991 Eli Reshotko
+ Homomorphisms of Differentiable Dynamical Systems (エルゴ-ド理論とその周辺) 1974 敏雄 丹羽
+ An introduction to infinite-dynamical systems 1985 Gian‐Carlo Rota
+ PDF Chat Nonextensivity: From Low-Dimensional Maps to Hamiltonian Systems 2002 Constantino Tsallis
Andrea Rapisarda
Vito Latora
Fulvio Baldovin
+ Dynamics of one-dimensional mappings 1989 A. N. Sharkovskii
S. F. Koli︠a︡da
Andrei G. Sivak
В. В. Федоренко
+ PDF Chat What can Koopmanism do for attractors in dynamical systems? 2019 Viktoria Kühner

Works Cited by This (0)

Action Title Year Authors