Using Bayesian adaptive designs to improve phase III trials: a respiratory care example

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2019-05-14

Citations: 35

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0739-3

Abstract

Bayesian adaptive designs can improve the efficiency of trials, and lead to trials that can produce high quality evidence more quickly, with fewer patients and lower costs than traditional methods. The aim of this work was to determine how Bayesian adaptive designs can be constructed for phase III clinical trials in critical care, and to assess the influence that Bayesian designs would have on trial efficiency and study results. We re-designed the High Frequency OSCillation in Acute Respiratory distress syndrome (OSCAR) trial using Bayesian adaptive design methods, to allow for the possibility of early stopping for success or futility. We constructed several alternative designs and studied their operating characteristics via simulation. We then performed virtual re-executions by applying the Bayesian adaptive designs using the OSCAR data to demonstrate the practical applicability of the designs. We constructed five alternative Bayesian adaptive designs and identified a preferred design based on the simulated operating characteristics, which had similar power to the original design but recruited fewer patients on average. The virtual re-executions showed the Bayesian sequential approach and original OSCAR trial yielded similar trial conclusions. However, using a Bayesian sequential design could have led to a reduced sample size and earlier completion of the trial. Using the OSCAR trial as an example, this case study found that Bayesian adaptive designs can be constructed for phase III critical care trials. If the OSCAR trial had been run using one of the proposed Bayesian adaptive designs, it would have terminated at a smaller sample size with fewer deaths in the trial, whilst reaching the same conclusions. We recommend the wider use of Bayesian adaptive approaches in phase III clinical trials. OSCAR Trial registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN10416500 . Retrospectively registered 13 June 2007.

Locations

  • BMC Medical Research Methodology - View - PDF
  • PubMed Central - View
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) - View - PDF
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) - View - PDF
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) - View
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) - View - PDF
  • PubMed - View

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat Bayesian adaptive clinical trial designs for respiratory medicine 2022 Elizabeth Ryan
Dominique‐Laurent Couturier
Stéphane Héritier
+ PDF Chat Adaptive designs in critical care trials: a simulation study 2023 Wei Li
Victoria Cornelius
Simon Finfer
Balasubramanian Venkatesh
Laurent Billot
+ PDF Chat The Bayesian Design of Adaptive Clinical Trials 2021 Alessandra Giovagnoli
+ Adaptive designs in clinical trials 2011 Suresh Bowalekar
+ Designing a Bayesian adaptive clinical trial to evaluate novel mechanical ventilation strategies in acute respiratory failure using Integrated Nested Laplace Approximations 2023 Reyhaneh Hosseini
Ziming Chen
Ewan C. Goligher
Eddy Fan
Niall D. Ferguson
Michael O. Harhay
Sarina K. Sahetya
Martin Urner
Christopher J. Yarnell
Anna Heath
+ Bayesian Adaptive Designs in Phase I/II Clinical Trials 2012 Wei Zhong
+ Simulation for Bayesian Adaptive Designs—Step-by-Step Guide for Developing the Necessary R Code 2019 J. Kyle Wathen
+ PDF Chat Improving clinical trials using Bayesian adaptive designs: a breast cancer example 2022 Wei Hong
Sue‐Anne McLachlan
Melissa M. Moore
Robert K. Mahar
+ PDF Chat A literature review of applied adaptive design methodology within the field of oncology in randomised controlled trials and a proposed extension to the CONSORT guidelines 2017 Pankaj Mistry
Janet Dunn
Andrea Marshall
+ PDF Chat Bayesian group sequential designs for phase III emergency medicine trials: a case study using the PARAMEDIC2 trial 2020 Elizabeth Ryan
Nigel Stallard
Ranjit Lall
Chen Ji
Gavin D. Perkins
Simon Gates
+ Novel Bayesian Adaptive Designs and Their Applications in Cancer Clinical Trials 2020 Ruitao Lin
J. Jack Lee
+ Characteristics and Principles of Adaptive Trial Designs 2023 Jay Park
J. Kyle Wathen
Edward J. Mills
+ PDF Chat Critical concepts in adaptive clinical trials 2018 Jay Park
Kristian Thorlund
Edward J. Mills
+ A Bayesian adaptive design for clinical trials of rare efficacy outcomes with multiple definitions 2022 Shirin Golchi
James J. Willard
Eleanor Pullenayegum
Diego G. Bassani
Lisa G. Pell
Kristian Thorlund
Daniel Roth
+ Common Types of Adaptive Trial Designs 2023 Jay Park
J. Kyle Wathen
Edward J. Mills
+ PDF Chat Bayesian Adaptive Randomization Designs for Clinical Trial 2015 Busaba Supawattan
Lily Ingsrisawa
+ Bayesian Optimal Phase II Design for Randomized Clinical Trials 2022 Yujie Zhao
Bo Yang
J. Jack Lee
Li Wang
Ying Yuan
+ Bayesian Optimal Phase II Design for Randomized Clinical Trials 2022 Yujie Zhao
Bo Yang
J. Jack Lee
Li Wang
Ying Yuan
+ Bayesian adaptive designs for clinical trials 2016 Benjamin R. Saville
+ PDF Chat Bayesian adaptive designs in a breast cancer trial with a delayed binary outcome 2024 Wei Hong
Sue‐Anne McLachlan
Melissa M. Moore
Robert K. Mahar

Works Cited by This (11)

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat Bayesian adaptive trials offer advantages in comparative effectiveness trials: an example in status epilepticus 2013 Jason T. Connor
Jordan Elm
Kristine Broglio
+ On the bias of maximum likelihood estimation following a sequential test 1986 John Whitehead
+ PDF Chat Adaptive Clinical Trials: The Promise and the Caution 2010 Donald A. Berry
+ PDF Chat The Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) trial: an adaptive trial design case study 2015 Jason T. Connor
Kristine Broglio
Valerie Durkalski
William J. Meurer
Karen C. Johnston
+ Not Too Big, Not Too Small: A Goldilocks Approach To Sample Size Selection 2014 Kristine Broglio
Jason T. Connor
Scott Berry
+ Reflections on meta-analyses involving trials stopped early for benefit: Is there a problem and if so, what is it? 2011 Dirk Bassler
Víctor M. Montori
Matthias Briel
Paul Glasziou
Stephen D. Walter
Tim Ramsay
Gordon Guyatt
+ PDF Chat Do Bayesian adaptive trials offer advantages for comparative effectiveness research? Protocol for the RE-ADAPT study 2013 Jason T. Connor
Bryan R. Luce
Kristine Broglio
K. Jack Ishak
C. Daniel Mullins
David J. Vanness
Rachael Fleurence
Elijah Saunders
Barry R. Davis
+ Rethinking Randomized Clinical Trials for Comparative Effectiveness Research: The Need for Transformational Change 2009 Bryan R. Luce
+ Using Bayesian Adaptive Trial Designs for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Virtual Trial Execution 2016 Bryan R. Luce
Jason T. Connor
Kristine Broglio
C. Daniel Mullins
K. Jack Ishak
Elijah Saunders
Barry R. Davis
+ Quantifying the bias in the estimated treatment effect in randomized trials having interim analyses and a rule for early stopping for futility 2017 Stephen D. Walter
Hye Ree Han
Matthias Briel
Gordon Guyatt