Optimal Budget-Feasible Mechanisms for Additive Valuations

Authors

Nick Gravin, Yaonan Jin, Pinyan Lu, Chenhao Zhang

Type: Preprint

Publication Date: 2019-01-01

Citations: 2

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1902.04635

View Ask PDF

Abstract

In this paper, we show a tight approximation guarantee for budget-feasible mechanisms with an additive buyer. We propose a new simple randomized mechanism with approximation ratio of $2$, improving the previous best known result of $3$. Our bound is tight with respect to either the optimal offline benchmark, or its fractional relaxation. We also present a simple deterministic mechanism with the tight approximation guarantee of $3$ against the fractional optimum, improving the best known result of $(2+ \sqrt{2})$ for the weaker integral benchmark.

Locations

arXiv (Cornell University)
View
DataCite API
View

Ask a Question About This Paper

Summary

Similar Works

Optimal Budget-Feasible Mechanisms for Additive Valuations

2019-06-17

Nick Gravin , Yaonan Jin , Pinyan Lu +1 more

In this paper, we obtain the tight approximation guarantees for budget-feasible mechanisms with an additive buyer. We propose a new simple randomized mechanism with an approximation ratio of $2$, improving … In this paper, we obtain the tight approximation guarantees for budget-feasible mechanisms with an additive buyer. We propose a new simple randomized mechanism with an approximation ratio of $2$, improving the previous best known result of $3$. Our bound is tight with respect to either the optimal offline benchmark or its fractional relaxation. We also present a simple deterministic mechanism with the tight approximation guarantee of $3$ against the fractional optimum, improving the best known result of $(\sqrt2 + 2)$ against the weaker integral benchmark.

Chat View PDF

Optimal Budget-Feasible Mechanisms for Additive Valuations

2020-10-16

Nick Gravin , Yaonan Jin , Pinyan Lu +1 more

In this article, we show a tight approximation guarantee for budget-feasible mechanisms with an additive buyer. We propose a new simple randomized mechanism with approximation ratio of 2, improving the … In this article, we show a tight approximation guarantee for budget-feasible mechanisms with an additive buyer. We propose a new simple randomized mechanism with approximation ratio of 2, improving the previous best known result of 3. Our bound is tight with respect to either the optimal offline benchmark or its fractional relaxation. We also present a simple deterministic mechanism with the tight approximation guarantee of 3 against the fractional optimum, improving the best known result of (2+ √ 2) for the weaker integral benchmark.

Chat View PDF

On the Complexity of Simple and Optimal Deterministic Mechanisms for an Additive Buyer

2018-01-01

Xi Chen , George Matikas , Dimitris Paparas +1 more

We show that the Revenue-Optimal Deterministic Mechanism Design problem for a single additive buyer is #P-hard, even when the distributions have support size 2 for each item and, more importantly, … We show that the Revenue-Optimal Deterministic Mechanism Design problem for a single additive buyer is #P-hard, even when the distributions have support size 2 for each item and, more importantly, even when the optimal solution is guaranteed to be of a very simple kind: the seller picks a price for each individual item and a price for the grand bundle of all the items; the buyer can purchase either the grand bundle at its given price or any subset of items at their total individual prices. The following problems are also #P-hard, as immediate corollaries of the proof:1.determining if individual item pricing is optimal for a given instance,2.determining if grand bundle pricing is optimal, and3.computing the optimal (deterministic) revenue.On the positive side, we show that when the distributions are i.i.d. with support size 2, the optimal revenue obtainable by any mechanism, even a randomized one, can be achieved by a simple solution of the above kind (individual item pricing with a discounted price for the grand bundle) and furthermore, it can be computed in polynomial time. The problem can be solved in polynomial time too when the number of items is constant.

Chat View PDF

On the Complexity of Simple and Optimal Deterministic Mechanisms for an Additive Buyer

2017-01-01

Xi Chen , George Matikas , Dimitris Paparas +1 more

We show that the Revenue-Optimal Deterministic Mechanism Design problem for a single additive buyer is #P-hard, even when the distributions have support size 2 for each item and, more importantly, … We show that the Revenue-Optimal Deterministic Mechanism Design problem for a single additive buyer is #P-hard, even when the distributions have support size 2 for each item and, more importantly, even when the optimal solution is guaranteed to be of a very simple kind: the seller picks a price for each individual item and a price for the grand bundle of all the items; the buyer can purchase either the grand bundle at its given price or any subset of items at their total individual prices. The following problems are also #P-hard, as immediate corollaries of the proof: 1. determining if individual item pricing is optimal for a given instance, 2. determining if grand bundle pricing is optimal, and 3. computing the optimal (deterministic) revenue. On the positive side, we show that when the distributions are i.i.d. with support size 2, the optimal revenue obtainable by any mechanism, even a randomized one, can be achieved by a simple solution of the above kind (individual item pricing with a discounted price for the grand bundle) and furthermore, it can be computed in polynomial time. The problem can be solved in polynomial time too when the number of items is constant.

Chat View PDF

The Complexity of Optimal Mechanism Design

2013-12-18

Constantinos Daskalakis , Alan Deckelbaum , Christos Tzamos

Myerson's seminal work provides a computationally efficient revenue-optimal auction for selling one item to multiple bidders [18]. Generalizing this work to selling multiple items at once has been a central … Myerson's seminal work provides a computationally efficient revenue-optimal auction for selling one item to multiple bidders [18]. Generalizing this work to selling multiple items at once has been a central question in economics and algorithmic game theory, but its complexity has remained poorly understood. We answer this question by showing that a revenue-optimal auction in multi-item settings cannot be found and implemented computationally efficiently, unless zpp ⊇ P#P. This is true even for a single additive bidder whose values for the items are independently distributed on two rational numbers with rational probabilities. Our result is very general: we show that it is hard to compute any encoding of an optimal auction of any format (direct or indirect, truthful or non-truthful) that can be implemented in expected polynomial time. In particular, under well-believed complexity-theoretic assumptions, revenue-optimization in very simple multi-item settings can only be tractably approximated.We note that our hardness result applies to randomized mechanisms in a very simple setting, and is not an artifact of introducing combinatorial structure to the problem by allowing correlation among item values, introducing combinatorial valuations, or requiring the mechanism to be deterministic (whose structure is readily combinatorial). Our proof is enabled by a flow-interpretation of the solutions of an exponential-size linear program for revenue maximization with an additional supermodularity constraint.

Chat View PDF

Improved Efficiency Guarantees in Auctions with Budgets

2014-01-01

Pinyan Lu , Tao Xiao

We study the efficiency guarantees in the simple auction environment where the auctioneer has one unit of divisible good to be distributed among a number of budget constrained agents. With … We study the efficiency guarantees in the simple auction environment where the auctioneer has one unit of divisible good to be distributed among a number of budget constrained agents. With budget constraints, the social welfare cannot be approximated by a better factor than the number of agents by any truthful mechanism. Thus, we follow a recent work by Dobzinski and Leme (ICALP 2014) to approximate the liquid welfare, which is the welfare of the agents each capped by her/his own budget. We design a new truthful auction with an approximation ratio of $\frac{\sqrt{5}+1}{2} \approx 1.618$, improving the best previous ratio of $2$ when the budgets for agents are public knowledge and their valuation is linear (additive). In private budget setting, we propose the first constant approximation auction with approximation ratio of $34$. Moreover, this auction works for any valuation function. Previously, only $O(\log n)$ approximation was known for linear and decreasing marginal (concave) valuations, and $O(\log^2 n)$ approximation was known for sub-additive valuations.

Chat View PDF

The Complexity of Optimal Mechanism Design

2012-01-01

Constantinos Daskalakis , Alan Deckelbaum , Christos Tzamos

Myerson's seminal work provides a computationally efficient revenue-optimal auction for selling one item to multiple bidders. Generalizing this work to selling multiple items at once has been a central question … Myerson's seminal work provides a computationally efficient revenue-optimal auction for selling one item to multiple bidders. Generalizing this work to selling multiple items at once has been a central question in economics and algorithmic game theory, but its complexity has remained poorly understood. We answer this question by showing that a revenue-optimal auction in multi-item settings cannot be found and implemented computationally efficiently, unless ZPP contains P^#P. This is true even for a single additive bidder whose values for the items are independently distributed on two rational numbers with rational probabilities. Our result is very general: we show that it is hard to compute any encoding of an optimal auction of any format (direct or indirect, truthful or non-truthful) that can be implemented in expected polynomial time. In particular, under well-believed complexity-theoretic assumptions, revenue-optimization in very simple multi-item settings can only be tractably approximated. We note that our hardness result applies to randomized mechanisms in a very simple setting, and is not an artifact of introducing combinatorial structure to the problem by allowing correlation among item values, introducing combinatorial valuations, or requiring the mechanism to be deterministic (whose structure is readily combinatorial). Our proof is enabled by a flow-interpretation of the solutions of an exponential-size linear program for revenue maximization with an additional supermodularity constraint.

Chat View PDF

On the approximability of budget feasible mechanisms

2011-01-23

Ning Chen , Nick Gravin , Pinyan Lu

Budget feasible mechanisms, recently initiated by Singer (FOCS 2010), extend algorithmic mechanism design problems to a realistic setting with a budget constraint. We consider the problem of designing truthful budget … Budget feasible mechanisms, recently initiated by Singer (FOCS 2010), extend algorithmic mechanism design problems to a realistic setting with a budget constraint. We consider the problem of designing truthful budget feasible mechanisms for monotone submodular functions: We give a randomized mechanism with an approximation ratio of 7.91 (improving on the previous best-known result 233.83), and a deterministic mechanism with an approximation ratio of 8.34. We also study the knapsack problem, which is a special submodular function, give a 2 + √2 approximation deterministic mechanism (improving on the previous best-known result 5), and a 3 approximation randomized mechanism. We provide similar results for an extended knapsack problem with heterogeneous items, where items are divided into groups and one can pick at most one item from each group.Finally we show a lower bound of 1 + √2 for the approximation ratio of deterministic mechanisms and 2 for randomized mechanisms for knapsack, as well as the general monotone submodular functions. Our lower bounds are unconditional, and do not rely on any computational or complexity assumptions.

Chat View PDF

Budget Feasible Mechanisms for Procurement Auctions with Divisible Agents

2022-01-01

Sophie Klumper , Guido Schäfer

We consider budget feasible mechanisms for procurement auctions with additive valuation functions. For the divisible case, where agents can be allocated fractionally, there exists an optimal mechanism with approximation guarantee … We consider budget feasible mechanisms for procurement auctions with additive valuation functions. For the divisible case, where agents can be allocated fractionally, there exists an optimal mechanism with approximation guarantee $e/(e-1)$ under the small bidder assumption. We study the divisible case without the small bidder assumption, but assume that the true costs of the agents are bounded by the budget. This setting lends itself to modeling economic situations in which the goods represent time and the agents' true costs are not necessarily small compared to the budget. Non-trivially, we give a mechanism with an approximation guarantee of 2.62, improving the result of 3 for the indivisible case. Additionally, we give a lower bound on the approximation guarantee of 1.25. We then study the problem in more competitive markets and assume that the agents' value over cost efficiencies are bounded by some $\theta \ge 1$. For $\theta \le 2$, we give a mechanism with an approximation guarantee of 2 and a lower bound of 1.18. Both results can be extended to settings with different agent types with a linear capped valuation function for each type. Finally, if each agent type has a concave valuation, we give a mechanism for which the approximation guarantee grows linearly with the number of agent types.

Chat View PDF

On the Approximability of Budget Feasible Mechanisms

2010-01-01

Ning Chen , Nick Gravin , Pinyan Lu

Budget feasible mechanisms, recently initiated by Singer (FOCS 2010), extend algorithmic mechanism design problems to a realistic setting with a budget constraint. We consider the problem of designing truthful budget … Budget feasible mechanisms, recently initiated by Singer (FOCS 2010), extend algorithmic mechanism design problems to a realistic setting with a budget constraint. We consider the problem of designing truthful budget feasible mechanisms for general submodular functions: we give a randomized mechanism with approximation ratio $7.91$ (improving the previous best-known result 112), and a deterministic mechanism with approximation ratio $8.34$. Further we study the knapsack problem, which is special submodular function, give a $2+\sqrt{2}$ approximation deterministic mechanism (improving the previous best-known result 6), and a 3 approximation randomized mechanism. We provide a similar result for an extended knapsack problem with heterogeneous items, where items are divided into groups and one can pick at most one item from each group. Finally we show a lower bound of approximation ratio of $1+\sqrt{2}$ for deterministic mechanisms and 2 for randomized mechanisms for knapsack, as well as the general submodular functions. Our lower bounds are unconditional, which do not rely on any computational or complexity assumptions.

Chat View PDF

Budget feasible mechanism design

2012-05-19

Xiaohui Bei , Ning Chen , Nick Gravin +1 more

Budget feasible mechanism design studies procurement combinatorial auctions where the sellers have private costs to produce items, and the buyer(auctioneer) aims to maximize a social valuation function on subsets of … Budget feasible mechanism design studies procurement combinatorial auctions where the sellers have private costs to produce items, and the buyer(auctioneer) aims to maximize a social valuation function on subsets of items, under the budget constraint on the total payment. One of the most important questions in the field is "which valuation domains admit truthful budget feasible mechanisms with `small' approximations (compared to the social optimum)?" Singer showed that additive and submodular functions have such constant approximations. Recently, Dobzinski, Papadimitriou, and Singer gave an O(log^2 n)-approximation mechanism for subadditive functions; they also remarked that: "A fundamental question is whether, regardless of computational constraints, a constant-factor budget feasible mechanism exists for subadditive functions." We address this question from two viewpoints: prior-free worst case analysis and Bayesian analysis. For the prior-free framework, we use an LP that describes the fractional cover of the valuation function; it is also connected to the concept of approximate core in cooperative game theory. We provide an O(I)-approximation mechanism for subadditive functions, via the worst case integrality gap I of LP. This implies an O(log n)-approximation for subadditive valuations, O(1)-approximation for XOS valuations, and for valuations with a constant I. XOS valuations are an important class of functions that lie between submodular and subadditive classes. We give another polynomial time O(log n/loglog n) sub-logarithmic approximation mechanism for subadditive valuations. For the Bayesian framework, we provide a constant approximation mechanism for all subadditive functions, using the above prior-free mechanism for XOS valuations as a subroutine. Our mechanism allows correlations in the distribution of private information and is universally truthful.

Chat View PDF

Mechanisms for Multi-Unit Auctions

2010-02-18

Shahar Dobzinski , Noam Nisan

We present an incentive-compatible polynomial-time approximation scheme for multi-unit auctions with general k-minded player valuations. The mechanism fully optimizes over an appropriately chosen sub-range of possible allocations and then uses … We present an incentive-compatible polynomial-time approximation scheme for multi-unit auctions with general k-minded player valuations. The mechanism fully optimizes over an appropriately chosen sub-range of possible allocations and then uses VCG payments over this sub-range. We show that obtaining a fully polynomial-time incentive-compatible approximation scheme, at least using VCG payments, is NP-hard. For the case of valuations given by black boxes, we give a polynomial-time incentive-compatible 2-approximation mechanism and show that no better is possible, at least using VCG payments.

Chat View PDF

Deterministic Budget-Feasible Clock Auctions

2021-01-01

Eric Balkanski , Pranav Garimidi , Vasilis Gkatzelis +2 more

We revisit the well-studied problem of budget-feasible procurement, where a buyer with a strict budget constraint seeks to acquire services from a group of strategic providers (the sellers). During the … We revisit the well-studied problem of budget-feasible procurement, where a buyer with a strict budget constraint seeks to acquire services from a group of strategic providers (the sellers). During the last decade, several strategyproof budget-feasible procurement auctions have been proposed, aiming to maximize the value of the buyer, while eliciting each seller's true cost for providing their service. These solutions predominantly take the form of randomized sealed-bid auctions: they ask the sellers to report their private costs and then use randomization to determine which subset of services will be procured and how much each of the chosen providers will be paid, ensuring that the total payment does not exceed budget. Our main result in this paper is a novel method for designing budget-feasible auctions, leading to solutions that outperform the previously proposed auctions in multiple ways. First, our solutions take the form of descending clock auctions, and thus satisfy a list of properties, such as obvious strategyproofness, group strategyproofness, transparency, and unconditional winner privacy; this makes these auctions much more likely to be used in practice. Second, in contrast to previous results that heavily depend on randomization, our auctions are deterministic. As a result, we provide an affirmative answer to one of the main open questions in this literature, asking whether a deterministic strategyproof auction can achieve a constant approximation when the buyer's valuation function is submodular over the set of services. In addition, we also provide the first deterministic budget-feasible auction that matches the approximation bound of the best-known randomized auction for the class of subadditive valuations. Finally, using our method, we improve the best-known approximation factor for monotone submodular valuations, which has been the focus of most of the prior work.

Chat View PDF

Improved Efficiency Guarantees in Auctions with Budgets

2015-06-12

Pinyan Lu , Tao Xiao

We study the efficiency guarantees in the simple auction environment where the auctioneer has one unit of divisible good to be distributed among a number of budget constrained agents. With … We study the efficiency guarantees in the simple auction environment where the auctioneer has one unit of divisible good to be distributed among a number of budget constrained agents. With budget constraints, the social welfare cannot be approximated by a better factor than the number of agents by any truthful mechanism. Thus, we follow a recent work by Dobzinski and Leme[Dobzinski and Leme 2014] to approximate the liquid welfare, which is the welfare of the agents each capped by her/his own budget. We design a new truthful auction with an approximation ratio of √5+1/2 ~1.618, improving the best previous ratio of 2 when the budgets for agents are public knowledge and their valuation is linear (additive). In private budget setting, we propose the first constant approximation auction with approximation ratio of 34. Moreover, this auction works for any valuation function. Previously, only O(log n) approximation was known for linear and decreasing marginal (concave) valuations, and O(log2 n) approximation was known for sub-additive valuations.

Chat View PDF

A simple and approximately optimal mechanism for an additive buyer

2015-01-28

Moshe Babaioff , Nicole Immorlica , Brendan Lucier +1 more

In this letter we briefly survey our main result from [Babaioff el al. 2014]: a simple and approximately revenue-optimal mechanism for a monopolist who wants to sell a variety of … In this letter we briefly survey our main result from [Babaioff el al. 2014]: a simple and approximately revenue-optimal mechanism for a monopolist who wants to sell a variety of items to a single buyer with an additive valuation.

Chat View PDF

From Convex Optimization to Randomized Mechanisms: Toward Optimal Combinatorial Auctions

2011-02-28

Shaddin Dughmi , Tim Roughgarden , Qiqi Yan

We design an expected polynomial-time, truthful-in-expectation, (1-1/e)-approximation mechanism for welfare maximization in a fundamental class of combinatorial auctions. Our results apply to bidders with valuations that are m matroid rank … We design an expected polynomial-time, truthful-in-expectation, (1-1/e)-approximation mechanism for welfare maximization in a fundamental class of combinatorial auctions. Our results apply to bidders with valuations that are m matroid rank sums (MRS), which encompass most concrete examples of submodular functions studied in this context, including coverage functions, matroid weighted-rank functions, and convex combinations thereof. Our approximation factor is the best possible, even for known and explicitly given coverage valuations, assuming P != NP. Ours is the first truthful-in-expectation and polynomial-time mechanism to achieve a constant-factor approximation for an NP-hard welfare maximization problem in combinatorial auctions with heterogeneous goods and restricted valuations. Our mechanism is an instantiation of a new framework for designing approximation mechanisms based on randomized rounding algorithms. A typical such algorithm first optimizes over a fractional relaxation of the original problem, and then randomly rounds the fractional solution to an integral one. With rare exceptions, such algorithms cannot be converted into truthful mechanisms. The high-level idea of our mechanism design framework is to optimize directly over the (random) output of the rounding algorithm, rather than over the input to the rounding algorithm. This approach leads to truthful-in-expectation mechanisms, and these mechanisms can be implemented efficiently when the corresponding objective function is concave. For bidders with MRS valuations, we give a novel randomized rounding algorithm that leads to both a concave objective function and a (1-1/e)-approximation of the optimal welfare.

Chat View PDF

From Convex Optimization to Randomized Mechanisms: Toward Optimal Combinatorial Auctions

2011-01-01

Shaddin Dughmi , Tim Roughgarden , Qiqi Yan

Chat View PDF

Mechanism Design for Fair Division

2012-01-01

Richard Cole , Vasilis Gkatzelis , Gagan Goel

We revisit the classic problem of fair division from a mechanism design perspective, using {\em Proportional Fairness} as a benchmark. In particular, we aim to allocate a collection of divisible … We revisit the classic problem of fair division from a mechanism design perspective, using {\em Proportional Fairness} as a benchmark. In particular, we aim to allocate a collection of divisible items to a set of agents while incentivizing the agents to be truthful in reporting their valuations. For the very large class of homogeneous valuations, we design a truthful mechanism that provides {\em every agent} with at least a $1/e\approx 0.368$ fraction of her Proportionally Fair valuation. To complement this result, we show that no truthful mechanism can guarantee more than a $0.5$ fraction, even for the restricted class of additive linear valuations. We also propose another mechanism for additive linear valuations that works really well when every item is highly demanded. To guarantee truthfulness, our mechanisms discard a carefully chosen fraction of the allocated resources; we conclude by uncovering interesting connections between our mechanisms and known mechanisms that use money instead.

Chat View PDF

Tight Approximation Ratio of Anonymous Pricing

2018-01-01

Yaonan Jin , Pinyan Lu , Qi Qi +2 more

We consider two canonical Bayesian mechanism design settings. In the single-item setting, we prove tight approximation ratio for anonymous pricing: compared with Myerson Auction, it extracts at least $\frac{1}{2.62}$-fraction of … We consider two canonical Bayesian mechanism design settings. In the single-item setting, we prove tight approximation ratio for anonymous pricing: compared with Myerson Auction, it extracts at least $\frac{1}{2.62}$-fraction of revenue; there is a matching lower-bound example. In the unit-demand single-buyer setting, we prove tight approximation ratio between the simplest and optimal deterministic mechanisms: in terms of revenue, uniform pricing admits a $2.62$-approximation of item pricing; we further validate the tightness of this ratio. These results settle two open problems asked in~\cite{H13,CD15,AHNPY15,L17,JLTX18}. As an implication, in the single-item setting: we improve the approximation ratio of the second-price auction with anonymous reserve to $2.62$, which breaks the state-of-the-art upper bound of $e \approx 2.72$.

Chat View PDF

Mechanisms for multi-unit auctions

2007-06-11

Shahar Dobzinski , Noam Nisan

We present an incentive-compatible polynomial-time approximation scheme for multi-unit auctions with general k-minded playervaluations. The mechanism fully optimizes over an appropriately chosen sub-range of possible allocations and then uses VCG … We present an incentive-compatible polynomial-time approximation scheme for multi-unit auctions with general k-minded playervaluations. The mechanism fully optimizes over an appropriately chosen sub-range of possible allocations and then uses VCG payments over this sub-range. We show that obtaining a fully polynomial-time incentive-compatible approximation scheme, at least using VCG payments, is NP-hard. For the case of valuations given by black boxes, we give a polynomial-time incentive-compatible 2-approximation mechanism and show that no better is possible, at least using VCG payments.

Chat View PDF

Cited by (2)

Tight Revenue Gaps among Multi-Unit Mechanisms

2021-01-01

Yaonan Jin , Shunhua Jiang , Pinyan Lu +1 more

This paper considers Bayesian revenue maximization in the $k$-unit setting, where a monopolist seller has $k$ copies of an indivisible item and faces $n$ unit-demand buyers (whose value distributions can … This paper considers Bayesian revenue maximization in the $k$-unit setting, where a monopolist seller has $k$ copies of an indivisible item and faces $n$ unit-demand buyers (whose value distributions can be non-identical). Four basic mechanisms among others have been widely employed in practice and widely studied in the literature: {\sf Myerson Auction}, {\sf Sequential Posted-Pricing}, {\sf $(k + 1)$-th Price Auction with Anonymous Reserve}, and {\sf Anonymous Pricing}. Regarding a pair of mechanisms, we investigate the largest possible ratio between the two revenues (a.k.a.\ the revenue gap), over all possible value distributions of the buyers. Divide these four mechanisms into two groups: (i)~the discriminating mechanism group, {\sf Myerson Auction} and {\sf Sequential Posted-Pricing}, and (ii)~the anonymous mechanism group, {\sf Anonymous Reserve} and {\sf Anonymous Pricing}. Within one group, the involved two mechanisms have an asymptotically tight revenue gap of $1 + \Theta(1 / \sqrt{k})$. In contrast, any two mechanisms from the different groups have an asymptotically tight revenue gap of $\Theta(\log k)$.

Chat View PDF

Deterministic Budget-Feasible Clock Auctions

2021-01-01

Eric Balkanski , Pranav Garimidi , Vasilis Gkatzelis +2 more

Chat View PDF

References (11)

Bayesian Budget Feasibility with Posted Pricing

2016-04-11

Eric Balkanski , Jason D. Hartline

We consider the problem of budget feasible mechanism design proposed by Singer, but in a Bayesian setting. A principal has a public value for hiring a subset of the agents … We consider the problem of budget feasible mechanism design proposed by Singer, but in a Bayesian setting. A principal has a public value for hiring a subset of the agents and a budget, while the agents have private costs for being hired. We consider both additive and submodular value functions of the principal. We show that there are simple, practical, ex post budget balanced posted pricing mechanisms that approximate the value obtained by the Bayesian optimal mechanism that is budget balanced only in expectation. A main motivating application for this work is crowdsourcing, e.g., on Mechanical Turk, where workers are drawn from a large population and posted pricing is standard. Our analysis methods relate to contention resolution schemes in submodular optimization of Vondràk et al. and the correlation gap analysis of Yan.

Chat View PDF

Mechanism Design for Crowdsourcing: An Optimal 1-1/e Competitive Budget-Feasible Mechanism for Large Markets

2014-10-01

Nima Anari , Gagan Goel , Afshin Nikzad

In this paper we consider a mechanism design problem in the context of large-scale crowdsourcing markets such as Amazon's Mechanical Turk mturk, ClickWorker clickworker, CrowdFlower crowdflower. In these markets, there … In this paper we consider a mechanism design problem in the context of large-scale crowdsourcing markets such as Amazon's Mechanical Turk mturk, ClickWorker clickworker, CrowdFlower crowdflower. In these markets, there is a requester who wants to hire workers to accomplish some tasks. Each worker is assumed to give some utility to the requester on getting hired. Moreover each worker has a minimum cost that he wants to get paid for getting hired. This minimum cost is assumed to be private information of the workers. The question then is -- if the requester has a limited budget, how to design a direct revelation mechanism that picks the right set of workers to hire in order to maximize the requester's utility? We note that although the previous work (Singer (2010) chen et al. (2011)) has studied this problem, a crucial difference in which we deviate from earlier work is the notion of large-scale markets that we introduce in our model. Without the large market assumption, it is known that no mechanism can achieve a competitive ratio better than 0.414 and 0.5 for deterministic and randomized mechanisms respectively (while the best known deterministic and randomized mechanisms achieve an approximation ratio of 0.292 and 0.33 respectively). In this paper, we design a budget-feasible mechanism for large markets that achieves a competitive ratio of 1 - 1/e ≃ 0.63. Our mechanism can be seen as a generalization of an alternate way to look at the proportional share mechanism, which is used in all the previous works so far on this problem. Interestingly, we can also show that our mechanism is optimal by showing that no truthful mechanism can achieve a factor better than 1 - 1/e, thus, fully resolving this setting. Finally we consider the more general case of submodular utility functions and give new and improved mechanisms for the case when the market is large.

Chat View PDF

Frugality ratios and improved truthful mechanisms for vertex cover

2007-06-11

Edith Elkind , Leslie Ann Goldberg , Paul W. Goldberg

In set-system auctions, there are several overlapping teams of agents, and a task that can be completed by any of these teams. The auctioneer's goal is to hire a team … In set-system auctions, there are several overlapping teams of agents, and a task that can be completed by any of these teams. The auctioneer's goal is to hire a team and pay as little as possible. Examples of this setting include shortest-path auctions and vertex-cover auctions. Recently, Karlin, Kempe and Tamir introduced a new definition of for this problem. Informally, the frugality ratio is the of the total payment of a mechanism to a desired payment bound. The captures the extent to which the mechanism overpays, relative to perceived fair cost in a truthful auction. In this paper, we propose a new truthful polynomial-time auction for the vertex cover problem and bound its ratio. We show that the solution quality is with a constant factor of optimal and the is within a constant factor of the best possible worst-case bound; this is the first auction for this problem to have these properties. Moreover, we show how to transform any truthful auction into a frugal one while preserving the approximation ratio. Also, we consider two natural modifications of the definition of Karlin et al., and we analyse the properties of the resulting payment bounds, such as monotonicity, computational hardness, and robustness with respect to the draw-resolution rule. We study the relationships between the different payment bounds, both for general set systems and for specific set-system auctions, such as path auctions and vertex-cover auctions. We use these new definitions in the proof of our main result for vertex-cover auctions via a boot-strapping technique, which may be of independent interest.

Chat View PDF

Frugal and Truthful Auctions for Vertex Covers, Flows and Cuts

2010-10-01

David Kempe , Mahyar Salek , Cristopher Moore

We study truthful mechanisms for hiring a team of agents in three classes of set systems: Vertex Cover auctions, How auctions, and cut auctions. For Vertex Cover auctions, the vertices … We study truthful mechanisms for hiring a team of agents in three classes of set systems: Vertex Cover auctions, How auctions, and cut auctions. For Vertex Cover auctions, the vertices are owned by selfish and rational agents, and the auctioneer wants to purchase a vertex cover from them. For k-flow auctions, the edges are owned by the agents, and the auctioneer wants to purchase k edge-disjoint s-t paths, for given s and t. In the same setting, for cut auctions, the auctioneer wants to purchase an s-t cut. Only the agents know their costs, and the auctioneer needs to select a feasible set and payments based on bids made by the agents. We present constant-competitive truthful mechanisms for all three set systems. That is, the maximum overpayment of the mechanism is within a constant factor of the maximum overpayment of any truthful mechanism, for every set system in the class. The mechanism for Vertex Cover is based on scaling each bid by a multiplier derived from the dominant eigenvector of a certain matrix. The mechanism for k-flows prunes the graph to be minimally (k + 1)-connected, and then applies the Vertex Cover mechanism. Similarly, the mechanism for cuts contracts the graph until all s-t paths have length exactly 2, and then applies the Vertex Cover mechanism.

Chat View PDF

Budget Feasible Mechanisms

2010-10-01

Yaron Singer

We study a novel class of mechanism design problems in which the outcomes are constrained by the payments. This basic class of mechanism design problems captures many common economic situations, … We study a novel class of mechanism design problems in which the outcomes are constrained by the payments. This basic class of mechanism design problems captures many common economic situations, and yet it has not been studied, to our knowledge, in the past. We focus on the case of procurement auctions in which sellers have private costs, and the auctioneer aims to maximize a utility function on subsets of items, under the constraint that the sum of the payments provided by the mechanism does not exceed a given budget. Standard mechanism design ideas such as the VCG mechanism and its variants are not applicable here. We show that, for general functions, the budget constraint can render mechanisms arbitrarily bad in terms of the utility of the buyer. However, our main result shows that for the important class of sub modular functions, a bounded approximation ratio is achievable. Better approximation results are obtained for subclasses of the sub modular functions. We explore the space of budget feasible mechanisms in other domains and give a characterization under more restricted conditions.

Chat View PDF

On the approximability of budget feasible mechanisms

2011-01-23

Ning Chen , Nick Gravin , Pinyan Lu

Chat View PDF

Coverage, Matching, and Beyond: New Results on Budgeted Mechanism Design

2016-01-01

Georgios Amanatidis , Georgios Birmpas , Evangelos Markakis

Chat View PDF

Budget Feasible Mechanisms on Matroids

2017-01-01

Stefano Leonardi , Gianpiero Monaco , Piotr Sankowski +1 more

Chat View PDF

Budget Feasible Mechanisms for Experimental Design

2014-01-01

Thibaut Horel , Stratis Ioannidis , S. Muthukrishnan

Chat View PDF

Frugal Mechanism Design via Spectral Techniques

2010-10-01

Ning Chen , Edith Elkind , Nick Gravin +1 more

We study the design of truthful mechanisms for set systems, i.e., scenarios where a customer needs to hire a team of agents to perform a complex task. In this setting, … We study the design of truthful mechanisms for set systems, i.e., scenarios where a customer needs to hire a team of agents to perform a complex task. In this setting, frugality [Archer&Tardos'02] provides a measure to evaluate the "cost of truthfulness", that is, the overpayment of a truthful mechanism relative to the "fair" payment. We propose a uniform scheme for designing frugal truthful mechanisms for general set systems. Our scheme is based on scaling the agents' bids using the eigenvector of a matrix that encodes the interdependencies between the agents. We demonstrate that the r-out-of-k-system mechanism and the \sqrt-mechanism for buying a path in a graph [Karlin et. al'05] can be viewed as instantiations of our scheme. We then apply our scheme to two other classes of set systems, namely, vertex cover systems and k-path systems, in which a customer needs to purchase k edge-disjoint source-sink paths. For both settings, we bound the frugality of our mechanism in terms of the largest eigenvalue of the respective interdependency matrix. We show that our mechanism is optimal for a large subclass of vertex cover systems satisfying a simple local sparsity condition. For k-path systems, while our mechanism is within a factor of k + 1 from optimal, we show that it is, in fact, optimal, when one uses a modified definition of frugality proposed in [Elkind et al.'07]. Our lower bound argument combines spectral techniques and Young's inequality, and is applicable to all set systems. As both r-out-of-k systems and single path systems can be viewed as special cases of k-path systems, our result improves the lower bounds of [Karlin et al.'05] and answers several open questions proposed in that paper.

Chat View PDF

Simple and Efficient Budget Feasible Mechanisms for Monotone Submodular Valuations

2018-01-01

Pooya Jalaly Khalilabadi , Éva Tardos

Chat View PDF