Uniform Continuity in Definable Groups

Type: Preprint
Publication Date: 2018-01-01
Citations: 0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1812.05146

Abstract

In this paper we study analogues of amenability for topological groups in the context of definable structures. We prove fixed point theorems for such groups. More importantly, we propose definitions for definable actions and continuous functions from definable groups to topological spaces which might prove useful in other contexts.

Locations

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • DataCite API
We discuss definable compactifications and topological dynamics. For G a group definable in some structure M, we define notions of "definable" compactification of G and "definable" action of G on … We discuss definable compactifications and topological dynamics. For G a group definable in some structure M, we define notions of "definable" compactification of G and "definable" action of G on a compact space X (definable G-flow), where the latter is under a definability of types assumption on M. We describe the universal definable compactification of G as G*/G*00_M and the universal definable G-ambit as the type space S_{G}(M). We also prove existence and uniqueness of "universal minimal definable G-flows", and discuss issues of amenability and extreme amenability in this definable category, with a characterization of the latter. For the sake of completeness we also describe the universal (Bohr) compactification and universal G-ambit in model-theoretic terms, when G is a topological group (although it is essentially well-known).
Abstract We extend some recent results about bounded invariant equivalence relations and invariant subgroups of definable groups: we show that type-definability and smoothness are equivalent conditions in a wider class … Abstract We extend some recent results about bounded invariant equivalence relations and invariant subgroups of definable groups: we show that type-definability and smoothness are equivalent conditions in a wider class of relations than heretofore considered, which includes all the cases for which the equivalence was proved before. As a by-product, we show some analogous results in purely topological context (without direct use of model theory).
We study amenability of definable and topological groups. Among our main technical tools is an elaboration on and strengthening of the Massicot-Wagner version of the stabilizer theorem, and some results … We study amenability of definable and topological groups. Among our main technical tools is an elaboration on and strengthening of the Massicot-Wagner version of the stabilizer theorem, and some results around measures. As an application we show that if $G$ is an amenable topological group, then the Bohr compactification of $G$ coincides with a certain "weak Bohr compactification" introduced in [24]. Formally, $G^{00}_{topo} = G^{000}_{topo}$. We also prove wide generalizations of this result, implying in particular its extension to a "definable-topological" context, confirming the main conjectures from [24]. We introduce $\bigvee$-definable group topologies on a given $\emptyset$-definable group $G$ (including group topologies induced by type-definable subgroups as well as uniformly definable group topologies), and prove that the existence of a mean on the lattice of closed, type-definable subsets of $G$ implies (under some assumption) that $cl(G^{00}_M) = cl(G^{000}_M)$ for any model $M$. We study the relationship between definability of an action of a definable group on a compact space, weakly almost periodic actions, and stability. We conclude that for any group $G$ definable in a sufficiently saturated structure, every definable action of $G$ on a compact space supports a $G$-invariant probability measure. This gives negative solutions to some questions and conjectures from [22] and [24]. We give an example of a $\emptyset$-definable approximate subgroup $X$ in a saturated extension of the group $\mathbb{F}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}$ in a suitable language for which the $\bigvee$-definable group $H:=\langle X \rangle$ contains no type-definable subgroup of bounded index. This refutes a conjecture by Wagner and shows that the Massicot-Wagner approach to prove that a locally compact "model" exists for each approximate subgroup does not work in general.
We generalize the notions of definable amenability and extreme definable amenability to continuous structures and show that the stable and ultracompact groups are definable amenable. In addition, we characterize both … We generalize the notions of definable amenability and extreme definable amenability to continuous structures and show that the stable and ultracompact groups are definable amenable. In addition, we characterize both notions in terms of fixed-point properties. We prove that, for dependent theories, definable amenability is equivalent to the existence of a good S1 ideal. Finally, we show the randomizations of first-order definable amenable groups are extremely definably amenable.
For G a group definable in some structure M, we define notions of "definable" compactification of G and "definable" action of G on a compact space X (definable G-flow), where … For G a group definable in some structure M, we define notions of "definable" compactification of G and "definable" action of G on a compact space X (definable G-flow), where the latter is under a definability of types assumption on M. We describe the universal definable compactification of G as G⁎/(G⁎)M00 and the universal definable G-ambit as the type space SG(M). We also point out the existence and uniqueness of "universal minimal definable G-flows", and discuss issues of amenability and extreme amenability in this definable category, with a characterization of the latter. For the sake of completeness we also describe the universal (Bohr) compactification and universal G-ambit in model-theoretic terms, when G is a topological group (although it is essentially well-known).
We discuss compactifications and topological dynamics. For G a group in some structure M, we define notions of definable compactification of G and definable action of G on a compact … We discuss compactifications and topological dynamics. For G a group in some structure M, we define notions of definable compactification of G and definable action of G on a compact space X (definable G-flow), where the latter is under a definability of types assumption on M. We describe the compactification of G as G*/G*00_M and the G-ambit as the type space S_{G}(M). We also prove existence and uniqueness of universal minimal G-flows, and discuss issues of amenability and extreme amenability in this category, with a characterization of the latter. For the sake of completeness we also describe the (Bohr) compactification and G-ambit in model-theoretic terms, when G is a topological group (although it is essentially well-known).
We study amenability of definable groups and topological groups, and prove various results, briefly described below. Among our main technical tools, of interest in its own right, is an elaboration … We study amenability of definable groups and topological groups, and prove various results, briefly described below. Among our main technical tools, of interest in its own right, is an elaboration on and strengthening of the Massicot-Wagner version of the stabilizer theorem, and also some results about measures and measure-like functions (which we call means and pre-means). As an application we show that if $G$ is an amenable topological group, then the Bohr compactification of $G$ coincides with a certain ``weak Bohr compactification'' introduced in [24]. In other words, the conclusion says that certain connected components of $G$ coincide: $G^{00}_{topo} = G^{000}_{topo}$. We also prove wide generalizations of this result, implying in particular its extension to a ``definable-topological'' context, confirming the main conjectures from [24]. We also introduce $\bigvee$-definable group topologies on a given $\emptyset$-definable group $G$ (including group topologies induced by type-definable subgroups as well as uniformly definable group topologies), and prove that the existence of a mean on the lattice of closed, type-definable subsets of $G$ implies (under some assumption) that $cl(G^{00}_M) = cl(G^{000}_M)$ for any model $M$. Thirdly, we give an example of a $\emptyset$-definable approximate subgroup $X$ in a saturated extension of the group $\mathbb{F}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}$ in a suitable language (where $\mathbb{F}_2$ is the free group in 2-generators) for which the $\bigvee$-definable group $H:=\langle X \rangle$ contains no type-definable subgroup of bounded index. This refutes a conjecture by Wagner and shows that the Massicot-Wagner approach to prove that a locally compact (and in consequence also Lie) ``model'' exists for each approximate subgroup does not work in general (they proved in [29] that it works for definably amenable approximate subgroups).
We prove an analogue of the fixed-point theorem for the case of definably amenable groups. We prove an analogue of the fixed-point theorem for the case of definably amenable groups.
Abstract We study amenability of definable groups and topological groups, and prove various results, briefly described below. Among our main technical tools, of interest in its own right, is an … Abstract We study amenability of definable groups and topological groups, and prove various results, briefly described below. Among our main technical tools, of interest in its own right, is an elaboration on and strengthening of the Massicot-Wagner version (Massicot and Wagner in J Ec Polytech Math 2:55–63, 2015) of the stabilizer theorem (Hrushovski in J Am Math Soc 25:189–243, 2012), and also some results about measures and measure-like functions (which we call means and pre-means). As an application we show that if G is an amenable topological group, then the Bohr compactification of G coincides with a certain “weak Bohr compactification” introduced in Krupiński and Pillay (Adv Math 345:1253–1299, 2019). In other words, the conclusion says that certain connected components of G coincide: $$G^{00}_{{{\,\mathrm{{top}}\,}}} = G^{000}_{{{\,\mathrm{{top}}\,}}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mspace /> <mml:mi>top</mml:mi> <mml:mspace /> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>00</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mspace /> <mml:mi>top</mml:mi> <mml:mspace /> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>000</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . We also prove wide generalizations of this result, implying in particular its extension to a “definable-topological” context, confirming the main conjectures from Krupiński and Pillay (2019). We also introduce $$\bigvee $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mo>⋁</mml:mo> </mml:math> -definable group topologies on a given $$\emptyset $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>∅</mml:mi> </mml:math> -definable group G (including group topologies induced by type-definable subgroups as well as uniformly definable group topologies), and prove that the existence of a mean on the lattice of closed, type-definable subsets of G implies (under some assumption) that $${{\,\mathrm{{cl}}\,}}(G^{00}_M) = {{\,\mathrm{{cl}}\,}}(G^{000}_M)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mspace /> <mml:mi>cl</mml:mi> <mml:mspace /> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mn>00</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mspace /> <mml:mi>cl</mml:mi> <mml:mspace /> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mn>000</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for any model M . Secondly, we study the relationship between (separate) definability of an action of a definable group on a compact space [in the sense of Gismatullin et al. (Ann Pure Appl Log 165:552–562, 2014)], weakly almost periodic (wap) actions of G [in the sense of Ellis and Nerurkar (Trans Am Math Soc 313:103–119, 1989)], and stability. We conclude that any group G definable in a sufficiently saturated structure is “weakly definably amenable” in the sense of Krupiński and Pillay (2019), namely any definable action of G on a compact space supports a G -invariant probability measure. This gives negative solutions to some questions and conjectures raised in Krupiński (J Symb Log 82:1080–1105, 2017) and Krupiński and Pillay (2019). Stability in continuous logic will play a role in some proofs in this part of the paper. Thirdly, we give an example of a $$\emptyset $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>∅</mml:mi> </mml:math> -definable approximate subgroup X in a saturated extension of the group $${{\mathbb {F}}}_2 \times {{\mathbb {Z}}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:mi>Z</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> in a suitable language (where $${{\mathbb {F}}}_2$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:math> is the free group in 2-generators) for which the $$\bigvee $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mo>⋁</mml:mo> </mml:math> -definable group $$H:=\langle X \rangle $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mo>:</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mo>⟨</mml:mo> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:mo>⟩</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> contains no type-definable subgroup of bounded index. This refutes a conjecture by Wagner and shows that the Massicot-Wagner approach to prove that a locally compact (and in consequence also Lie) “model” exists for each approximate subgroup does not work in general (they proved in (Massicot and Wagner 2015) that it works for definably amenable approximate subgroups).
We define and study notions of amenability and skew-amenability of continuous actions of topological groups on compact topological spaces. Our main motivation is the question under what conditions amenability of … We define and study notions of amenability and skew-amenability of continuous actions of topological groups on compact topological spaces. Our main motivation is the question under what conditions amenability of a topological group passes to a closed subgroup. Other applications include the understanding of the universal minimal flow of various non-amenable groups.
We prove several theorems relating amenability of groups in various categories (discrete, definable, topological, automorphism group) to model-theoretic invariants (quotients by connected components, Lascar Galois group, G-compactness, ...). For example, … We prove several theorems relating amenability of groups in various categories (discrete, definable, topological, automorphism group) to model-theoretic invariants (quotients by connected components, Lascar Galois group, G-compactness, ...). For example, if $M$ is a countable, $\omega$-categorical structure and $Aut(M)$ is amenable, as a topological group, then the Lascar Galois group $Gal_{L}(T)$ of the theory $T$ of $M$ is compact, Hausdorff (also over any finite set of parameters), that is $T$ is G-compact. An essentially special case is that if $Aut(M)$ is extremely amenable, then $Gal_{L}(T)$ is trivial, so, by a theorem of Lascar, the theory $T$ can be recovered from its category $Mod(T)$ of models. On the side of definable groups, we prove for example that if $G$ is definable in a model $M$, and $G$ is definably amenable, then the connected components ${G^{*}}^{00}_{M}$ and ${G^{*}}^{000}_{M}$ coincide, answering positively a question from an earlier paper of the authors. We also take the opportunity to further develop the model-theoretic approach to topological dynamics, obtaining for example some new invariants for topological groups, as well as allowing a uniform approach to the theorems above and the various categories.
We prove several theorems relating amenability of groups in various categories (discrete, definable, topological, automorphism group) to model-theoretic invariants (quotients by connected components, Lascar Galois group, G-compactness, ...). For example, … We prove several theorems relating amenability of groups in various categories (discrete, definable, topological, automorphism group) to model-theoretic invariants (quotients by connected components, Lascar Galois group, G-compactness, ...). For example, if $M$ is a countable, $\omega$-categorical structure and $Aut(M)$ is amenable, as a topological group, then the Lascar Galois group $Gal_{L}(T)$ of the theory $T$ of $M$ is compact, Hausdorff (also over any finite set of parameters), that is $T$ is G-compact. An essentially special case is that if $Aut(M)$ is extremely amenable, then $Gal_{L}(T)$ is trivial, so, by a theorem of Lascar, the theory $T$ can be recovered from its category $Mod(T)$ of models. On the side of definable groups, we prove for example that if $G$ is definable in a model $M$, and $G$ is definably amenable, then the connected components ${G^{*}}^{00}_{M}$ and ${G^{*}}^{000}_{M}$ coincide, answering positively a question from an earlier paper of the authors. We also take the opportunity to further develop the model-theoretic approach to topological dynamics, obtaining for example some new invariants for topological groups, as well as allowing a uniform approach to the theorems above and the various categories.
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content. A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
A $G$-invariant version of definable Tietze extension theorem for definably complete structures is proved when a definably compact definable topological group $G$ acts definably and continuously on the definable set. A $G$-invariant version of definable Tietze extension theorem for definably complete structures is proved when a definably compact definable topological group $G$ acts definably and continuously on the definable set.
In this work we introduce and study a new notion of amenability for actions of locally compact groups on <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper C Superscript asterisk"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> … In this work we introduce and study a new notion of amenability for actions of locally compact groups on <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper C Superscript asterisk"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:msup> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">C^*</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-algebras. Our definition extends the definition of amenability for actions of discrete groups due to Claire Anantharaman-Delaroche. We show that our definition has several characterizations and permanence properties analogous to those known in the discrete case. For example, for actions on commutative <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper C Superscript asterisk"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:msup> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">C^*</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-algebras, we show that our notion of amenability is equivalent to measurewise amenability. Combined with a recent result of Alex Bearden and Jason Crann, this also settles a long standing open problem about the equivalence of topological amenability and measurewise amenability for a second countable <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">G</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-space <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper X"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">X</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>. We use our new notion of amenability to study when the maximal and reduced crossed products agree. One of our main results generalizes a theorem of Matsumura: we show that for an action of an exact locally compact group <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">G</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> on a locally compact space <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper X"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">X</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> the full and reduced crossed products <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper C 0 left-parenthesis upper X right-parenthesis right-normal-factor-semidirect-product Subscript normal m normal a normal x Baseline upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mo>⋊</mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">C_0(X)\rtimes _\mathrm {max}G</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> and <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper C 0 left-parenthesis upper X right-parenthesis right-normal-factor-semidirect-product Subscript normal r normal e normal d Baseline upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mo>⋊</mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">C_0(X)\rtimes _\mathrm {red}G</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> coincide if and only if the action of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">G</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> on <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper X"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">X</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is amenable. We also show that the analogue of this theorem does not hold for actions on noncommutative <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper C Superscript asterisk"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:msup> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">C^*</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-algebras. Finally, we study amenability as it relates to more detailed structure in the case of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper C Superscript asterisk"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:msup> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">C^*</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-algebras that fibre over an appropriate <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">G</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>-space <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper X"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">X</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula>, and the interaction of amenability with various regularity properties such as nuclearity, exactness, and the (L)LP, and the equivariant versions of injectivity and the WEP.
By Stan Wagon: pp. 251. £25.00; US$37.50. (Cambridge University Press, 1985.) By Stan Wagon: pp. 251. £25.00; US$37.50. (Cambridge University Press, 1985.)