Experimental demonstration of perturbative anticrossing mitigation using nonuniform driver Hamiltonians

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2017-10-16

Citations: 37

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.96.042322

Abstract

Perturbative anticrossings have long been identified as a potential computational bottleneck for quantum annealing. This bottleneck can appear, for example, when a uniform transverse driver Hamiltonian is applied to each qubit. Previous theoretical research sought to alleviate such anticrossings by adjusting the transverse driver Hamiltonians on individual qubits according to a perturbative approximation. Here we apply this principle to a physical implementation of quantum annealing in a D-Wave 2000Q system. We use samples from the quantum annealing hardware and per-qubit anneal offsets to produce nonuniform driver Hamiltonians. On small instances with severe perturbative anticrossings, our algorithm yields an increase in minimum eigengaps, ground-state success probabilities, and escape rates from metastable valleys. We also demonstrate that the same approach can mitigate biased sampling of degenerate ground states.

Locations

  • Physical review. A/Physical review, A - View
  • arXiv (Cornell University) - View - PDF
  • DataCite API - View

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat Replication-based quantum annealing error mitigation 2024 Hristo Djidjev
+ PDF Chat Uncertain fate of fair sampling in quantum annealing 2019 Mario S. Könz
Guglielmo Mazzola
Andrew J. Ochoa
Helmut G. Katzgraber
Matthias Troyer
+ PDF Chat Comparing Relaxation Mechanisms in Quantum and Classical Transverse-Field Annealing 2021 Tameem Albash
Jeffrey Marshall
+ Breakdown of the weak coupling limit in experimental quantum annealing. 2021 Yuki Bando
Ka Wa Yip
Huo Chen
Daniel A. Lidar
Hidetoshi Nishimori
+ PDF Chat EQUAL: Improving the Fidelity of Quantum Annealers by Injecting Controlled Perturbations 2022 Ramin Ayanzadeh
Poulami Das
Swamit Tannu
Moinuddin K. Qureshi
+ EQUAL: Improving the Fidelity of Quantum Annealers by Injecting Controlled Perturbations 2021 Ramin Ayanzadeh
Poulami Das
Swamit Tannu
Moinuddin K. Qureshi
+ PDF Chat Breakdown of the Weak-Coupling Limit in Quantum Annealing 2022 Yuki Bando
Ka Wa Yip
Huo Chen
Daniel A. Lidar
Hidetoshi Nishimori
+ PDF Chat Anneal-path correction in flux qubits 2021 Mostafa Khezri
Jeffrey A. Grover
James I. Basham
Steven Disseler
Huo Chen
S P Novikov
Kenneth M. Zick
Daniel A. Lidar
+ PDF Chat Customized Quantum Annealing Schedules 2022 Mostafa Khezri
Xi Dai
Rui Yang
Tameem Albash
Adrian Lupaşcu
Daniel A. Lidar
+ PDF Chat EQUAL: Improving the Fidelity of Quantum Annealers by Injecting Controlled Perturbations 2022 Ramin Ayanzadeh
Poulami Das
Swamit Tannu
Moinuddin K. Qureshi
+ Test-driving 1000 qubits 2017 Joshua Job
Daniel A. Lidar
+ PDF Chat Locally suppressed transverse-field protocol for diabatic quantum annealing 2021 Louis Fry-Bouriaux
Daniel T. O'Connor
Natasha Feinstein
P. A. Warburton
+ Test-driving 1000 qubits 2017 Joshua Job
Daniel A. Lidar
+ PDF Chat Degeneracy, degree, and heavy tails in quantum annealing 2016 Andrew D. King
Emile Hoskinson
T. Lanting
Evgeny Andriyash
M. H. S. Amin
+ Locally Suppressed Transverse-Field Protocol for Diabatic Quantum Annealing 2021 Louis Fry-Bouriaux
Daniel T. O'Connor
Natasha Feinstein
P. A. Warburton
+ Counterdiabatic Reverse Annealing 2022 Gianluca Passarelli
Procolo Lucignano
+ PDF Chat Counterdiabatic reverse annealing 2023 Gianluca Passarelli
Procolo Lucignano
+ PDF Chat A comment on comparing optimization on D-Wave and IBM quantum processors 2024 Catherine C. McGeoch
Kevin Chern
Pau Farré
Andrew K. King
+ PDF Chat Quantum Annealing with chaotic driver Hamiltonians 2024 Henning Schlömer
Subir Sachdev
+ PDF Chat Exponentially Biased Ground-State Sampling of Quantum Annealing Machines with Transverse-Field Driving Hamiltonians 2017 Salvatore Mandrà
Zheng Zhu
Helmut G. Katzgraber

Works That Cite This (29)

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat Observation of topological phenomena in a programmable lattice of 1,800 qubits 2018 Andrew D. King
Juan Carrasquilla
Jack Raymond
Isil Ozfidan
Evgeny Andriyash
A. J. Berkley
Maurício Sedrez dos Reis
T. Lanting
R. Harris
Fabio Altomare
+ PDF Chat Single-Qubit Fidelity Assessment of Quantum Annealing Hardware 2021 Jon Nelson
Marc Vuffray
Andrey Y. Lokhov
Carleton Coffrin
+ PDF Chat Fluctuation-guided search in quantum annealing 2020 Nicholas Chancellor
+ Inhomogeneous driving in quantum annealers can result in orders-of-magnitude improvements in performance 2020 Juan I. Adame
Peter L. McMahon
+ PDF Chat Calibration of Flux Crosstalk in Large-Scale Flux-Tunable Superconducting Quantum Circuits 2021 Xi Dai
Daniel Tennant
Robbyn Trappen
Antonio Martinez
Denis Melanson
Muhammet Ali Yurtalan
Yongchao Tang
S P Novikov
Jeffrey A. Grover
Steven Disseler
+ Inferring the Dynamics of the State Evolution During Quantum Annealing 2020 Elijah Pelofske
Georg Hahn
Hristo Djidjev
+ Calibration of flux crosstalk in large-scale flux-tunable superconducting quantum circuits 2021 Xi Dai
Daniel Tennant
Robbyn Trappen
Antonio Martinez
Denis Melanson
Muhammet Ali Yurtalan
Yongchao Tang
S P Novikov
Jeffrey A. Grover
Steven Disseler
+ Prospects and challenges of quantum finance 2020 Adam Bouland
Wim van Dam
Hamed Joorati
Iordanis Kerenidis
Anupam Prakash
+ Track clustering with a quantum annealer for primary vertex reconstruction at hadron colliders 2019 Souvik Das
Andrew Wildridge
Sachin B. Vaidya
Andreas Werner Jung
+ PDF Chat The quantum annealing gap and quench dynamics in the exact cover problem 2022 Bernhard Irsigler
Tobias Graß

Works Cited by This (22)

Action Title Year Authors
+ Quantum Computation by Adiabatic Evolution 2000 Edward Farhi
Jeffrey Goldstone
Sam Gutmann
Michael Sipser
+ PDF Chat Performance of the quantum adiabatic algorithm on random instances of two optimization problems on regular hypergraphs 2012 Edward Farhi
David Gosset
Itay Hen
Anders W. Sandvik
Peter W. Shor
A. P. Young
Francesco Zamponi
+ PDF Chat Probing Noise in Flux Qubits via Macroscopic Resonant Tunneling 2008 R. Harris
Mark W. Johnson
Siyuan Han
A. J. Berkley
J. Johansson
P. Bunyk
E. Ladizinsky
S. A. Govorkov
M. C. Thom
S. Uchaikin
+ PDF Chat Compound Josephson-junction coupler for flux qubits with minimal crosstalk 2009 R. Harris
T. Lanting
A. J. Berkley
Jonas Johansson
Mark W. Johnson
P. Bunyk
E. Ladizinsky
N. Ladizinsky
T. Oh
Siyuan Han
+ PDF Chat Algorithmic approach to adiabatic quantum optimization 2012 Neil G. Dickson
M. H. S. Amin
+ PDF Chat Consistency tests of classical and quantum models for a quantum annealer 2015 Tameem Albash
Walter Vinci
Anurag Mishra
P. A. Warburton
Daniel A. Lidar
+ PDF Chat Zur Theorie der Matrices 1907 Oskar Perron
+ PDF Chat First-order quantum phase transition in adiabatic quantum computation 2009 M. H. S. Amin
Vicky Choi
+ PDF Chat A Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithm Applied to Random Instances of an NP-Complete Problem 2001 Edward Farhi
Jeffrey Goldstone
Sam Gutmann
Joshua M. Lapan
A. P. Lundgren
Daniel Preda
+ PDF Chat Experimental demonstration of a robust and scalable flux qubit 2010 R. Harris
Jonas Johansson
A. J. Berkley
Mark W. Johnson
T. Lanting
Siyuan Han
P. Bunyk
E. Ladizinsky
T. Oh
I. Perminov