DISTANCE-DEPENDENT OFFSETS BETWEEN PARALLAXES FOR NEARBY STARS AND GAIA DR1 PARALLAXES

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2016-11-17

Citations: 29

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/832/1/l18

Abstract

We use 612 single stars with previously published trigonometric parallaxes placing them within 25 pc to evaluate parallaxes released in Gaia's first data release (DR1). We find that the Gaia parallaxes are, on average, $0.24 \pm 0.02$ mas smaller than the weighted mean trigonometric parallax values for these stars in the solar neighborhood. We also find that the offset changes with distance out to 100 pc, in the sense that the closer the star, the larger the offset. We find no systematic trends in the parallax offsets with stellar $V$ magnitude, $V-K$ color, or proper motion. We do find that the offset is roughly twice as large for stars south of the ecliptic compared to those that are north.

Locations

  • The Astrophysical Journal Letters - View - PDF
  • arXiv (Cornell University) - View - PDF
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) - View - PDF
  • DataCite API - View

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ Evidence for a systematic offset of $-$0.25 mas in the Gaia DR1 parallaxes at $\pi \gtrsim 1$ mas 2016 Keivan G. Stassun
Guillermo Torres
+ PDF Chat Distances and parallax bias in Gaia DR2 2019 Ralph Schönrich
P. J. McMillan
L. Eyer
+ PDF Chat Planetary nebula distances in <i>Gaia</i> DR2 2018 S. Kimeswenger
Daniela Barría
+ PDF Chat EVIDENCE FOR A SYSTEMATIC OFFSET OF −0.25 mas IN THE <i>GAIA</i> DR1 PARALLAXES 2016 Keivan G. Stassun
Guillermo Torres
+ PDF Chat Evidence for a Systematic Offset of −80 μas in the Gaia DR2 Parallaxes 2018 Keivan G. Stassun
Guillermo Torres
+ PDF Chat Gaia EDR3 Parallax Zero-point Offset Based on W Ursae Majoris-type Eclipsing Binaries 2021 Fangzhou Ren
Xiaodian Chen
Huawei Zhang
Richard de Grijs
Licai Deng
Yang Huang
+ Tests of the Galactic planetary nebula distance scale with the initial Gaia parallax distances of their central stars 2016 Letizia Stanghellini
B. Bucciarelli
M. G. Lattanzi
R. Morbidelli
+ PDF Chat Orbital parallax of binary systems compared to <i>Gaia</i> DR3 and the parallax zero-point offset at bright magnitudes 2022 M. A. T. Groenewegen
+ PDF Chat Testing Systematics of Gaia DR2 Parallaxes with Empirical Surface Brightness: Color Relations Applied to Eclipsing Binaries 2019 D. Graczyk
G. Pietrzyński
W. Gieren
J. Storm
N. Nardetto
A. Gallenne
P. F. L. Maxted
P. Kervella
Z. Kołaczkowski
P. Konorski
+ Tests of the Galactic planetary nebula distance scale with the initial Gaia parallax distances of their central stars 2016 Letizia Stanghellini
B. Bucciarelli
M. G. Lattanzi
R. Morbidelli
+ Orbital parallax of binary systems compared to GAIA DR3 and the parallax zero-point offset at bright magnitudes 2022 M. A. T. Groenewegen
+ PDF Chat Comparison of Gaia DR2 Parallaxes of Stars with VLBI Astrometry 2019 Shuangjing Xu
Bo Zhang
M. J. Reid
Zhenhua Wu
Guangli Wang
+ PDF Chat A Spatially Dependent Correction of Gaia EDR3 Parallax Zero-point Offset based on 0.3 million LAMOST DR8 Giant Stars 2022 Chun Wang
Haibo Yuan
Yang Huang
+ PDF Chat Analysis of Gaia Data Release 3 Parallax bias in the Galactic plane 2024 Ye Ding
S. Liao
Qiqi Wu
Zhaoxiang Qi
Zhenghong Tang
+ Gaia Data Release 2. Using Gaia parallaxes 2018 X. Luri
A. G. A. Brown
L. M. Sarro
F. Arenou
C. A. L. Bailer‐Jones
A. Castro-Ginard
J. H. J. de Bruijne
T. Prusti
C. Babusiaux
H. E. Delgado
+ PDF Chat The Gaia Data Release 1 parallaxes and the distance scale of Galactic planetary nebulae 2017 Letizia Stanghellini
B. Bucciarelli
M. G. Lattanzi
R. Morbidelli
+ Estimating Distance from Parallaxes. IV. Distances to 1.33 Billion Stars in Gaia Data Release 2 2018 C. A. L. Bailer‐Jones
J. Rybizki
M. Fouesneau
G. Mantelet
R. Andrae
+ PDF Chat Using red clump stars to correct the<i>Gaia</i>DR1 parallaxes 2017 G. R. Davies
Mikkel N. Lund
A. Miglio
Y. Elsworth
James S. Kuszlewicz
Thomas S. H. North
B. M. Rendle
W. J. Chaplin
Thaíse S. Rodrigues
T. L. Campante
+ Simple distance estimates for Gaia DR2 stars with radial velocities 2018 P. J. McMillan
+ Distances for the Gaia RV set with corrected parallaxes 2019 Ralph Schoenrich
P. J. McMillan
L. Eyer

Works That Cite This (28)

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat Parameters of the Link between the Optical and Radio Frames from Gaia DR2 Data and VLBI Measurements 2019 В. В. Бобылев
+ PDF Chat HAT-P-67b: An Extremely Low Density Saturn Transiting an F-subgiant Confirmed via Doppler Tomography<sup>∗</sup> 2017 George Zhou
G. Á. Bakos
J. D. Hartman
David W. Latham
Guillermo Torres
W. Bhatti
K. Penev
Lars A. Buchhave
G. Kovács
Allyson Bieryla
+ PDF Chat A super-Earth and two sub-Neptunes transiting the nearby and quiet M dwarf TOI-270 2019 Maximilian N. Günther
F. J. Pozuelos
Jason Dittmann
Diana Dragomir
Stephen R. Kane
Tansu Daylan
Adina D. Feinstein
Chelsea X. Huang
Timothy D. Morton
A. Bonfanti
+ PDF Chat SUPPLEMENT: “THE RATE OF BINARY BLACK HOLE MERGERS INFERRED FROM ADVANCED LIGO OBSERVATIONS SURROUNDING GW150914” (2016, ApJL, 833, L1) 2016 B. P. Abbott
R. Abbott
T. D. Abbott
M. R. Abernathy
F. Acernese
K. Ackley
C. Adams
T. Adams
P. Addesso
R. X. Adhikari
+ PDF Chat Parallax Systematics and Photocenter Motions of Benchmark Eclipsing Binaries in Gaia EDR3 2021 Keivan G. Stassun
Guillermo Torres
+ PDF Chat Systematic error of the Gaia DR1 TGAS parallaxes from data for the red giant clump 2017 G. A. Gontcharov
+ PDF Chat Gaia EDR3 Parallax Zero-point Offset Based on W Ursae Majoris-type Eclipsing Binaries 2021 Fangzhou Ren
Xiaodian Chen
Huawei Zhang
Richard de Grijs
Licai Deng
Yang Huang
+ PDF Chat Gaia: The Galaxy in six (and more) dimensions 2019 E. Pancino
+ PDF Chat The Volume-complete Sample of M Dwarfs with Masses 0.1 ≤ M/M<sub>⊙</sub> ≤ 0.3 within 15 Parsecs 2021 Jennifer G. Winters
David Charbonneau
Todd J. Henry
Jonathan Irwin
Wei‐Chun Jao
Adric R. Riedel
Kenneth J. Slatten
+ PDF Chat OB Stars and Cepheids From the Gaia TGAS Catalogue: Test of their Distances and Proper Motions 2017 В. В. Бобылев
A. T. Bajkova

Works Cited by This (14)

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat THE SOLAR NEIGHBORHOOD. XXII. PARALLAX RESULTS FROM THE CTIOPI 0.9 m PROGRAM: TRIGONOMETRIC PARALLAXES OF 64 NEARBY SYSTEMS WITH 0.″5 ⩽μ⩽ 1.″0 yr<sup>–1</sup>(SLOWMO SAMPLE) 2010 Adric R. Riedel
John P. Subasavage
Charlie T. Finch
Wei‐Chun Jao
Todd J. Henry
Jennifer G. Winters
Misty A. Brown
P. A. Ianna
E. Costa
R. A. Méndez
+ PDF Chat IDENTIFYING THE YOUNG LOW-MASS STARS WITHIN 25 pc. II. DISTANCES, KINEMATICS, AND GROUP MEMBERSHIP 2012 Evgenya L. Shkolnik
G. Anglada‐Escudé
Michael C. Liu
Brendan P. Bowler
Alycia J. Weinberger
Alan P. Boss
I. Neill Reid
Motohide Tamura
+ PDF Chat The Solar Neighborhood. XIII. Parallax Results from the CTIOPI 0.9 Meter Program: Stars with μ ≥ 1."0 yr<sup>-1</sup>(MOTION Sample) 2005 Wei‐Chun Jao
Todd J. Henry
John P. Subasavage
Misty A. Brown
P. A. Ianna
Jennifer Bartlett
E. Costa
R. A. Méndez
+ PDF Chat TRIGONOMETRIC PARALLAXES FOR 1507 NEARBY MID-TO-LATE M DWARFS 2014 Jason Dittmann
Jonathan Irwin
David Charbonneau
Zachory K. Berta-Thompson
+ PDF Chat Validation of the new Hipparcos reduction 2007 F. van Leeuwen
+ PDF Chat A 3% SOLUTION: DETERMINATION OF THE HUBBLE CONSTANT WITH THE<i>HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE</i>AND WIDE FIELD CAMERA 3 2011 Adam G. Riess
Lucas M. Macri
Stefano Casertano
Hubert Lampeitl
Henry C. Ferguson
A. V. Filippenko
Saurabh W. Jha
Weidong Li
R. Chornock
+ PDF Chat The SuperCOSMOS Sky Survey - III. Astrometry 2001 N. C. Hambly
A. C. Davenhall
M. Irwin
H. T. MacGillivray
+ PDF Chat A test of<i>Gaia</i>Data Release 1 parallaxes: implications for the local distance scale 2016 Stefano Casertano
Adam G. Riess
B. Bucciarelli
M. G. Lattanzi
+ PDF Chat EVIDENCE FOR A SYSTEMATIC OFFSET OF −0.25 mas IN THE <i>GAIA</i> DR1 PARALLAXES 2016 Keivan G. Stassun
Guillermo Torres
+ PDF Chat THE SOLAR NEIGHBORHOOD. XXI. PARALLAX RESULTS FROM THE CTIOPI 0.9 m PROGRAM: 20 NEW MEMBERS OF THE 25 PARSEC WHITE DWARF SAMPLE 2009 John P. Subasavage
Wei‐Chun Jao
Todd J. Henry
P. Bergeron
P. Dufour
P. A. Ianna
E. Costa
R. A. Méndez