Computational Simulation of Equivalence Class Formation Using the go/no-go Procedure with Compound Stimuli

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2016-05-19

Citations: 15

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0184-1

Abstract

Research about equivalence has commonly utilized human participants as experimental subjects. More recently, computational models have been capable of reproducing performances observed in experiments with humans. The computational model often utilized is called RELNET, and it simulates training and testing trials of conditional relations using the matching-to-sample procedure (MTS). The differentiation between sample stimulus and comparison stimuli, indispensable in MTS, implies operational difficulties for simulations. For this reason, new studies seek to utilize alternative procedures to MTS, which do not differentiate the functions of the antecedent stimuli. This work evaluated the possibility of developing a new computational model to simulate equivalence class formation using the go/no-go procedure with compound stimuli. In Experiment 1, artificial neural networks were utilized to simulate training of the AB and BC relations as well as the testing of the AC relation. The results showed that four out of six runs demonstrated equivalence class formation. Experiment 2 evaluated whether the additional class training performed in Experiment 1, which was analogous to the simulation of pre-experimental experience of human participants, would be essential for simulating the establishment of equivalence classes. It was found that it was not possible to simulate equivalence class formation without the additional class training. Altogether, the experiments show that it is possible to simulate equivalence class formation using the go/no-go procedure with compound stimuli and that it is necessary to conduct additional class training. The model developed is, therefore, an alternative to RELNET for the study of equivalence relations using computational simulations.

Locations

  • PubMed Central - View
  • PubMed - View
  • The Psychological Record - View - PDF

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat CONDITIONAL RELATIONS WITH COMPOUND ABSTRACT STIMULI USING A GO/NO‐GO PROCEDURE 2007 Paula Debert
María Amélia Matos
William J. McIlvane
+ Go/no-go procedure with compound stimuli and the emergence of two equivalence classes with three stimuli 2009 William F. PĂ©rez
HeloĂ­sa Cursi Campos
Paula Debert
+ FORMING OF CLASSES OF EQUIVALENCE THROUGH A ONE-PHASE TRAINING PROCEDURE 2021 Carmen Caballero HermosĂ­n
Mayte Gutiérrez Domínguez
Andrés García García
MarĂ­a RuĂ­z PĂ©rez
José Luis Ruiz Noguero
+ Using compound stimuli to establish equivalence classes with adults: An extension using different negative comparison compounds 2024 David G. Dragani
Christopher R. Colasurdo
Kenneth F. Reeve
Adrienne M. Jennings
Sharon A. Reeve
+ Comparing the stimulus-pairing yes/no procedure to match-to-sample to establish equivalence classes with adults 2024 Sarah A. Hensel
Alexandra M. Cicero
Christopher R. Colasurdo
Kenneth F. Reeve
Karly Stepper
Sharon A. Reeve
Ruth M. DeBar
+ Effects of heterogeneous controlling relations on tests of transitivity and equivalence: An exploratory study 2017 William F. PĂ©rez
Gerson Yukio Tomanari
Manish Vaidya
+ Equivalence Class Formation Using Stimulus-Pairing and Yes-No Responding 1997 Lanny Fields
Kenneth F. Reeve
Antonios Varelas
Devorah Rosen
James Belanich
+ PDF Chat Teaching Chemistry Based on the Stimulus Equivalence Model 2018 Marcelo de Abreu CĂ©sar
Melania Moroz
+ Effects of repeating or not repeating trials immediately when errors occur during training of equivalence classes with college students 2023 Danielle M. Staropoli
Christopher R. Colasurdo
Kenneth F. Reeve
Adrienne M. Jennings
Sharon A. Reeve
Meghan A. Deshais
+ Symmetry Evaluation by Comparing Acquisition of Conditional Relations in Successive (Go/No-Go) Matching-to-Sample Training 2014 Carlos Rafael Fernandes Picanço
Romariz S. Barros
+ PDF Chat EMERGENT CONDITIONAL RELATIONS IN A GO/NO‐GO PROCEDURE: FIGURE—GROUND AND STIMULUS‐POSITION COMPOUND RELATIONS 2009 Paula Debert
Edson Massayuki Huziwara
Robson Brino Faggiani
Maria EugĂȘnia SimĂ”es De Mathis
William J. McIlvane
+ Emergence of equivalence relations 2011 Lindsay J. Grimm
+ Hierarchy Among Intersecting Equivalence Classes Formed by Unitary and Compound Stimuli 2013 Benigno Alonso‐Álvarez
Luis Antonio PĂ©rez‐GonzĂĄlez
+ PDF Chat Training Structures and the Formation of Equivalence Classes 2011 Erik Arntzen
Steffen Stummann Hansen
+ PDF Chat NEW KNOWLEDGE DERIVED FROM LEARNED KNOWLEDGE: FUNCTIONAL‐ANATOMIC CORRELATES OF STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE 2007 Michael W. Schlund
Rudolf Hoehn‐Saric
Michael F. Cataldo
+ 10 Stimulus equivalence: A class of correlations, or a correlation of classes? 1996 Carol Pilgrim
Mark Galizio
+ PDF Chat The establishment of auditory–visual equivalence classes with a go/no‐go successive matching‐to‐sample procedure 2020 Karina N. Zhelezoglo
Robbie J. Hanson
Caio F. Miguel
Karen M. Lionello‐Denolf
+ Stimulus equivalence as a function of training protocol in a connectionist network. 2007 Fiona Lyddy
Yvonne Barnes‐Holmes
+ Role of stimulus similarity in equivalence training. 1973 Arthur Tomie
Gregory A. Davitt
David R. Thomas
+ Conditional relations among abstract stimuli 2010 Kimberly Walter

Works That Cite This (0)

Action Title Year Authors