Some Reasons for Not Using the Yates Continuity Correction on 2 × 2 Contingency Tables: Comment

C F Starmer, James E. Grizzle, P. K. Sen

Type: Article

Publication Date: 1974-06-01

Citations: 24

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2285662

View Publication

Locations

Journal of the American Statistical Association - View

Similar Works

Action	Title	Year	Authors
+	Some Reasons for Not Using the Yates Continuity Correction on 2 × 2 Contingency Tables: Comment	1974	Olli S. Miettinen
+	Some Reasons for Not Using the Yates Continuity Correction on 2 × 2 Contingency Tables: Comment and a Suggestion	1974	Nathan Mantel
+	Some Reasons for Not Using the Yates Continuity Correction on 2 × 2 Contingency Tables	1974	W. J. Conover
+	Analysis of Contingency Tables and Further Reasons for not Using Yates Correction in 2×2 Tables	1976	E. A. Maxwell
+	Some Reasons for Not Using the Yates Continuity Correction on 2 × 2 Contingency Tables: Rejoinder	1974	W. J. Conover
+	Note on the chi-square statistic of association in 2x2 contingency tables and the correction for continuity	1978	Franz Loosen
+	The Performance of Yates' Correction in 2×2 Contingency Tables	1996	昭夫工藤
+	Correcting for Continuity in 2 × 2 Chi-Square Tests: Comment on Skagerberg, Parkinson, and Carmichael (2013)	2013	Kenneth J. Zucker
+	Note on the chi-square statistic of association in 2�2 contingency tables and the correction for continuity	1979	Franz Loosen
+	<scp>Y</scp> ates' Correction	2005	Cătălina Ştefănescu Vance W. Berger Scott L. Hershberger
+	<scp>Y</scp>ates' Correction	2014	Cătălina Ştefănescu Vance W. Berger Scott L. Hershberger
+	Some Reasons for Not Using the Yates Continuity Correction on 2×2 Contingency Tables	1974	W. J. Conover
+	A sample size correction for Pearson chi-square in 2???2 contingency tables.	1982	Howard M. Rhoades John E. Overall
+	Yates's correction for continuity and the analysis of 2 × 2 contingency tables	1990	Mark G. Haviland
+	A sample size correction for Pearson chi-square in 2 × 2 contingency tables.	1982	Howard M. Rhoades John E. Overall
+	Corrections: Computing an Exact Confidence Interval for the Common Odds Ratio in Several 2 × 2 Contingency Tables	1986	Cyrus R. Mehta Nitin R. Patel Robert J. Gray
+	The Eccentric Properties of the Chi-Squared Test with Yates' Continuity Correction in Extremely Unbalanced 2 × 2 Contingency Tables	2010	KangSeungHo 권태혁
+	Categorical Data: Analysis of Two‐way Frequency Tables	2009	Olive Jean Dunn Virginia A. Clark
+	C111. The continuity correction for chi-squared for 2×2 tables	1981	Saeed Maghsoodloo
+	Chi-square test for larger (r×c) contingency tables	2001	Salim Daya

Works That Cite This (18)

Action	Title	Year	Authors
+	1980–2000	2014	Kenneth J. Berry Janis E. Johnston Paul W. Mielke
+	Testing for association in 2 × 2 contingency tables with very small sample sizes.	1979	Gregory Camilli Kenneth D. Hopkins
+	Small Sample Properties of the Mantel‐Haenszel Test Statistic for Density Follow‐Up Studies	1988	H.C. Boshuizen
+	A Comparison of Alternative Tests for the 2 × 2 Comparative Trial	1982	Graham Upton
+ PDF Chat	References	2010	John M. Lachin
+	On Significance Testing in Comparative Epidemiologic Research	1982	Marja‐Leena Nurminen Pertti Mutanen Erkki Järvinen
+	The Continuity Correction and Statistical Testing	1982	Michael Haber
+	Analysis of clustered matched‐pair data	2003	Valerie Durkalski Yuko Y. Palesch Stuart R. Lipsitz Philip F. Rust
+	References	2000	John M. Lachin
+	A critical review of asymptotic methods for comparing two proportions by means of independent samples	1992	Antonio Martín Andrés A. Silva Mato Tejedor I. Herranz

Works Cited by This (0)

Action	Title	Year	Authors