Stopping Rules in Principal Components Analysis: A Comparison of Heuristical and Statistical Approaches

Type: Article

Publication Date: 1993-12-01

Citations: 2193

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1939574

Locations

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat A Monte Carlo examination of the broken-stick distribution to identify components to retain in principal component analysis 2015 Pier‐Olivier Caron
+ PDF Chat Impact of different conditions on accuracy of five rules for principal components retention 2013 Aleksandar Zorić
Goran Opačić
+ Peer Review #1 of "PCAtest: testing the statistical significance of Principal Component Analysis in R (v0.3)" 2022 Arley Camargo
+ PCAtest: testing the statistical significance of Principal Component Analysis in R 2022 Arley Camargo
+ PDF Chat Hypothesis Tests for Principal Component Analysis When Variables are Standardized 2019 Johannes Forkman
Julie Josse
Hans‐Peter Piepho
+ A Simple Rule for the Selection of Principal Components 2003 Dimitris Karlis
Gilbert Saporta
Antonis Spinakis
+ Principal Components 2014 Bernard D. Flury
+ Principal components analysis. 2021 Donаld L. J. Quicke
Buntikа А. Butcher
Rachel Kruft Welton
+ Principal components analysis. 2021 Donаld L. J. Quicke
Buntikа А. Butcher
Rachel Kruft Welton
+ Information Theoretic Approaches to Principal Component Selection 2018 A. R. Khan
Rahmatullah Imon
+ PDF Chat Procedure for the Selection of Principal Components in Principal Components Regression 2010 Bu-Yong Kim
Myung‐Hee Shin
+ Principal Components Analysis 2017 David L. Carlson
+ Principal Components Analysis 2005 Ralph B. D’Agostino
+ Principal Components 2005 Bernard D. Flury
+ Principal Components 2012 Marc Hallin
Siegfried Hörmann
+ Principal component analysis in statistics 2014 Ahmed Sami Abdulghafour Alani
+ PDF Chat Comparison of Correction Factors and Sample Size Required to Test the Equality of the Smallest Eigenvalues in Principal Component Analysis 2021 Eduard Gañan-Cardenas
Juan Carlos Correa
+ PDF Chat Identifying the Informational/Signal Dimension in Principal Component Analysis 2018 Sergio Camiz
Valério D. Pillar
+ PDF Chat Parallel Analysis: a method for determining significant principal components 1995 Scott B. Franklin
David J. Gibson
Philip A. Robertson
John T. Pohlmann
James S. Fralish
+ Principal Component Analysis 2014 Ian T. Jolliffe

Works That Cite This (262)

Action Title Year Authors
+ Morphometrical methods as tools for identifying field maple (<i>Acer campestre</i> L.) trees 2020 Eric Wahlsteen
+ Beyond principal components: a critical comparison of factor analysis methods for subspace modelling in chemistry 2021 Peter D. Wentzell
Cannon Giglio
Mohsen Kompany‐Zareh
+ Peer Review #1 of "Effects of taphonomic deformation on geometric morphometric analysis of fossils: a study using the dicynodont Diictodon feliceps (Therapsida, Anomodontia) (v0.2)" 2020 BP Hedrick
+ Tracing the evolution of Australasian mammals: Integrating morphological, palaeontological and molecular data 2020 Mélina A. Celik
+ THE DIMENSIONALITY OF GENETIC VARIATION FOR WING SHAPE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER 2005 Jason G. Mezey
David Houle
+ Molecular phylogenetic and taxonomic status of the large-eared desert shrew <i>Notiosorex evotis</i> (Eulipotyphla: Soricidae) 2022 Issac Camargo
Sergio Ticul Álvarez-Castañeda
P. David Polly
John D. Stuhler
Jesús E. Maldonado
+ PDF Chat Number of Relevant Directions in Principal Component Analysis and Wishart Random Matrices 2012 Satya N. Majumdar
Pierpaolo Vivo
+ PDF Chat Determining The Number of Principal Components with Schur's Theorem in Principal Component Analysis 2023 Cihan KARAKUZULU
İbrahim Halil Gümüş
Serkan Güldal
Mustafa YAVAŞ
+ PDF Chat On the Use of Multidimensional Data Analysis Techniques for Corporate Valuation 2014 Georgeta Vintilă
Ştefan Cristian Gherghina
+ PDF Chat Congruent geographic variation in saccular otolith shape across multiple species of African cichlids 2020 Aneesh P. H. Bose
Holger Zimmermann
Georg Winkler
Alexandra Kaufmann
Thomas Strohmeier
Stephan Koblmüller
Kristina M. Sefc