Mendelian Randomization: New Applications in the Coming Age of Hypothesis-Free Causality

Type: Review

Publication Date: 2015-05-04

Citations: 434

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-090314-050016

Abstract

Mendelian randomization (MR) is an approach that uses genetic variants associated with a modifiable exposure or biological intermediate to estimate the causal relationship between these variables and a medically relevant outcome. Although it was initially developed to examine the relationship between modifiable exposures/biomarkers and disease, its use has expanded to encompass applications in molecular epidemiology, systems biology, pharmacogenomics, and many other areas. The purpose of this review is to introduce MR, the principles behind the approach, and its limitations. We consider some of the new applications of the methodology, including informing drug development, and comment on some promising extensions, including two-step, two-sample, and bidirectional MR. We show how these new methods can be combined to efficiently examine causality in complex biological networks and provide a new framework to data mine high-dimensional studies as we transition into the age of hypothesis-free causality.

Locations

  • PubMed - View
  • Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics - View - PDF

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ Mendelian Randomization 2017 Sandeep Grover
Fabiola Del Greco M
Catherine M. Stein
Andreas Ziegler
+ Mendelian randomization in pharmacogenomics: The unforeseen potentials 2022 Lubna Q. Khasawneh
Zeina N. Al-Mahayri
Bassam R. Ali
+ PDF Chat Using genetic association data to guide drug discovery and development: Review of methods and applications 2023 Stephen Burgess
Amy M. Mason
Andrew J. Grant
Eric A. W. Slob
Apostolos Gkatzionis
Verena Zuber
Ashish Patel
Haodong Tian
Cunhao Liu
William G. Haynes
+ Mendelian randomization and causal networks for systematic analysis of omics 2020 Azam Yazdani
+ PDF Chat An Introduction to Causal Inference Methods with Multi-omics Data 2024 Minhao Yao
Zhonghua Liu
+ Using the MR-Base platform to investigate risk factors and drug targets for thousands of phenotypes 2019 Venexia Walker
Neil M Davies
Gibran Hemani
Jie Zheng
Philip Haycock
Tom R. Gaunt
George Davey Smith
Richard M. Martin
+ PDF Chat MR.RGM: An R Package for Fitting Bayesian Multivariate Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Networks 2024 Bitan Sarkar
Yang Ni
+ A Primer in Mendelian Randomization Methodology with a Focus on Utilizing Published Summary Association Data 2018 Niki Dimou
Konstantinos K. Tsilidis
+ A Guide to Understanding Mendelian Randomization Studies 2024 Kevin A. Nguyen
Braxton D. Mitchell
+ Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: the design, analysis, and interpretation of Mendelian randomization studies 2016 Philip Haycock
Stephen Burgess
Kaitlin H. Wade
Jack Bowden
Caroline L. Relton
George Davey Smith
+ Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference 2007 Vanessa Didelez
Nuala A. Sheehan
+ PDF Chat Can a Mendelian Randomization Study Predict the Results of a Clinical Trial? Yes and No 2016 Antonio Abbate
Charles A. Dinarello
Mariangela Peruzzi
Sebastiano Sciarretta
Giacomo Frati
Giuseppe Biondi‐Zoccai
+ PDF Chat Overview of Mendelian Randomization Analysis 2020 Young Ho Lee
+ PDF Chat Meta‐analysis and<scp>Mendelian</scp>randomization: A review 2019 Jack Bowden
Michael V. Holmes
+ PDF Chat Sensitivity Analyses for Robust Causal Inference from Mendelian Randomization Analyses with Multiple Genetic Variants 2016 Stephen Burgess
Jack Bowden
Tove Fall
Erik Ingelsson
Simon G. Thompson
+ PDF Chat Mendelian randomization for multiple exposures and outcomes with Bayesian Directed Acyclic Graphs exploration and causal effects estimation 2024 Verena Zuber
Héléne T. Cronjé
Na Cai
Dipender Gill
Leonardo Bottolo
+ Mendelian randomization and pleiotropy analysis 2020 Xiaofeng Zhu
+ PDF Chat Inferring the direction of a causal link and estimating its effect via a Bayesian Mendelian randomization approach 2019 Ioan Gabriel Bucur
Tom Claassen
Tom Heskes
+ A Random Effects Model-based Method of Moments Estimation of Causal Effect in Mendelian Randomization Studies 2023 Wenhao Cao
Saonli Basu
+ Causal Inference in Medicine via Mendelian Randomization 2016 Timothy M. Frayling
Benjamin F. Voight

Works That Cite This (20)

Action Title Year Authors
+ Mendelian randomization and pleiotropy analysis 2020 Xiaofeng Zhu
+ Causal Inference in Cancer Epidemiology: What Is the Role of Mendelian Randomization? 2018 James Yarmolinsky
Kaitlin H. Wade
Rebecca C. Richmond
Ryan Langdon
Caroline J. Bull
Kate Tilling
Caroline L. Relton
Sarah J. Lewis
George Davey Smith
Richard M. Martin
+ PDF Chat MR-DoC2: Bidirectional Causal Modeling with Instrumental Variables and Data from Relatives 2022 LuĂ­s Fernando Silva Castro-de-Araujo
Madhurbain Singh
Yi Zhou
Philip Vinh
Brad Verhulst
Conor V. Dolan
Michael C. Neale
+ PDF Chat Bayesian network analysis incorporating genetic anchors complements conventional Mendelian randomization approaches for exploratory analysis of causal relationships in complex data 2019 Richard Howey
So–Youn Shin
Caroline L. Relton
George Davey Smith
Heather J. Cordell
+ PDF Chat Mendelian randomization analysis of a time‐varying exposure for binary disease outcomes using functional data analysis methods 2016 Ying Cao
Suja S. Rajan
Peng Wei
+ PDF Chat MR-DoC2: Bidirectional Causal Modeling with Instrumental Variables and Data from Relatives 2022 LuĂ­s Fernando Silva Castro-de-Araujo
Madhurbain Singh
Yi Zhou
Philip Vinh
Brad Verhulst
Conor V. Dolan
Michael C. Neale
+ Interpretation of Mendelian randomization using a single measure of an exposure that varies over time 2022 Tim Morris
Jon Heron
Eleanor Sanderson
George Davey Smith
Vanessa Didelez
Kate Tilling
+ PDF Chat Power, measurement error, and pleiotropy robustness in twin-design extensions to Mendelian Randomization 2023 LuĂ­s Fernando Silva Castro-de-Araujo
Madhurbain Singh
Yi Zhou
Philip Vinh
Hermine HM Maes
Brad Verhulst
Conor V. Dolan
Michael C. Neale
+ Causal inference in drug discovery and development 2023 Tom Michoel
Jitao David Zhang
+ Limitations and Misinterpretations of E-Values for Sensitivity Analyses of Observational Studies 2018 John P. A. Ioannidis
Yuan Tan
Manuel R. Blum

Works Cited by This (20)

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat The many weak instruments problem and Mendelian randomization 2014 Neil M Davies
Stephanie von Hinke
Helmut Farbmacher
Stephen Burgess
Frank Windmeijer
George Davey Smith
+ An Introduction to the Bootstrap 1994 Bradley Efron
Robert Tibshirani
+ How independent are “independent” effects? relative risk estimation when correlated exposures are measured imprecisely 1991 Andrew Phillips
George Davey Smith
+ PDF Chat Instrumental Variable Analysis with a Nonlinear Exposure–Outcome Relationship 2014 Stephen Burgess
Neil M Davies
Simon G. Thompson
+ Drug repositioning: identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs 2004 Ted T. Ashburn
Karl B. Thor
+ Estimation with weak instruments: Accuracy of higher‐order bias and MSE approximations 2004 Jinyong Hahn
Jerry A. Hausman
Guido M. Kuersteiner
+ Problems of reporting genetic associations with complex outcomes 2003 Helen M. Colhoun
Paul McKeigue
George Davey Smith
+ PDF Chat Network Mendelian randomization: using genetic variants as instrumental variables to investigate mediation in causal pathways 2014 Stephen Burgess
Rhian Daniel
Adam S. Butterworth
Simon G. Thompson
+ PDF Chat Power and instrument strength requirements for Mendelian randomization studies using multiple genetic variants 2010 Brandon L. Pierce
Habibul Ahsan
Tyler J. VanderWeele
+ Re: Estimation of Bias in Nongenetic Observational Studies Using “Mendelian Triangulation” by Bautista et al. 2007 Duncan C. Thomas
Debbie A. Lawlor
John R. Thompson