Algorithms to automatically quantify the geometric similarity of anatomical surfaces

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2011-10-24

Citations: 164

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112822108

Abstract

We describe approaches for distances between pairs of two-dimensional surfaces (embedded in three-dimensional space) that use local structures and global information contained in interstructure geometric relationships. We present algorithms to automatically determine these distances as well as geometric correspondences. This approach is motivated by the aspiration of students of natural science to understand the continuity of form that unites the diversity of life. At present, scientists using physical traits to study evolutionary relationships among living and extinct animals analyze data extracted from carefully defined anatomical correspondence points (landmarks). Identifying and recording these landmarks is time consuming and can be done accurately only by trained morphologists. This necessity renders these studies inaccessible to nonmorphologists and causes phenomics to lag behind genomics in elucidating evolutionary patterns. Unlike other algorithms presented for morphological correspondences, our approach does not require any preliminary marking of special features or landmarks by the user. It also differs from other seminal work in computational geometry in that our algorithms are polynomial in nature and thus faster, making pairwise comparisons feasible for significantly larger numbers of digitized surfaces. We illustrate our approach using three datasets representing teeth and different bones of primates and humans, and show that it leads to highly accurate results.

Locations

  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - View - PDF
  • PubMed Central - View
  • arXiv (Cornell University) - View - PDF
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) - View - PDF
  • PubMed - View
  • DataCite API - View

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat Studying Morphological Variation: Exploring the Shape Space in Evolutionary Anthropology 2024 Shira Faigenbaum-Golovin
Ingrid Daubechies
+ PDF Chat Landmark-free geometric methods in biological shape analysis 2015 Patrice Koehl
Joel Hass
+ PDF Chat A New Fully Automated Approach for Aligning and Comparing Shapes 2014 Douglas Boyer
JesĂșs Puente
Justin T. Gladman
Chris Glynn
Sayan Mukherjee
Gabriel Yapuncich
Ingrid Daubechies
+ PDF Chat A statistical pipeline for identifying physical features that differentiate classes of 3D shapes 2021 Bruce Wang
Timothy Sudijono
Henry Kirveslahti
Tingran Gao
Douglas Boyer
Sayan Mukherjee
Lorin Crawford
+ Nonlandmark classification in paleobiology: computational geometry as a tool for species discrimination 2016 Joshua Lee Mike
Colin D. Sumrall
Vasileios Maroulas
Fernando Schwartz
+ PDF Chat Geometric analysis of shape variability of lower jaws of prehistoric humans 2020 Jing Ren
Peter Wonka
Gowtham Harihara
Maks Ovsjanikov
+ PDF Chat Leveraging Descriptor Learning and Functional Map-based Shape Matching for Automatic Landmark Acquisition 2024 Oshane O. Thomas
A. Murat Maga
+ PDF Chat Development and Assessment of Fully Automated and Globally Transitive Geometric Morphometric Methods, With Application to a Biological Comparative Dataset With High Interspecific Variation 2017 Tingran Gao
Gabriel Yapuncich
Ingrid Daubechies
Sayan Mukherjee
Douglas Boyer
+ PDF Chat Shape analysis via inconsistent surface registration 2020 Gary P. T. Choi
Di Qiu
Lok Ming Lui
+ The continuous Procrustes distance between two surfaces 2011 Yaron Lipman Reema Al-Aifari Ingrid Daubechies
+ The continuous Procrustes distance between two surfaces 2011 Yaron Lipman Reema Al-Aifari Ingrid Daubechies
+ GPSA2: combining landmark-free and landmark-based methods in geometric morphometrics 2024 Benjamin J Pomidor
Matt Dean
+ Distances and algorithms to compare sets of shapes for automated biological morphometrics 2013 JesĂșs Puente
+ Leveraging descriptor learning and functional map‐based shape matching for automated anatomical Landmarking in mouse mandibles 2025 Oshane O. Thomas
A. Murat Maga
+ Development and assessment of fully automated and globally transitive geometric morphometric methods, with application to a biological comparative dataset with high interspecific variation 2016 Tingran Gao
Gabriel Yapuncich
Ingrid Daubechies
Sayan Mukherjee
Douglas Boyer
+ PDF Chat Continuous Procrustes Distance Between Two Surfaces 2013 Reema Al‐Aifari
Ingrid Daubechies
Yaron Lipman
+ PDF Chat Automated Landmarking via Multiple Templates 2022 Charles Zhang
Arthur Porto
Sara Rolfe
Altan Kocatulum
A. Murat Maga
+ Mathematical Methods for Shape Analysis and form Comparison in 3D Anthropometry: A Literature Review 2007 Jianwei Niu
Zhizhong Li
Gavriel Salvendy
+ Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology 1999 Subhash R. Lele
Fred L. Bookstein
+ PDF Chat Detailed Anatomical Orientations for Certain Types of Morphometric Measurements Can Be Determined Automatically With Geometric Algorithms 2015 Douglas Boyer
Julia M. Winchester
Chris Glynn
JesĂșs Puente

Works That Cite This (106)

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat Development and Assessment of Fully Automated and Globally Transitive Geometric Morphometric Methods, With Application to a Biological Comparative Dataset With High Interspecific Variation 2017 Tingran Gao
Gabriel Yapuncich
Ingrid Daubechies
Sayan Mukherjee
Douglas Boyer
+ PDF Chat ariaDNE: A robustly implemented algorithm for Dirichlet energy of the normal 2019 Shan Shan
Shahar Z. Kovalsky
Julie Winchester
Douglas Boyer
Ingrid Daubechies
+ The Occasional Perils of Reflection (Across the Midline; in Geometric Morphometrics) 2020 David C. Katz
+ Tracing the evolution of Australasian mammals: Integrating morphological, palaeontological and molecular data 2020 MĂ©lina A. Celik
+ PDF Chat Morphometry of anatomical shape complexes with dense deformations and sparse parameters 2014 Stanley Durrleman
Marcel Prastawa
Nicolas Charon
Julie R. Korenberg
Sarang Joshi
Guido Gerig
Alain Trouvé
+ PDF Chat A Comparison of Semilandmarking Approaches in the Visualisation of Shape Differences 2023 Wuyang Shui
Antonio Profico
Paul O’Higgins
+ PDF Chat <i>AutoMorph</i>: Accelerating morphometrics with automated 2D and 3D image processing and shape extraction 2017 Allison Y. Hsiang
Kaylea Nelson
Leanne E. Elder
Elizabeth C Sibert
Sara S. Kahanamoku
Janet E. Burke
Abigail Kelly
Yusu Liu
Pincelli M. Hull
+ PDF Chat What Could Hominoid Fetuses Tell Us about Human Evolution? 2018 Naoki Morimoto
+ PDF Chat Scan, extract, wrap, compute—a 3D method to analyse morphological shape differences 2018 Martin Horstmann
Alexander T. Topham
Petra Stamm
Sebastian Kruppert
John K. Colbourne
Ralph Tollrian
Linda C. Weiss
+ PDF Chat Imaging with Kantorovich--Rubinstein Discrepancy 2014 Jan Lellmann
Dirk A. Lorenz
Carola‐Bibiane Schönlieb
Tuomo Valkonen