The effects of ellipticity and substructure on estimates of cluster density profiles based on lensing and kinematics

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2007-09-16

Citations: 46

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12225.x

Abstract

We address the question of how well the density profile of galaxy clusters can be determined by combining strong lensing and velocity dispersion data. We use cosmological dark matter simulations of clusters to test the reliability of the method, producing mock catalogues of tangential and radial gravitational arcs and simulating the radial velocity dispersion profile of the cluster brightest central galaxy. The density profiles of the simulated clusters closely follow the NFW form, but we find that the recovered values of the inner slope are systematically underestimated, by about 0.4 in the mean, if the lens is assumed to be axially symmetric. However, if the ellipticity and orientation of the iso-contours of the cluster lensing potential are taken into account, then the inner slopes can be recovered quite accurately for a significant subset of the clusters whose central surface density profiles appear the most regular. These have lensing potentials with ellipticities in the range 0.15-0.4. Further simulations projecting one cluster along many random lines-of-sight show that, even for lower ellipticities, the central slopes are underestimated by $\sim 10-35%$. These simulations closely mimic past observations (see e.g. Sand et al., 2004), suggesting that existing estimates of the central slopes may be biased towards low values. For the remaining clusters, where the lensing potential is strongly perturbed by active merging or by substructure, the correct determination of the inner slope requires a more accurate model for the lens. When the halo profile is modelled by a generalised NFW profile, we find that the inferred scale radius and characteristic density, unlike the inner slope, are generally poorly constrained, since there is a strong degeneracy between these two parameters.

Locations

  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society - View - PDF
  • arXiv (Cornell University) - View - PDF
  • DataCite API - View

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ Constraints on cluster density profiles from strong lensing and velocity dispersion data: importance of ellipticity and substructures 2005 M. Meneghetti
Matthias Bartelmann
Adrian Jenkins
Carlos S. Frenk
+ PDF Chat Measuring the surface mass density ellipticity of redMaPPer galaxy clusters using weak lensing 2020 Elizabeth Johana Gonzalez
Martı́n Makler
D. G. Lambas
MartĂ­n Chalela
M. E. S. Pereira
Ludovic Van Waerbeke
Huanyuan Shan
T. Erben
+ PDF Chat Lensing Constraints on the Mass Profile Shape and the Splashback Radius of Galaxy Clusters 2017 Keiichi Umetsu
Benedikt Diemer
+ The ellipticity of galaxy cluster haloes from satellite galaxies and weak lensing 2018 T. Shin
Joseph Clampitt
Bhuvnesh Jain
G. M. Bernstein
A.R. Neil
Eduardo Rozo
E. S. Rykoff
+ PDF Chat The shape of galaxy dark matter haloes in massive galaxy clusters: insights from strong gravitational lensing 2018 Mathilde Jauzac
David Harvey
R. Massey
+ PDF Chat Optimizing weak lensing mass estimates for cluster profile uncertainty 2011 D. Gruen
G. M. Bernstein
Tsz Yan Lam
S. Seitz
+ Why weak lensing cluster shapes are insensitive to self-interacting dark matter 2022 Andrew Robertson
Eric Huff
K. Markovič
+ PDF Chat Why weak lensing cluster shapes are insensitive to self-interacting dark matter 2023 Andrew Robertson
Eric Huff
K. Markovič
+ PDF Chat Weak-Lensing Ellipticities in a Strong-Lensing Regime 2008 R. Massey
David M. Goldberg
+ Constraints on Cosmological Parameters from Strong Gravitational Lensing by Galaxy Clusters 2012 Britta Zieser
Matthias Bartelmann
+ Constraints on Cosmological Parameters from Strong Gravitational Lensing by Galaxy Clusters 2012 Britta Zieser
Matthias Bartelmann
+ PDF Chat Hubble Frontier Fields: systematic errors in strong lensing models of galaxy clusters – implications for cosmography 2017 Ana Acebrón
Eric Jullo
Marceau Limousin
A. Tilquin
C. Giocoli
Mathilde Jauzac
Guillaume Mahler
Johan Richard
+ PDF Chat Lensing measurements of the ellipticity of luminous red galaxies dark matter haloes 2016 Joseph Clampitt
Bhuvnesh Jain
+ (Lack of) lensing constraints on cluster dark matter profiles 2003 Neal Dalal
Charles R. Keeton
+ On the ellipticity parameterization for an NFW profile: an overlooked angular structure in strong lens modeling 2023 Matthew R. Gomer
Dominique Sluse
Lyne Van de Vyvere
Simon Birrer
Anowar J. Shajib
F. Courbin
+ PDF Chat Orientation bias of optically selected galaxy clusters and its impact on stacked weak-lensing analyses 2014 J. P. Dietrich
Yuanyuan Zhang
Jeeseon Song
C. Davis
Timothy A. McKay
L. Baruah
M. R. Becker
Christophe Benoist
Michael T. Busha
L. A. N. da Costa
+ PDF Chat Detailed cluster lensing profiles at large radii and the impact on cluster weak lensing studies 2011 Masamune Oguri
Takashi Hamana
+ The Strongest Cluster Lenses: An Analysis of the Relation Between Strong Gravitational Lensing Strength and the Physical Properties of Galaxy Clusters 2021 Carter Fox
Guillaume Mahler
Keren Sharon
J. D. Remolina GonzĂĄlez
+ PDF Chat Halo cluster shapes: insights from simulated galaxies and ICL with prospects for weak lensing applications 2021 Elizabeth Johana Gonzalez
Cinthia Ragone-Figueroa
C. Donzelli
Martı́n Makler
D. G. Lambas
G. L. Granato
+ PDF Chat Constraining the inner density slope of massive galaxy clusters 2020 Qiuhan He
Hongyu Li
Ran Li
Carlos S. Frenk
Matthieu Schaller
David J Barnes
Yannick M. Bahé
Scott T. Kay
Liang Gao
Claudio Dalla Vecchia

Works That Cite This (41)

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat A halo mass—concentration relation from weak lensing 2008 Rachel Mandelbaum
UroĆĄ Seljak
Christopher M. Hirata
+ PDF Chat Cluster–galaxy weak lensing 2020 Keiichi Umetsu
+ PDF Chat Cosmology with the cluster mass function: mass estimators and shape systematics in large weak lensing surveys 2009 Virginia L. Corless
Lindsay King
+ PDF Chat The impact of AGN feedback and baryonic cooling on galaxy clusters as gravitational lenses 2010 James M. G. Mead
Lindsay King
Debora Sijacki
Adrienne Leonard
Ewald Puchwein
Ian G. McCarthy
+ PDF Chat Strong lensing in the MARENOSTRUM UNIVERSE 2010 M. Meneghetti
C. Fedeli
Francesco Pace
Stefan Gottlöber
Gustavo Yepes
+ PDF Chat Correlations between triaxial shapes and formation history of dark matter haloes 2020 Erwin T. Lau
Andrew P. Hearin
Daisuke Nagai
N. Cappelluti
+ PDF Chat Separating Baryons and Dark Matter in Cluster Cores: A Full Two‐dimensional Lensing and Dynamic Analysis of Abell 383 and MS 2137−23 2008 David J. Sand
Tommaso Treu
Richard S. Ellis
G. P. Smith
Jean‐Paul Kneib
+ PDF Chat THE DENSITY PROFILES OF MASSIVE, RELAXED GALAXY CLUSTERS. I. THE TOTAL DENSITY OVER THREE DECADES IN RADIUS 2013 Andrew B. Newman
Tommaso Treu
Richard S. Ellis
David J. Sand
Carlo Nipoti
Johan Richard
Eric Jullo
+ PDF Chat EasyCritics – I. Efficient detection of strongly lensing galaxy groups and clusters in wide-field surveys 2018 S. Stapelberg
Mauricio Carrasco
M. Maturi
+ PDF Chat Combining weak and strong lensing in cluster potential reconstruction 2006 Marcello Cacciato
Matthias Bartelmann
M. Meneghetti
L. Moscardini

Works Cited by This (49)

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat [ITAL]Chandra[/ITAL] Observations of Abell 2029: No Cooling Flow and a Steep Abundance Gradient 2002 Aaron D. Lewis
John T. Stocke
David A. Buote
+ PDF Chat A Wide‐Field<i>Hubble Space Telescope</i>Study of the Cluster Cl 0024+1654 at \documentclass{aastex} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{bm} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{pifont} \usepackage{stmaryrd} \usepackage{textcomp} \usepackage{portland,xspace} \usepackage{amsmath,amsxtra} \usepackage[OT2,OT1]{fontenc} \newcommand\cyr{ \renewcommand\rmdefault{wncyr} \renewcommand\sfdefault{wncyss} \renewcommand\encodingdefault{OT2} \normalfont \selectfont} \
 2003 Jean‐Paul Kneib
P. Hudelot
Richard S. Ellis
Tommaso Treu
G. P. Smith
Philip J. Marshall
O. Czoske
Ian Smail
Priyamvada Natarajan
+ PDF Chat Response of Dark Matter Halos to Condensation of Baryons: Cosmological Simulations and Improved Adiabatic Contraction Model 2004 Oleg Y. Gnedin
Andrey V. Kravtsov
Anatoly Klypin
Daisuke Nagai
+ PDF Chat A<i>Hubble Space Telescope</i>Lensing Survey of X‐Ray Luminous Galaxy Clusters. I. A383 2001 G. P. Smith
Jean‐Paul Kneib
H. Ebeling
O. Czoske
Ian Smail
+ PDF Chat The Dark Matter Distribution in the Central Regions of Galaxy Clusters: Implications for Cold Dark Matter 2004 David J. Sand
Tommaso Treu
G. P. Smith
Richard S. Ellis
+ PDF Chat Chandra observations of RX J1347.5−1145: the distribution of mass in the most X-ray-luminous galaxy cluster known 2002 S. W. Allen
R. W. Schmidt
A. C. Fabian
+ The Density Profile of Cluster-Scale Dark Matter Halos 2003 Hkon Dahle
Steen Hannestad
Jesper Sommer‐Larsen
+ PDF Chat Combining weak and strong lensing in cluster potential reconstruction 2006 Marcello Cacciato
Matthias Bartelmann
M. Meneghetti
L. Moscardini
+ PDF Chat Mass Distributions of<i>Hubble Space Telescope</i>Galaxy Clusters from Gravitational Arcs 2006 Julia M. Comerford
M. Meneghetti
Matthias Bartelmann
M. Schirmer
+ PDF Chat Hiding cusps in cores: kinematics of disc galaxies in triaxial dark matter haloes 2006 Eric Hayashi
Julio F. Navarro