A Tully-Fisher Relation for S0 Galaxies

Type: Article

Publication Date: 1999-06-01

Citations: 85

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/300869

Abstract

We present an I-band Tully-Fisher relation (TFR) for 18 nearby S0 galaxies using kinematics derived from long-slit spectroscopy of stellar absorption lines. Our estimates of the circular velocity, Vc, at 2–3 exponential disk scale lengths account for line-of-sight projection and for the stellar random motions through an asymmetric drift correction. Uniform and accurate distance calibration is available from recent surface brightness fluctuation measurements. Despite the care taken in estimating both Vc and MI, the TFR shows an intrinsic scatter of about 0.7 mag in MI or 0.15 in log Vc. This result is surprising, because S0 galaxies appear to have both the simple kinematics of disk galaxies and the simple stellar populations of early-type galaxies. Remarkably, in this sample of overall rotation-dominated galaxies, the central stellar velocity dispersion is a better predictor of the total I-band luminosity (through the fundamental plane relations) than the circular speed at several exponential scale lengths. Furthermore, the TFR zero point, or the mean stellar I-band luminosity at a given Vc, differs by only about 0.5 mag between our sample of S0s and a comparison sample of late-type spirals, once both data sets are brought onto a consistent distance scale. This offset is less than expected if S0s are former spiral galaxies with prematurely truncated star formation (≳4 Gyrs ago).

Locations

  • The Astronomical Journal - View
  • arXiv (Cornell University) - PDF
  • DataCite API - View

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat The Tully-Fisher relations of early-type spiral and S0 galaxies 2010 Michael J. Williams
Martin Bureau
Michele Cappellari
+ PDF Chat The Tully–Fisher relation for S0 galaxies 2006 A. G. Bedregal
Alfonso Aragón‐Salamanca
M. R. Merrifield
+ A Shared Tully-Fisher Relation for Spiral and S0 Galaxies 2009 Michael J. Williams
Martin Bureau
Michele Cappellari
+ PDF Chat S0 galaxies in the Coma cluster: environmental dependence of the S0 offset from the Tully–Fisher relation 2013 Tim Rawle
J. R. Lucey
Russell J. Smith
Jacob T. C. G. Head
+ PDF Chat The Evolution of the Tully-Fisher Relation of Spiral Galaxies 2002 B. Ziegler
A. Böhm
K. J. Fricke
Klaus Jäger
H. Nicklas
R. Bender
Niv Drory
A. Gabasch
R. P. Saglia
S. Seitz
+ PDF Chat The dynamics of S0 galaxies and their TullyFisher relation 2002 Anne Mathieu
M. R. Merrifield
Konrad Kuijken
+ Physical Sources of Scatter in the Tully-Fisher Relation 2002 Sheila J. Kannappan
Daniel G. Fabricant
Marijn Franx
+ PDF Chat The Tully-Fisher relation of distant field galaxies 2006 S. P. Bamford
Alfonso Aragón‐Salamanca
B. Milvang‐Jensen
+ PDF Chat The Tully-Fisher relation for 25 000 Sloan Digital Sky Survey galaxies as a function of environment 2012 Philip Mocz
Andrew W. Green
M. Malacari
Karl Glazebrook
+ PDF Chat The Tully-Fisher relation at intermediate redshift 2004 A. Böhm
B. Ziegler
R. P. Saglia
R. Bender
K. J. Fricke
A. Gabasch
J. Heidt
D. Mehlert
S. Noll
S. Seitz
+ PDF Chat Physical Sources of Scatter in the Tully-Fisher Relation 2002 Sheila J. Kannappan
Daniel G. Fabricant
Marijn Franx
+ On measuring the Tully-Fisher relation at $z > 1$ 2006 Lottie van Starkenburg
P. van der Werf
Lin Yan
A. F. M. Moorwood
+ Tully-Fisher Relation of Late-type Galaxies at $0.6 \leq z \leq 2.5$ 2024 Gauri Sharma
Varenya Upadhyaya
P. Salucci
S. Desai
+ PDF Chat Measuring the fading of S0 galaxies using globular clusters 2006 Alfonso Aragón‐Salamanca
A. G. Bedregal
M. R. Merrifield
+ PDF Chat The H I Tully-Fisher relation of early-type galaxies 2015 Milan den Heijer
Tom Oosterloo
P. Serra
G. I. G. Józsa
J. Kerp
Raffaella Morganti
Michele Cappellari
Timothy A. Davis
Pierre-Alain Duc
Éric Emsellem
+ PDF Chat Stellar Mass‐to‐Light Ratios and the Tully‐Fisher Relation 2001 Eric F. Bell
Roelof S. de Jong
+ PDF Chat The Tully-Fisher Relation as a Measure of Luminosity Evolution: A Low-Redshift Baseline for Evolving Galaxies 2001 E. J. Barton
Margaret J. Geller
Benjamin C. Bromley
Liese van Zee
Scott J. Kenyon
+ PDF Chat The fundamental manifold of spiral galaxies: ordered versus random motions and the morphology dependence of the Tully–Fisher relation 2014 Chiara Tonini
D. H. Jones
J. R. Mould
R. L. Webster
T. Danilovich
S. Özbilgen
+ PDF Chat The high-mass end of the Tully-Fisher relation 2007 E. Noordermeer
Marc Verheijen
+ PDF Chat The Tully-Fisher Relation and its Residuals for a Broadly Selected Sample of Galaxies 2007 James Pizagno
Francisco Prada
David H. Weinberg
Hans‐Walter Rix
Richard W. Pogge
E. K. Grebel
Daniel Harbeck
Michael R. Blanton
J. Brinkmann
James E. Gunn

Works That Cite This (69)

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat Nearby galaxies in the LOFAR Two-metre Sky Survey 2022 V. Heesen
M. Staffehl
Aritra Basu
R. Beck
M. Stein
F. S. Tabatabaei
M. J. Hardcastle
K. T. Chyży
T. W. Shimwell
B. Adebahr
+ PDF Chat Polar Ring Galaxies and the Tully‐Fisher Relation: Implications for the Dark Halo Shape 2003 E. Iodice
M. Arnaboldi
F. Bournaud
F. Combes
L. S. Sparke
W.D. van Driel
M. Capaccioli
+ PDF Chat The Bulge-Halo Connection in Galaxies: A Physical Interpretation of the <i>V</i> <sub> <i>c</i> </sub> -σ <sub>0</sub> Relation 2007 Stéphane Courteau
M. McDonald
Lawrence M. Widrow
Jon A. Holtzman
+ PDF Chat The ATLAS3D project - V. The CO Tully-Fisher relation of early-type galaxies 2011 Timothy A. Davis
Martin Bureau
Lisa M. Young
Katherine Alatalo
Leo Blitz
Michele Cappellari
Nicholas Scott
Maxime Bois
F. Bournaud
Roger L. Davies
+ Dynamical Family Properties and Dark Halo Scaling Relations of Giant Elliptical Galaxies 2001 Ortwin Gerhard
Andi Kronawitter
R. P. Saglia
R. Bender
+ PDF Chat Double-barred galaxies 2004 Peter Erwin
+ PDF Chat Environmental Effects on Late‐Type Galaxies in Nearby Clusters 2006 A. Boselli
Giuseppe Gavazzi
+ PDF Chat Mass profiles and anisotropies of early-type galaxies 2001 John Magorrian
D. R. Ballantyne
+ PDF Chat The Tully-Fisher Relation as a Measure of Luminosity Evolution: A Low-Redshift Baseline for Evolving Galaxies 2001 E. J. Barton
Margaret J. Geller
Benjamin C. Bromley
Liese van Zee
Scott J. Kenyon
+ PDF Chat Planetary Nebula Spectrograph survey of S0 galaxy kinematics – II. Clues to the origins of S0 galaxies 2013 A. Cortesi
M. R. Merrifield
L. Coccato
M. Arnaboldi
Ortwin Gerhard
S. P. Bamford
N. R. Napolitano
Aaron J. Romanowsky
N. G. Douglas
Konrad Kuijken

Works Cited by This (20)

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat The Fundamental Plane for cluster E and S0 galaxies 1996 Inger Jørgensen
Marijn Franx
P. Kjærgaard
+ PDF Chat The Formation of Disk Galaxies 1997 Julianne J. Dalcanton
David N. Spergel
F. J. Summers
+ PDF Chat Tests of the Tully-Fisher Relation.II.Scatter Using Optical Rotation Curves 1997 Somak Raychaudhury
Kaspar von Braun
G. M. Bernstein
Puragra Guhathakurta
+ Optical Rotation Curves and Linewidths for Tully-Fisher Applications 1997 Stéphane Courteau
+ PDF Chat The I Band Tully-Fisher Relation for Cluster Galaxies: a Template Relation, its Scatter and Bias Corrections. 1997 Riccardo Giovanelli
Martha P. Haynes
T. Herter
Nicole P. Vogt
L. N. da Costa
W. Freudling
John J. Salzer
G. Wegner
+ PDF Chat Unequal-Mass Galaxy Mergers and the Creation of Cluster S0 Galaxies 1998 Kenji Bekki
+ The I band Tully-Fisher relation for cluster galaxies: data presentation. 1997 Riccardo Giovanelli
Martha P. Haynes
T. Herter
Nicole P. Vogt
L. N. da Costa
W. Freudling
John J. Salzer
G. Wegner
+ PDF Chat Optimal estimates of line-of-sight velocity distributions from absorption line spectra of galaxies: nuclear discs in elliptical galaxies 1992 Hans–Walter Rix
S. D. M. White
+ PDF Chat Internal kinematics of distant field galaxies -- I. Emission linewidths for a complete sample of faint blue galaxies at &lt;z&gt; 0.25 1997 Hans‐Walter Rix
P. Guhathakurta
Matthew Colless
K. Ing
+ Some Musings on Galaxy Classification 1997 Sidney van den Bergh