Properties and consequences of Thorn-independence

Authors

Type: Article
Publication Date: 2006-03-01
Citations: 61
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2178/jsl/1140641160

Abstract

Abstract We develop a new notion of independence (ϸ-independence, read “thorn”-independence) that arises from a family of ranks suggested by Scanlon (ϸ-ranks). We prove that in a large class of theories (including simple theories and o-minimal theories) this notion has many of the properties needed for an adequate geometric structure. We prove that ϸ-independence agrees with the usual independence notions in stable, supersimple and o-minimal theories. Furthermore, we give some evidence that the equivalence between forking and ϸ-forking in simple theories might be closely related to one of the main open conjectures in simplicity theory, the stable forking conjecture. In particular, we prove that in any simple theory where the stable forking conjecture holds, ϸ-independence and forking independence agree.

Locations

  • Journal of Symbolic Logic

Similar Works

We develop a new notion of independence suggested by Scanlon (th-independence). We prove that in a large class of theories (which includes all simple theories) this notion has many of … We develop a new notion of independence suggested by Scanlon (th-independence). We prove that in a large class of theories (which includes all simple theories) this notion has many of the properties needed for an adequate geometric structure in these models. We also prove that this definition agrees with the usual independence notions in stable, supersimple and o-minimal theories. Finally, many of the proofs and results we get for th-independence when restricted to simple theories seem to show there is some connection between th-independence and the stable forking conjecture. In particular, we prove that in any simple theory where this conjecture holds, our definition agrees with the classic definition.
A ternary relation [Formula: see text] between subsets of the big model of a complete first-order theory T is called an independence relation if it satisfies a certain set of … A ternary relation [Formula: see text] between subsets of the big model of a complete first-order theory T is called an independence relation if it satisfies a certain set of axioms. The primary example is forking in a simple theory, but o-minimal theories are also known to have an interesting independence relation. Our approach in this paper is to treat independence relations as mathematical objects worth studying. The main application is a better understanding of thorn-forking, which turns out to be closely related to modular pairs in the lattice of algebraically closed sets.
Abstract We examine several conditions, either the existence of a rank or a particular property of þ-forking that suggest the existence of a well-behaved independence relation, and determine the consequences … Abstract We examine several conditions, either the existence of a rank or a particular property of þ-forking that suggest the existence of a well-behaved independence relation, and determine the consequences of each of these conditions towards the rosiness of the theory. In particular we show that the existence of an ordinal valued equivalence relation rank is a (necessary and) sufficient condition for rosiness.
Just as Lascar's notion of abstract rank axiomatizes the U-rank, we propose axioms for the ranks $SU^d$ and $SU^f$, the foundation ranks of dividing and forking. We study the relationships … Just as Lascar's notion of abstract rank axiomatizes the U-rank, we propose axioms for the ranks $SU^d$ and $SU^f$, the foundation ranks of dividing and forking. We study the relationships between these axioms. As with superstable, we characterize supersimple types and theories based on the existence of these ranks. We show that the U-rank is the foundation rank of the Lascar-splitting independence relationship. We also provide an alternative definition of SUd similar to the original definition of U. Finally, we check that if in the standard characterizations of simple and supersimple we change the non-forking independence for the non-lascar-splitting independence, we characterize stable and superstable.
We analyze the notion of weak elimination of hyperimaginaries (WEHI) in simple theories. A key observation in the analysis is a characterization of WEHI in terms of forking dependence -- … We analyze the notion of weak elimination of hyperimaginaries (WEHI) in simple theories. A key observation in the analysis is a characterization of WEHI in terms of forking dependence -- a condition we dub dependence-witnessed-by-imaginaries (DWIP). Generalizing results of [1] and [3], we show that in a simple theory with WEHI, forking and thorn-forking coincide. We also show that, conversely, the equivalence of independence and thorn-independence is (almost) sufficient for WEHI. Thus, the WEHI and the statement independence = thorn-independence are morally equivalent. As a further application of our technology, we demonstrate stable forking for 1-based theories of finite SU-rank that have WEHI.
Abstract Building on Pierre Simon’s notion of distality, we introduce distality rank as a property of first-order theories and give examples for each rank m such that $1\leq m \leq … Abstract Building on Pierre Simon’s notion of distality, we introduce distality rank as a property of first-order theories and give examples for each rank m such that $1\leq m \leq \omega $ . For NIP theories, we show that distality rank is invariant under base change. We also define a generalization of type orthogonality called m -determinacy and show that theories of distality rank m require certain products to be m -determined. Furthermore, for NIP theories, this behavior characterizes m -distality. If we narrow the scope to stable theories, we observe that m -distality can be characterized by the maximum cycle size found in the forking “geometry,” so it coincides with $(m-1)$ -triviality. On a broader scale, we see that m -distality is a strengthening of Saharon Shelah’s notion of m -dependence.
Building on Pierre Simon's notion of distality, we introduce distality rank as a property of first-order theories and give examples for each rank $m$ such that $1\leq m \leq \omega$. … Building on Pierre Simon's notion of distality, we introduce distality rank as a property of first-order theories and give examples for each rank $m$ such that $1\leq m \leq \omega$. For NIP theories, we show that distality rank is invariant under base change. We also define a generalization of type orthogonality called $m$-determinacy and show that theories of distality rank $m$ require certain products to be $m$-determined. Furthermore, for NIP theories, this behavior characterizes $m$-distality. If we narrow the scope to stable theories, we observe that $m$-distality can be characterized by the maximum cycle size found in the forking "geometry," so it coincides with $(m-1)$-triviality. On a broader scale, we see that $m$-distality is a strengthening of Saharon Shelah's notion of $m$-dependence.
Building on Pierre Simon's notion of distality, we introduce distality rank as a property of first-order theories and give examples for each rank $m$ such that $1\leq m \leq \omega$. … Building on Pierre Simon's notion of distality, we introduce distality rank as a property of first-order theories and give examples for each rank $m$ such that $1\leq m \leq \omega$. For NIP theories, we show that distality rank is invariant under base change. We also define a generalization of type orthogonality called $m$-determinacy and show that theories of distality rank $m$ require certain products to be $m$-determined. Furthermore, for NIP theories, this behavior characterizes $m$-distality. If we narrow the scope to stable theories, we observe that $m$-distality can be characterized by the maximum cycle size found in the forking geometry, so it coincides with $(m-1)$-triviality. On a broader scale, we see that $m$-distality is a strengthening of Saharon Shelah's notion of $m$-dependence.
An axiomatic treatment of `independence relations' (notions of independence) for complete first-order theories is presented, the principal examples being forking (due to Shelah) and thorn-forking (due to Onshuus). Thorn-forking is … An axiomatic treatment of `independence relations' (notions of independence) for complete first-order theories is presented, the principal examples being forking (due to Shelah) and thorn-forking (due to Onshuus). Thorn-forking is characterised in terms of modular pairs in the lattice of algebraically closed sets. Wherever possible, forking and thorn-forking are treated in a uniform way. They are dual in the sense that forking is the finest (most restrictive) and thorn-forking the coarsest independence relation worth examining. We finish by defining the kernel of a sequence of indiscernibles and studying its relation to canonical bases.
Abstract We investigate the geometry of forking for SU-rank 2 elements in supersimple ω-categorical theories and prove stable forking and some structural properties for such elements. We extend this analysis … Abstract We investigate the geometry of forking for SU-rank 2 elements in supersimple ω-categorical theories and prove stable forking and some structural properties for such elements. We extend this analysis to the case of SU-rank 3 elements.
Abstract The classes stable, simple, and NSOP $_1$ in the stability hierarchy for first-order theories can be characterised by the existence of a certain independence relation. For each of them … Abstract The classes stable, simple, and NSOP $_1$ in the stability hierarchy for first-order theories can be characterised by the existence of a certain independence relation. For each of them there is a canonicity theorem: there can be at most one nice independence relation. Independence in stable and simple first-order theories must come from forking and dividing (which then coincide), and for NSOP $_1$ theories it must come from Kim-dividing. We generalise this work to the framework of Abstract Elementary Categories (AECats) with the amalgamation property. These are a certain kind of accessible category generalising the category of (subsets of) models of some theory. We prove canonicity theorems for stable, simple, and NSOP $_1$ -like independence relations. The stable and simple cases have been done before in slightly different setups, but we provide them here as well so that we can recover part of the original stability hierarchy. We also provide abstract definitions for each of these independence relations as what we call isi-dividing, isi-forking, and long Kim-dividing.
Abstract We give a characterisation of forking in the context of simple theories in terms of the fundamental order. Abstract We give a characterisation of forking in the context of simple theories in terms of the fundamental order.
We introduce the notion of a preindependence relation between subsets of the big model of a complete first-order theory, an abstraction of the properties which numerous concrete notions such as … We introduce the notion of a preindependence relation between subsets of the big model of a complete first-order theory, an abstraction of the properties which numerous concrete notions such as forking, dividing, thorn-forking, thorn-dividing, splitting or finite satisfiability share in all complete theories. We examine the relation between four additional axioms (extension, local character, full existence and symmetry) that one expects of a good notion of independence. We show that thorn-forking can be described in terms of local forking if we localize the number k in Kim's notion of "dividing with respect to k" (using Ben-Yaacov's "k-inconsistency witnesses") rather than the forking formulas. It follows that every theory with an M-symmetric lattice of algebraically closed sets (in T eq ) is rosy, with a simple lattice theoretical interpretation of thorn-forking.
In a previous paper we developed the notions of th-independence and þ-ranks which define a geometric independence relation in a class of theories which we called ``rosy''. We proved that … In a previous paper we developed the notions of th-independence and þ-ranks which define a geometric independence relation in a class of theories which we called ``rosy''. We proved that rosy theories include simple and o-minimal theories and that for any theory for which the stable forking conjecture was true, þ-forking coincides with forking independence. In this article, we continue to study properties of th-forking and find more examples of rosy theories. Among the new properties we prove in this paper are some alternative characterizations of rosy theories and some tools to prove and analyze rosiness in particular cases. Finally, we use this to find two examples of rosy non simple theories: pseudo real closed fields (PRC-fields) and the uniform companion of a large differential field defined by Marcus Tressl.
Kim's Lemma is a key ingredient in the theory of forking independence in simple theories. It asserts that if a formula divides, then it divides along every Morley sequence in … Kim's Lemma is a key ingredient in the theory of forking independence in simple theories. It asserts that if a formula divides, then it divides along every Morley sequence in type of the parameters. Variants of Kim's Lemma have formed the core of the theories of independence in two orthogonal generalizations of simplicity - namely, the classes of NTP2 and NSOP1 theories. We introduce a new variant of Kim's Lemma that simultaneously generalizes the NTP2 and NSOP1 variants. We explore examples and non-examples in which this lemma holds, discuss implications with syntactic properties of theories, and ask several questions.
We investigate the geometry of forking for U-rank 2 elements in supersimple w-categorical theories and prove stable forking and some structural properties for such elements. We extend this analysis to … We investigate the geometry of forking for U-rank 2 elements in supersimple w-categorical theories and prove stable forking and some structural properties for such elements. We extend this analysis to the case of U-rank 3 elements.
The classes stable, simple and NSOP$_1$ in the stability hierarchy for first-order theories can be characterised by the existence of a certain independence relation. For each of them there is … The classes stable, simple and NSOP$_1$ in the stability hierarchy for first-order theories can be characterised by the existence of a certain independence relation. For each of them there is a canonicity theorem: there can be at most one nice independence relation. Independence in stable and simple first-order theories must come from forking and dividing (which then coincide), and for NSOP$_1$ theories it must come from Kim-dividing. We generalise this work to the framework of AECats (Abstract Elementary Categories) with the amalgamation property. These are a certain kind of accessible category generalising the category of (subsets of) models of some theory. We prove canonicity theorems for stable, simple and NSOP$_1$-like independence relations. The stable and simple cases have been done before in slightly different setups, but we provide them here as well so that we can recover part of the original stability hierarchy. We also provide abstract definitions for each of these independence relations as what we call isi-dividing, isi-forking and long Kim-dividing.
Kim's Lemma is a key ingredient in the theory of forking independence in simple theories.It asserts that if a formula divides, then it divides along every Morley sequence in type … Kim's Lemma is a key ingredient in the theory of forking independence in simple theories.It asserts that if a formula divides, then it divides along every Morley sequence in type of the parameters.Variants of Kim's Lemma have formed the core of the theories of independence in two orthogonal generalizations of simplicity -namely, the classes of NTP 2 and NSOP 1 theories.We introduce a new variant of Kim's Lemma that simultaneously generalizes the NTP 2 and NSOP 1 variants.We explore examples and nonexamples in which this lemma holds, discuss implications with syntactic properties of theories, and ask several questions. 1. Introduction 825 2. Preliminaries 828 3. A diversity of Kim's lemmas 838 4. Examples 844 5.
Abstract We initiate a systematic study of generic stability independence and introduce the class of treeless theories in which this notion of independence is particularly well behaved. We show that … Abstract We initiate a systematic study of generic stability independence and introduce the class of treeless theories in which this notion of independence is particularly well behaved. We show that the class of treeless theories contains both binary theories and stable theories and give several applications of the theory of independence for treeless theories. As a corollary, we show that every binary NSOP $_{3}$ theory is simple.

Cited by (40)

Usamos una contrucción particular de una relación de independencia para demostrar que en cualquier teoría þ-bifurcación es equivalente a bifurcación con una fórmula estable (en el sentido específico de st-bifurcación … Usamos una contrucción particular de una relación de independencia para demostrar que en cualquier teoría þ-bifurcación es equivalente a bifurcación con una fórmula estable (en el sentido específico de st-bifurcación dada en la Definición 1.3). También demostramos que si tenemos þ-división podemos lograr división fuerte sobre una base que pertenece a la clausura algebraica del conjunto parámetro.
We present an updated exposition of the classical theory of complete first order theories without the independence property (also called NIP theories or dependent theories). We present an updated exposition of the classical theory of complete first order theories without the independence property (also called NIP theories or dependent theories).
Abstract Let M be an arbitrary structure. Then we say that an M ‐formula φ ( x ) defines a stable set in M if every formula φ ( x … Abstract Let M be an arbitrary structure. Then we say that an M ‐formula φ ( x ) defines a stable set in M if every formula φ ( x ) ∧ α ( x , y ) is stable. We prove: If G is an M ‐definable group and every definable stable subset of G has U ‐rank at most n (the same n for all sets), then G has a maximal connected stable normal subgroup H such that G / H is purely unstable. The assumptions hold for example if M is interpretable in an o‐minimal structure. More generally, an M ‐definable set X is weakly stable if the M ‐induced structure on X is stable. We observe that, by results of Shelah, every weakly stable set in theories with NIP is stable. (© 2007 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Abstract We consider the question of when an expansion of a first-order topological structure has the property that every open set definable in the expansion is definable in the original … Abstract We consider the question of when an expansion of a first-order topological structure has the property that every open set definable in the expansion is definable in the original structure. This question has been investigated by Dolich, Miller and Steinhorn in the setting of ordered structures as part of their work on the property of having o-minimal open core. We answer the question in a fairly general setting and provide conditions which in practice are often easy to check. We give a further characterisation in the special case of an expansion by a generic predicate.
Abstract We provide a general theorem implying that for a (strongly) dependent theory T the theory of sufficiently well-behaved pairs of models of T is again (strongly) dependent. We apply … Abstract We provide a general theorem implying that for a (strongly) dependent theory T the theory of sufficiently well-behaved pairs of models of T is again (strongly) dependent. We apply the theorem to the case of lovely pairs of thorn-rank one theories as well as to a setting of dense pairs of first-order topological theories.
A ternary relation [Formula: see text] between subsets of the big model of a complete first-order theory T is called an independence relation if it satisfies a certain set of … A ternary relation [Formula: see text] between subsets of the big model of a complete first-order theory T is called an independence relation if it satisfies a certain set of axioms. The primary example is forking in a simple theory, but o-minimal theories are also known to have an interesting independence relation. Our approach in this paper is to treat independence relations as mathematical objects worth studying. The main application is a better understanding of thorn-forking, which turns out to be closely related to modular pairs in the lattice of algebraically closed sets.
In this paper we introduce the concept of O-asymptotic classes of finite structures, melding ideas coming from 1-dimensional asymptotic classes and o-minimality. The results we present here include a cell-decomposition … In this paper we introduce the concept of O-asymptotic classes of finite structures, melding ideas coming from 1-dimensional asymptotic classes and o-minimality. The results we present here include a cell-decomposition result for O-asymptotic classes and a classification of their infinite ultraproducts: Every infinite ultraproduct of structures in an O-asymptotic class is superrosy of U-thorn-rank 1, and NTP2 (in fact, inp-minimal).
Abstract We examine fields in which model theoretic algebraic closure coincides with relative field theoretic algebraic closure. These are perfect fields with nice model theoretic behaviour. For example they are … Abstract We examine fields in which model theoretic algebraic closure coincides with relative field theoretic algebraic closure. These are perfect fields with nice model theoretic behaviour. For example they are exactly the fields in which algebraic independence is an abstract independence relation in the sense of Kim and Pillay. Classes of examples are perfect PAC fields, model complete large fields and henselian valued fields of characteristic 0.
We present definitions of homology groups associated to a family of amalgamation functors. We show that if the generalized amalgamation properties hold, then the homology groups are trivial. We compute … We present definitions of homology groups associated to a family of amalgamation functors. We show that if the generalized amalgamation properties hold, then the homology groups are trivial. We compute the group H_2 for strong types in stable theories and show that in this context, the class of possible groups H_2 is precisely the profinite abelian groups.
We show that any rosy CM-trivial theory has weak canonical bases, and CM-triviality in the real sort is equivalent to CM-triviality with geometric elimination of imaginaries. We also show that … We show that any rosy CM-trivial theory has weak canonical bases, and CM-triviality in the real sort is equivalent to CM-triviality with geometric elimination of imaginaries. We also show that CM-triviality is equivalent to the modularity in O-minimal theories with elimination of imaginaries.
We study orthogonality, domination, weight, regular and minimal types in the contexts of rosy and super-rosy theories. We study orthogonality, domination, weight, regular and minimal types in the contexts of rosy and super-rosy theories.
Abstract We give some sufficient conditions for a predicate P in a complete theory T to be “stably embedded”. Let be P with its “induced ∅-definable structure”. The conditions are … Abstract We give some sufficient conditions for a predicate P in a complete theory T to be “stably embedded”. Let be P with its “induced ∅-definable structure”. The conditions are that (or rather its theory) is “rosy”. P has NIP in T and that P is stably 1-embedded in T . This generalizes a recent result of Hasson and Onshuus [6] which deals with the case where P is o-minimal in T . Our proofs make use of the theory of strict nonforking and weight in NIP theories ([3], [10]).
The idea of applying methods and results from stability theory to unstable theories has been an important theme over the past 25 years, with o-minimality, smoothly approximable structures, and simple … The idea of applying methods and results from stability theory to unstable theories has been an important theme over the past 25 years, with o-minimality, smoothly approximable structures, and simple theories being key examples. But there have been some key recent developments which bring new ideas and techniques to the table. One of these is the investigation of abstract notions of independence, leading for example to the notions of thorn forking and rosiness. Another is the discovery that forking, weight, and related notions from stability are meaningful in dependent theories. Another is the formulation of notions of stable, compact, or more general domination, coming from the analysis of theories such as algebraically closed valued fields and o-minimal theories. The level of different approaches and techniques which end up overlapping was the reason we decided it would be a perfect time for a research meeting where the most prominent researchers would come together and discuss the ideas, results and goals that were showing up in different contexts. The dominant subjects of the meeting were the following.
Abstract Let T be a complete geometric theory and let $$T_P$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> be the theory of dense pairs of models of T . We … Abstract Let T be a complete geometric theory and let $$T_P$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> be the theory of dense pairs of models of T . We show that if T is superrosy with "Equation missing"<!-- image only, no MathML or LaTex -->-rank 1 then $$T_P$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> is superrosy with "Equation missing"<!-- image only, no MathML or LaTex -->-rank at most $$\omega $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>ω</mml:mi> </mml:math> .
We study the notion of weak one-basedness introduced in recent work of Berenstein and Vassiliev. Our main results are that this notion characterizes linearity in the setting of geometric þ-rank … We study the notion of weak one-basedness introduced in recent work of Berenstein and Vassiliev. Our main results are that this notion characterizes linearity in the setting of geometric þ-rank 1structures and that lovely pairs of weakly one-based geometric þ-rank 1 structures are weakly one-based with respect to þ-independence. We also study geometries arising from infinite-dimensional vector spaces over division rings.
Abstract We study the class of weakly locally modular geometric theories introduced in [4], a common generalization of the classes of linear SU-rank 1 and linear o-minimal theories. We find … Abstract We study the class of weakly locally modular geometric theories introduced in [4], a common generalization of the classes of linear SU-rank 1 and linear o-minimal theories. We find new conditions equivalent to weak local modularity: “weak one-basedness”, absence of type definable “almost quasidesigns”, and “generic linearity”. Among other things, we show that weak one-basedness is closed under reducts. We also show that the lovely pair expansion of a non-trivial weakly one-based ω -categorical geometric theory interprets an infinite vector space over a finite field.
Abstract We study dp-minimal and strongly dependent theories and investigate connections between these notions and weight. Abstract We study dp-minimal and strongly dependent theories and investigate connections between these notions and weight.
We introduce the concept of an amenable class of functors and define homology groups for such classes. Amenable classes of functors arise naturally in model theory from considering types of … We introduce the concept of an amenable class of functors and define homology groups for such classes. Amenable classes of functors arise naturally in model theory from considering types of independent systems of elements. Basic lemmas for computing these homology groups are established, and we discuss connections with type amalgamation properties. Mathematics Subject Classification (2010). Primary 03C45; Secondary 55N35.
We introduce the notion of a preindependence relation between subsets of the big model of a complete first-order theory, an abstraction of the properties which numerous concrete notions such as … We introduce the notion of a preindependence relation between subsets of the big model of a complete first-order theory, an abstraction of the properties which numerous concrete notions such as forking, dividing, thorn-forking, thorn-dividing, splitting or finite satisfiability share in all complete theories. We examine the relation between four additional axioms (extension, local character, full existence and symmetry) that one expects of a good notion of independence. We show that thorn-forking can be described in terms of local forking if we localize the number k in Kim's notion of "dividing with respect to k" (using Ben-Yaacov's "k-inconsistency witnesses") rather than the forking formulas. It follows that every theory with an M-symmetric lattice of algebraically closed sets (in T eq ) is rosy, with a simple lattice theoretical interpretation of thorn-forking.
The main result of this paper is that if M is a bounded PRC field then Th(M) eliminates imaginaries in the language of rings expanded by constant symbols. The main result of this paper is that if M is a bounded PRC field then Th(M) eliminates imaginaries in the language of rings expanded by constant symbols.
Abstract We discuss the role of weakly normal formulas in the theory of thorn forking, as part of a commentary on the paper [5]. We also give a counterexample to … Abstract We discuss the role of weakly normal formulas in the theory of thorn forking, as part of a commentary on the paper [5]. We also give a counterexample to Corollary 4.2 from that paper, and in the process discuss “theories with selectors.”
O-minimal structures have long been thought to occupy the base of a hierarchy of ordered structures, in analogy with the role that strongly minimal structures play with respect to stable … O-minimal structures have long been thought to occupy the base of a hierarchy of ordered structures, in analogy with the role that strongly minimal structures play with respect to stable theories. This is the first in an anticipated series of papers whose aim is the development of model theory for ordered structures of rank greater than one. A class of ordered structures to which a notion of finite rank can be assigned, the decomposable structures, is introduced here. These include all ordered structures definable (as subsets of n-tuples of the universe) in o-minimal structures. The principal result in this paper, Theorem 5.1, asserts roughly that a decomposable structure [Formula: see text] can be partitioned into finitely many definable subsets such that on each set the restriction of &lt; is a "twisted lexicographic" order. As a consequence (Corollary 5.1), for all n and linear orders ≺ definable on a subset X ⊆ M n in an o-minimal structure [Formula: see text], there is a definable partition of X such that the restriction of ≺ to each set in the partition is "lexicographic".
We show that many nice properties of a theory $T$ follow from the corresponding properties of its reducts to finite subsignatures. If $\{ T_i \}_{i \in I}$ is a directed … We show that many nice properties of a theory $T$ follow from the corresponding properties of its reducts to finite subsignatures. If $\{ T_i \}_{i \in I}$ is a directed family of conservative expansions of first-order theories and each $T_i$ is stable (respectively, simple, rosy, dependent, submodel complete, model complete, companionable), then so is the union $T := \cup_i T_i$. In most cases, (thorn)-forking in $T$ is equivalent to (thorn)-forking of algebraic closures in some $T_i$. This applies to fields with an action by $(\mathbb{Q}, +)$, whose reducts to finite subsignatures are interdefinable with the theory of fields with one automorphism. We show that the model companion $\mathbb{Q}$ACFA of this theory is strictly simple and has the same level of quantifier elimination and the same algebraic characterization of algebraic closure and forking independence as ACFA. The lattice of the fixed fields of the named automorphisms breaks supersimplicity in $\mathbb{Q}$ACFA, but away from these we find many (weakly) minimal formulas.
The randomization of a complete first-order theory [Formula: see text] is the complete continuous theory [Formula: see text] with two sorts, a sort for random elements of models of [Formula: … The randomization of a complete first-order theory [Formula: see text] is the complete continuous theory [Formula: see text] with two sorts, a sort for random elements of models of [Formula: see text] and a sort for events in an underlying atomless probability space. We study independence relations and related ternary relations on the randomization of [Formula: see text]. We show that if [Formula: see text] has the exchange property and [Formula: see text], then [Formula: see text] has a strict independence relation in the home sort, and hence is real rosy. In particular, if [Formula: see text] is o-minimal, then [Formula: see text] is real rosy.
We give sufficient conditions for a predicate P in a complete theory T to be stably embedded: P with its induced 0-definable structure has finite rank, P has NIP in … We give sufficient conditions for a predicate P in a complete theory T to be stably embedded: P with its induced 0-definable structure has finite rank, P has NIP in T and P is 1-stably embedded. This generalizes recent work by Hasson and Onshuus in the case where P is o-minimal in T.
We consider the question of when an expansion of a topological structure has the property that every open set definable in the expansion is definable in the original structure. This … We consider the question of when an expansion of a topological structure has the property that every open set definable in the expansion is definable in the original structure. This question is related to and inspired by recent work of Dolich, Miller and Steinhorn on the property of having o-minimal open core. We answer the question in a fairly general setting and provide conditions which in practice are often easy to check. We give a further characterisation in the special case of an expansion by a generic predicate.
The randomization of a complete first order theory $T$ is the complete continuous theory $T^R$ with two sorts, a sort for random elements of models of $T$, and a sort … The randomization of a complete first order theory $T$ is the complete continuous theory $T^R$ with two sorts, a sort for random elements of models of $T$, and a sort for events in an underlying probability space. We study various notions of independence in models of $T^R$.
We classify primitive, rank 1, omega-categorical structures having polynomially many types over finite sets. For a fixed number of 4-types, we show that there are only finitely many such structures … We classify primitive, rank 1, omega-categorical structures having polynomially many types over finite sets. For a fixed number of 4-types, we show that there are only finitely many such structures and that all are built out of finitely many linear orders interacting in a restricted number of ways. As an example of application, we deduce the classification of primitive structures homogeneous in a language consisting of n linear orders as well as all reducts of such structures.

References (4)

In this paper we discuss several generalization of theorems from stability theory to simple theories. Cherlin and Hrushovski, in [2] develop a substitute for canonical bases in finite rank, ω-categorical … In this paper we discuss several generalization of theorems from stability theory to simple theories. Cherlin and Hrushovski, in [2] develop a substitute for canonical bases in finite rank, ω-categorical supersimple theories. Motivated by methods there, we prove the existence of canonical bases (in a suitable sense) for types in any simple theory. This is done in Section 2. In general these canonical bases will (as far as we know) exist only as “hyperimaginaries”, namely objects of the form a / E where a is a possibly infinite tuple and E a type-definable equivalence relation. (In the supersimple, ω-categorical case, these reduce to ordinary imaginaries.) So in Section 1 we develop the general theory of hyperimaginaries and show how first order model theory (including the theory of forking) generalises to hyperimaginaries. We go on, in Section 3 to show the existence and ubiquity of regular types in supersimple theories, ω-categorical simple structures and modularity is discussed in Section 4. It is also shown here how the general machinery of simplicity simplifies some of the general theory of smoothly approximable (or Lie-coordinatizable) structures from [2]. Throughout this paper we will work in a large, saturated model M of a complete theory T . All types, sets and sequences will have size smaller than the size of M . We will assume that the reader is familiar with the basics of forking in simple theories as laid out in [4] and [6]. For basic stability-theoretic results concerning regular types, orthogonality etc., see [1] or [9].
Following their introduction in the early 1980s o-minimal structures were found to provide an elegant and surprisingly efficient generalization of semialgebraic and subanalytic geometry. These notes give a self-contained treatment … Following their introduction in the early 1980s o-minimal structures were found to provide an elegant and surprisingly efficient generalization of semialgebraic and subanalytic geometry. These notes give a self-contained treatment of the theory of o-minimal structures from a geometric and topological viewpoint, assuming only rudimentary algebra and analysis. The book starts with an introduction and overview of the subject. Later chapters cover the monotonicity theorem, cell decomposition, and the Euler characteristic in the o-minimal setting and show how these notions are easier to handle than in ordinary topology. The remarkable combinatorial property of o-minimal structures, the Vapnik-Chervonenkis property, is also covered. This book should be of interest to model theorists, analytic geometers and topologists.
Abstract This book gives an account of the fundamental results in geometric stability theory, a subject that has grown out of categoricity and classification theory. This approach studies the fine … Abstract This book gives an account of the fundamental results in geometric stability theory, a subject that has grown out of categoricity and classification theory. This approach studies the fine structure of models of stable theories, using the geometry of forking; this often achieves global results relevant to classification theory. Topics range from Zilber-Cherlin classification of infinite locally finite homogenous geometries, to regular types, their geometries, and their role in superstable theories. The structure and existence of definable groups is featured prominently, as is work by Hrushovski. The book is unique in the range and depth of material covered and will be invaluable to anyone interested in modern model theory.
We prove elimination of hyperimaginaries in supersimple theories. This means that if an equivalence relation on the set of realisations of a complete type (in a supersimple theory) is defined … We prove elimination of hyperimaginaries in supersimple theories. This means that if an equivalence relation on the set of realisations of a complete type (in a supersimple theory) is defined by a possibly infinite conjunction of first order formulas, then it is the intersection of definable equivalence relations.