SCALING RELATIONS AND OVERABUNDANCE OF MASSIVE CLUSTERS AT<i>z</i>≳ 1 FROM WEAK-LENSING STUDIES WITH THE<i>HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE</i>

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2011-08-03

Citations: 111

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/737/2/59

Abstract

We present weak gravitational lensing analysis of 22 high-redshift (z >~1) clusters based on Hubble Space Telescope images. Most clusters in our sample provide significant lensing signals and are well detected in their reconstructed two-dimensional mass maps. Combining the current results and our previous weak-lensing studies of five other high-z clusters, we compare gravitational lensing masses of these clusters with other observables. We revisit the question whether the presence of the most massive clusters in our sample is in tension with the current LambdaCDM structure formation paradigm. We find that the lensing masses are tightly correlated with the gas temperatures and establish, for the first time, the lensing mass-temperature relation at z >~ 1. For the power law slope of the M-TX relation (M propto T^{\alpha}), we obtain \alpha=1.54 +/- 0.23. This is consistent with the theoretical self-similar prediction \alpha=3/2 and with the results previously reported in the literature for much lower redshift samples. However, our normalization is lower than the previous results by 20-30%, indicating that the normalization in the M-TX relation might evolve. After correcting for Eddington bias and updating the discovery area with a more conservative choice, we find that the existence of the most massive clusters in our sample still provides a tension with the current Lambda CDM model. The combined probability of finding the four most massive clusters in this sample after marginalization over current cosmological parameters is less than 1%.

Locations

  • The Astrophysical Journal - View - PDF
  • arXiv (Cornell University) - View - PDF
  • DataCite API - View

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat SCALING RELATIONS AND X-RAY PROPERTIES OF MODERATE-LUMINOSITY GALAXY CLUSTERS FROM 0.3 &lt;<i>z</i>&lt; 0.6 WITH<i>XMM-NEWTON</i> 2014 Thomas Connor
Megan Donahue
Ming Sun
Henk Hoekstra
Andisheh Mahdavi
Christopher J. Conselice
B. R. McNamara
+ PDF Chat <i>HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE</i>WEAK-LENSING STUDY OF THE GALAXY CLUSTER XMMU J2235.3 – 2557 AT<i>z</i>∼ 1.4: A SURPRISINGLY MASSIVE GALAXY CLUSTER WHEN THE UNIVERSE IS ONE-THIRD OF ITS CURRENT AGE 2009 M. James Jee
P. Rosati
H. C. Ford
Kyle Dawson
C. Lidman
S. Perlmutter
R. Demarco
V. Strazzullo
C. R. Mullis
H. Böhringer
+ PDF Chat WEAK LENSING CALIBRATED<i>M</i>-<i>T</i>SCALING RELATION OF GALAXY GROUPS IN THE COSMOS FIELD 2013 K. Kettula
A. Finoguenov
R. Massey
Jason Rhodes
Henk Hoekstra
James E. Taylor
P. Spinelli
Masayuki Tanaka
O. Ilbert
P. Capak
+ PDF Chat Calibration of the Mass‐Temperature Relation for Clusters of Galaxies Using Weak Gravitational Lensing 2007 Kristian Pedersen
H. Dahle
+ Observed Scaling Relations for Strong Lensing Clusters: Consequences for Cosmology and Cluster Assembly 2010 Julia M. Comerford
Leonidas A. Moustakas
Priyamvada Natarajan
+ PDF Chat <i>Hubble Space Telescope</i>Advanced Camera for Surveys Weak‐Lensing and<i>Chandra</i>X‐Ray Studies of the High‐Redshift Cluster MS 1054−0321 2005 M. James Jee
R. L. White
H. C. Ford
John P. Blakeslee
G. D. Illingworth
Dan Coe
Kim‐Vy Tran
+ PDF Chat OBSERVED SCALING RELATIONS FOR STRONG LENSING CLUSTERS: CONSEQUENCES FOR COSMOLOGY AND CLUSTER ASSEMBLY 2010 Julia M. Comerford
Leonidas A. Moustakas
Priyamvada Natarajan
+ PDF Chat Observational constraints on the redshift evolution of X-ray scaling relations of galaxy clusters out to<i>z</i> ~ 1.5 2011 A. Reichert
H. Böhringer
R. Fassbender
M. Mühlegger
+ PDF Chat The dark matter distribution in<i>z</i> ~ 0.5 clusters of galaxies 2012 G. Foëx
G. Soucail
É. Pointecouteau
M. Arnaud
Marceau Limousin
G. W. Pratt
+ PDF Chat A comparison of different cluster mass estimates: consistency or discrepancy? 1998 Xiangping Wu
Tzihong Chiueh
L. Z. Fang
Y. Xue
+ PDF Chat A comparison of different cluster mass estimates: consistency or discrepancy? 1998 Xiangping Wu
Tzihong Chiueh
Li‐Zhi Fang
Yan‐Jie Xue
+ PDF Chat Weak‐Lensing Discovery and Tomography of a Cluster at<i>z</i>= 0.68 2003 David Wittman
V. E. Margoniner
J. A. Tyson
Judith G. Cohen
A. C. Becker
Ian Dell’Antonio
+ <i>HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE</i>COMBINED STRONG AND WEAK LENSING ANALYSIS OF THE CLASH SAMPLE: MASS AND MAGNIFICATION MODELS AND SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTIES 2015 Adi Zitrin
Agnese Fabris
Julian Merten
P. Melchior
M. Meneghetti
Anton M. Koekemoer
Dan Coe
M. Maturi
Matthias Bartelmann
Marc Postman
+ PDF Chat Extending empirical constraints on the SZ–mass scaling relation to higher redshifts via HST weak lensing measurements of nine clusters from the SPT-SZ survey at <i>z</i> ≳ 1 2022 Hannah Zohren
T. Schrabback
S. Bocquet
Martin Sommer
Fatimah Raihan
Beatriz Hernández-Martín
O. Marggraf
Behzad Ansarinejad
Matthew Bayliss
L. E. Bleem
+ PDF Chat A Comparison of Direct and Indirect Mass Estimates for Distant Clusters of Galaxies 1997 Ian Smail
Richard S. Ellis
Alan Dressler
W. J. Couch
Augustus Oemler
R. M. Sharples
H. R. Butcher
+ PDF Chat The Strongest Cluster Lenses: An Analysis of the Relation between Strong Gravitational Lensing Strength and the Physical Properties of Galaxy Clusters 2022 Carter Fox
Guillaume Mahler
Keren Sharon
J. D. Remolina González
+ PDF Chat CFHTLenS: weak lensing calibrated scaling relations for low-mass clusters of galaxies 2015 K. Kettula
S. Giodini
Edo van Uitert
Henk Hoekstra
A. Finoguenov
M. Lerchster
T. Erben
Catherine Heymans
H. Hildebrandt
Thomas Kitching
+ PDF Chat A Hubble Space Telescope lensing survey of X-ray luminous galaxy clusters - IV. Mass, structure and thermodynamics of cluster cores at z = 0.2 2005 G. P. Smith
Jean‐Paul Kneib
Ian Smail
P. Mazzotta
H. Ebeling
O. Czoske
+ A Hubble Space Telescope Lensing Survey of X-ray Luminous Galaxy Clusters: IV. Mass, Structure and Thermodynamics of Cluster Cores at z=0.2 2004 G. P. Smith
Jean‐Paul Kneib
Ian Smail
P. Mazzotta
H. Ebeling
O. Czoske
+ PDF Chat Discovery of a New Fundamental Plane Dictating Galaxy Cluster Evolution from Gravitational Lensing 2018 Yutaka Fujita
Keiichi Umetsu
E. Rasia
M. Meneghetti
Megan Donahue
Elinor Medezinski
N. Okabe
Marc Postman

Works That Cite This (108)

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat CCCP and MENeaCS: (updated) weak-lensing masses for 100 galaxy clusters 2020 Ricardo Herbonnet
Cristobál Sifón
Henk Hoekstra
Yannick M. Bahé
R. F. J. van der Burg
Jean-Baptiste Melin
Anja von der Linden
David J. Sand
Scott T. Kay
David J Barnes
+ The XXL Survey 2023 S Bhargava
C. Garrel
E. Koulouridis
M. Pierre
I. Valtchanov
Nicolas Cerardi
B. J. Maughan
M. Aguena
Christophe Benoist
Cale Baguley
+ PDF Chat Multi-probe analysis of the galaxy cluster CL J1226.9+3332 2023 M. Muñoz-Echeverría
J. F. Macías–Pérez
G. W. Pratt
R. Adam
P. A. R. Ade
H. Ajeddig
P. André
M. Arnaud
E. Artis
H. Aussel
+ PDF Chat THE ERA OF STAR FORMATION IN GALAXY CLUSTERS 2013 M. Brodwin
S. A. Stanford
Anthony H. Gonzalez
Gregory R. Zeimann
Gregory F. Snyder
Conor L. Mancone
Alexandra Pope
Peter Eisenhardt
Daniel Stern
Stacey Alberts
+ PDF Chat Mass calibration of distant SPT galaxy clusters through expanded weak-lensing follow-up observations with <i>HST</i>, VLT, &amp; Gemini-South 2021 T. Schrabback
S. Bocquet
Martin W. Sommer
Hannah Zohren
Jan Luca van den Busch
Beatriz Hernández-Martín
Henk Hoekstra
Selim Raihan
M. Schirmer
Douglas Applegate
+ PDF Chat Optical and Sunyaev–Zel'dovich observations of a new sample of distant rich galaxy clusters in the ROSAT All Sky 2015 Axel Buddendiek
T. Schrabback
Christopher H. Greer
Henk Hoekstra
Martin W. Sommer
T. F. Eifler
T. Erben
Jens Erler
A. K. Hicks
F. W. High
+ PDF Chat Measuring the total infrared light from galaxy clusters at <i>z</i> = 0.5–1.6: connecting stellar populations to dusty star formation 2020 Stacey Alberts
Kyoung-Soo Lee
Alexandra Pope
M. Brodwin
Yi-Kuan Chiang
Jed McKinney
Rui Xue
Yun Huang
M. J. I. Brown
Arjun Dey
+ PDF Chat ASSEMBLY OF THE RED SEQUENCE IN INFRARED-SELECTED GALAXY CLUSTERS FROM THE IRAC SHALLOW CLUSTER SURVEY 2012 Gregory F. Snyder
M. Brodwin
Conor Mancone
Gregory R. Zeimann
S. A. Stanford
Anthony H. Gonzalez
Daniel Stern
Peter Eisenhardt
M. J. I. Brown
Arjun Dey
+ PDF Chat CoMaLit – III. Literature catalogues of weak lensing clusters of galaxies (LC2) 2015 M. Sereno
+ PDF Chat <i>Chandra</i>and optical/IR observations of CXO J1415.2+3610, a massive, newly discovered galaxy cluster at<i>z</i>~ 1.5 2013 P. Tozzi
J. S. Santos
M. Nonino
P. Rosati
S. Borgani
B. Sartoris
B. Altieri
M. Sánchez-Portal

Works Cited by This (91)

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat DARK MATTER IN THE GALAXY CLUSTER CL J1226+3332 AT<i>z</i>= 0.89 2009 M. James Jee
J. A. Tyson
+ An X-Ray–Selected Galaxy Cluster at [CLC][ITAL]z[/ITAL][/CLC] = 1.26 1999 P. Rosati
S. A. Stanford
Peter Eisenhardt
R. Elston
Hyron Spinrad
Daniel Stern
Arjun Dey
+ PDF Chat RCS 043938-2904.9: A New Rich Cluster of Galaxies at [FORMULA][F]z=0.951[/F][/FORMULA] 2004 L. Felipe Barrientos
Michael D. Gladders
H. K. C. Yee
L. Infante
E. Ellingson
Patrick B. Hall
G. Hertling
+ PDF Chat The Most Massive Distant Clusters: Determining Ω and σ<sub>8</sub> 1998 Neta A. Bahcall
Xiaohui Fan
+ PDF Chat <i>Hubble Space Telescope</i>Advanced Camera for Surveys Weak‐Lensing and<i>Chandra</i>X‐Ray Studies of the High‐Redshift Cluster MS 1054−0321 2005 M. James Jee
R. L. White
H. C. Ford
John P. Blakeslee
G. D. Illingworth
Dan Coe
Kim‐Vy Tran
+ PDF Chat A maximum-entropy method for reconstructing the projected mass distribution of gravitational lenses 1998 S. L. Bridle
M. P. Hobson
A. Lasenby
Richard Saunders
+ PDF Chat Deep<i>XMM‐Newton</i>and<i>Chandra</i>Observations of Cl J1226.9+3332: A Detailed X‐Ray Mass Analysis of a<i>z</i>= 0.89 Galaxy Cluster 2007 B. J. Maughan
C. Jones
L. R. Jones
L. van Speybroeck
+ PDF Chat The structural and scaling properties of nearby galaxy clusters 2005 M. Arnaud
É. Pointecouteau
G. W. Pratt
+ PDF Chat <i>HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE</i>WEAK-LENSING STUDY OF THE GALAXY CLUSTER XMMU J2235.3 – 2557 AT<i>z</i>∼ 1.4: A SURPRISINGLY MASSIVE GALAXY CLUSTER WHEN THE UNIVERSE IS ONE-THIRD OF ITS CURRENT AGE 2009 M. James Jee
P. Rosati
H. C. Ford
Kyle Dawson
C. Lidman
S. Perlmutter
R. Demarco
V. Strazzullo
C. R. Mullis
H. Böhringer
+ PDF Chat Simultaneous falsification of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>CDM</mml:mi></mml:math>and quintessence with massive, distant clusters 2011 Michael J. Mortonson
Wayne Hu
Dragan Huterer