A Comparison of Methods for Treatment Selection in Seamless Phase II/III Clinical Trials Incorporating Information on Short-Term Endpoints

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2014-04-03

Citations: 31

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2013.840646

Abstract

In an adaptive seamless phase II/III clinical trial interim analysis, data are used for treatment selection, enabling resources to be focused on comparison of more effective treatment(s) with a control. In this paper, we compare two methods recently proposed to enable use of short-term endpoint data for decision-making at the interim analysis. The comparison focuses on the power and the probability of correctly identifying the most promising treatment. We show that the choice of method depends on how well short-term data predict the best treatment, which may be measured by the correlation between treatment effects on short- and long-term endpoints.

Locations

  • PubMed Central - View
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) - View - PDF
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) - View - PDF
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-UniversitĂ€t Göttingen (Georg-August-UniversitĂ€t Göttingen) - View - PDF
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) - View - PDF
  • PubMed - View
  • Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics - View - PDF

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat An adaptive seamless phase II/III clinical trial design incorporating short-term endpoint information 2011 Nigel Stallard
+ A confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trial design incorporating short‐term endpoint information 2010 Nigel Stallard
+ PDF Chat Data‐driven treatment selection for seamless phase II/III trials incorporating early‐outcome data 2014 Cornelia Ursula Kunz
Tim Friede
Nick Parsons
Susan Todd
Nigel Stallard
+ PDF Chat Flexible selection of a single treatment incorporating short‐term endpoint information in a phase II/III clinical trial 2015 Nigel Stallard
Cornelia Ursula Kunz
Susan Todd
Nick Parsons
Tim Friede
+ Comparison of two methods for seamless phase II/III Clinical trials using early outcome for treatment selection 2024 Ken-Ning Hsu
Weichung Joe Shih
+ Confirmatory Seamless Phase II/III Clinical Trials with Hypotheses Selection at Interim: Opportunities and Limitations 2006 Christopher Jennison
Bruce W. Turnbull
+ Dose selection in seamless phase II/III clinical trials based on efficacy and safety 2009 Peter Kimani
Nigel Stallard
Jane L. Hutton
+ PDF Chat Using short-term endpoints to improve interim decision making and trial duration in two-stage phase II trials with nested binary endpoints 2023 Dario Zocholl
Cornelia Ursula Kunz
Geraldine Rauch
+ PDF Chat Estimation bias in survival data within clinical trials that use adaptive seamless designs 2015 Jamal Nasir Khan
Peter Kimani
Nigel Stallard
Ekkehard Glimm
+ Adaptive seamless designs with interim treatment selection: a case study in oncology 2015 MĂĄximo Carreras
Georg Gutjahr
Werner Brannath
+ Statistical tests for two‐stage adaptive seamless design using short‐ and long‐term binary outcomes 2022 Kenichi Takahashi
Ryota Ishii
Kazushi Maruo
Masahiko Gosho
+ Group-Sequential Methods for Adaptive Seamless Phase II/III Clinical Trials 2011 Nigel Stallard
+ Improving interim decisions in randomized trials by exploiting information on short-term outcomes and prognostic baseline covariates 2019 Kelly Van Lancker
An Vandebosch
Stijn Vansteelandt
+ PDF Chat Adaptive two-stage seamless sequential design for clinical trials 2024 Ping Gao
Yingqiu Li
+ Optimal Interim Decision Rules Based on a Binary Surrogate Outcome for Adaptive Biomarker-Based Trials in Oncology 2018 Johannes Krisam
Meinhard Kieser
+ Optimal Interim Decision Rules Based on a Binary Surrogate Outcome for Adaptive Biomarker-Based Trials in Oncology 2017 Johannes Krisam
Meinhard Kieser
+ Joint modeling of short-term and long-term outcomes for interim decision making in oncology phase II clinical trials 2014 E Lin
+ Seamless phase II/III clinical trials using early outcomes for treatment or subgroup selection: Methods and aspects of their implementation 2019 Tim Friede
Nigel Stallard
Nick Parsons
+ Designing a seamless phase II/III clinical trial using early outcomes for treatment selection: An application in multiple sclerosis 2011 Tim Friede
Nick Parsons
Nigel Stallard
S. Todd
E. Valdes Marquez
Jeremy Chataway
Richard Nicholas
+ Improving interim decisions in randomized trials by exploiting information on short‐term endpoints and prognostic baseline covariates 2020 Kelly Van Lancker
An Vandebosch
Stijn Vansteelandt

Works That Cite This (31)

Action Title Year Authors
+ Statistical tests for two‐stage adaptive seamless design using short‐ and long‐term binary outcomes 2022 Kenichi Takahashi
Ryota Ishii
Kazushi Maruo
Masahiko Gosho
+ Incorporating Intermediate Endpoint in Two-Stage Design Decision Making 2022 Xiaofei Bai
Qiqi Deng
+ PDF Chat Comparing the MAMS framework with the combination method in multi-arm adaptive trials with binary outcomes 2018 Julia E Abery
Susan Todd
+ A systematic survey of adaptive trials shows substantial improvement in methods is needed 2024 Yuning Wang
Minghong Yao
Jiali Liu
Yanmei Liu
Yu Ma
Xiaochao Luo
Fan Mei
Hunong Xiang
Kang Zou
Xin Sun
+ PDF Chat Type I error rates of multi-arm multi-stage clinical trials: strong control and impact of intermediate outcomes 2016 Daniel J. Bratton
Mahesh Parmar
Patrick Phillips
Babak Choodari‐Oskooei
+ Advanced Utilization of Intermediate Endpoints for Making Optimized Cost-Effective Decisions in Seamless Phase II/III Oncology Trials 2019 Linda Sun
Wen Li
Cong Chen
Jing Zhao
+ PDF Chat Multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) randomised selection designs: impact of treatment selection rules on the operating characteristics 2024 Babak Choodari‐Oskooei
Alexandra Blenkinsop
Kelly Handley
Thomas Pinkney
Mahesh Parmar
+ PDF Chat Clinical Trials Submitted to the JID : Place Your Bet and Show Us Your Hand 2015 Hywel C Williams
Barbara A. Gilchrest
+ Comparison of two methods for seamless phase II/III Clinical trials using early outcome for treatment selection 2024 Ken-Ning Hsu
Weichung Joe Shih
+ Seamless phase 2/3 oncology trial design with flexible sample size determination 2020 Zhaoyang Teng
Yuan Tian
Yi Liu
Guohui Liu