Supernovae, Jets, and Collapsars

Type: Article

Publication Date: 2001-03-20

Citations: 657

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/319698

Abstract

We continue our study of the possible production of supernovae and a variety of high-energy transients by black hole formation in massive stars endowed with rotation: the "collapsar model." The black hole may form either promptly, since a successful outgoing shock fails to be launched by the collapsed iron core (collapsar Type I), or, in a mild explosion, by fallback (collapsar Type II). In the latter case, the inner layers of the star initially move outward but lack adequate momentum to eject all the matter exterior to the young neutron star. Over a period of minutes to hours, ~0.1-5 M☉ falls back onto the collapsed remnant, turning it into a black hole and establishing an accretion disk. The accretion rate, ~0.001-0.01 M☉ s-1, is inadequate to produce a jet mediated by neutrino annihilation but is similar to what has been invoked in magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) models for gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). This fallback is modeled in detail for two 25 M☉ progenitors using two different one-dimensional hydrodynamics codes, one Lagrangian and one Eulerian. The production and consequences of jets are then explored in both sorts of collapsars. Justification is given for assuming that the jet power is a constant times the mass accretion rate, c2, and the consequences of = 0.001 and 0.01 are explored. Adopting an initial collimation half-angle of 10°, the opening of the jet as it propagates through the exploding star is strongly influenced not only by the jet's kinetic energy but also by its initial pressure and the stellar structure. Cold jets tend to stay collimated and become even more so, sometimes having an angle of only a few degrees when they reach the surface. Jets having higher internal pressure than the stellar material through which they pass, or less initial collimation, spread out and tend to make energetic, asymmetric supernovae accompanied, in helium stars, by weak GRBs. SN 1998bw may have been such an event, and other events having energies between that of ordinary GRBs and GRB 980425 await discovery. In supergiant stars, shock breakout also produces bright X-ray transients that might be a diagnostic of the model, but even the most powerful jets (equivalent isotropic energy 1054 ergs) will not produce a GRB in a red supergiant. For such Type II supernovae the limiting Lorentz factor is Γ ≈ 2. Type II collapsars should be more frequent than Type I and may power the most common form of gamma-ray transient in the universe. However, the GRBs seen by BATSE are, for the most part, too brief to be Type II collapsars. Those are still attributed to prompt black hole formation. Even there though, the diverse energies and time structure reflect chiefly the viewing angle and the variable collimation of the jet inside the star, not a highly variable "central engine." Indeed, collapsar-induced transients may all have a common total energy in the range 1051-1052 ergs.

Locations

  • The Astrophysical Journal - View - PDF
  • arXiv (Cornell University) - View - PDF
  • DataCite API - View

Similar Works

Action Title Year Authors
+ Collapsars, Gamma-Ray Bursts, and Supernovae 1999 S. E. Woosley
Andrew MacFadyen
Alexander Heger
+ Collapsars: Gamma‐Ray Bursts and Explosions in “Failed Supernovae” 1999 Andrew MacFadyen
S. E. Woosley
+ PDF Chat Relativistic Jets in Collapsars 2003 Weiqun Zhang
S. E. Woosley
Andrew MacFadyen
+ PDF Chat A Collapsar Model with Disk Wind: Implications for Supernovae Associated with Gamma-Ray Bursts 2018 Tomoyasu Hayakawa
Keiichi Maeda
+ Collapsars 2000 Andrew MacFadyen
+ Relativistic Jets from Collapsars: Gamma-Ray Bursts 2002 W. Zhang
S. E. Woosley
+ Evolution of black hole mass and spin in collapsars 2019 Dominika Ł. Król
Agnieszka Janiuk
+ Long-Term Evolution of Collapsar: Mechanism of Outflow Production 2009 Seiji Harikae
Tomoya Takiwaki
Kei Kotake
+ PDF Chat Black hole to breakout: 3D GRMHD simulations of collapsar jets reveal a wide range of transients 2021 Ore Gottlieb
Aretaios Lalakos
Omer Bromberg
Matthew Liska
Alexander Tchekhovskoy
+ Collapsar Black Holes are Likely Born Slowly Spinning 2023 Ore Gottlieb
Jonatan Jacquemin-Ide
Beverly Lowell
Alexander Tchekhovskoy
E. Ramirez‐Ruiz
+ PDF Chat Collapsar Black Holes Are Likely Born Slowly Spinning 2023 Ore Gottlieb
Jonatan Jacquemin-Ide
Beverly Lowell
Alexander Tchekhovskoy
E. Ramirez‐Ruiz
+ PDF Chat Accretion Modes in Collapsars: Prospects for Gamma‐Ray Burst Production 2006 William H. Lee
E. Ramirez‐Ruiz
+ PDF Chat OPENING ANGLES OF COLLAPSAR JETS 2013 Akira Mizuta
Kunihito Ioka
+ PDF Chat Relativistic Jets in Collapsars 2003 Weiqun Zhang
+ Collapsars in Three Dimensions 2006 Gabriel Rockefeller
Chris L. Fryer
Hui Li
+ PDF Chat Gamma Ray Bursts: Progenitors, Accretion in the Central Engine, Jet Acceleration Mechanisms 2018 Agnieszka Janiuk
K. Sapountzis
+ PDF Chat The Proto-Neutron Star Phase of the Collapsar Model and the Route to Long-Soft Gamma-Ray Bursts and Hypernovae 2008 Luc Dessart
Adam Burrows
E. Livne
Christian D. Ott
+ PDF Chat Gamma-ray bursts: The central engine 2000 S. E. Woosley
+ From Engine to Afterglow: Collapsars Naturally Produce Top-Heavy Jets and Early-Time Plateaus in Gamma Ray Burst Afterglows 2014 Paul C. Duffell
Andrew MacFadyen
+ From Engine to Afterglow: Collapsars Naturally Produce Top-Heavy Jets and Early-Time Plateaus in Gamma Ray Burst Afterglows 2014 Paul C. Duffell
Andrew MacFadyen

Works That Cite This (533)

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat The high-redshift star formation rate derived from gamma-ray bursts: possible origin and cosmic reionization 2013 F. Y. Wang
+ PDF Chat Triggering jet-driven explosions of core-collapse supernovae by accretion from convective regions 2014 Avishai Gilkis
Noam Soker
+ PDF Chat GRAVITATIONAL WAVE SIGNATURES IN BLACK HOLE FORMING CORE COLLAPSE 2013 P. Cerdá‐Durán
N. DeBrye
M. Á. Aloy
J. A. Font
M. Obergaulinger
+ PDF Chat First joint observation by the underground gravitational-wave detector KAGRA with GEO 600 2022 R. Abbott
H Abe
F Acernese
K. Ackley
N. Adhikari
R. X. Adhikari
V. K. Adkins
V. B. Adya
C. Affeldt
D. Agarwal
+ Powering Luminous Core Collapse Supernovae with Jets 2022 Noam Soker
+ PDF Chat The chemical evolution of iron-peak elements with hypernovae 2020 J J Grimmett
Amanda I. Karakas
Alexander Heger
Bernhard Müller
Christopher West
+ PDF Chat The S-PLUS Transient Extension Program: imaging pipeline, transient identification, and survey optimization for multimessenger astronomy 2024 Angelo Santos
C. D. Kilpatrick
C. R. Bom
P. Darc
F. R. Herpich
E. A. D. Lacerda
M. J. Sartori
Á. Álvarez-Candal
C. Mendes de Oliveira
A. Kanaan
+ PDF Chat A giant outburst two years before the core-collapse of a massive star 2007 A. Pastorello
S. J. Smartt
S. Mattila
J. J. Eldridge
D. R. Young
K. Itagaki
H. Yamaoka
H. Navasardyan
S. Valenti
F. Patat
+ CONNECTING THE GAMMA RAY BURST RATE AND THE COSMIC STAR FORMATION HISTORY: IMPLICATIONS FOR REIONIZATION AND GALAXY EVOLUTION 2011 Brant Robertson
Richard S. Ellis
+ PDF Chat Current status of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll" id="d1e239" altimg="si231.gif"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math>-process nucleosynthesis 2019 Toshitaka Kajino
Wako Aoki
A. B. Balantekin
R. Diehl
M. Famiano
Grant J. Mathews

Works Cited by This (36)

Action Title Year Authors
+ PDF Chat The afterglow, redshift and extreme energetics of the γ-ray burst of 23 January 1999 1999 S. R. Kulkarni
S. G. Djorgovski
S. C. Odewahn
J. S. Bloom
R. R. Gal
C. Koresko
F. A. Harrison
L. M. Lubin
L. Armus
Re’em Sari
+ PDF Chat SN 1997cy/GRB 970514: A New Piece in the Gamma‐Ray Burst Puzzle? 2000 L. Germany
David J. Reiss
E. M. Sadler
B. Schmidt
C. W. Stubbs
+ An unusual supernova in the error box of the γ-ray burst of 25 April 1998 1998 T. J. Galama
P. M. Vreeswijk
J. van Paradijs
C. Kouveliotou
T. Augusteijn
H. Böhnhardt
J. Brewer
V. Doublier
Jean-François Gonzalez
B. Leibundgut
+ PDF Chat Gamma‐Ray Bursts and Type Ic Supernova SN 1998bw 1999 S. E. Woosley
Ronald G. Eastman
B. Schmidt
+ Extracting Energy from Black Holes: The Relative Importance of the Blandford‐Znajek Mechanism 1999 Mario Livio
G. I. Ogilvie
J. E. Pringle
+ Relativistic Jets from Collapsars 2000 M. Á. Aloy
Ewald Müller
J. Ma. Ibáñez
J. Martı́
Andrew MacFadyen
+ PDF Chat Hydrodynamical non-radiative accretion flows in two dimensions 1999 James M. Stone
J. E. Pringle
Mitchell C. Begelman
+ PDF Chat Hyperaccreting Black Holes and Gamma‐Ray Bursts 1999 Robert Popham
S. E. Woosley
Chris L. Fryer
+ PDF Chat Nucleosynthesis in Neutrino‐driven Winds. II. Implications for Heavy Element Synthesis 1997 R. D. Hoffman
S. E. Woosley
Y.‐Z. Qian
+ PDF Chat Asymmetric Supernovae, Pulsars, Magnetars, and Gamma‐Ray Bursts 2000 J. C. Wheeler
Insu Yi
Peter Höflich
Lifan Wang