Type: Erratum
Publication Date: 1983-12-01
Citations: 1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02564631
out that the proof of the key Lemma on "hopfian" rings in w of [1] is incorrect.As I have been unable to find a correct argument, the results on pages 465-469 are moot.(Corollaries 2 and 3 on page 470 are true as it is easy to see that the lemma holds for any commutative ring, while the results in w use only Kaplansky's original theorem, and not the lemma.)I hope that some ring-theorist may be able to prove the lemma.In the first line of page 469, the map from /-/~(C*) to Homr (H2(C,I, F) given by the universal coefficient spectral sequence is, a priori, only a monomorphism.However the theorem is still true (without any essential change in the argument), modulo the lemma.A. Suciu has pointed out that the map 9 in line 1 of page 471 should be replaced by its square 4 2, to ensure that the mapping torus M be orientable.I am grateful to Dyer and Suciu for their observations.
Action | Title | Year | Authors |
---|---|---|---|
+ | Abelian normal subgroups of two-knot groups | 1986 |
Jonathan A. Hillman |
Action | Title | Year | Authors |
---|---|---|---|
+ | Aspherical four-manifolds and the centres of two-knot groups | 1981 |
Jonathan A. Hillman |